All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: qemu devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 1/3] net/colo-compare.c: Optimize unpredictable tcp options comparison
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:55:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503305719-2512-2-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503305719-2512-1-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

When network is busy, some tcp options(like sack) will unpredictable
occur in primary side or secondary side. it will make packet size
not same, but the two packet's payload is identical. colo just
care about packet payload, so we skip the option field.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 net/colo-compare.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c
index ca67c68..f6bda41 100644
--- a/net/colo-compare.c
+++ b/net/colo-compare.c
@@ -186,7 +186,10 @@ static int packet_enqueue(CompareState *s, int mode)
  * return:    0  means packet same
  *            > 0 || < 0 means packet different
  */
-static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
+static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt,
+                                      Packet *spkt,
+                                      int poffset,
+                                      int soffset)
 {
     if (trace_event_get_state(TRACE_COLO_COMPARE_MISCOMPARE)) {
         char pri_ip_src[20], pri_ip_dst[20], sec_ip_src[20], sec_ip_dst[20];
@@ -201,12 +204,13 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_common(Packet *ppkt, Packet *spkt, int offset)
                                    sec_ip_src, sec_ip_dst);
     }
 
-    offset = ppkt->vnet_hdr_len + offset;
+    poffset = ppkt->vnet_hdr_len + poffset;
+    soffset = ppkt->vnet_hdr_len + soffset;
 
-    if (ppkt->size == spkt->size) {
-        return memcmp(ppkt->data + offset,
-                      spkt->data + offset,
-                      spkt->size - offset);
+    if (ppkt->size == spkt->size || poffset != soffset) {
+        return memcmp(ppkt->data + poffset,
+                      spkt->data + soffset,
+                      spkt->size - soffset);
     } else {
         trace_colo_compare_main("Net packet size are not the same");
         return -1;
@@ -263,13 +267,22 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_tcp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
      * so we just need skip this field.
      */
     if (ptcp->th_off > 5) {
-        ptrdiff_t tcp_offset;
+        ptrdiff_t ptcp_offset, stcp_offset;
 
-        tcp_offset = ppkt->transport_header - (uint8_t *)ppkt->data
-                     + (ptcp->th_off * 4) - ppkt->vnet_hdr_len;
-        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, tcp_offset);
+        ptcp_offset = ppkt->transport_header - (uint8_t *)ppkt->data
+                      + (ptcp->th_off * 4) - ppkt->vnet_hdr_len;
+        stcp_offset = spkt->transport_header - (uint8_t *)spkt->data
+                      + (stcp->th_off * 4) - spkt->vnet_hdr_len;
+
+        /*
+         * When network is busy, some tcp options(like sack) will unpredictable
+         * occur in primary side or secondary side. it will make packet size
+         * not same, but the two packet's payload is identical. colo just
+         * care about packet payload, so we skip the option field.
+         */
+        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ptcp_offset, stcp_offset);
     } else if (ptcp->th_sum == stcp->th_sum) {
-        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN);
+        res = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, ETH_HLEN, ETH_HLEN);
     } else {
         res = -1;
     }
@@ -329,6 +342,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_udp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
      * the ip payload here.
      */
     ret = colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt,
+                                     network_header_length + ETH_HLEN,
                                      network_header_length + ETH_HLEN);
 
     if (ret) {
@@ -366,6 +380,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_icmp(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
      * the ip payload here.
      */
     if (colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt,
+                                   network_header_length + ETH_HLEN,
                                    network_header_length + ETH_HLEN)) {
         trace_colo_compare_icmp_miscompare("primary pkt size",
                                            ppkt->size);
@@ -403,7 +418,7 @@ static int colo_packet_compare_other(Packet *spkt, Packet *ppkt)
                                    sec_ip_src, sec_ip_dst);
     }
 
-    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0);
+    return colo_packet_compare_common(ppkt, spkt, 0, 0);
 }
 
 static int colo_old_packet_check_one(Packet *pkt, int64_t *check_time)
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-21  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-21  8:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] Optimize COLO-compare performance Zhang Chen
2017-08-21  8:55 ` Zhang Chen [this message]
2017-09-01  9:35   ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 1/3] net/colo-compare.c: Optimize unpredictable tcp options comparison Dou Liyang
2017-09-01 16:02     ` Zhang Chen
2017-09-04  1:52       ` Dou Liyang
2017-08-21  8:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 2/3] net/colo-compare.c: Adjust net queue pop order for performance Zhang Chen
2017-08-21  8:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 3/3] net/colo-compare.c: Fix comments and scheme Zhang Chen
2017-08-22  7:16 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] Optimize COLO-compare performance no-reply
2017-08-29  9:01   ` Jason Wang
2017-08-29 10:45     ` Fam Zheng
2017-08-30  1:47       ` Jason Wang
2017-08-29  5:34 ` Zhang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503305719-2512-2-git-send-email-zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=zhangchen.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.