From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:40319 "EHLO rcsinet10.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752115Ab0ITUhq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:37:46 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] sunrpc: Start making sunrpc work in containers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Chuck Lever In-Reply-To: <20100920195635.GA18808@fieldses.org> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:35:54 -0400 Cc: Pavel Emelyanov , Neil Brown , Trond Myklebust , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <14F506C2-8BDB-440E-A5A9-A99E4CC7512D@oracle.com> References: <4C90BADB.10700@parallels.com> <20100920161326.GL4580@fieldses.org> <4C978CE6.5080508@parallels.com> <20100920180418.GN4580@fieldses.org> <4C97B248.1030801@parallels.com> <20100920195635.GA18808@fieldses.org> To: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:56 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 03:28:00PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: >> >> On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Pavel Emelyanov wrote: >>> The nearest plan is >>> >>> 1. Prepare the sunrpc layer to work in net namespaces 2. Make >>> rpcpipefs and nfsd filesystems be mountable multiple times 3. Make >>> support for multiple instances of the nfsd caches 4. Make suuport >>> for multiple instances of the nfsd_serv >>> >>> After this several NFSd-s can be used in containers (hopefully I >>> didn't miss anything). >> >> Are you assuming NFSv4 only? Something needs to be done about NLM and >> NSM to make this work right. >> >> Is there an issue for idmapper and svcgssd? Probably not, but worth >> exploring. >> >> And, how about AUTH_SYS certs? These contain the host's name in them, >> and that depends on the net namespace. NLM uses AUTH_SYS, and I >> believe the NFS server can make NLM calls to the client. > > The client probably can't use the auth_sys cred on nlm callbacks in any > sensible way, so this may not be a big deal. I doubt anything looks at that hostname, really. My worry is that it could leak information (like the wrong hostname) onto the network. -- chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com