From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.63.242]:34332 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760132AbdLSJin (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 04:38:43 -0500 Message-ID: <1513676321.26145.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20171219_103848_547223_A849E6CB) Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] qtnfmac: support MAC address based access control From: Johannes Berg To: Sergey Matyukevich , Kalle Valo Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Igor Mitsyanko , Avinash Patil Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 10:38:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171218161811.3f3sjhlxdfmsnljx@bars> References: <20171113102815.11254-1-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <20171113102815.11254-11-sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com> <871skalepz.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <20171205160010.cytra3bqbttwz5db@bars> <878te0kud2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20171218161811.3f3sjhlxdfmsnljx@bars> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 19:18 +0300, Sergey Matyukevich wrote: > Meanwhile now it is not yet clear to me what should be done for driver which > supports MAC-based ACL, but not full-fledged AP SME. Are you sure that such a device can even exist? It'd have to drop the auth frames, so they can't be handled by the host? Is there much point in that? johannes