From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luca Boccassi Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] Regression tests for stable releases from companies involved in DPDK Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 09:38:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1528101517.6997.78.camel@debian.org> References: <1527762399.6997.44.camel@debian.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" , "thomas@monjalon.net" , "dev@dpdk.org" To: Shreyansh Jain Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 05:24 +0000, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > Hello Luca >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Luca Boccassi > > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2018 3:57 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; thomas@monjalon.net > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Regression tests for stable releases from > > companies > > involved in DPDK > >=20 > > Hello all, > >=20 > > At this morning's release meeting (minutes coming soon from John), > > we > > briefly discussed the state of the regression testing for stable > > releases and agreed we need to formalise the process. > >=20 > > At the moment we have a firm commitment from Intel and Mellanox to > > test > > all stable branches (and if I heard correctly from NXP as well? > > Please >=20 > Yes, I confirmed that on call on behalf of NXP. But... >=20 > > confirm!). AT&T committed to run regressions on the 16.11 branch. >=20 > Not until 17.05 did NXP's first driver started appearing in the DPDK > upstream releases. Somehow, I misunderstood your request for 16.11 > with 17.11 stable. That's fine - the 17.11 branch is also getting ready for release (see relevant threads), and 18.02 will soon as well. --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi