From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yipeng Wang Subject: [PATCH v3 3/8] hash: fix to have more accurate key slot size Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 12:46:41 -0700 Message-ID: <1530906406-289697-4-git-send-email-yipeng1.wang@intel.com> References: <1528455078-328182-1-git-send-email-yipeng1.wang@intel.com> <1530906406-289697-1-git-send-email-yipeng1.wang@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, vguvva@caviumnetworks.com, brijesh.s.singh@gmail.com To: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com Return-path: Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E741BE0C for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2018 04:53:55 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1530906406-289697-1-git-send-email-yipeng1.wang@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" This commit calculates the needed key slot size more accurately. The previous local cache fix requires the free slot ring to be larger than actually needed. The calculation of the value is inaccurate. Fixes: 5915699153d7 ("hash: fix scaling by reducing contention") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Yipeng Wang --- lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c index 80dcf41..11602af 100644 --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c @@ -126,13 +126,13 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) * except for the first cache */ num_key_slots = params->entries + (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 1) * - LCORE_CACHE_SIZE + 1; + (LCORE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) + 1; else num_key_slots = params->entries + 1; snprintf(ring_name, sizeof(ring_name), "HT_%s", params->name); /* Create ring (Dummy slot index is not enqueued) */ - r = rte_ring_create(ring_name, rte_align32pow2(num_key_slots - 1), + r = rte_ring_create(ring_name, rte_align32pow2(num_key_slots), params->socket_id, 0); if (r == NULL) { RTE_LOG(ERR, HASH, "memory allocation failed\n"); @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params) h->add_key = ADD_KEY_SINGLEWRITER; /* Populate free slots ring. Entry zero is reserved for key misses. */ - for (i = 1; i < params->entries + 1; i++) + for (i = 1; i < num_key_slots; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); te->data = (void *) h; @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ void rte_hash_reset(struct rte_hash *h) { void *ptr; - unsigned i; + uint32_t tot_ring_cnt, i; if (h == NULL) return; @@ -386,7 +386,13 @@ rte_hash_reset(struct rte_hash *h) rte_pause(); /* Repopulate the free slots ring. Entry zero is reserved for key misses */ - for (i = 1; i < h->entries + 1; i++) + if (h->hw_trans_mem_support) + tot_ring_cnt = h->entries + (RTE_MAX_LCORE - 1) * + (LCORE_CACHE_SIZE - 1); + else + tot_ring_cnt = h->entries; + + for (i = 1; i < tot_ring_cnt + 1; i++) rte_ring_sp_enqueue(h->free_slots, (void *)((uintptr_t) i)); if (h->hw_trans_mem_support) { -- 2.7.4