On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 13:55 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 01/29/2018 10:09 AM, argus.lin@mediatek.com wrote:
> > From: Argus Lin <argus.lin@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > New pwrap support int1_en flag for starvation and channel
> > request exception. We need to register it for interrupt
> > handler.
> > We also add pwrap capability flag used to declare if we
> 
> "We also" wording is nearly always a hint, that this should be done
> in two independent patches.
> 
hmm, I see and will modify it.
> > support BRIDGE, RESET, DCM, PRIORITY_SEL and INT1_EN
> > or not.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Argus Lin <argus.lin@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > index e9e054a15b7d..9f924d3f8645 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@
> >  #define PWRAP_SLV_CAP_SECURITY	BIT(2)
> >  #define HAS_CAP(_c, _x)	(((_c) & (_x)) == (_x))
> >  
> > +/* Group of bits used for shown pwrap capability */
> > +#define PWRAP_CAP_BRIDGE	BIT(0)
> > +#define PWRAP_CAP_RESET		BIT(1)
> > +#define PWRAP_CAP_DCM		BIT(2)
> 
> As you told me the driver will be upstreamed in April, please add this flag when
> you upstream the driver, as this will be in a different kernel version.
> 
Dear Matthias:
I add those flags for different wrap HW IP version.
To be forward compatible, I also modify MT2701/MT7622/MT8135/MT8173's
capability.
You can see [PATCH v2 4/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap for mt6797
SoCs for capability definition.
> > +#define PWRAP_CAP_PRIORITY_SEL	BIT(3)
> > +#define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN	BIT(4)
> > +
> 
> Add each flag when you add the user of the flag.

I had added new struct for mt6797, caps was included in it.
It was declared at [PATCH v2 4/5] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap for
mt6797 SoCs.

+static const struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt6797 = {
+	.regs = mt6797_regs,
+	.type = PWRAP_MT6797,
+	.arb_en_all = 0x01fff,
+	.int_en_all = 0xfffffffd,
+	.int1_en_all = 0x0001ffff,
+	.spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
+	.wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL,
+	.caps = PWRAP_CAP_DCM | PWRAP_CAP_PRIORITY_SEL | PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN,
+	.init_reg_clock = pwrap_common_init_reg_clock,
+	.init_soc_specific = NULL,
+};
+

> 
> >  /* defines for slave device wrapper registers */
> >  enum dew_regs {
> >  	PWRAP_DEW_BASE,
> > @@ -681,9 +688,11 @@ struct pmic_wrapper_type {
> >  	enum pwrap_type type;
> >  	u32 arb_en_all;
> >  	u32 int_en_all;
> > +	u32 int1_en_all;
> >  	u32 spi_w;
> >  	u32 wdt_src;
> > -	unsigned int has_bridge:1;
> > +	/* Flags indicating the capability for the target pwrap */
> > +	u32 caps;
> 
> NAK, this will not compile. Please make sure that every patch on it's own does
> not break compilation.
> 
OK, I will check it.
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> >  	int (*init_reg_clock)(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp);
> >  	int (*init_soc_specific)(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp);
> >  };
> > -- 
> > 2.12.5
> > 
> > ************* Email Confidentiality Notice
> >  ********************
> > The information contained in this e-mail message (including any 
> > attachments) may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise
> > exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. It is intended to be 
> > conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). Any use, dissemination, 
> > distribution, printing, retaining or copying of this e-mail (including its 
> > attachments) by unintended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may 
> > be unlawful. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, or believe
> >  
> > that you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
> > immediately (by replying to this e-mail), delete any and all copies of 
> > this e-mail (including any attachments) from your system, and do not
> > disclose the content of this e-mail to any other person. Thank
> >  you!
> > 
>