From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761983AbdDSJzZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:55:25 -0400 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:42852 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759504AbdDSJzW (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:55:22 -0400 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Eddie Cai Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: reuse firefly dtsi Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:55:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1534547.uoxyx99BdA@phil> User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.9.0-2-amd64; KDE/5.28.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20170418121527.3155-1-eddie.cai.linux@gmail.com> <746291609.ssvjv54Vin@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Eddie, Am Mittwoch, 19. April 2017, 08:42:09 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai: > 2017-04-19 6:20 GMT+08:00 Heiko Stuebner : > > Hi Eddie, > > > > Am Dienstag, 18. April 2017, 20:15:27 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai: > >> firefly reload is very similar with firefly board, so reuse firefly dtsi > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eddie Cai > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi | 310 ------------------ > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload.dts | 368 ++-------------------- > > > > I would disagree and remember having a similar discussion when the reload- > > support was initially submitted. Please keep in mind that the firefly- > > reload is a som+baseboard combination, so somebody could (or maybe > > already has) create a completely different baseboard for the som that > > does not have any similarities with the original firefly. > > The previous firefly being a real single board. > > > > We also don't combine rock2 and firefly and other boards following the > > general rk3288 design guidelines :-) and the original firefly and reload are > > very different boards if you look at them. > OK, i think the real similar part is the core board and firefly. how > about reuse the > firefly code in the core board? I'd really like to keep these separate. - firefly-rk3288 is one board - firefly-rk3288-reload is a completely different som+baseboard That they both have the "firefly" in the name is really more based on the company being named firefly :-) , but are not an indication that they are similar boards. Heiko From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heiko Stuebner Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: reuse firefly dtsi Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:55:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1534547.uoxyx99BdA@phil> References: <20170418121527.3155-1-eddie.cai.linux@gmail.com> <746291609.ssvjv54Vin@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Eddie Cai Cc: robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org, linux-I+IVW8TIWO2tmTQ+vhA3Yw@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Eddie, Am Mittwoch, 19. April 2017, 08:42:09 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai: > 2017-04-19 6:20 GMT+08:00 Heiko Stuebner : > > Hi Eddie, > > > > Am Dienstag, 18. April 2017, 20:15:27 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai: > >> firefly reload is very similar with firefly board, so reuse firefly dtsi > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eddie Cai > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi | 310 ------------------ > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload.dts | 368 ++-------------------- > > > > I would disagree and remember having a similar discussion when the reload- > > support was initially submitted. Please keep in mind that the firefly- > > reload is a som+baseboard combination, so somebody could (or maybe > > already has) create a completely different baseboard for the som that > > does not have any similarities with the original firefly. > > The previous firefly being a real single board. > > > > We also don't combine rock2 and firefly and other boards following the > > general rk3288 design guidelines :-) and the original firefly and reload are > > very different boards if you look at them. > OK, i think the real similar part is the core board and firefly. how > about reuse the > firefly code in the core board? I'd really like to keep these separate. - firefly-rk3288 is one board - firefly-rk3288-reload is a completely different som+baseboard That they both have the "firefly" in the name is really more based on the company being named firefly :-) , but are not an indication that they are similar boards. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner) Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:55:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: rockchip: reuse firefly dtsi In-Reply-To: References: <20170418121527.3155-1-eddie.cai.linux@gmail.com> <746291609.ssvjv54Vin@phil> Message-ID: <1534547.uoxyx99BdA@phil> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Eddie, Am Mittwoch, 19. April 2017, 08:42:09 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai: > 2017-04-19 6:20 GMT+08:00 Heiko Stuebner : > > Hi Eddie, > > > > Am Dienstag, 18. April 2017, 20:15:27 CEST schrieb Eddie Cai: > >> firefly reload is very similar with firefly board, so reuse firefly dtsi > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Eddie Cai > >> --- > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload-core.dtsi | 310 ------------------ > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288-firefly-reload.dts | 368 ++-------------------- > > > > I would disagree and remember having a similar discussion when the reload- > > support was initially submitted. Please keep in mind that the firefly- > > reload is a som+baseboard combination, so somebody could (or maybe > > already has) create a completely different baseboard for the som that > > does not have any similarities with the original firefly. > > The previous firefly being a real single board. > > > > We also don't combine rock2 and firefly and other boards following the > > general rk3288 design guidelines :-) and the original firefly and reload are > > very different boards if you look at them. > OK, i think the real similar part is the core board and firefly. how > about reuse the > firefly code in the core board? I'd really like to keep these separate. - firefly-rk3288 is one board - firefly-rk3288-reload is a completely different som+baseboard That they both have the "firefly" in the name is really more based on the company being named firefly :-) , but are not an indication that they are similar boards. Heiko