From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework References: <20180417173038.25510-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <14b8384d-707d-42b7-b3ac-1ad914997a2e@ti.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:14:47 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Suman Anna , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , David Lechner , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Philipp Zabel Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski List-ID: On Tuesday 17 April 2018 11:00 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines > we used so far. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Looks good! Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori This depends on DaVinci gaining common clock / reset framework support though. I am guessing remoteproc maintainers will have to be reminded when its safe to apply. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752580AbeDRFqN (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 01:46:13 -0400 Received: from lelnx194.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.80]:50189 "EHLO lelnx194.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750718AbeDRFqK (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2018 01:46:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Suman Anna , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , David Lechner , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Philipp Zabel CC: , , , , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20180417173038.25510-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: <14b8384d-707d-42b7-b3ac-1ad914997a2e@ti.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:14:47 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 April 2018 11:00 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines > we used so far. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Looks good! Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori This depends on DaVinci gaining common clock / reset framework support though. I am guessing remoteproc maintainers will have to be reminded when its safe to apply. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:14:47 +0530 Message-ID: <14b8384d-707d-42b7-b3ac-1ad914997a2e@ti.com> References: <20180417173038.25510-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> Content-Language: en-US List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Suman Anna , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , David Lechner , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , Philipp Zabel Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 17 April 2018 11:00 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines > we used so far. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Looks good! Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori This depends on DaVinci gaining common clock / reset framework support though. I am guessing remoteproc maintainers will have to be reminded when its safe to apply. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 11:14:47 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v6 6/7] remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework In-Reply-To: <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> References: <20180417173038.25510-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <20180417173038.25510-7-brgl@bgdev.pl> Message-ID: <14b8384d-707d-42b7-b3ac-1ad914997a2e@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 17 April 2018 11:00 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines > we used so far. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Looks good! Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori This depends on DaVinci gaining common clock / reset framework support though. I am guessing remoteproc maintainers will have to be reminded when its safe to apply. Thanks, Sekhar