From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C64C433EF for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54B0961139 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 08:10:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 54B0961139 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=kalrayinc.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=A8DhQCwDH9T+l9Bt/pevx+s1Zc2UcbNe/1bRsU9JQkg=; b=uPvxkkOkMnjwSVJMm6J4LaLDup QDY8Y6rPk+wNIAewN64DBtgHYmHyxUQhL3TI7JohS8eMXv5hY6dVqtVe9MkWrwAS84pxaBPiTbgUm YgF5ZtF7ZTJODW3IQrF1Kddrt82+5ng7KjM4CbMkVnREE58gZ93YSnjCYNXKXZY9b1bGxUnQMlyNH LJkkQkZjQar6NCM9549kqUDJyxiET9JkDGGSFYNtvcttt3asndQ8o481FhJlZjXfKexXuCcHizFMt 0Vn0IKvioxO7xjQxo9ak8YX2YYI2wlVTpiS7mIrXRHgAJLjxIbXIQCZ2N9u6VSSch84Ja348W97hI ntRTQvUw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mOF7v-008XWh-6j; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:09:43 +0000 Received: from smtpout140.security-mail.net ([85.31.212.145] helo=fx405.security-mail.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mOF7r-008XVz-PL for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 08:09:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fx405.security-mail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297CE3237D0 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kalrayinc.com; s=sec-sig-email; t=1631174976; bh=tJdtzYRS2SFGcKO4uwFZjx+rzvJHCE044jF9Om8Mb88=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject; b=B9xzii7hoTtRD3gOGTP4wyHjbOcLrAMLuaC1QgGCcyM0isiA7S5Nq0xGk3XRdveiN 5xpMwP7R/BDGRXdPkNMQE7hpXvRl5eD5A1wWCLwnb7PJ+5yzRYVZHBu3buKkGEEr0t iCEauMaPj6J0UZqnvnkHsvkKSzM7UiLzRhl/67gA= Received: from fx405 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fx405.security-mail.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC753237A9; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu (unknown [217.181.231.53]) by fx405.security-mail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE0F323777; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra2.kalray.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2AF727E02EB; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra2.kalray.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC99127E02E5; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra2.kalray.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id PMsPxeRqShr1; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zimbra2.kalray.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra2.kalray.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A839927E02DA; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: E-securemail, by Secumail Secumail-id: <915.6139c13e.ea05d.0> DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 zimbra2.kalray.eu BC99127E02E5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kalrayinc.com; s=4F334102-7B72-11EB-A74E-42D0B9747555; t=1631174974; bh=45Mm5skaPU+f4WBgnUerUILgHJkt4yhN5rA2RSx3D6Y=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=oUWq+Aq55UflxAXRmo1POA8C07GAgc0w6Uen2W0yqU+noTMJyTAUdbDIHT6rki0m2 o8HlnPO8XJe7ZJJgNsDkipzLQ0ud2BhFLGvVVeMKkkYHQf2KLoBl0oqH140h2PP8he UuEtRIlZSaANkNezeOPyyRIID1HCG+FVr+7IgrQKYPJziPjy9lwVjTV39Z0WOgQHw5 0tb3RirKHtBAWmGgJWA5Qi0GQs7jy00YTEUpLIn0lRAOTcD2NBucb2PvZ1RI5Uc1Uj KboL2gXsaYoP0T9W3zitlHdKKqx8N5xcnOMk9LWwIMbCiapQLgcAtoIo9l1ae+8URC dW1laXP6VDMZg== Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 10:09:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Samuel Jones To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: Keith Busch , linux-nvme Message-ID: <1537083616.6148364.1631174974578.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> In-Reply-To: References: <1058345072.5039165.1630330229081.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <337815466.5790984.1631005553242.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <20210907164236.GA367782@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> <20210907204615.GA591280@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> <473ad941-a01d-8107-a6a8-6d051f6955a5@grimberg.me> <20210908215017.GA2116734@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com> <9266ad25-ec2c-377d-092d-941f26371c7b@grimberg.me> Subject: Re: Command timeouts with NVMe TCP kernel driver MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [192.168.40.202] X-Mailer: Zimbra 9.0.0_GA_3990 (ZimbraWebClient - FF70 (Linux)/9.0.0_GA_3990) Thread-Topic: Command timeouts with NVMe TCP kernel driver Thread-Index: rrnteH2YMBWA953yI4tNA85/WQRCYg== X-ALTERMIMEV2_out: done X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210909_010940_614459_F156226C X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.06 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org >>>> Sam, can you run some more extensive I/O testing with this (different >>>> patterns of r/w and block sizes)? Also Keith, can you ask the WD folks >>>> to also take it for a spin? >>> >>> Sure, I'll request this patch for their next test cycle. >> >> Great. > > Keith, can you send a proper patch with a Fixes: tag and a descriptive > title so this can go to stable. > > And let's wait for Sam to do some more extensive testing. Ideally we can > also hear from the WD folks that this doesn't cause any regressions. OK, I'll do some more testing over the weekend and let you know next week. _______________________________________________ Linux-nvme mailing list Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme