From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1163035AbeCAXLw (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 18:11:52 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:30247 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162931AbeCAXKK (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Mar 2018 18:10:10 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,409,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="208165065" From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com To: acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, wangnan0@huawei.com, ak@linux.intel.com, Kan Liang Subject: [PATCH 11/14] perf test: Apply new perf_mmap__read_event() interface for sw-clock Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 18:09:08 -0500 Message-Id: <1519945751-37786-11-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.4.11 In-Reply-To: <1519945751-37786-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> References: <1519945751-37786-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Kan Liang The perf test 'sw-clock' still use the legacy interface. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang --- tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c b/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c index f6c72f9..206a111 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sw-clock.c @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id) }; struct cpu_map *cpus; struct thread_map *threads; + struct perf_mmap *md; + u64 end, start; attr.sample_freq = 500; @@ -93,7 +95,11 @@ static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id) perf_evlist__disable(evlist); - while ((event = perf_evlist__mmap_read(evlist, 0)) != NULL) { + md = &evlist->mmap[0]; + if (perf_mmap__read_init(md, 0, &start, &end) < 0) + goto out_init; + + while ((event = perf_mmap__read_event(md, 0, &start, end)) != NULL) { struct perf_sample sample; if (event->header.type != PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE) @@ -108,9 +114,11 @@ static int __test__sw_clock_freq(enum perf_sw_ids clock_id) total_periods += sample.period; nr_samples++; next_event: - perf_evlist__mmap_consume(evlist, 0); + perf_mmap__consume(md, 0); } + perf_mmap__read_done(md); +out_init: if ((u64) nr_samples == total_periods) { pr_debug("All (%d) samples have period value of 1!\n", nr_samples); -- 2.4.11