From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1B4C433EF for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71711208B2 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 02:48:16 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 71711208B2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965511AbeFOCsO (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:48:14 -0400 Received: from Mailgw01.mediatek.com ([1.203.163.78]:1806 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965345AbeFOCsM (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2018 22:48:12 -0400 X-UUID: 7a6089e3e55d4d448b4f3b1b3c142cb4-20180615 Received: from mtkcas36.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.250)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 2010608972; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:58 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS31N1.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.69) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:57 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1210.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:56 +0800 Message-ID: <1529030875.28160.10.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712 From: Honghui Zhang To: Andy Shevchenko CC: Arnd Bergmann , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Marc Zyngier , "Bjorn Helgaas" , Matthias Brugger , linux-arm Mailing List , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , , Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree , , Eddie Huang , , , , , , , Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:55 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1527822270-30280-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> <1527850145.28160.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:52 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Honghui Zhang > wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM, wrote: > >> > From: Honghui Zhang > >> > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> > +static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > >> > >> __maybe_unused > >> > > > > Hi, Andy, thanks for your review. > > Bjorn had point this out that at: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg656774.html > > Nice, one more maintainer with strong opinion here. > > Arnd, that's what I mentioned as a split in opinions earlier. > Any new developer or even existing contributor would be now really > confusing since maintainers asked for two different approaches on the > same matter. > Hi, Arnd, Do you have any comments about this patch? Sorry I missed the previous discussion about which should be used for this approach. thanks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Honghui Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:55 +0800 Message-ID: <1529030875.28160.10.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1527822270-30280-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> <1527850145.28160.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Marc Zyngier , Bjorn Helgaas , Matthias Brugger , linux-arm Mailing List , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree , yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, Eddie Huang , ryder.lee@mediatek.com, hongkun.cao@mediatek.com, youlin.pei@mediatek.com, yong.wu@mediatek.com, yt.shen@mediatek.com, sean.wang@mediatek.com, xinping.qian@mediatek.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:52 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Honghui Zhang > wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM, wrote: > >> > From: Honghui Zhang > >> > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> > +static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > >> > >> __maybe_unused > >> > > > > Hi, Andy, thanks for your review. > > Bjorn had point this out that at: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg656774.html > > Nice, one more maintainer with strong opinion here. > > Arnd, that's what I mentioned as a split in opinions earlier. > Any new developer or even existing contributor would be now really > confusing since maintainers asked for two different approaches on the > same matter. > Hi, Arnd, Do you have any comments about this patch? Sorry I missed the previous discussion about which should be used for this approach. thanks. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Message-ID: <1529030875.28160.10.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712 From: Honghui Zhang To: Andy Shevchenko Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:55 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1527822270-30280-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> <1527850145.28160.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, devicetree , hongkun.cao@mediatek.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Marc Zyngier , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, sean.wang@mediatek.com, xinping.qian@mediatek.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , yt.shen@mediatek.com, Matthias Brugger , ryder.lee@mediatek.com, "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , yong.wu@mediatek.com, Bjorn Helgaas , yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, Arnd Bergmann , Eddie Huang , linux-arm Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+bjorn=helgaas.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:52 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Honghui Zhang > wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM, wrote: > >> > From: Honghui Zhang > >> > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> > +static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > >> > >> __maybe_unused > >> > > > > Hi, Andy, thanks for your review. > > Bjorn had point this out that at: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg656774.html > > Nice, one more maintainer with strong opinion here. > > Arnd, that's what I mentioned as a split in opinions earlier. > Any new developer or even existing contributor would be now really > confusing since maintainers asked for two different approaches on the > same matter. > Hi, Arnd, Do you have any comments about this patch? Sorry I missed the previous discussion about which should be used for this approach. thanks. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: honghui.zhang@mediatek.com (Honghui Zhang) Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:47:55 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3] PCI: mediatek: Add system pm support for MT2712 In-Reply-To: References: <1527822270-30280-1-git-send-email-honghui.zhang@mediatek.com> <1527850145.28160.6.camel@mhfsdcap03> Message-ID: <1529030875.28160.10.camel@mhfsdcap03> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:52 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:49 PM, Honghui Zhang > wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-06-01 at 13:17 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 6:04 AM, wrote: > >> > From: Honghui Zhang > >> > >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > >> > +static int mtk_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) > >> > >> __maybe_unused > >> > > > > Hi, Andy, thanks for your review. > > Bjorn had point this out that at: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg656774.html > > Nice, one more maintainer with strong opinion here. > > Arnd, that's what I mentioned as a split in opinions earlier. > Any new developer or even existing contributor would be now really > confusing since maintainers asked for two different approaches on the > same matter. > Hi, Arnd, Do you have any comments about this patch? Sorry I missed the previous discussion about which should be used for this approach. thanks.