All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/execlists: Move RPCS setup to context pin
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 15:11:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <154695311608.11059.9805547432804901399@jlahtine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190108112252.29002-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-01-08 13:22:46)
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> 
> Configuring RPCS in context image just before pin is sufficient and will
> come extra handy in one of the following patches.
> 
> v2:
>  * Split image setup a bit differently. (Chris Wilson)
> 
> v3:
>  * Update context image after reset as well - otherwise the application
>    of pinned default state clears the RPCS.
> 
> v4:
>  * Use local variable throughout the function. (Chris Wilson)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

<SNIP>

> +static u32 make_rpcs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);

This will be gotten rid of in upcoming patches, so ok.

>         if (rcs) {
>                 regs[CTX_LRI_HEADER_2] = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(1);
> -               CTX_REG(regs, CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE, GEN8_R_PWR_CLK_STATE,
> -                       make_rpcs(dev_priv));
> +               CTX_REG(regs, CTX_R_PWR_CLK_STATE, GEN8_R_PWR_CLK_STATE, 0);

While here, we could poison the value with something nasty as code flow
assumes it to be overwritten in next call.

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-08 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-08 11:22 [PATCH 0/7] Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/execlists: Move RPCS setup to context pin Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 13:11   ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Record the sseu configuration per-context & engine Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 13:17   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915/perf: lock powergating configuration to default when active Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 13:40   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Add timeline barrier support Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Expose RPCS (SSEU) configuration to userspace (Gen11 only) Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 14:22   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-08 14:35     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 14:57       ` Chris Wilson
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915/icl: Support co-existence between per-context SSEU and OA Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 13:59   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-08 11:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915/selftests: Context SSEU reconfiguration tests Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 12:50   ` Chris Wilson
2019-01-08 13:58   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2019-01-08 14:38     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-01-08 13:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating (rev10) Patchwork
2019-01-08 13:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-01-08 13:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-12-31 16:06 [PATCH 0/7] Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-31 16:06 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/execlists: Move RPCS setup to context pin Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-14 12:34 [PATCH 0/7] Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-14 12:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/execlists: Move RPCS setup to context pin Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-09-05 14:22 [PATCH v11 0/7] Per context dynamic (sub)slice power-gating Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-09-05 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915/execlists: Move RPCS setup to context pin Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-09-05 15:14   ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=154695311608.11059.9805547432804901399@jlahtine-desk.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.