From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752805AbdLHF3C (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 00:29:02 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:43762 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752679AbdLHF2H (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Dec 2017 00:28:07 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 562 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:28:00 EST X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,376,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="156972879" From: Jin Yao To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, Jin Yao Subject: [PATCH v7 4/6] perf util: Create function to perform multiple time range checking Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 21:13:44 +0800 Message-Id: <1512738826-2628-5-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1512738826-2628-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> References: <1512738826-2628-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Previous patch supports the multiple time range. For example, select the first and second 10% time slices. perf report --time 10%/1,10%/2 We need a function to check if a timestamp is in the ranges of [0, 10%) and [10%, 20%]. Note that it includes the last element in [10%, 20%] but it doesn't include the last element in [0, 10%). It's to avoid the overlap. This patch implments a new function perf_time__ranges_skip_sample for this checking. Change log: ----------- v4: Let perf_time__ranges_skip_sample be compatible with perf_time__skip_sample when only one time range. Signed-off-by: Jin Yao --- tools/perf/util/time-utils.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/perf/util/time-utils.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c index 61c46022..3f7f18f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c @@ -300,6 +300,34 @@ bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp) return false; } +bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, + int num, u64 timestamp) +{ + struct perf_time_interval *ptime; + int i; + + if ((timestamp == 0) || (num == 0)) + return false; + + if (num == 1) + return perf_time__skip_sample(&ptime_buf[0], timestamp); + + /* + * start/end of multiple time ranges must be valid. + */ + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { + ptime = &ptime_buf[i]; + + if (timestamp >= ptime->start && + ((timestamp < ptime->end && i < num - 1) || + (timestamp <= ptime->end && i == num - 1))) { + break; + } + } + + return (i == num) ? true : false; +} + int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz) { u64 sec = timestamp / NSEC_PER_SEC; diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h index 2308723..34d5eba 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ int perf_time__percent_parse_str(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, int num, bool perf_time__skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime, u64 timestamp); +bool perf_time__ranges_skip_sample(struct perf_time_interval *ptime_buf, + int num, u64 timestamp); + int timestamp__scnprintf_usec(u64 timestamp, char *buf, size_t sz); int fetch_current_timestamp(char *buf, size_t sz); -- 2.7.4