From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:49930 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752658AbdLDTSc (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:18:32 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vB4JElRi144797 for ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 14:18:32 -0500 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2enbw0s9kq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:18:31 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 19:18:30 -0000 Subject: Re: IMA-EVM-Utils OpenSSL1.1 interface update From: Mimi Zohar To: "Bruno E. O. Meneguele" , Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:18:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20171204171435.GA6190@glitch> References: <20171201181522.GB3056@glitch> <1512392157.3977.36.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20171204171435.GA6190@glitch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1512415106.3977.53.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:14 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > On 04-12, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 16:15 -0200, Bruno E. O. Meneguele wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I don't really know what are your best interest in update ima-evm-utils > > > 1.0 package to support OpenSSL 1.1 new interface considering lots of > > > distros are chaging to it as the default one. Some are maintaining > > > compatibility packages to OpenSSL 1.0, but usually it remains available > > > in the official repos for something like 1 or 2 releases and then > > > removed completely. > > > > > > Actually I have a simple/small port of it to OpenSSL 1.1 that I plan to > > > maintain for Fedora's Rawhide (next release, f28) package. Do you guys > > > have interest on it? I could post it as a patch. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Yes, I'd really appreciate it. We need to release the new EVM > > portable signature support as well. > > > > Perfect! should I post with some different subject prefix or something > like that to let things clear that is a patch for the userspace app? In general, now that we have a shared mailing list with TPM, the subject line should be prefixed with the kernel subystem (eg. "ima:", "evm:", "tpm:"). Similarly we could do the equivalent for userspace applications (eg. "ima-evm-utils:"). Jarkko, is that ok? Mimi