All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
@ 2018-02-06 21:07 ` naresh.kamboju
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2018-02-06 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: shuahkh, linux-kselftest; +Cc: shuah, daniel, netdev, alexei.starovoitov, ast

test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.

Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
"modprobe test_bpf"

Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 #!/bin/sh
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
-SRC_TREE=../../../../
-
 test_run()
 {
 	sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
@@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
 
 	echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
 	dmesg -C
-	insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
-	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	# Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
+	if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
+		echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
+	elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
+		echo "test_bpf: ok"
+	else
+		echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
 		rc=1
 	fi
 	rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
@ 2018-02-06 21:07 ` naresh.kamboju
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: naresh.kamboju @ 2018-02-06 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)


test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.

Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
"modprobe test_bpf"

Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju at linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 #!/bin/sh
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
-SRC_TREE=../../../../
-
 test_run()
 {
 	sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
@@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
 
 	echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
 	dmesg -C
-	insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
-	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	# Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
+	if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
+		echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
+	elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
+		echo "test_bpf: ok"
+	else
+		echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
 		rc=1
 	fi
 	rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
@ 2018-02-06 21:07 ` naresh.kamboju
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2018-02-06 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)


test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.

Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
"modprobe test_bpf"

Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju at linaro.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
 #!/bin/sh
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
-SRC_TREE=../../../../
-
 test_run()
 {
 	sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
@@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
 
 	echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
 	dmesg -C
-	insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
-	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
+	# Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
+	if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
+		echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
+	elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
+		echo "test_bpf: ok"
+	else
+		echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
 		rc=1
 	fi
 	rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
-- 
2.7.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
  2018-02-06 21:07 ` naresh.kamboju
  (?)
@ 2018-02-07 13:32   ` daniel
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2018-02-07 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Naresh Kamboju, shuahkh, linux-kselftest
  Cc: shuah, netdev, alexei.starovoitov, ast

Hi Naresh,

On 02/06/2018 10:07 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
> Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
> 
> Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
> "modprobe test_bpf"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>

Thanks for looking into this! Could we have a way to be able to
support both? Say, when test_bpf.ko from SRC_TREE is not present,
we try with modprobe -q fallback? I would still like to support
the case where you can make local changes and add new tests to
test_bpf.c, recompile and then just rerun the test_kmod.sh w/o
having to install it first.

Thanks,
Daniel

>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  
> -SRC_TREE=../../../../
> -
>  test_run()
>  {
>  	sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
> @@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
>  
>  	echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
>  	dmesg -C
> -	insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
> -	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> +	# Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
> +	if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
> +		echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
> +	elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
> +		echo "test_bpf: ok"
> +	else
> +		echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
>  		rc=1
>  	fi
>  	rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
@ 2018-02-07 13:32   ` daniel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: daniel @ 2018-02-07 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)


Hi Naresh,

On 02/06/2018 10:07 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
> Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
> 
> Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
> "modprobe test_bpf"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju at linaro.org>

Thanks for looking into this! Could we have a way to be able to
support both? Say, when test_bpf.ko from SRC_TREE is not present,
we try with modprobe -q fallback? I would still like to support
the case where you can make local changes and add new tests to
test_bpf.c, recompile and then just rerun the test_kmod.sh w/o
having to install it first.

Thanks,
Daniel

>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  
> -SRC_TREE=../../../../
> -
>  test_run()
>  {
>  	sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
> @@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
>  
>  	echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
>  	dmesg -C
> -	insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
> -	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> +	# Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
> +	if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
> +		echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
> +	elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
> +		echo "test_bpf: ok"
> +	else
> +		echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
>  		rc=1
>  	fi
>  	rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
@ 2018-02-07 13:32   ` daniel
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Borkmann @ 2018-02-07 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)


Hi Naresh,

On 02/06/2018 10:07 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
> Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
> 
> Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
> "modprobe test_bpf"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju at linaro.org>

Thanks for looking into this! Could we have a way to be able to
support both? Say, when test_bpf.ko from SRC_TREE is not present,
we try with modprobe -q fallback? I would still like to support
the case where you can make local changes and add new tests to
test_bpf.c, recompile and then just rerun the test_kmod.sh w/o
having to install it first.

Thanks,
Daniel

>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>  #!/bin/sh
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  
> -SRC_TREE=../../../../
> -
>  test_run()
>  {
>  	sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
> @@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
>  
>  	echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
>  	dmesg -C
> -	insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
> -	if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> +	# Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
> +	if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
> +		echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
> +	elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
> +		echo "test_bpf: ok"
> +	else
> +		echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
>  		rc=1
>  	fi
>  	rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
  2018-02-07 13:32   ` daniel
  (?)
@ 2018-02-07 18:17     ` naresh.kamboju
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2018-02-07 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Borkmann
  Cc: Shuah Khan, linux-kselftest, Shuah Khan, netdev, alexei.starovoitov, ast

Hi Daniel,

On 7 February 2018 at 19:02, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On 02/06/2018 10:07 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
>> Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
>>
>> Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
>> "modprobe test_bpf"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
>
> Thanks for looking into this! Could we have a way to be able to
> support both? Say, when test_bpf.ko from SRC_TREE is not present,
> we try with modprobe -q fallback? I would still like to support
> the case where you can make local changes and add new tests to
> test_bpf.c, recompile and then just rerun the test_kmod.sh w/o
> having to install it first.

Thanks for the review comments.
I have sent patch v2 with your comments addressed.

- Naresh

>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>>  #!/bin/sh
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>
>> -SRC_TREE=../../../../
>> -
>>  test_run()
>>  {
>>       sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
>> @@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
>>
>>       echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
>>       dmesg -C
>> -     insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
>> -     if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
>> +     # Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
>> +     if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
>> +             echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
>> +     elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
>> +             echo "test_bpf: ok"
>> +     else
>> +             echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
>>               rc=1
>>       fi
>>       rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
>>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
@ 2018-02-07 18:17     ` naresh.kamboju
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: naresh.kamboju @ 2018-02-07 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)


Hi Daniel,

On 7 February 2018 at 19:02, Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net> wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On 02/06/2018 10:07 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
>> Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
>>
>> Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
>> "modprobe test_bpf"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju at linaro.org>
>
> Thanks for looking into this! Could we have a way to be able to
> support both? Say, when test_bpf.ko from SRC_TREE is not present,
> we try with modprobe -q fallback? I would still like to support
> the case where you can make local changes and add new tests to
> test_bpf.c, recompile and then just rerun the test_kmod.sh w/o
> having to install it first.

Thanks for the review comments.
I have sent patch v2 with your comments addressed.

- Naresh

>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>>  #!/bin/sh
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>
>> -SRC_TREE=../../../../
>> -
>>  test_run()
>>  {
>>       sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
>> @@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
>>
>>       echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
>>       dmesg -C
>> -     insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
>> -     if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
>> +     # Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
>> +     if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
>> +             echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
>> +     elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
>> +             echo "test_bpf: ok"
>> +     else
>> +             echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
>>               rc=1
>>       fi
>>       rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Linux-kselftest-mirror] [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod
@ 2018-02-07 18:17     ` naresh.kamboju
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2018-02-07 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)


Hi Daniel,

On 7 February 2018@19:02, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
> Hi Naresh,
>
> On 02/06/2018 10:07 PM, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> test_kmod.sh reported false failure when module not present.
>> Check test_bpf.ko is present in the path before loading it.
>>
>> Stop using "insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko" instead use
>> "modprobe test_bpf"
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju at linaro.org>
>
> Thanks for looking into this! Could we have a way to be able to
> support both? Say, when test_bpf.ko from SRC_TREE is not present,
> we try with modprobe -q fallback? I would still like to support
> the case where you can make local changes and add new tests to
> test_bpf.c, recompile and then just rerun the test_kmod.sh w/o
> having to install it first.

Thanks for the review comments.
I have sent patch v2 with your comments addressed.

- Naresh

>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh | 11 +++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> index ed4774d..54177b1 100755
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmod.sh
>> @@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
>>  #!/bin/sh
>>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>
>> -SRC_TREE=../../../../
>> -
>>  test_run()
>>  {
>>       sysctl -w net.core.bpf_jit_enable=$1 2>&1 > /dev/null
>> @@ -10,8 +8,13 @@ test_run()
>>
>>       echo "[ JIT enabled:$1 hardened:$2 ]"
>>       dmesg -C
>> -     insmod $SRC_TREE/lib/test_bpf.ko 2> /dev/null
>> -     if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
>> +     # Use modprobe dry run to check for missing test_bpf module
>> +     if ! /sbin/modprobe -q -n test_bpf; then
>> +             echo "test_bpf: [SKIP]"
>> +     elif /sbin/modprobe -q test_bpf; then
>> +             echo "test_bpf: ok"
>> +     else
>> +             echo "test_bpf: [FAIL]"
>>               rc=1
>>       fi
>>       rmmod  test_bpf 2> /dev/null
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-07 18:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-02-06 21:07 [PATCH] selftests: bpf: test_kmod.sh: check the module path before insmod Naresh Kamboju
2018-02-06 21:07 ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Naresh Kamboju
2018-02-06 21:07 ` naresh.kamboju
2018-02-07 13:32 ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-07 13:32   ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Daniel Borkmann
2018-02-07 13:32   ` daniel
2018-02-07 18:17   ` Naresh Kamboju
2018-02-07 18:17     ` [Linux-kselftest-mirror] " Naresh Kamboju
2018-02-07 18:17     ` naresh.kamboju

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.