On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 01:26 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 31.05.17 at 23:20, <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have not imported augmented and rcu rbtree functionality to the
> > xen tree,
> > as there was no specific requirement for current planned
> > implementation.
> > 
> Bug fixes and improvements to existing code are clearly welcome
> and need no further rationale provided here. Having looked only
> over the titles so far I see two patches which look to add new
> functionality (13 and 17). 
>
I also have only quickly skimmed through the series for now.

Indeed 17 adds stuff which I suspect we may not need, and in any case,
I don't think it belongs in this series.

If you really need those iterators when actually using rb-tree, you'll
add the patch at that time.

13, despite its own (poor, I agree) subject line, is actually doing
some decent refactoring of the code, so I'd keep it:
<<Add __rb_change_child() as an inline helper function to replace code 
that would otherwise be duplicated 4 times in the source.>>

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)