From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>,
Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems.
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 08:16:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152904696116.18533.3199784878650249370@mail.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180614225330.3686.60473@emeril.freedesktop.org>
Quoting Patchwork (2018-06-14 23:53:30)
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems.
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/44781/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> = CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_4322 -> Patchwork_9312 =
>
> == Summary - FAILURE ==
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_9312 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_9312, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/44781/revisions/1/mbox/
>
> == Possible new issues ==
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_9312:
>
> === IGT changes ===
>
> ==== Possible regressions ====
>
> igt@gem_workarounds@basic-read:
> fi-skl-6260u: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-cfl-s3: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-skl-6700k2: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-skl-6770hq: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-kbl-7560u: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-skl-6600u: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-bxt-dsi: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-kbl-guc: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-kbl-7500u: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-skl-6700hq: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-bxt-j4205: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-skl-gvtdvm: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-cfl-guc: PASS -> FAIL
> {fi-whl-u}: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-cfl-8700k: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-glk-j4005: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-skl-guc: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-kbl-7567u: PASS -> FAIL
> fi-kbl-r: PASS -> FAIL
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: Address val mask read result
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07014 0x20002000 0x00002000 0x00002000 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E194 0x01000100 0x00000100 0x00000114 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E4F0 0x81008100 0x00008100 0xFFFF8120 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E184 0x00200020 0x00000020 0x00000022 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E194 0x00140014 0x00000014 0x00000114 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07004 0x00420042 0x00000042 0x000029C2 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E188 0x00080000 0x00000008 0x00008030 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07300 0x80208020 0x00008020 0x00008830 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x07300 0x00100010 0x00000010 0x00008830 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E184 0x00020002 0x00000002 0x00000022 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x0E180 0x20002000 0x00002000 0x00002000 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x02580 0x00010000 0x00000001 0x00000004 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) DEBUG: 0x02580 0x00060004 0x00000006 0x00000004 OK
(gem_workarounds:3828) WARNING: 0x02088 0x00020002 0x00000002 0x00000000 FAIL
(gem_workarounds:3828) WARNING: 0x02090 0x10001000 0x00001000 0x00000000 FAIL
The 2 writes didn't stick. Not context saved? Or something even more
peculiar?
(Look at all those repeated register writes, no wonder we ran out of
space.)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-15 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-14 21:53 [PATCH] drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems Kenneth Graunke
2018-06-14 22:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-06-14 22:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2018-06-15 7:16 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2018-06-15 7:51 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-15 14:52 ` Patchwork
2018-06-15 18:31 ` [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2018-06-15 18:34 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems. (rev2) Patchwork
2018-06-15 19:06 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9 systems Chris Wilson
2018-06-16 5:07 ` Kenneth Graunke
2018-06-18 9:03 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-06-18 9:12 ` Chris Wilson
2018-06-15 20:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Enable provoking vertex fix on Gen9+ systems. (rev3) Patchwork
2018-06-16 9:35 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152904696116.18533.3199784878650249370@mail.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kenneth@whitecape.org \
--cc=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.