All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v6] drm/i915: Add IOCTL Param to control data port coherency.
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 15:07:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1531746436-9696-1-git-send-email-tomasz.lis@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522163879-10837-1-git-send-email-tomasz.lis@intel.com>

The patch adds a parameter to control the data port coherency functionality
on a per-context level. When the IOCTL is called, a command to switch data
port coherency state is added to the ordered list. All prior requests are
executed on old coherency settings, and all exec requests after the IOCTL
will use new settings.

Rationale:

The OpenCL driver develpers requested a functionality to control cache
coherency at data port level. Keeping the coherency at that level is disabled
by default due to its performance costs. OpenCL driver is planning to
enable it for a small subset of submissions, when such functionality is
required. Below are answers to basic question explaining background
of the functionality and reasoning for the proposed implementation:

1. Why do we need a coherency enable/disable switch for memory that is shared
between CPU and GEN (GPU)?

Memory coherency between CPU and GEN, while being a great feature that enables
CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER OCL capability on Intel GEN architecture, adds
overhead related to tracking (snooping) memory inside different cache units
(L1$, L2$, L3$, LLC$, etc.). At the same time, minority of modern OCL
applications actually use CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER (and hence require
memory coherency between CPU and GPU). The goal of coherency enable/disable
switch is to remove overhead of memory coherency when memory coherency is not
needed.

2. Why do we need a global coherency switch?

In order to support I/O commands from within EUs (Execution Units), Intel GEN
ISA (GEN Instruction Set Assembly) contains dedicated "send" instructions.
These send instructions provide several addressing models. One of these
addressing models (named "stateless") provides most flexible I/O using plain
virtual addresses (as opposed to buffer_handle+offset models). This "stateless"
model is similar to regular memory load/store operations available on typical
CPUs. Since this model provides I/O using arbitrary virtual addresses, it
enables algorithmic designs that are based on pointer-to-pointer (e.g. buffer
of pointers) concepts. For instance, it allows creating tree-like data
structures such as:
                   ________________
                  |      NODE1     |
                  | uint64_t data  |
                  +----------------|
                  | NODE*  |  NODE*|
                  +--------+-------+
                    /              \
   ________________/                \________________
  |      NODE2     |                |      NODE3     |
  | uint64_t data  |                | uint64_t data  |
  +----------------|                +----------------|
  | NODE*  |  NODE*|                | NODE*  |  NODE*|
  +--------+-------+                +--------+-------+

Please note that pointers inside such structures can point to memory locations
in different OCL allocations  - e.g. NODE1 and NODE2 can reside in one OCL
allocation while NODE3 resides in a completely separate OCL allocation.
Additionally, such pointers can be shared with CPU (i.e. using SVM - Shared
Virtual Memory feature). Using pointers from different allocations doesn't
affect the stateless addressing model which even allows scattered reading from
different allocations at the same time (i.e. by utilizing SIMD-nature of send
instructions).

When it comes to coherency programming, send instructions in stateless model
can be encoded (at ISA level) to either use or disable coherency. However, for
generic OCL applications (such as example with tree-like data structure), OCL
compiler is not able to determine origin of memory pointed to by an arbitrary
pointer - i.e. is not able to track given pointer back to a specific
allocation. As such, it's not able to decide whether coherency is needed or not
for specific pointer (or for specific I/O instruction). As a result, compiler
encodes all stateless sends as coherent (doing otherwise would lead to
functional issues resulting from data corruption). Please note that it would be
possible to workaround this (e.g. based on allocations map and pointer bounds
checking prior to each I/O instruction) but the performance cost of such
workaround would be many times greater than the cost of keeping coherency
always enabled. As such, enabling/disabling memory coherency at GEN ISA level
is not feasible and alternative method is needed.

Such alternative solution is to have a global coherency switch that allows
disabling coherency for single (though entire) GPU submission. This is
beneficial because this way we:
* can enable (and pay for) coherency only in submissions that actually need
coherency (submissions that use CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER resources)
* don't care about coherency at GEN ISA granularity (no performance impact)

3. Will coherency switch be used frequently?

There are scenarios that will require frequent toggling of the coherency
switch.
E.g. an application has two OCL compute kernels: kern_master and kern_worker.
kern_master uses, concurrently with CPU, some fine grain SVM resources
(CL_MEM_SVM_FINE_GRAIN_BUFFER). These resources contain descriptors of
computational work that needs to be executed. kern_master analyzes incoming
work descriptors and populates a plain OCL buffer (non-fine-grain) with payload
for kern_worker. Once kern_master is done, kern_worker kicks-in and processes
the payload that kern_master produced. These two kernels work in a loop, one
after another. Since only kern_master requires coherency, kern_worker should
not be forced to pay for it. This means that we need to have the ability to
toggle coherency switch on or off per each GPU submission:
(ENABLE COHERENCY) kern_master -> (DISABLE COHERENCY)kern_worker -> (ENABLE
COHERENCY) kern_master -> (DISABLE COHERENCY)kern_worker -> ...

v2: Fixed compilation warning.
v3: Refactored the patch to add IOCTL instead of exec flag.
v4: Renamed and documented the API flag. Used strict values.
    Removed redundant GEM_WARN_ON()s. Improved to coding standard.
    Introduced a macro for checking whether hardware supports the feature.
v5: Renamed some locals. Made the flag write to be lazy.
    Updated comments to remove misconceptions. Added gen11 support.
v6: Moved the flag write to gen8_enit_flush_render(). Renamed some functions.
    Moved all flags checking to one place. Added mutex check.

Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>

Bspec: 11419
Bspec: 19175
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 29 +++++++++++++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h | 17 +++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c        | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h             |  7 ++++
 5 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 4fb9373..bae3999 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2524,6 +2524,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 #define HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv)	(!!((dev_priv)->edram_cap & EDRAM_ENABLED))
 #define HAS_WT(dev_priv)	((IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || \
 				 IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) && HAS_EDRAM(dev_priv))
+#define HAS_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY(dev_priv)	(INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
 
 #define HWS_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev_priv)	((dev_priv)->info.hws_needs_physical)
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index b10770c..44ebc31 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -784,6 +784,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_destroy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 				    struct drm_file *file)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dev);
 	struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
 	struct drm_i915_gem_context_param *args = data;
 	struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
@@ -804,10 +805,10 @@ int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_GTT_SIZE:
 		if (ctx->ppgtt)
 			args->value = ctx->ppgtt->vm.total;
-		else if (to_i915(dev)->mm.aliasing_ppgtt)
-			args->value = to_i915(dev)->mm.aliasing_ppgtt->vm.total;
+		else if (i915->mm.aliasing_ppgtt)
+			args->value = i915->mm.aliasing_ppgtt->vm.total;
 		else
-			args->value = to_i915(dev)->ggtt.vm.total;
+			args->value = i915->ggtt.vm.total;
 		break;
 	case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_NO_ERROR_CAPTURE:
 		args->value = i915_gem_context_no_error_capture(ctx);
@@ -818,6 +819,12 @@ int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY:
 		args->value = ctx->sched.priority;
 		break;
+	case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY:
+		if (!HAS_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY(i915))
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+		else
+			args->value = i915_gem_context_is_data_port_coherent(ctx);
+		break;
 	default:
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		break;
@@ -830,6 +837,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_getparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 int i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 				    struct drm_file *file)
 {
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dev);
 	struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
 	struct drm_i915_gem_context_param *args = data;
 	struct i915_gem_context *ctx;
@@ -880,7 +888,7 @@ int i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 
 			if (args->size)
 				ret = -EINVAL;
-			else if (!(to_i915(dev)->caps.scheduler & I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY))
+			else if (!(i915->caps.scheduler & I915_SCHEDULER_CAP_PRIORITY))
 				ret = -ENODEV;
 			else if (priority > I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY ||
 				 priority < I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY)
@@ -893,6 +901,19 @@ int i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		}
 		break;
 
+	case I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY:
+		if (args->size)
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		else if (!HAS_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY(i915))
+			ret = -ENODEV;
+		else if (args->value == 1)
+			i915_gem_context_set_data_port_coherent(ctx);
+		else if (args->value == 0)
+			i915_gem_context_clear_data_port_coherent(ctx);
+		else
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		break;
+
 	default:
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		break;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
index b116e49..9312343 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.h
@@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ struct i915_gem_context {
 #define CONTEXT_BANNABLE		3
 #define CONTEXT_BANNED			4
 #define CONTEXT_FORCE_SINGLE_SUBMISSION	5
+#define CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED	6
+#define CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE	7
 
 	/**
 	 * @hw_id: - unique identifier for the context
@@ -257,6 +259,21 @@ static inline void i915_gem_context_set_force_single_submission(struct i915_gem_
 	__set_bit(CONTEXT_FORCE_SINGLE_SUBMISSION, &ctx->flags);
 }
 
+static inline bool i915_gem_context_is_data_port_coherent(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
+{
+	return test_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
+}
+
+static inline void i915_gem_context_set_data_port_coherent(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
+{
+	__set_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
+}
+
+static inline void i915_gem_context_clear_data_port_coherent(struct i915_gem_context *ctx)
+{
+	__clear_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
+}
+
 static inline bool i915_gem_context_is_default(const struct i915_gem_context *c)
 {
 	return c->user_handle == DEFAULT_CONTEXT_HANDLE;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 6fef9d1..6a08e10 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -259,6 +259,63 @@ intel_lr_context_descriptor_update(struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
 	ce->lrc_desc = desc;
 }
 
+static int emit_set_data_port_coherency(struct i915_request *rq, bool enable)
+{
+	u32 *cs;
+	i915_reg_t reg;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(rq->engine->class != RENDER_CLASS);
+	GEM_BUG_ON(INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) < 9);
+
+	cs = intel_ring_begin(rq, 4);
+	if (IS_ERR(cs))
+		return PTR_ERR(cs);
+
+	if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 11)
+		reg = ICL_HDC_MODE;
+	else if (INTEL_GEN(rq->i915) >= 10)
+		reg = CNL_HDC_CHICKEN0;
+	else
+		reg = HDC_CHICKEN0;
+
+	*cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1);
+	*cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(reg);
+	/* Enabling coherency means disabling the bit which forces it off */
+	if (enable)
+		*cs++ = _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(HDC_FORCE_NON_COHERENT);
+	else
+		*cs++ = _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(HDC_FORCE_NON_COHERENT);
+	*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
+
+	intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+intel_lr_context_update_data_port_coherency(struct i915_request *rq)
+{
+	struct i915_gem_context *ctx = rq->gem_context;
+	bool enable = test_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_REQUESTED, &ctx->flags);
+	int ret;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&rq->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+
+	if (test_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE, &ctx->flags) == enable)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = emit_set_data_port_coherency(rq, enable);
+
+	if (!ret) {
+		if (enable)
+			__set_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE, &ctx->flags);
+		else
+			__clear_bit(CONTEXT_DATA_PORT_COHERENT_ACTIVE, &ctx->flags);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static struct i915_priolist *
 lookup_priolist(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
 {
@@ -2133,7 +2190,7 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct i915_request *request,
 		i915_ggtt_offset(engine->scratch) + 2 * CACHELINE_BYTES;
 	bool vf_flush_wa = false, dc_flush_wa = false;
 	u32 *cs, flags = 0;
-	int len;
+	int err, len;
 
 	flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_CS_STALL;
 
@@ -2164,6 +2221,13 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct i915_request *request,
 		/* WaForGAMHang:kbl */
 		if (IS_KBL_REVID(request->i915, 0, KBL_REVID_B0))
 			dc_flush_wa = true;
+
+		/* Emit the switch of data port coherency state if needed */
+		err = intel_lr_context_update_data_port_coherency(request);
+		if (GEM_WARN_ON(err)) {
+			DRM_DEBUG("Data Port Coherency toggle failed.\n");
+			return err;
+		}
 	}
 
 	len = 6;
diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
index 7f5634c..6ece759 100644
--- a/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h
@@ -1456,6 +1456,13 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_context_param {
 #define   I915_CONTEXT_MAX_USER_PRIORITY	1023 /* inclusive */
 #define   I915_CONTEXT_DEFAULT_PRIORITY		0
 #define   I915_CONTEXT_MIN_USER_PRIORITY	-1023 /* inclusive */
+/*
+ * When data port level coherency is enabled, the GPU will update memory
+ * buffers shared with CPU, by forcing internal cache units to send memory
+ * writes to higher level caches faster. Enabling data port coherency has
+ * a performance cost.
+ */
+#define I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_DATA_PORT_COHERENCY	0x7
 	__u64 value;
 };
 
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-16 13:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-27 15:17 [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-03-27 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-03-27 15:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-03-27 20:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-03-27 23:27 ` [PATCH v1] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-28 16:06   ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-28 22:28     ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-30 15:42       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-30 19:45         ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-04-26 14:02           ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-30 18:23   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-04-12 17:15     ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-04-19 11:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Tomasz Lis
2018-04-19 12:00   ` Chris Wilson
2018-04-19 22:23     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-04-19 11:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev2) Patchwork
2018-04-19 11:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-04-19 12:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-04-19 16:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-05-11 15:45 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists - v3 notes Tomasz Lis
2018-05-11 15:45   ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-05-18 21:08     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-05-21 10:16       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-05-22 14:39         ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2018-05-22 14:54           ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-05-11 16:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev3) Patchwork
2018-05-11 16:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-11 16:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-11 17:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-05-25 18:26 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-06-11 16:37   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-06-29 16:50     ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-02 17:36       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-05-25 18:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev4) Patchwork
2018-05-25 18:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-25 19:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-26  5:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-07-06 15:52 ` [PATCH v5] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-07-06 16:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev5) Patchwork
2018-07-06 16:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-07-06 16:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-07-07 14:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-07-16 13:07 ` Tomasz Lis [this message]
2018-07-16 13:35   ` [PATCH v6] drm/i915: Add IOCTL Param to control data port coherency Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-07-18 13:24   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-07-18 14:42     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-07-18 15:28       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-19  7:12         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-07-19 15:10           ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-16 14:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev6) Patchwork
2018-07-16 14:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-07-16 14:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-07-16 19:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-10-15 17:29 ` [PATCH v5] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-10-16 10:53   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-10-19 16:00     ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-10-23  9:13       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-10-23  9:24         ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-10-15 17:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev7) Patchwork
2018-10-15 17:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-15 18:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-15 23:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-11-09 17:18 ` [PATCH v6] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-12-10 15:40   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-14 11:10     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-12-17 15:21       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-11-09 18:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev8) Patchwork
2018-11-09 18:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-09 18:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-10  3:29 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-03-19 12:37 [RFC v1] drm/i915: Add Exec param to control data port coherency Tomasz Lis
2018-10-09 18:06 ` [PATCH v6] drm/i915: Add IOCTL Param " Tomasz Lis
2018-10-10  7:29   ` Tvrtko Ursulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1531746436-9696-1-git-send-email-tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --to=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.