From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pankaj Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/7] dm: enable synchronous dax Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 01:08:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1533125860.33764157.1560143300908.JavaMail.zimbra__4883.94271103374$1560143319$gmane$org@redhat.com> References: <20190521133713.31653-1-pagupta@redhat.com> <20190521133713.31653-5-pagupta@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Dan Williams Cc: cohuck@redhat.com, Jan Kara , KVM list , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , david , Qemu Developers , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, device-mapper development , Andreas Dilger , Ross Zwisler , Andrea Arcangeli , Dave Jiang , jstaron@google.com, linux-nvdimm , Vishal L Verma , Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Hellwig , Linux ACPI , jmoyer , linux-ext4 , Len Brown , Adam Borowski , Randy Dunlap , Rik van Riel , yuval shaia List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 6:43 AM Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > > > This patch sets dax device 'DAXDEV_SYNC' flag if all the target > > devices of device mapper support synchrononous DAX. If device > > mapper consists of both synchronous and asynchronous dax devices, > > we don't set 'DAXDEV_SYNC' flag. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta > > --- > > drivers/md/dm-table.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c > > index cde3b49b2a91..1cce626ff576 100644 > > --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c > > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c > > @@ -886,10 +886,17 @@ static int device_supports_dax(struct dm_target *ti, > > struct dm_dev *dev, > > return bdev_dax_supported(dev->bdev, PAGE_SIZE); > > } > > > > +static int device_synchronous(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev, > > + sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data) > > +{ > > + return dax_synchronous(dev->dax_dev); > > +} > > + > > static bool dm_table_supports_dax(struct dm_table *t) > > { > > struct dm_target *ti; > > unsigned i; > > + bool dax_sync = true; > > > > /* Ensure that all targets support DAX. */ > > for (i = 0; i < dm_table_get_num_targets(t); i++) { > > @@ -901,7 +908,14 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_dax(struct dm_table *t) > > if (!ti->type->iterate_devices || > > !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_supports_dax, > > NULL)) > > return false; > > + > > + /* Check devices support synchronous DAX */ > > + if (dax_sync && > > + !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_synchronous, > > NULL)) > > + dax_sync = false; > > Looks like this needs to be rebased on the current state of v5.2-rc, > and then we can nudge Mike for an ack. Sorry! for late reply due to vacations. I will rebase the series on v5.2-rc4 and send a v11. Thanks, Pankaj Yes, >