From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C73C282D8 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180DC20870 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729962AbfAaDW1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:22:27 -0500 Received: from Mailgw01.mediatek.com ([1.203.163.78]:57006 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725535AbfAaDW1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2019 22:22:27 -0500 X-UUID: 1ec16c9d00d54013964520d04e7ab69d-20190131 X-UUID: 1ec16c9d00d54013964520d04e7ab69d-20190131 Received: from mtkcas34.mediatek.inc [(172.27.4.250)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mailgw01.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 792486470; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:20 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS31DR.mediatek.inc (172.27.6.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:18 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:17 +0800 Message-ID: <1548904937.19710.39.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/20] memory: mtk-smi: Get rid of need_larbid From: Yong Wu To: Evan Green CC: , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Nicolas Boichat , Arnd Bergmann , , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , LKML , Tomasz Figa , , Rob Herring , , Matthias Brugger , , Robin Murphy , Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:17 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1546314952-15990-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1546314952-15990-18-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 11:11 -0800, Evan Green wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > > > The "mediatek,larb-id" has already been parsed in MTK IOMMU driver. > > It's no need to parse it again in SMI driver. Only clean some codes. > > This patch is fit for all the current mt2701, mt2712, mt7623, mt8173 > > and mt8183. > > > > After this patch, the "mediatek,larb-id" only be needed for mt2712 > > which have 2 M4Us. In the other SoCs, we can get the larb-id from M4U > > in which the larbs in the "mediatek,larbs" always are ordered. > > > > CC: Matthias Brugger > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu > > --- > > drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 26 ++------------------------ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > index 08cf40d..10e6493 100644 > > --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_common_plat { > > }; > > > > struct mtk_smi_larb_gen { > > - bool need_larbid; > > int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1]; > > void (*config_port)(struct device *); > > unsigned int larb_direct_to_common_mask; > > @@ -153,18 +152,9 @@ void mtk_smi_larb_put(struct device *larbdev) > > struct mtk_smi_iommu *smi_iommu = data; > > unsigned int i; > > > > - if (larb->larb_gen->need_larbid) { > > - larb->mmu = &smi_iommu->larb_imu[larb->larbid].mmu; > > - return 0; > > - } > > - > > - /* > > - * If there is no larbid property, Loop to find the corresponding > > - * iommu information. > > - */ > > - for (i = 0; i < smi_iommu->larb_nr; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) { > > Looks like this was the only use of mtk_smi_iommu.larb_nr. Should we > remove that now? This is necessary since the mt2712 which has two M4U HW. >From its dtsi[1], take iommu1 as a example, its larb_nr only is 3, but we need scan all the larb. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2018-December/016119.html > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yong Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/20] memory: mtk-smi: Get rid of need_larbid Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:17 +0800 Message-ID: <1548904937.19710.39.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1546314952-15990-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1546314952-15990-18-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Evan Green Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Nicolas Boichat , Arnd Bergmann , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , LKML , Tomasz Figa , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 11:11 -0800, Evan Green wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > > > The "mediatek,larb-id" has already been parsed in MTK IOMMU driver. > > It's no need to parse it again in SMI driver. Only clean some codes. > > This patch is fit for all the current mt2701, mt2712, mt7623, mt8173 > > and mt8183. > > > > After this patch, the "mediatek,larb-id" only be needed for mt2712 > > which have 2 M4Us. In the other SoCs, we can get the larb-id from M4U > > in which the larbs in the "mediatek,larbs" always are ordered. > > > > CC: Matthias Brugger > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu > > --- > > drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 26 ++------------------------ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > index 08cf40d..10e6493 100644 > > --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_common_plat { > > }; > > > > struct mtk_smi_larb_gen { > > - bool need_larbid; > > int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1]; > > void (*config_port)(struct device *); > > unsigned int larb_direct_to_common_mask; > > @@ -153,18 +152,9 @@ void mtk_smi_larb_put(struct device *larbdev) > > struct mtk_smi_iommu *smi_iommu = data; > > unsigned int i; > > > > - if (larb->larb_gen->need_larbid) { > > - larb->mmu = &smi_iommu->larb_imu[larb->larbid].mmu; > > - return 0; > > - } > > - > > - /* > > - * If there is no larbid property, Loop to find the corresponding > > - * iommu information. > > - */ > > - for (i = 0; i < smi_iommu->larb_nr; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) { > > Looks like this was the only use of mtk_smi_iommu.larb_nr. Should we > remove that now? This is necessary since the mt2712 which has two M4U HW. >>From its dtsi[1], take iommu1 as a example, its larb_nr only is 3, but we need scan all the larb. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2018-December/016119.html > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC28CC282D7 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEDF7218AC for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lE7fj44a" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AEDF7218AC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=IRm+i42ddAKRruuA8wJjffqRMD7u8AII0xEYG8RzcFA=; b=lE7fj44aqVRF/E wwPkyPfNhqypvdlhsp9WT/Gbgm6LUBKf8CO99ldvALeLU6UlelsQ9ePc88pccegFkD8Aq/8LZDaG9 ubezVSfDkBQ1Yb6z39gk+70OeKAeyNWU+RFcavY14llSQtzepljTfUtlSIQk1hu+wnCwtgQeFaDWC vyJTrNSD4nCadS1lkeH8tq+Ip44I7pbaBPj2HOl9+JFcqMcS8bytdRDVuewxXGMhCCJwEACybCgJy gTYdbq9Eyh0hrzbRxDM89PQ5HxgFSbKW3NjqTASuGDB+2w3iXBALDKVnsbovlVuED4wRFnXXgL4J4 idB4oweEfxcWSWUQu0Qw==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gp2vp-0003sL-Jb; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:22:25 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gp2vm-0003rx-Tc; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 03:22:24 +0000 X-UUID: dc15f1870d244c62bdcaf5b868f13bd5-20190130 X-UUID: dc15f1870d244c62bdcaf5b868f13bd5-20190130 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1827413931; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:22:22 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS31DR.mediatek.inc (172.27.6.102) by MTKMBS62DR.mediatek.inc (172.29.94.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 30 Jan 2019 19:22:20 -0800 Received: from MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.186) by MTKMBS31DR.mediatek.inc (172.27.6.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:18 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (10.17.3.153) by MTKCAS36.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:17 +0800 Message-ID: <1548904937.19710.39.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/20] memory: mtk-smi: Get rid of need_larbid From: Yong Wu To: Evan Green Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:22:17 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1546314952-15990-1-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> <1546314952-15990-18-git-send-email-yong.wu@mediatek.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190130_192222_955218_0CEB15D1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.89 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: youlin.pei@mediatek.com, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Nicolas Boichat , Arnd Bergmann , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , LKML , Tomasz Figa , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, Robin Murphy , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 11:11 -0800, Evan Green wrote: > On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yong Wu wrote: > > > > The "mediatek,larb-id" has already been parsed in MTK IOMMU driver. > > It's no need to parse it again in SMI driver. Only clean some codes. > > This patch is fit for all the current mt2701, mt2712, mt7623, mt8173 > > and mt8183. > > > > After this patch, the "mediatek,larb-id" only be needed for mt2712 > > which have 2 M4Us. In the other SoCs, we can get the larb-id from M4U > > in which the larbs in the "mediatek,larbs" always are ordered. > > > > CC: Matthias Brugger > > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu > > --- > > drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 26 ++------------------------ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > index 08cf40d..10e6493 100644 > > --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c > > @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_common_plat { > > }; > > > > struct mtk_smi_larb_gen { > > - bool need_larbid; > > int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1]; > > void (*config_port)(struct device *); > > unsigned int larb_direct_to_common_mask; > > @@ -153,18 +152,9 @@ void mtk_smi_larb_put(struct device *larbdev) > > struct mtk_smi_iommu *smi_iommu = data; > > unsigned int i; > > > > - if (larb->larb_gen->need_larbid) { > > - larb->mmu = &smi_iommu->larb_imu[larb->larbid].mmu; > > - return 0; > > - } > > - > > - /* > > - * If there is no larbid property, Loop to find the corresponding > > - * iommu information. > > - */ > > - for (i = 0; i < smi_iommu->larb_nr; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) { > > Looks like this was the only use of mtk_smi_iommu.larb_nr. Should we > remove that now? This is necessary since the mt2712 which has two M4U HW. >From its dtsi[1], take iommu1 as a example, its larb_nr only is 3, but we need scan all the larb. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2018-December/016119.html > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel