From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f195.google.com ([209.85.220.195]:50489 "EHLO mail-qk0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753367AbdJaNzg (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:55:36 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f195.google.com with SMTP id o187so20521831qke.7 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 06:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1509458134.4553.16.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] SUNRPC: drop unnecessary svc_bc_tcp_create() helper From: Jeff Layton To: Stefan Hajnoczi , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: Abbas Naderi , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 09:55:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170630132352.32133-8-stefanha@redhat.com> References: <20170630132352.32133-1-stefanha@redhat.com> <20170630132352.32133-8-stefanha@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2017-06-30 at 14:23 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > svc_bc_tcp_create() is a helper function that simply calls > svc_bc_create_socket() with an added IPPROTO_TCP argument. > > svc_bc_create_socket() then checks that the protocol argument is indeed > IPPROTO_TCP. > > This isn't necessary since svc_bc_tcp_create() is the only > svc_bc_create_socket() caller. The next patch adds a second caller for > AF_VSOCK where IPPROTO_TCP will not be used. > > Scrap this scheme and just call svc_bc_create_socket() directly. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > --- > net/sunrpc/svcsock.c | 21 +++------------------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c > index 2b720fa..394e7a2 100644 > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int, > struct net *, struct sockaddr *, > int, int); > #if defined(CONFIG_SUNRPC_BACKCHANNEL) > -static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int, > +static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, > struct net *, struct sockaddr *, > int, int); > static void svc_bc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt); > @@ -1212,25 +1212,17 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_tcp_create(struct svc_serv *serv, > } > > #if defined(CONFIG_SUNRPC_BACKCHANNEL) > -static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, int, > +static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *, > struct net *, struct sockaddr *, > int, int); > static void svc_bc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt); > > -static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_tcp_create(struct svc_serv *serv, > - struct net *net, > - struct sockaddr *sa, int salen, > - int flags) > -{ > - return svc_bc_create_socket(serv, IPPROTO_TCP, net, sa, salen, flags); > -} > - > static void svc_bc_tcp_sock_detach(struct svc_xprt *xprt) > { > } > > static struct svc_xprt_ops svc_tcp_bc_ops = { > - .xpo_create = svc_bc_tcp_create, > + .xpo_create = svc_bc_create_socket, > .xpo_detach = svc_bc_tcp_sock_detach, > .xpo_free = svc_bc_sock_free, > .xpo_prep_reply_hdr = svc_tcp_prep_reply_hdr, > @@ -1615,7 +1607,6 @@ static void svc_sock_free(struct svc_xprt *xprt) > * Create a back channel svc_xprt which shares the fore channel socket. > */ > static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *serv, > - int protocol, > struct net *net, > struct sockaddr *sin, int len, > int flags) > @@ -1623,12 +1614,6 @@ static struct svc_xprt *svc_bc_create_socket(struct svc_serv *serv, > struct svc_sock *svsk; > struct svc_xprt *xprt; > > - if (protocol != IPPROTO_TCP) { > - printk(KERN_WARNING "svc: only TCP sockets" > - " supported on shared back channel\n"); > - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > - } > - > svsk = kzalloc(sizeof(*svsk), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!svsk) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); This one can go in ahead of the rest, I think. Trond or Bruce, do either of you want to pick this up for the next merge window? Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton