All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] target/core: Make sure that target_wait_for_sess_cmds() waits long enough
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 16:14:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1539015258.64374.8.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180917213554.987-6-bvanassche@acm.org>

On Sat, 2018-10-06 at 14:05 +-0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+AD4 On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 02:35:42PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
+AD4 +AD4 A session must only be released after all code that accesses the session
+AD4 +AD4 structure has finished. Make sure that this is the case by introducing a
+AD4 +AD4 new command counter per session that is only decremented after the
+AD4 +AD4 .release+AF8-cmd() callback has finished.
+AD4 
+AD4 Can you explain what problems we are running into right now due to the
+AD4 lack of a refcount?

I will explain that further down in this e-mail.

+AD4 +AD4 +AEAAQA -2897,6 +-2907,8 +AEAAQA void target+AF8-sess+AF8-cmd+AF8-list+AF8-set+AF8-waiting(struct se+AF8-session +ACo-se+AF8-sess)
+AD4 +AD4  	spin+AF8-lock+AF8-irqsave(+ACY-se+AF8-sess-+AD4-sess+AF8-cmd+AF8-lock, flags)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4  	se+AF8-sess-+AD4-sess+AF8-tearing+AF8-down +AD0 1+ADs
+AD4 +AD4  	spin+AF8-unlock+AF8-irqrestore(+ACY-se+AF8-sess-+AD4-sess+AF8-cmd+AF8-lock, flags)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +-
+AD4 +AD4 +-	percpu+AF8-ref+AF8-kill+AF8-and+AF8-confirm(+ACY-se+AF8-sess-+AD4-cmd+AF8-count, NULL)+ADs
+AD4 
+AD4 This is equivalent ot a plain percpu+AF8-ref+AF8-kill call.

OK, I will change this into percpu+AF8-ref+AF8-kill().

+AD4 +AD4 +AEAAQA -2911,17 +-2923,14 +AEAAQA void target+AF8-wait+AF8-for+AF8-sess+AF8-cmds(struct se+AF8-session +ACo-se+AF8-sess)
+AD4 +AD4  
+AD4 +AD4  	WARN+AF8-ON+AF8-ONCE(+ACE-se+AF8-sess-+AD4-sess+AF8-tearing+AF8-down)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4  
+AD4 +AD4 -	spin+AF8-lock+AF8-irq(+ACY-se+AF8-sess-+AD4-sess+AF8-cmd+AF8-lock)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4  	do +AHs
+AD4 +AD4 -		ret +AD0 wait+AF8-event+AF8-interruptible+AF8-lock+AF8-irq+AF8-timeout(
+AD4 +AD4 -				se+AF8-sess-+AD4-cmd+AF8-list+AF8-wq,
+AD4 +AD4 -				list+AF8-empty(+ACY-se+AF8-sess-+AD4-sess+AF8-cmd+AF8-list),
+AD4 +AD4 -				se+AF8-sess-+AD4-sess+AF8-cmd+AF8-lock, 180 +ACo HZ)+ADs
+AD4 +AD4 +-		ret +AD0 wait+AF8-event+AF8-timeout(se+AF8-sess-+AD4-cmd+AF8-list+AF8-wq,
+AD4 +AD4 +-				percpu+AF8-ref+AF8-is+AF8-zero(+ACY-se+AF8-sess-+AD4-cmd+AF8-count),
+AD4 +AD4 +-				180 +ACo HZ)+ADs
+AD4 
+AD4 So this is basically the big change - check for a zero reference instead
+AD4 of the list+AF8-empty.
+AD4 
+AD4 I fail to see how this makes a difference, and also why we even need a
+AD4 percpu ref as the get/pull calls are under, or right next to
+AD4 sess+AF8-cmd+AF8-lock critical sections.

Hi Christoph,

After having called target+AF8-wait+AF8-for+AF8-sess+AF8-cmds(), several target drivers call
target+AF8-remove+AF8-session(). That last function frees the session object
synchronously. In other words, it is not safe to use the session pointer after
target+AF8-wait+AF8-for+AF8-sess+AF8-cmds() has returned. That means that
target+AF8-wait+AF8-for+AF8-sess+AF8-cmds() must wait until all code that can dereference the
session pointer has finished, including target+AF8-release+AF8-cmd+AF8-kref(). That
function executes the following code after having removed a command from the
command list:

	target+AF8-free+AF8-cmd+AF8-mem(se+AF8-cmd)+ADs
	se+AF8-cmd-+AD4-se+AF8-tfo-+AD4-release+AF8-cmd(se+AF8-cmd)+ADs
	if (compl)
		complete(compl)+ADs

Hence this patch that makes target+AF8-wait+AF8-for+AF8-sess+AF8-cmds() wait until
target+AF8-release+AF8-cmd+AF8-kref() has called .release+AF8-cmd(). Since I applied this patch
I have not hit the following crash anymore:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in do+AF8-raw+AF8-spin+AF8-lock+-0x1c/0x130
Read of size 4 at addr ffff8801534b16e4 by task rmdir/14805
CPU: 16 PID: 14805 Comm: rmdir Not tainted 4.18.0-rc2-dbg+- +ACM-5
Call Trace:
dump+AF8-stack+-0xa4/0xf5
print+AF8-address+AF8-description+-0x6f/0x270
kasan+AF8-report+-0x241/0x360
+AF8AXw-asan+AF8-load4+-0x78/0x80
do+AF8-raw+AF8-spin+AF8-lock+-0x1c/0x130
+AF8-raw+AF8-spin+AF8-lock+AF8-irqsave+-0x52/0x60
srpt+AF8-set+AF8-ch+AF8-state+-0x27/0x70 +AFs-ib+AF8-srpt+AF0
srpt+AF8-disconnect+AF8-ch+-0x1b/0xc0 +AFs-ib+AF8-srpt+AF0
srpt+AF8-close+AF8-session+-0xa8/0x260 +AFs-ib+AF8-srpt+AF0
target+AF8-shutdown+AF8-sessions+-0x170/0x180 +AFs-target+AF8-core+AF8-mod+AF0
core+AF8-tpg+AF8-del+AF8-initiator+AF8-node+AF8-acl+-0xf3/0x200 +AFs-target+AF8-core+AF8-mod+AF0
target+AF8-fabric+AF8-nacl+AF8-base+AF8-release+-0x25/0x30 +AFs-target+AF8-core+AF8-mod+AF0
config+AF8-item+AF8-release+-0x9c/0x110 +AFs-configfs+AF0
config+AF8-item+AF8-put+-0x26/0x30 +AFs-configfs+AF0
configfs+AF8-rmdir+-0x3b8/0x510 +AFs-configfs+AF0
vfs+AF8-rmdir+-0xb3/0x1e0
do+AF8-rmdir+-0x262/0x2c0
do+AF8-syscall+AF8-64+-0x77/0x230
entry+AF8-SYSCALL+AF8-64+AF8-after+AF8-hwframe+-0x49/0xbe

Please let me know if you need more information.

Bart.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-08 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-17 21:35 [PATCH 05/17] target/core: Make sure that target_wait_for_sess_cmds() waits long enough Bart Van Assche
2018-10-06 12:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-07  3:28 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-10-08 16:14 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-10-08 16:32 ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1539015258.64374.8.camel@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.