From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751377AbeEVMtB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 08:49:01 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:36025 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751036AbeEVMs6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2018 08:48:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1526993322.6491.7.camel@gmx.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: UV: raw_spinlock conversion From: Mike Galbraith To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 14:48:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1526982375.6491.3.camel@gmx.de> References: <20180504111459.24825-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20180504111459.24825-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1525604359.28142.3.camel@gmx.de> <20180507073928.shmtfpqyhgxya53b@linutronix.de> <1526738996.5365.1.camel@gmx.de> <20180522065051.xy42nwvcxz2nekti@linutronix.de> <1526977462.6491.1.camel@gmx.de> <20180522091408.nt4fodr4f5ikk5ow@linutronix.de> <1526982375.6491.3.camel@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:abEkbh571GmWBBNc+bJj+Bgd+k1ByQi5UGqaQ/4fFNfH9TEhVhQ mOj1VSbSIgzjGPzhlJNIH/yUvIyxxjZtMxyxRL3kHeR2UNR7/5u65quZ1orc5P0puybEgJM fAiyIV4rSH6ukWkNlmk2p/3jvMnTgUmMBMoKeRuYlKwNmHuSdzZLXCK8dOGDZcKMjT0CjJ0 gT/c07tUnNRbK84DH2FZQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OtZqAsSN0qY=:QrvWVpOfsg8L6pCylogrFD sXvcs+U2QBiDiho4kUZsyguNqNMgqw64hXntT7zfK5rw6ZrE4YiG+rtNy5djG+NQW5hCq7Llp ja1psQNNy3npbIiQJN5lvEy2ZiRt9EwyehNDEL1toTOgylLzTRkTzRoXVjmlaOOhiFtfW3j9G LsdnwESq3iYVrhiztOfGiItVpGLACyl3ynCqJPV4aJKxN7mUoAv95tACSjnhfWuFb3TqZH2MZ ga+J3HVJ2rla5MHpQIqnZCTRmboupBgRcp9o4OARO2cmSVLznBKB6QzBbY60wSK/c2IoNzHty +kMifQdHRzc60XDYk0sZ2FmlyhxquhZhYkGQgarQhi1wtHjmgPxqmQRvSRw0NdH5UbrAcCs2T 8eCxvZ+8aRmV1y8qAFZkjZZ7+oVq5hRxLKY4NHuaClC0O1VHk/QJTCNPLL8k7CLvO93jy+jk0 AjRh6UduRn+Mch68wcVstgnd8kdawP/nF4a1oVccoMCtCEiWtFLkIcJ06RGOYz71gShcbJhRl y1blVpiCz5LWsfp5xyLRPDJF1GRtYmF2lOK56Jmn6J7WkSyyj+bKdjX+ey/1w75T0Va52w+xe O81GiVOUcXmLlLdgzaboPHee3xHmq2g0PIYHED0UzLaW++G6+og5M5XkaVLxfDad7TtZlgjqD bAw9TgEcjKzk7RhYokzrb3aL/qU9jNkyLqt33FqnKgkW4JqrCR2rvChEw3DbGJc43uB1FG1KC x3Bp7OnUT/UtwMxQeW7eWXuERMoUsju83qRzeK/Af68pZOWeFlm1+QA+p2u4Jo10wSeSyd5I2 o8HCFFv Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:46 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:14 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > If you suggest that I > > should stop caring about UV than I do so. Please post a patch that adds > > a dependency to UV on PREEMPT so that part of the architecture is > > documented. > > Will do. On second thought, no I won't. It's either already known, or it should be, making any such submission smell funny. -Mike