From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Petschina Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 12:42:41 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/stm32flash: bump to version 0.6 In-Reply-To: <65661872-fda7-0554-7da2-c6fcf126b9d3@lucaceresoli.net> References: <20210702091131.817804-1-bernhard.petschina@gmail.com> <65661872-fda7-0554-7da2-c6fcf126b9d3@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <14c4d2cf-b918-5cbe-083c-fed1ac0fb915@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Luca, On 02.07.2021 12:31 Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Hi Bernhard, > > On 02/07/21 11:11, Bernhard Petschina wrote: >> Bump to latest official version. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Petschina >> --- >> package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash | 2 +- >> package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash >> index 1b06a8f0f0..9bfb3f3be4 100644 >> --- a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash >> +++ b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash >> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ >> # Locally computed: >> -sha256 42b7d63f6016bd75911cbb87fe85fbc4f98adf3ceecfe6d91f7956b31d18095f stm32flash-3cebf121f7b32b9edfcb0d49f0fb43ccf33e5650-br1.tar.gz >> +sha256 f140dcf9319b0a02c9137bc3824ab4b71719cb5470b3b78bbac7bcef8f299660 stm32flash-82f16f317185b6916e5f8b5697de58960f7e48a7-br1.tar.gz >> sha256 8177f97513213526df2cf6184d8ff986c675afb514d4e68a404010521b880643 gpl-2.0.txt >> diff --git a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk >> index a8ae9b01df..32ca5cf222 100644 >> --- a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk >> +++ b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ >> # >> ################################################################################ >> >> -STM32FLASH_VERSION = 3cebf121f7b32b9edfcb0d49f0fb43ccf33e5650 >> +STM32FLASH_VERSION = 82f16f317185b6916e5f8b5697de58960f7e48a7 > Why not using a tag? 'v0.6' points to that exact SHA-1. I looked at some other packages and previous commits and pretty much every package uses the commithash instead of a tag. So I thought that was something lika an unwritten rule. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernhard Petschina Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 12:42:41 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/stm32flash: bump to version 0.6 In-Reply-To: <65661872-fda7-0554-7da2-c6fcf126b9d3@lucaceresoli.net> References: <20210702091131.817804-1-bernhard.petschina@gmail.com> <65661872-fda7-0554-7da2-c6fcf126b9d3@lucaceresoli.net> Message-ID: <14c4d2cf-b918-5cbe-083c-fed1ac0fb915@gmail.com> List-Id: To: buildroot@busybox.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20210702104241.UjVVx7UrEJwUZGqQ4CHX22ceUZFzf_CD_PPnXqB-fjw@z> Hello Luca, On 02.07.2021 12:31 Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Hi Bernhard, > > On 02/07/21 11:11, Bernhard Petschina wrote: >> Bump to latest official version. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Petschina >> --- >> package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash | 2 +- >> package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash >> index 1b06a8f0f0..9bfb3f3be4 100644 >> --- a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash >> +++ b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.hash >> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ >> # Locally computed: >> -sha256 42b7d63f6016bd75911cbb87fe85fbc4f98adf3ceecfe6d91f7956b31d18095f stm32flash-3cebf121f7b32b9edfcb0d49f0fb43ccf33e5650-br1.tar.gz >> +sha256 f140dcf9319b0a02c9137bc3824ab4b71719cb5470b3b78bbac7bcef8f299660 stm32flash-82f16f317185b6916e5f8b5697de58960f7e48a7-br1.tar.gz >> sha256 8177f97513213526df2cf6184d8ff986c675afb514d4e68a404010521b880643 gpl-2.0.txt >> diff --git a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk >> index a8ae9b01df..32ca5cf222 100644 >> --- a/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk >> +++ b/package/stm32flash/stm32flash.mk >> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ >> # >> ################################################################################ >> >> -STM32FLASH_VERSION = 3cebf121f7b32b9edfcb0d49f0fb43ccf33e5650 >> +STM32FLASH_VERSION = 82f16f317185b6916e5f8b5697de58960f7e48a7 > Why not using a tag? 'v0.6' points to that exact SHA-1. I looked at some other packages and previous commits and pretty much every package uses the commithash instead of a tag. So I thought that was something lika an unwritten rule. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: