From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sock: Move the socket inuse to namespace. Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:20:08 -0800 Message-ID: <1512667208.25033.13.camel@gmail.com> References: <1512665148-2413-1-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> <1512665148-2413-2-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Tonghao Zhang , davem@davemloft.net, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com, willemb@google.com Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:38524 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756669AbdLGRUK (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:20:10 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id r6so16042157itr.3 for ; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:20:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1512665148-2413-2-git-send-email-xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 08:45 -0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > In some case, we want to know how many sockets are in use in > different _net_ namespaces. It's a key resource metric. > ... > +static void sock_inuse_add(struct net *net, int val) > +{ > + if (net->core.prot_inuse) > + this_cpu_add(*net->core.sock_inuse, val); > +} This is very confusing. Why testing net->core.prot_inuse for NULL is needed at all ? Why not testing net->core.sock_inuse instead ?