From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752450AbdFHFQh (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 01:16:37 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0073.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.73]:42643 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752391AbdFHFQc (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2017 01:16:32 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2692:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3871:3872:3874:4184:4321:5007:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12050:12740:12760:12895:13069:13311:13357:13439:14096:14097:14180:14181:14659:14721:21060:21080:21433:21627:30051:30054:30056:30070:30090:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: way48_8f469b9db873f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2575 Message-ID: <1496898982.1929.7.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [media] vb2: core: Lower the log level of debug outputs From: Joe Perches To: Tomasz Figa , Hirokazu Honda , Hans Verkuil Cc: Pawel Osciak , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:16:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <20170530094901.1807-1-hiroh@chromium.org> <1496139572.2618.19.camel@perches.com> <1496196991.2618.47.camel@perches.com> <1496203602.2618.54.camel@perches.com> <0eb529d9-a710-4305-f0e2-e2fcd5d5433a@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 13:39 +0900, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Hirokazu Honda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I completely understand bitmask method now. > > I agree to the idea, but it is necessary to change the specification of > > a debug parameter. > > (We probably need to change a document about that?) > > For example, there is maybe a user who set a debug parameter 3. > > The user assume that logs whose levels are less than 4 are shown. > > However, after the bitmask method is adopted, someday the logs whose > > level is 1 or 2 are only shown, not 3 level logs are not shown. > > This will be confusing to users. > > I think I have to agree with Hirokazu here. Even though it's only > about debugging, there might be some automatic testing systems that > actually rely on certain values here. I think it's a non-argument. If there automated systems that rely on specific levels, then changing the levels of individual messages could also cause those automated systems to fail.