From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jim burns Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Xen-devel] Updating Xen 4.1.x xmexamples files (vfb line required for HVM guests) Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 17:57:52 -0400 Message-ID: <1496120.UukZanXWbP@dell4550> References: <1489473.kvsEubHm6y@dell4550> <20110802171718.GW11133@dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: M A Young Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Pasi =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= , Boris Derzhavets , "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org M A Young said: > On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 06:07:39AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: >>> I've installed xen-4.1.1-1.fc16.src.rpm. It doesn't contain mentioned patch. >>> Added patch as raw content of >>> >>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-4.1-testing.hg/rev/1976adbf2b80 > It already is in xen-4.1.1-2.fc16 and xen-4.1.1-2.fc15 . > Michael Young [516] > rpm -q --last xen xen-4.1.1-2.fc16 Fri 22 Jul 2011 10:24:57 PM EDT Huh!!! I guess I never tried removing the vfb= line since I got this update. I can verify that the vfb= line is no longer necessary. Sorry for making so much noise about this problem. (Also odd that the vfb= line was a temporary fix!)