From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96899BFE for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [66.63.167.143]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED6423D0 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1505921466.4410.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com> From: James Bottomley To: Doug Ledford , Linus Torvalds , ksummit Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 08:31:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <5a06ed25-6110-c639-b7d6-a6b3544fbc30@redhat.com> <1505920038.4410.5.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-DeTAyWhxVh587Eus86/y" Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: Dave Airlie , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , David Miller Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] "Maintainer summit" invitation discussion List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --=-DeTAyWhxVh587Eus86/y Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 11:22 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 9/20/2017 11:07 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > >=20 > > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 10:45 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > >=20 > > > On 4/18/2017 2:59 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > I'd like the maintainership summit list to be fairly small. Not > > > > even 50 people. Maybe 30. A group that can actually sit in a > > > > room for half a day and talk to each other about the issues > > > > they have rather than being talked to. And talk literally about > > > > *process* issues, not about any particular technical issues > > > > within whatever subsystem. Bring up peeves or wishes for actual > > > > process improvements? > > > >=20 > > > > Comments? People who should be involved? Or people who don't > > > > have any particular issues and want to not be involved? > > >=20 > > > Hi Linus, > > >=20 > > > Do we have a final determination as to whether or not this is > > > going to happen?=C2=A0=C2=A0I got the impression from this thread tha= t it > > > was "tentative" and not certain.=C2=A0=C2=A0If it's going to happen, = I > > > should probably get my travel request in. > >=20 > > We've collected the sponsor's money and paid for the space, so it's > > as certain to happen as any previous kernel summit. >=20 > I knew the kernel summit was going to happen... I took "this" in your email to refer to Maintainer Summit, so that's what the above is about. > > =C2=A0The maintainer's summit is tacked on to a bigger kernel summit, > > which is open to all and also has reserved space in Prague. >=20 > The question is whether or not this is going to happen... Confused by what "this" is here, however: both the kernel summit and the maintainer summit are happening. =C2=A0The former merely requires a OSSE+ELCE pass and the latter an invite. James --=-DeTAyWhxVh587Eus86/y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJZwonVAAoJEAVr7HOZEZN4pWgP/itRGd4CgmxWBFkalcIMTq5L CkC0FsBO0Syyxg6QXICXyZUEbvvX0l+M94Rtvs0Z615jt5AuoE1Tf2Vu3/X3xnUR cdM1WA+KU851jezNF3tHpkm6u2LwzTpFug3j2sBqdS33ekJzndyEfyjEqVOioxMo +Iw8YcFAmx60SWpWfmf5VZETWfZpncmW4P3OTeg0UPgBEJtLmf+oYOcBMQktLaCU 0bojMFJHgDFw5DD4Sj6GrxcQCxU5KfYgPbXBrU/D7MnHSibPiZrF9dABBParSWUH c53ULHnGZbcD3ls0S0QvxT/AfSJpflXSHirRFDpJrmVhsZnpMAfEyl02amnBBt1d fVSC88X/RuidlfeoJJAKd2EPV6XhF8Id3GS20Mbw5VCnegrkVUaWnqi8Jl4qkJ1/ 3D72mMLf44Fyu+Bou/BBNjNkrSdGSGEBCdH0sJJNlK3tBHQLNjhVpiwB9JtsW9Z5 8PvBuIAZO8rWduJkv7YpkUPQIX9RclHoItLxS0+mOdocRm4jaBRlTWenhs+XuyLA dzR/thUzGwmdvDTlgsuorpuSQny8O1RFOoekhDQndrjKjwL8BqP7RfNyYwYiyBN/ dj2bDrM7fvcftY+aRlKpGnD5rNBXlgyi/YRws80/6BCsebi/zxEm1T6fqumBMNRH s8ZjKAvSGzlurzMm1ntC =4ZP8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DeTAyWhxVh587Eus86/y--