All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.

STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
features:
- I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
- resistive touchscreen controller,
- IDD measurement.

I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
registers STMFX features MFD children.

---
Changes in v4:
- mfd: move registers #define into the header
- mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
- mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
  i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
- mfd: fix typos
- mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
- pinctrl: rework registers #define
- dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
Changes in v3:
- fix MFD interrupt bindings
- fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
  in this function
Changes in v2:
- move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
- improve regmap configuration
- take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges

Amelie Delaunay (9):
  dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
  pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
  ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
  ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
 drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.

STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
features:
- I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
- resistive touchscreen controller,
- IDD measurement.

I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
registers STMFX features MFD children.

---
Changes in v4:
- mfd: move registers #define into the header
- mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
- mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
  i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
- mfd: fix typos
- mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
- pinctrl: rework registers #define
- dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
Changes in v3:
- fix MFD interrupt bindings
- fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
  in this function
Changes in v2:
- move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
- improve regmap configuration
- take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges

Amelie Delaunay (9):
  dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
  pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
  ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
  ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
 drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.

STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
features:
- I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
- resistive touchscreen controller,
- IDD measurement.

I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
registers STMFX features MFD children.

---
Changes in v4:
- mfd: move registers #define into the header
- mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
- mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
  i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
- mfd: fix typos
- mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
- pinctrl: rework registers #define
- dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
Changes in v3:
- fix MFD interrupt bindings
- fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
  in this function
Changes in v2:
- move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
- improve regmap configuration
- take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges

Amelie Delaunay (9):
  dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
  dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
  pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
  ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
  ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
  ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
 drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
 11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0c2f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+STMicroelectonics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) Core bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller using I2C for
+communication with the main MCU. Its main features are GPIO expansion, main
+MCU IDD measurement (IDD is the amount of current that flows through VDD) and
+resistive touchscreen controller.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300".
+- reg: I2C slave address of the device.
+- interrupts: interrupt specifier triggered by MFX_IRQ_OUT signal.
+  Please refer to ../interrupt-controller/interrupt.txt
+
+Optional properties:
+- drive-open-drain: configure MFX_IRQ_OUT as open drain.
+- vdd-supply: phandle of the regulator supplying STMFX.
+
+Example:
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+		vdd-supply = <&v3v3>;
+	};
+
+Please refer to ../pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt for STMFX GPIO expander function bindings.
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0c2f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+STMicroelectonics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) Core bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller using I2C for
+communication with the main MCU. Its main features are GPIO expansion, main
+MCU IDD measurement (IDD is the amount of current that flows through VDD) and
+resistive touchscreen controller.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300".
+- reg: I2C slave address of the device.
+- interrupts: interrupt specifier triggered by MFX_IRQ_OUT signal.
+  Please refer to ../interrupt-controller/interrupt.txt
+
+Optional properties:
+- drive-open-drain: configure MFX_IRQ_OUT as open drain.
+- vdd-supply: phandle of the regulator supplying STMFX.
+
+Example:
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+		vdd-supply = <&v3v3>;
+	};
+
+Please refer to ../pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt for STMFX GPIO expander function bindings.
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f0c2f7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+STMicroelectonics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) Core bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller using I2C for
+communication with the main MCU. Its main features are GPIO expansion, main
+MCU IDD measurement (IDD is the amount of current that flows through VDD) and
+resistive touchscreen controller.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300".
+- reg: I2C slave address of the device.
+- interrupts: interrupt specifier triggered by MFX_IRQ_OUT signal.
+  Please refer to ../interrupt-controller/interrupt.txt
+
+Optional properties:
+- drive-open-drain: configure MFX_IRQ_OUT as open drain.
+- vdd-supply: phandle of the regulator supplying STMFX.
+
+Example:
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+		vdd-supply = <&v3v3>;
+	};
+
+Please refer to ../pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt for STMFX GPIO expander function bindings.
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
- 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
- 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
STMFX functions are not used
- Main MCU IDD measurement
- Resistive touchscreen controller

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
 drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 18ee803..08d3701 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1904,6 +1904,19 @@ config MFD_STPMIC1
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
 	  module will be called stpmic1.
 
+config MFD_STMFX
+	tristate "Support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)"
+	depends on I2C
+	depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
+	select MFD_CORE
+	select REGMAP_I2C
+	help
+	  Support for the STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander.
+
+	  This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
+	  additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
+	  of the device.
+
 menu "Multimedia Capabilities Port drivers"
 	depends on ARCH_SA1100
 
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index 61a078a..77859d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -245,4 +245,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MXS_LRADC)     += mxs-lradc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SC27XX_PMIC)	+= sprd-sc27xx-spi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE)	+= rave-sp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX)	+= rohm-bd718x7.o
-
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) 	+= stmfx.o
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fab574
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+
+static u8 stmfx_func_to_mask(u32 func)
+{
+	u8 mask = 0;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_GPIO)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN;
+
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH))
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN;
+
+	return mask;
+}
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+	u32 sys_ctrl;
+	u8 mask;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, &sys_ctrl);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * IDD and TS have priority in STMFX FW, so if IDD and TS are enabled,
+	 * ALTGPIO function is disabled by STMFX FW. If IDD or TS is enabled,
+	 * the number of aGPIO available decreases. To avoid GPIO management
+	 * disturbance, abort IDD or TS function enable in this case.
+	 */
+	if (((func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "ALTGPIO function already enabled\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	/* If TS is enabled, aGPIO[3:0] cannot be used */
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "TS in use, aGPIO[3:0] unavailable\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	/* If IDD is enabled, aGPIO[7:4] cannot be used */
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "IDD in use, aGPIO[7:4] unavailable\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_enable);
+
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+	u8 mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_disable);
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	mutex_lock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, stmfx->irq_src);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	stmfx->irq_src &= ~BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	stmfx->irq_src |= BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip stmfx_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "stmfx-core",
+	.irq_bus_lock		= stmfx_irq_bus_lock,
+	.irq_bus_sync_unlock	= stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
+	.irq_mask		= stmfx_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask		= stmfx_irq_unmask,
+};
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = data;
+	unsigned long n, pending;
+	u32 ack;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING,
+			  (u32 *)&pending);
+	if (ret)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	/*
+	 * There is no ACK for GPIO, MFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING_GPIO is a logical OR
+	 * of MFX_REG_IRQ_GPI _PENDING1/_PENDING2/_PENDING3
+	 */
+	ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
+	if (ack) {
+		ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK, ack);
+		if (ret)
+			return IRQ_NONE;
+	}
+
+	for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX)
+		handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, n));
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+			 irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data);
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &stmfx_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+	irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
+	irq_set_noprobe(virq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
+{
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops stmfx_irq_ops = {
+	.map	= stmfx_irq_map,
+	.unmap	= stmfx_irq_unmap,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_irq_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	int hwirq;
+
+	for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX; hwirq++)
+		irq_dispose_mapping(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, hwirq));
+
+	irq_domain_remove(stmfx->irq_domain);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	u32 irqoutpin = 0, irqtrigger;
+	int ret;
+
+	stmfx->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_simple(stmfx->dev->of_node,
+						  STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX, 0,
+						  &stmfx_irq_ops, stmfx);
+	if (!stmfx->irq_domain) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!of_property_read_bool(stmfx->dev->of_node, "drive-open-drain"))
+		irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE;
+
+	irqtrigger = irq_get_trigger_type(client->irq);
+	if ((irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) ||
+	    (irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+		irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN, irqoutpin);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(stmfx->dev, client->irq,
+					NULL, stmfx_irq_handler,
+					irqtrigger | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					"stmfx", stmfx);
+	if (ret)
+		stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_reset(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			   STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	msleep(STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	u32 id;
+	u8 version[2];
+	int ret;
+
+	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
+	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+				dev_err(&client->dev,
+					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	} else {
+		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID, &id);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading chip ID: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that ID is the complement of the I2C address:
+	 * STMFX I2C address follows the 7-bit format (MSB), that's why
+	 * client->addr is shifted.
+	 *
+	 * STMFX_I2C_ADDR|       STMFX         |        Linux
+	 *   input pin   | I2C device address  | I2C device address
+	 *---------------------------------------------------------
+	 *       0       | b: 1000 010x h:0x84 |       0x42
+	 *       1       | b: 1000 011x h:0x86 |       0x43
+	 */
+	if (FIELD_GET(STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK, ~id) != (client->addr << 1)) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unknown chip ID: %#x\n", id);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB,
+			       version, ARRAY_SIZE(version));
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading FW version: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(&client->dev, "STMFX id: %#x, fw version: %x.%02x\n",
+		 id, version[0], version[1]);
+
+	return stmfx_chip_reset(stmfx);
+
+err:
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+		return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, 0);
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, 0);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+		return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_pinctrl_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_idd_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
+};
+
+static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
+		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
+	},
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
+		.name = "stmfx-idd",
+		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
+	},
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
+		.name = "stmfx-ts",
+		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
+	},
+};
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+	switch (reg) {
+	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits	= 8,
+	.reg_stride	= 1,
+	.val_bits	= 8,
+	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
+	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
+	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
+	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+	struct stmfx *stmfx;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!stmfx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
+
+	stmfx->dev = dev;
+
+	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
+
+	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
+	if (ret) {
+		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
+			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (client->irq < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
+		ret = client->irq;
+		goto err_chip_exit;
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_chip_exit;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
+		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
+		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
+				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_irq_exit;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_irq_exit:
+	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+err_chip_exit:
+	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
+			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
+				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
+
+static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "stmfx-core",
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
+		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = stmfx_probe,
+	.remove = stmfx_remove,
+};
+module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d890595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef MFD_STMFX_H
+#define MFX_STMFX_H
+
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+/* General */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID		0x00 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB	0x01 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_LSB	0x02 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL		0x40 /* RW */
+/* IRQ output management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN		0x41 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN		0x42 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING		0x08 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK		0x44 /* RW */
+/* GPIO management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1	0x0C /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2	0x0D /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3	0x0E /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1		0x10 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2		0x11 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3		0x12 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1		0x48 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2		0x49 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3		0x4A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1		0x4C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT2		0x4D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT3		0x4E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1		0x50 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE2		0x51 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE3		0x52 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1		0x54 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK2		0x55 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK3		0x56 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1		0x60 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR2		0x61 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR3		0x62 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1		0x64 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE2		0x65 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE3		0x66 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1		0x68 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD2		0x69 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD3		0x6A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1		0x6C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2		0x6D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3		0x6E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1		0x70 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2		0x71 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3		0x72 /* RW */
+
+#define STMFX_REG_MAX			0xB0
+
+/* MFX boot time is around 10ms, so after reset, we have to wait this delay */
+#define STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS 10
+
+/* STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN	BIT(0)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN	BIT(1)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN	BIT(2)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN	BIT(3)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST	BIT(7)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE	BIT(0) /* 0-OD 1-PP */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL	BIT(1) /* 0-active LOW 1-active HIGH */
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_(SRC_EN/PENDING/ACK) bit shift */
+enum stmfx_irqs {
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO = 0,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX,
+};
+
+enum stmfx_functions {
+	STMFX_FUNC_GPIO		= BIT(0), /* GPIO[15:0] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW	= BIT(1), /* aGPIO[3:0] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH = BIT(2), /* aGPIO[7:4] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_TS		= BIT(3),
+	STMFX_FUNC_IDD		= BIT(4),
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct stmfx_ddata - STMFX MFD structure
+ * @device:		device reference used for logs
+ * @map:		register map
+ * @vdd:		STMFX power supply
+ * @irq_domain:		IRQ domain
+ * @lock:		IRQ bus lock
+ * @irq_src:		cache of IRQ_SRC_EN register for bus_lock
+ * @bkp_sysctrl:	backup of SYS_CTRL register for suspend/resume
+ * @bkp_irqoutpin:	backup of IRQ_OUT_PIN register for suspend/resume
+ */
+struct stmfx {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct regmap *map;
+	struct regulator *vdd;
+	struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
+	struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+	u8 irq_src;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+	u8 bkp_sysctrl;
+	u8 bkp_irqoutpin;
+#endif
+};
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+#endif
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
- 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
- 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
STMFX functions are not used
- Main MCU IDD measurement
- Resistive touchscreen controller

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
 drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 18ee803..08d3701 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1904,6 +1904,19 @@ config MFD_STPMIC1
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
 	  module will be called stpmic1.
 
+config MFD_STMFX
+	tristate "Support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)"
+	depends on I2C
+	depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
+	select MFD_CORE
+	select REGMAP_I2C
+	help
+	  Support for the STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander.
+
+	  This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
+	  additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
+	  of the device.
+
 menu "Multimedia Capabilities Port drivers"
 	depends on ARCH_SA1100
 
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index 61a078a..77859d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -245,4 +245,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MXS_LRADC)     += mxs-lradc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SC27XX_PMIC)	+= sprd-sc27xx-spi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE)	+= rave-sp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX)	+= rohm-bd718x7.o
-
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) 	+= stmfx.o
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fab574
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+
+static u8 stmfx_func_to_mask(u32 func)
+{
+	u8 mask = 0;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_GPIO)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN;
+
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH))
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN;
+
+	return mask;
+}
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+	u32 sys_ctrl;
+	u8 mask;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, &sys_ctrl);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * IDD and TS have priority in STMFX FW, so if IDD and TS are enabled,
+	 * ALTGPIO function is disabled by STMFX FW. If IDD or TS is enabled,
+	 * the number of aGPIO available decreases. To avoid GPIO management
+	 * disturbance, abort IDD or TS function enable in this case.
+	 */
+	if (((func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "ALTGPIO function already enabled\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	/* If TS is enabled, aGPIO[3:0] cannot be used */
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "TS in use, aGPIO[3:0] unavailable\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	/* If IDD is enabled, aGPIO[7:4] cannot be used */
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "IDD in use, aGPIO[7:4] unavailable\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_enable);
+
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+	u8 mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_disable);
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	mutex_lock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, stmfx->irq_src);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	stmfx->irq_src &= ~BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	stmfx->irq_src |= BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip stmfx_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "stmfx-core",
+	.irq_bus_lock		= stmfx_irq_bus_lock,
+	.irq_bus_sync_unlock	= stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
+	.irq_mask		= stmfx_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask		= stmfx_irq_unmask,
+};
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = data;
+	unsigned long n, pending;
+	u32 ack;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING,
+			  (u32 *)&pending);
+	if (ret)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	/*
+	 * There is no ACK for GPIO, MFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING_GPIO is a logical OR
+	 * of MFX_REG_IRQ_GPI _PENDING1/_PENDING2/_PENDING3
+	 */
+	ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
+	if (ack) {
+		ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK, ack);
+		if (ret)
+			return IRQ_NONE;
+	}
+
+	for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX)
+		handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, n));
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+			 irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data);
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &stmfx_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+	irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
+	irq_set_noprobe(virq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
+{
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops stmfx_irq_ops = {
+	.map	= stmfx_irq_map,
+	.unmap	= stmfx_irq_unmap,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_irq_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	int hwirq;
+
+	for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX; hwirq++)
+		irq_dispose_mapping(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, hwirq));
+
+	irq_domain_remove(stmfx->irq_domain);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	u32 irqoutpin = 0, irqtrigger;
+	int ret;
+
+	stmfx->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_simple(stmfx->dev->of_node,
+						  STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX, 0,
+						  &stmfx_irq_ops, stmfx);
+	if (!stmfx->irq_domain) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!of_property_read_bool(stmfx->dev->of_node, "drive-open-drain"))
+		irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE;
+
+	irqtrigger = irq_get_trigger_type(client->irq);
+	if ((irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) ||
+	    (irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+		irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN, irqoutpin);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(stmfx->dev, client->irq,
+					NULL, stmfx_irq_handler,
+					irqtrigger | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					"stmfx", stmfx);
+	if (ret)
+		stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_reset(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			   STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	msleep(STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	u32 id;
+	u8 version[2];
+	int ret;
+
+	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
+	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+				dev_err(&client->dev,
+					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	} else {
+		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID, &id);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading chip ID: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that ID is the complement of the I2C address:
+	 * STMFX I2C address follows the 7-bit format (MSB), that's why
+	 * client->addr is shifted.
+	 *
+	 * STMFX_I2C_ADDR|       STMFX         |        Linux
+	 *   input pin   | I2C device address  | I2C device address
+	 *---------------------------------------------------------
+	 *       0       | b: 1000 010x h:0x84 |       0x42
+	 *       1       | b: 1000 011x h:0x86 |       0x43
+	 */
+	if (FIELD_GET(STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK, ~id) != (client->addr << 1)) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unknown chip ID: %#x\n", id);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB,
+			       version, ARRAY_SIZE(version));
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading FW version: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(&client->dev, "STMFX id: %#x, fw version: %x.%02x\n",
+		 id, version[0], version[1]);
+
+	return stmfx_chip_reset(stmfx);
+
+err:
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+		return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, 0);
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, 0);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+		return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_pinctrl_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_idd_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
+};
+
+static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
+		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
+	},
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
+		.name = "stmfx-idd",
+		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
+	},
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
+		.name = "stmfx-ts",
+		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
+	},
+};
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+	switch (reg) {
+	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits	= 8,
+	.reg_stride	= 1,
+	.val_bits	= 8,
+	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
+	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
+	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
+	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+	struct stmfx *stmfx;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!stmfx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
+
+	stmfx->dev = dev;
+
+	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
+
+	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
+	if (ret) {
+		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
+			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (client->irq < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
+		ret = client->irq;
+		goto err_chip_exit;
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_chip_exit;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
+		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
+		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
+				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_irq_exit;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_irq_exit:
+	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+err_chip_exit:
+	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
+			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
+				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
+
+static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "stmfx-core",
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
+		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = stmfx_probe,
+	.remove = stmfx_remove,
+};
+module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d890595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef MFD_STMFX_H
+#define MFX_STMFX_H
+
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+/* General */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID		0x00 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB	0x01 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_LSB	0x02 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL		0x40 /* RW */
+/* IRQ output management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN		0x41 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN		0x42 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING		0x08 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK		0x44 /* RW */
+/* GPIO management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1	0x0C /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2	0x0D /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3	0x0E /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1		0x10 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2		0x11 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3		0x12 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1		0x48 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2		0x49 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3		0x4A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1		0x4C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT2		0x4D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT3		0x4E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1		0x50 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE2		0x51 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE3		0x52 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1		0x54 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK2		0x55 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK3		0x56 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1		0x60 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR2		0x61 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR3		0x62 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1		0x64 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE2		0x65 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE3		0x66 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1		0x68 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD2		0x69 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD3		0x6A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1		0x6C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2		0x6D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3		0x6E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1		0x70 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2		0x71 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3		0x72 /* RW */
+
+#define STMFX_REG_MAX			0xB0
+
+/* MFX boot time is around 10ms, so after reset, we have to wait this delay */
+#define STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS 10
+
+/* STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN	BIT(0)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN	BIT(1)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN	BIT(2)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN	BIT(3)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST	BIT(7)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE	BIT(0) /* 0-OD 1-PP */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL	BIT(1) /* 0-active LOW 1-active HIGH */
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_(SRC_EN/PENDING/ACK) bit shift */
+enum stmfx_irqs {
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO = 0,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX,
+};
+
+enum stmfx_functions {
+	STMFX_FUNC_GPIO		= BIT(0), /* GPIO[15:0] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW	= BIT(1), /* aGPIO[3:0] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH = BIT(2), /* aGPIO[7:4] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_TS		= BIT(3),
+	STMFX_FUNC_IDD		= BIT(4),
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct stmfx_ddata - STMFX MFD structure
+ * @device:		device reference used for logs
+ * @map:		register map
+ * @vdd:		STMFX power supply
+ * @irq_domain:		IRQ domain
+ * @lock:		IRQ bus lock
+ * @irq_src:		cache of IRQ_SRC_EN register for bus_lock
+ * @bkp_sysctrl:	backup of SYS_CTRL register for suspend/resume
+ * @bkp_irqoutpin:	backup of IRQ_OUT_PIN register for suspend/resume
+ */
+struct stmfx {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct regmap *map;
+	struct regulator *vdd;
+	struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
+	struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+	u8 irq_src;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+	u8 bkp_sysctrl;
+	u8 bkp_irqoutpin;
+#endif
+};
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+#endif
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
- 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
- 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
STMFX functions are not used
- Main MCU IDD measurement
- Resistive touchscreen controller

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
 drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
 4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 18ee803..08d3701 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1904,6 +1904,19 @@ config MFD_STPMIC1
 	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
 	  module will be called stpmic1.
 
+config MFD_STMFX
+	tristate "Support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)"
+	depends on I2C
+	depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
+	select MFD_CORE
+	select REGMAP_I2C
+	help
+	  Support for the STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander.
+
+	  This driver provides common support for accessing the device,
+	  additional drivers must be enabled in order to use the functionality
+	  of the device.
+
 menu "Multimedia Capabilities Port drivers"
 	depends on ARCH_SA1100
 
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index 61a078a..77859d7 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -245,4 +245,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MXS_LRADC)     += mxs-lradc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_SC27XX_PMIC)	+= sprd-sc27xx-spi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RAVE_SP_CORE)	+= rave-sp.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_ROHM_BD718XX)	+= rohm-bd718x7.o
-
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_STMFX) 	+= stmfx.o
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9fab574
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+
+static u8 stmfx_func_to_mask(u32 func)
+{
+	u8 mask = 0;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_GPIO)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN;
+
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH))
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN;
+
+	if (func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD)
+		mask |= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN;
+
+	return mask;
+}
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+	u32 sys_ctrl;
+	u8 mask;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, &sys_ctrl);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * IDD and TS have priority in STMFX FW, so if IDD and TS are enabled,
+	 * ALTGPIO function is disabled by STMFX FW. If IDD or TS is enabled,
+	 * the number of aGPIO available decreases. To avoid GPIO management
+	 * disturbance, abort IDD or TS function enable in this case.
+	 */
+	if (((func & STMFX_FUNC_IDD) || (func & STMFX_FUNC_TS)) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "ALTGPIO function already enabled\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	/* If TS is enabled, aGPIO[3:0] cannot be used */
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "TS in use, aGPIO[3:0] unavailable\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	/* If IDD is enabled, aGPIO[7:4] cannot be used */
+	if ((func & STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH) &&
+	    (sys_ctrl & STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN)) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "IDD in use, aGPIO[7:4] unavailable\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, mask);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_enable);
+
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func)
+{
+	u8 mask = stmfx_func_to_mask(func);
+
+	return regmap_update_bits(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, mask, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(stmfx_function_disable);
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	mutex_lock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, stmfx->irq_src);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&stmfx->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	stmfx->irq_src &= ~BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+	stmfx->irq_src |= BIT(data->hwirq % 8);
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip stmfx_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "stmfx-core",
+	.irq_bus_lock		= stmfx_irq_bus_lock,
+	.irq_bus_sync_unlock	= stmfx_irq_bus_sync_unlock,
+	.irq_mask		= stmfx_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask		= stmfx_irq_unmask,
+};
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = data;
+	unsigned long n, pending;
+	u32 ack;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING,
+			  (u32 *)&pending);
+	if (ret)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	/*
+	 * There is no ACK for GPIO, MFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING_GPIO is a logical OR
+	 * of MFX_REG_IRQ_GPI _PENDING1/_PENDING2/_PENDING3
+	 */
+	ack = pending & ~BIT(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO);
+	if (ack) {
+		ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK, ack);
+		if (ret)
+			return IRQ_NONE;
+	}
+
+	for_each_set_bit(n, &pending, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX)
+		handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, n));
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq,
+			 irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
+{
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, d->host_data);
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, &stmfx_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+	irq_set_nested_thread(virq, 1);
+	irq_set_noprobe(virq);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_irq_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int virq)
+{
+	irq_set_chip_and_handler(virq, NULL, NULL);
+	irq_set_chip_data(virq, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops stmfx_irq_ops = {
+	.map	= stmfx_irq_map,
+	.unmap	= stmfx_irq_unmap,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_irq_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	int hwirq;
+
+	for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX; hwirq++)
+		irq_dispose_mapping(irq_find_mapping(stmfx->irq_domain, hwirq));
+
+	irq_domain_remove(stmfx->irq_domain);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_irq_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	u32 irqoutpin = 0, irqtrigger;
+	int ret;
+
+	stmfx->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_simple(stmfx->dev->of_node,
+						  STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX, 0,
+						  &stmfx_irq_ops, stmfx);
+	if (!stmfx->irq_domain) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!of_property_read_bool(stmfx->dev->of_node, "drive-open-drain"))
+		irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE;
+
+	irqtrigger = irq_get_trigger_type(client->irq);
+	if ((irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) ||
+	    (irqtrigger & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+		irqoutpin |= STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN, irqoutpin);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(stmfx->dev, client->irq,
+					NULL, stmfx_irq_handler,
+					irqtrigger | IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					"stmfx", stmfx);
+	if (ret)
+		stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_reset(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			   STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	msleep(STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	u32 id;
+	u8 version[2];
+	int ret;
+
+	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
+	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
+			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+				dev_err(&client->dev,
+					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	} else {
+		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = regmap_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID, &id);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading chip ID: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Check that ID is the complement of the I2C address:
+	 * STMFX I2C address follows the 7-bit format (MSB), that's why
+	 * client->addr is shifted.
+	 *
+	 * STMFX_I2C_ADDR|       STMFX         |        Linux
+	 *   input pin   | I2C device address  | I2C device address
+	 *---------------------------------------------------------
+	 *       0       | b: 1000 010x h:0x84 |       0x42
+	 *       1       | b: 1000 011x h:0x86 |       0x43
+	 */
+	if (FIELD_GET(STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK, ~id) != (client->addr << 1)) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unknown chip ID: %#x\n", id);
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB,
+			       version, ARRAY_SIZE(version));
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&client->dev, "Error reading FW version: %d\n", ret);
+		goto err;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(&client->dev, "STMFX id: %#x, fw version: %x.%02x\n",
+		 id, version[0], version[1]);
+
+	return stmfx_chip_reset(stmfx);
+
+err:
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+		return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_chip_exit(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN, 0);
+	regmap_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL, 0);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))
+		return regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_pinctrl_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_idd_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR),
+};
+
+static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
+	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
+};
+
+static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
+		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
+	},
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
+		.name = "stmfx-idd",
+		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
+	},
+	{
+		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
+		.name = "stmfx-ts",
+		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
+		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
+	},
+};
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+	switch (reg) {
+	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
+	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
+	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
+		return true;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
+{
+	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
+}
+
+static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
+	.reg_bits	= 8,
+	.reg_stride	= 1,
+	.val_bits	= 8,
+	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
+	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
+	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
+	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
+		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
+	struct stmfx *stmfx;
+	int i, ret;
+
+	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!stmfx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
+
+	stmfx->dev = dev;
+
+	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
+	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
+		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
+
+	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
+	if (ret) {
+		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
+			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (client->irq < 0) {
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
+		ret = client->irq;
+		goto err_chip_exit;
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_chip_exit;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
+		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
+		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
+				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_irq_exit;
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_irq_exit:
+	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+err_chip_exit:
+	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
+
+	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
+			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
+			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
+			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
+			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
+		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
+				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
+
+static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "stmfx-core",
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
+		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = stmfx_probe,
+	.remove = stmfx_remove,
+};
+module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d890595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef MFD_STMFX_H
+#define MFX_STMFX_H
+
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+/* General */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID		0x00 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_MSB	0x01 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_FW_VERSION_LSB	0x02 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL		0x40 /* RW */
+/* IRQ output management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN		0x41 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN		0x42 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING		0x08 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_ACK		0x44 /* RW */
+/* GPIO management */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1	0x0C /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2	0x0D /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3	0x0E /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1		0x10 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2		0x11 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3		0x12 /* R */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1		0x48 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2		0x49 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3		0x4A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1		0x4C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT2		0x4D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT3		0x4E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1		0x50 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE2		0x51 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE3		0x52 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1		0x54 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK2		0x55 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK3		0x56 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1		0x60 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR2		0x61 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR3		0x62 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1		0x64 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE2		0x65 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE3		0x66 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1		0x68 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD2		0x69 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD3		0x6A /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1		0x6C /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2		0x6D /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3		0x6E /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1		0x70 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2		0x71 /* RW */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3		0x72 /* RW */
+
+#define STMFX_REG_MAX			0xB0
+
+/* MFX boot time is around 10ms, so after reset, we have to wait this delay */
+#define STMFX_BOOT_TIME_MS 10
+
+/* STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_CHIP_ID_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_GPIO_EN	BIT(0)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_TS_EN	BIT(1)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_IDD_EN	BIT(2)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_ALTGPIO_EN	BIT(3)
+#define STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL_SWRST	BIT(7)
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN bitfields */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_TYPE	BIT(0) /* 0-OD 1-PP */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN_POL	BIT(1) /* 0-active LOW 1-active HIGH */
+
+/* STMFX_REG_IRQ_(SRC_EN/PENDING/ACK) bit shift */
+enum stmfx_irqs {
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_GPIO = 0,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_IDD,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_ERROR,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF,
+	STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_MAX,
+};
+
+enum stmfx_functions {
+	STMFX_FUNC_GPIO		= BIT(0), /* GPIO[15:0] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW	= BIT(1), /* aGPIO[3:0] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH = BIT(2), /* aGPIO[7:4] */
+	STMFX_FUNC_TS		= BIT(3),
+	STMFX_FUNC_IDD		= BIT(4),
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct stmfx_ddata - STMFX MFD structure
+ * @device:		device reference used for logs
+ * @map:		register map
+ * @vdd:		STMFX power supply
+ * @irq_domain:		IRQ domain
+ * @lock:		IRQ bus lock
+ * @irq_src:		cache of IRQ_SRC_EN register for bus_lock
+ * @bkp_sysctrl:	backup of SYS_CTRL register for suspend/resume
+ * @bkp_irqoutpin:	backup of IRQ_OUT_PIN register for suspend/resume
+ */
+struct stmfx {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct regmap *map;
+	struct regulator *vdd;
+	struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
+	struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+	u8 irq_src;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+	u8 bkp_sysctrl;
+	u8 bkp_irqoutpin;
+#endif
+};
+
+int stmfx_function_enable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+int stmfx_function_disable(struct stmfx *stmfx, u32 func);
+#endif
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1b4c18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) offers up to 24 GPIOs expansion.
+Please refer to ../mfd/stmfx.txt for STMFX Core bindings.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl".
+- #gpio-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the second
+  cell is the gpio flags in accordance with <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
+- gpio-controller: marks the device as a GPIO controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the
+  second cell is the interrupt flags in accordance with
+  <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>.
+- interrupt-controller: marks the device as an interrupt controller.
+- gpio-ranges: specifies the mapping between gpio controller and pin
+  controller pins. Check "Concerning gpio-ranges property" below.
+Please refer to ../gpio/gpio.txt.
+
+Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt for pin configuration.
+
+Required properties for pin configuration sub-nodes:
+- pins: list of pins to which the configuration applies.
+
+Optional properties for pin configuration sub-nodes (pinconf-generic ones):
+- bias-disable: disable any bias on the pin.
+- bias-pull-up: the pin will be pulled up.
+- bias-pull-pin-default: use the pin-default pull state.
+- bias-pull-down: the pin will be pulled down.
+- drive-open-drain: the pin will be driven with open drain.
+- drive-push-pull: the pin will be driven actively high and low.
+- output-high: the pin will be configured as an output driving high level.
+- output-low: the pin will be configured as an output driving low level.
+
+Note that STMFX pins[15:0] are called "gpio[15:0]", and STMFX pins[23:16] are
+called "agpio[7:0]". Example, to refer to pin 18 of STMFX, use "agpio2".
+
+Concerning gpio-ranges property:
+- if all STMFX pins[24:0] are available (no other STMFX function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+- if agpio[3:0] are not available (STMFX Touchscreen function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 16>, <&stmfx_pinctrl 20 20 4>;
+- if agpio[7:4] are not available (STMFX IDD function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 20>;
+
+
+Example:
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		...
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-controller;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-up;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
+Example of STMFX GPIO consumers:
+
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	leds {
+		compatible = "gpio-leds";
+		orange {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+		};
+
+		blue {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+		};
+	}
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1b4c18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) offers up to 24 GPIOs expansion.
+Please refer to ../mfd/stmfx.txt for STMFX Core bindings.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl".
+- #gpio-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the second
+  cell is the gpio flags in accordance with <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
+- gpio-controller: marks the device as a GPIO controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the
+  second cell is the interrupt flags in accordance with
+  <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>.
+- interrupt-controller: marks the device as an interrupt controller.
+- gpio-ranges: specifies the mapping between gpio controller and pin
+  controller pins. Check "Concerning gpio-ranges property" below.
+Please refer to ../gpio/gpio.txt.
+
+Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt for pin configuration.
+
+Required properties for pin configuration sub-nodes:
+- pins: list of pins to which the configuration applies.
+
+Optional properties for pin configuration sub-nodes (pinconf-generic ones):
+- bias-disable: disable any bias on the pin.
+- bias-pull-up: the pin will be pulled up.
+- bias-pull-pin-default: use the pin-default pull state.
+- bias-pull-down: the pin will be pulled down.
+- drive-open-drain: the pin will be driven with open drain.
+- drive-push-pull: the pin will be driven actively high and low.
+- output-high: the pin will be configured as an output driving high level.
+- output-low: the pin will be configured as an output driving low level.
+
+Note that STMFX pins[15:0] are called "gpio[15:0]", and STMFX pins[23:16] are
+called "agpio[7:0]". Example, to refer to pin 18 of STMFX, use "agpio2".
+
+Concerning gpio-ranges property:
+- if all STMFX pins[24:0] are available (no other STMFX function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+- if agpio[3:0] are not available (STMFX Touchscreen function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 16>, <&stmfx_pinctrl 20 20 4>;
+- if agpio[7:4] are not available (STMFX IDD function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 20>;
+
+
+Example:
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		...
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-controller;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-up;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
+Example of STMFX GPIO consumers:
+
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	leds {
+		compatible = "gpio-leds";
+		orange {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+		};
+
+		blue {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+		};
+	}
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1b4c18
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander bindings
+
+ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) offers up to 24 GPIOs expansion.
+Please refer to ../mfd/stmfx.txt for STMFX Core bindings.
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: should be "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl".
+- #gpio-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the second
+  cell is the gpio flags in accordance with <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>.
+- gpio-controller: marks the device as a GPIO controller.
+- #interrupt-cells: should be <2>, the first cell is the GPIO number and the
+  second cell is the interrupt flags in accordance with
+  <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>.
+- interrupt-controller: marks the device as an interrupt controller.
+- gpio-ranges: specifies the mapping between gpio controller and pin
+  controller pins. Check "Concerning gpio-ranges property" below.
+Please refer to ../gpio/gpio.txt.
+
+Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt for pin configuration.
+
+Required properties for pin configuration sub-nodes:
+- pins: list of pins to which the configuration applies.
+
+Optional properties for pin configuration sub-nodes (pinconf-generic ones):
+- bias-disable: disable any bias on the pin.
+- bias-pull-up: the pin will be pulled up.
+- bias-pull-pin-default: use the pin-default pull state.
+- bias-pull-down: the pin will be pulled down.
+- drive-open-drain: the pin will be driven with open drain.
+- drive-push-pull: the pin will be driven actively high and low.
+- output-high: the pin will be configured as an output driving high level.
+- output-low: the pin will be configured as an output driving low level.
+
+Note that STMFX pins[15:0] are called "gpio[15:0]", and STMFX pins[23:16] are
+called "agpio[7:0]". Example, to refer to pin 18 of STMFX, use "agpio2".
+
+Concerning gpio-ranges property:
+- if all STMFX pins[24:0] are available (no other STMFX function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+- if agpio[3:0] are not available (STMFX Touchscreen function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 16>, <&stmfx_pinctrl 20 20 4>;
+- if agpio[7:4] are not available (STMFX IDD function in use), you
+  should use gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 20>;
+
+
+Example:
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		...
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-controller;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-up;
+			};
+		};
+	};
+
+Example of STMFX GPIO consumers:
+
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#address-cells = <1>;
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	leds {
+		compatible = "gpio-leds";
+		orange {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+		};
+
+		blue {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+		};
+	}
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig         |  12 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile        |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 833 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index 2764d71..ab2eab7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -265,6 +265,18 @@ config PINCTRL_ST
 	select PINCONF
 	select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
 
+config PINCTRL_STMFX
+	tristate "STMicroelectronics STMFX GPIO expander pinctrl driver"
+	select GENERIC_PINCONF
+	select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+	select MFD_STMFX
+	help
+	  Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)
+	  GPIO expander.
+	  This provides a GPIO interface supporting inputs and outputs,
+	  and configuring push-pull, open-drain, and can also be used as
+	  interrupt-controller.
+
 config PINCTRL_U300
 	bool "U300 pin controller driver"
 	depends on ARCH_U300
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
index 712184b..c188e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LANTIQ)	+= pinctrl-lantiq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPC18XX)	+= pinctrl-lpc18xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_TB10X)	+= pinctrl-tb10x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ST) 	+= pinctrl-st.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_STMFX) 	+= pinctrl-stmfx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ZYNQ)	+= pinctrl-zynq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_INGENIC)	+= pinctrl-ingenic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_RK805)	+= pinctrl-rk805.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc1bb0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,820 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
+
+#include "core.h"
+#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
+
+/* GPIOs expander */
+/* GPIO_STATE1 0x10, GPIO_STATE2 0x11, GPIO_STATE3 0x12 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE		STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 /* R */
+/* GPIO_DIR1 0x60, GPIO_DIR2 0x61, GPIO_DIR3 0x63 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR		STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_TYPE1 0x64, GPIO_TYPE2 0x65, GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE		STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_PUPD1 0x68, GPIO_PUPD2 0x69, GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD		STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_SET1 0x6C, GPO_SET2 0x6D, GPO_SET3 0x6E */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET		STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_CLR1 0x70, GPO_CLR2 0x71, GPO_CLR3 0x72 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR		STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48, IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49, IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C, IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D, IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50, IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51, IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C, IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D, IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E*/
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING	STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 /* R */
+/* IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54, IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55, IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 /* RW */
+
+#define NR_GPIO_REGS			3
+#define NR_GPIOS_PER_REG		8
+#define get_reg(offset)			((offset) / NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_shift(offset)		((offset) % NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_mask(offset)		(BIT(get_shift(offset)))
+
+/*
+ * STMFX pinctrl can have up to 24 pins if STMFX other functions are not used.
+ * Pins availability is managed thanks to gpio-ranges property.
+ */
+static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stmfx_pins[] = {
+	PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(16, "agpio0"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(17, "agpio1"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(18, "agpio2"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(19, "agpio3"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(20, "agpio4"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(21, "agpio5"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(22, "agpio6"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(23, "agpio7"),
+};
+
+struct stmfx_pinctrl {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct stmfx *stmfx;
+	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
+	struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc;
+	struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
+	struct irq_chip irq_chip;
+	struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+	unsigned long gpio_valid_mask;
+	/* Cache of IRQ_GPI_* registers for bus_lock */
+	u8 irq_gpi_src[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_gpi_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_gpi_evt[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_toggle_edge[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+	/* Backup of GPIO_* registers for suspend/resume */
+	u8 bkp_gpio_state[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_dir[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_pupd[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#endif
+};
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	u32 value;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &value);
+
+	return ret ? ret : !!(value & mask);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = value ? STMFX_REG_GPO_SET : STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR;
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg + get_reg(offset),
+			  mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &val);
+	/*
+	 * On stmfx, gpio pins direction is (0)input, (1)output.
+	 * .get_direction returns 0=out, 1=in
+	 */
+
+	return ret ? ret : !(val & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+				       unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	stmfx_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 pupd, mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &pupd);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return !!(pupd & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset, u32 pupd)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, pupd ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 type, mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &type);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return !!(type & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset, u32 type)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, type ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+			     unsigned int pin, unsigned long *config)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	u32 param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	u32 dir, type, pupd;
+	u32 arg = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+	if (!range)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return dir;
+	type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, pin);
+	if (type < 0)
+		return type;
+	pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, pin);
+	if (pupd < 0)
+		return pupd;
+
+	switch (param) {
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+		if ((!dir && (!type || !pupd)) || (dir && !type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+		if (dir && type && !pupd)
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+		if (type && pupd)
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+		if ((!dir && type) || (dir && !type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+		if ((!dir && !type) || (dir && type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+		if (dir)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+
+		arg = ret;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	*config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
+			     unsigned long *configs, unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	enum pin_config_param param;
+	u32 arg;
+	int dir, i, ret;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+	if (!range) {
+		dev_err(pctldev->dev, "pin %d is not available\n", pin);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return dir;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+		param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+		arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+
+		switch (param) {
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+			ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 0);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+			ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 1);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+			if (!dir)
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+			else
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+			if (!dir)
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+			else
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+			ret = stmfx_gpio_direction_output(&pctl->gpio_chip,
+							  pin, arg);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		default:
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+				   struct seq_file *s, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	int dir, type, pupd, val;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, offset);
+	if (!range)
+		return;
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return;
+	type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, offset);
+	if (type < 0)
+		return;
+	pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, offset);
+	if (pupd < 0)
+		return;
+	val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (val < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (!dir) {
+		seq_printf(s, "output %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+		if (type)
+			seq_printf(s, "open drain %s internal pull-up ",
+				   pupd ? "with" : "without");
+		else
+			seq_puts(s, "push pull no pull ");
+	} else {
+		seq_printf(s, "input %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+		if (type)
+			seq_printf(s, "with internal pull-%s ",
+				   pupd ? "up" : "down");
+		else
+			seq_printf(s, "%s ", pupd ? "floating" : "analog");
+	}
+}
+
+static const struct pinconf_ops stmfx_pinconf_ops = {
+	.pin_config_get		= stmfx_pinconf_get,
+	.pin_config_set		= stmfx_pinconf_set,
+	.pin_config_dbg_show	= stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const char *stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+						unsigned int selector)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+					unsigned int selector,
+					const unsigned int **pins,
+					unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops stmfx_pinctrl_ops = {
+	.get_groups_count = stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+	.get_group_name = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+	.get_group_pins = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+	.dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+	.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] &= ~mask;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] |= mask;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] |= mask;
+		irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
+	} else {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] &= ~mask;
+		irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
+	}
+
+	if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) || (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+	else
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+
+	/*
+	 * In case of (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), we need to know current
+	 * GPIO value to set the right edge trigger. But in atomic context
+	 * here we can't access registers over I2C. That's why (type &
+	 * IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) will be managed in .irq_sync_unlock.
+	 */
+
+	if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
+		pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] |= mask;
+	else
+		pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] &= mask;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+
+	mutex_lock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	/*
+	 * In case of IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), read the current GPIO value
+	 * (this couldn't be done in .irq_set_type because of atomic context)
+	 * to set the right irq trigger type.
+	 */
+	if (pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask) {
+		if (stmfx_gpio_get(gpio_chip, data->hwirq))
+			pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+		else
+			pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+	}
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+					     unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int val;
+
+	if (!(pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask))
+		return;
+
+	val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (val < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (val) {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= mask;
+		regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+				  STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+				  mask, 0);
+
+	} else {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+		regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+				  STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+				  mask, mask);
+	}
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = (struct stmfx_pinctrl *)dev_id;
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = &pctl->gpio_chip;
+	u8 pending[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 src[NR_GPIO_REGS] = {0, 0, 0};
+	unsigned long n, status;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING,
+			       &pending, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	status = *(unsigned long *)pending;
+	for_each_set_bit(n, &status, gc->ngpio) {
+		handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, n));
+		stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(pctl, n);
+	}
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range;
+	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev = pctl->pctl_dev;
+	u32 func = STMFX_FUNC_GPIO;
+
+	pctl->gpio_valid_mask = GENMASK(15, 0);
+
+	gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 16);
+	if (gpio_range) {
+		func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW;
+		pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(19, 16);
+	}
+
+	gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 20);
+	if (gpio_range) {
+		func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH;
+		pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(23, 20);
+	}
+
+	return stmfx_function_enable(pctl->stmfx, func);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl;
+	u32 n;
+	int irq, ret;
+
+	pctl = devm_kzalloc(stmfx->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pctl)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
+
+	pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
+
+	if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (irq <= 0) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+
+	mutex_init(&pctl->lock);
+
+	/* Register pin controller */
+	pctl->pctl_desc.name = "stmfx-pinctrl";
+	pctl->pctl_desc.pctlops = &stmfx_pinctrl_ops;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.confops = &stmfx_pinconf_ops;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.pins = stmfx_pins;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pins);
+	pctl->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+	ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(pctl->dev, &pctl->pctl_desc,
+					     pctl, &pctl->pctl_dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl registration failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl->pctl_dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl enable failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* Register gpio controller */
+	pctl->gpio_chip.label = "stmfx-gpio";
+	pctl->gpio_chip.parent = pctl->dev;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.get_direction = stmfx_gpio_get_direction;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.direction_input = stmfx_gpio_direction_input;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.direction_output = stmfx_gpio_direction_output;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.get = stmfx_gpio_get;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.set = stmfx_gpio_set;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.set_config = gpiochip_generic_config;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
+
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "gpio_chip registration failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(pctl);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	pctl->irq_chip.name = dev_name(pctl->dev);
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_mask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_unmask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_set_type = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_lock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
+	for_each_clear_bit(n, &pctl->gpio_valid_mask, pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio)
+		clear_bit(n, pctl->gpio_chip.valid_mask);
+
+	ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip,
+					  0, handle_bad_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot add irqchip to gpiochip\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pctl->dev, irq, NULL,
+					stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn,
+					IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					pctl->irq_chip.name, pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot request irq%d\n", irq);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip, irq);
+
+	dev_info(pctl->dev,
+		 "%ld GPIOs available\n", hweight_long(pctl->gpio_valid_mask));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+	return stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
+				      STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
+				      STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
+				      STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPO_SET,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers backup failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers restoration failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+			 stmfx_pinctrl_suspend, stmfx_pinctrl_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl", },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_pinctrl_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver stmfx_pinctrl_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+		.of_match_table = stmfx_pinctrl_of_match,
+		.pm = &stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = stmfx_pinctrl_probe,
+	.remove = stmfx_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(stmfx_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX pinctrl/GPIO driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig         |  12 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile        |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 833 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index 2764d71..ab2eab7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -265,6 +265,18 @@ config PINCTRL_ST
 	select PINCONF
 	select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
 
+config PINCTRL_STMFX
+	tristate "STMicroelectronics STMFX GPIO expander pinctrl driver"
+	select GENERIC_PINCONF
+	select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+	select MFD_STMFX
+	help
+	  Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)
+	  GPIO expander.
+	  This provides a GPIO interface supporting inputs and outputs,
+	  and configuring push-pull, open-drain, and can also be used as
+	  interrupt-controller.
+
 config PINCTRL_U300
 	bool "U300 pin controller driver"
 	depends on ARCH_U300
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
index 712184b..c188e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LANTIQ)	+= pinctrl-lantiq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPC18XX)	+= pinctrl-lpc18xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_TB10X)	+= pinctrl-tb10x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ST) 	+= pinctrl-st.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_STMFX) 	+= pinctrl-stmfx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ZYNQ)	+= pinctrl-zynq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_INGENIC)	+= pinctrl-ingenic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_RK805)	+= pinctrl-rk805.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc1bb0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,820 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
+
+#include "core.h"
+#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
+
+/* GPIOs expander */
+/* GPIO_STATE1 0x10, GPIO_STATE2 0x11, GPIO_STATE3 0x12 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE		STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 /* R */
+/* GPIO_DIR1 0x60, GPIO_DIR2 0x61, GPIO_DIR3 0x63 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR		STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_TYPE1 0x64, GPIO_TYPE2 0x65, GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE		STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_PUPD1 0x68, GPIO_PUPD2 0x69, GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD		STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_SET1 0x6C, GPO_SET2 0x6D, GPO_SET3 0x6E */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET		STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_CLR1 0x70, GPO_CLR2 0x71, GPO_CLR3 0x72 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR		STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48, IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49, IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C, IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D, IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50, IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51, IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C, IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D, IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E*/
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING	STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 /* R */
+/* IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54, IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55, IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 /* RW */
+
+#define NR_GPIO_REGS			3
+#define NR_GPIOS_PER_REG		8
+#define get_reg(offset)			((offset) / NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_shift(offset)		((offset) % NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_mask(offset)		(BIT(get_shift(offset)))
+
+/*
+ * STMFX pinctrl can have up to 24 pins if STMFX other functions are not used.
+ * Pins availability is managed thanks to gpio-ranges property.
+ */
+static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stmfx_pins[] = {
+	PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(16, "agpio0"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(17, "agpio1"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(18, "agpio2"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(19, "agpio3"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(20, "agpio4"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(21, "agpio5"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(22, "agpio6"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(23, "agpio7"),
+};
+
+struct stmfx_pinctrl {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct stmfx *stmfx;
+	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
+	struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc;
+	struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
+	struct irq_chip irq_chip;
+	struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+	unsigned long gpio_valid_mask;
+	/* Cache of IRQ_GPI_* registers for bus_lock */
+	u8 irq_gpi_src[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_gpi_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_gpi_evt[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_toggle_edge[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+	/* Backup of GPIO_* registers for suspend/resume */
+	u8 bkp_gpio_state[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_dir[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_pupd[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#endif
+};
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	u32 value;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &value);
+
+	return ret ? ret : !!(value & mask);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = value ? STMFX_REG_GPO_SET : STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR;
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg + get_reg(offset),
+			  mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &val);
+	/*
+	 * On stmfx, gpio pins direction is (0)input, (1)output.
+	 * .get_direction returns 0=out, 1=in
+	 */
+
+	return ret ? ret : !(val & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+				       unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	stmfx_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 pupd, mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &pupd);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return !!(pupd & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset, u32 pupd)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, pupd ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 type, mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &type);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return !!(type & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset, u32 type)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, type ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+			     unsigned int pin, unsigned long *config)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	u32 param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	u32 dir, type, pupd;
+	u32 arg = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+	if (!range)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return dir;
+	type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, pin);
+	if (type < 0)
+		return type;
+	pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, pin);
+	if (pupd < 0)
+		return pupd;
+
+	switch (param) {
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+		if ((!dir && (!type || !pupd)) || (dir && !type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+		if (dir && type && !pupd)
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+		if (type && pupd)
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+		if ((!dir && type) || (dir && !type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+		if ((!dir && !type) || (dir && type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+		if (dir)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+
+		arg = ret;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	*config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
+			     unsigned long *configs, unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	enum pin_config_param param;
+	u32 arg;
+	int dir, i, ret;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+	if (!range) {
+		dev_err(pctldev->dev, "pin %d is not available\n", pin);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return dir;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+		param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+		arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+
+		switch (param) {
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+			ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 0);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+			ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 1);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+			if (!dir)
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+			else
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+			if (!dir)
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+			else
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+			ret = stmfx_gpio_direction_output(&pctl->gpio_chip,
+							  pin, arg);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		default:
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+				   struct seq_file *s, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	int dir, type, pupd, val;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, offset);
+	if (!range)
+		return;
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return;
+	type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, offset);
+	if (type < 0)
+		return;
+	pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, offset);
+	if (pupd < 0)
+		return;
+	val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (val < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (!dir) {
+		seq_printf(s, "output %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+		if (type)
+			seq_printf(s, "open drain %s internal pull-up ",
+				   pupd ? "with" : "without");
+		else
+			seq_puts(s, "push pull no pull ");
+	} else {
+		seq_printf(s, "input %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+		if (type)
+			seq_printf(s, "with internal pull-%s ",
+				   pupd ? "up" : "down");
+		else
+			seq_printf(s, "%s ", pupd ? "floating" : "analog");
+	}
+}
+
+static const struct pinconf_ops stmfx_pinconf_ops = {
+	.pin_config_get		= stmfx_pinconf_get,
+	.pin_config_set		= stmfx_pinconf_set,
+	.pin_config_dbg_show	= stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const char *stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+						unsigned int selector)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+					unsigned int selector,
+					const unsigned int **pins,
+					unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops stmfx_pinctrl_ops = {
+	.get_groups_count = stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+	.get_group_name = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+	.get_group_pins = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+	.dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+	.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] &= ~mask;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] |= mask;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] |= mask;
+		irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
+	} else {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] &= ~mask;
+		irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
+	}
+
+	if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) || (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+	else
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+
+	/*
+	 * In case of (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), we need to know current
+	 * GPIO value to set the right edge trigger. But in atomic context
+	 * here we can't access registers over I2C. That's why (type &
+	 * IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) will be managed in .irq_sync_unlock.
+	 */
+
+	if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
+		pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] |= mask;
+	else
+		pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] &= mask;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+
+	mutex_lock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	/*
+	 * In case of IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), read the current GPIO value
+	 * (this couldn't be done in .irq_set_type because of atomic context)
+	 * to set the right irq trigger type.
+	 */
+	if (pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask) {
+		if (stmfx_gpio_get(gpio_chip, data->hwirq))
+			pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+		else
+			pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+	}
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+					     unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int val;
+
+	if (!(pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask))
+		return;
+
+	val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (val < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (val) {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= mask;
+		regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+				  STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+				  mask, 0);
+
+	} else {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+		regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+				  STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+				  mask, mask);
+	}
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = (struct stmfx_pinctrl *)dev_id;
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = &pctl->gpio_chip;
+	u8 pending[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 src[NR_GPIO_REGS] = {0, 0, 0};
+	unsigned long n, status;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING,
+			       &pending, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	status = *(unsigned long *)pending;
+	for_each_set_bit(n, &status, gc->ngpio) {
+		handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, n));
+		stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(pctl, n);
+	}
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range;
+	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev = pctl->pctl_dev;
+	u32 func = STMFX_FUNC_GPIO;
+
+	pctl->gpio_valid_mask = GENMASK(15, 0);
+
+	gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 16);
+	if (gpio_range) {
+		func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW;
+		pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(19, 16);
+	}
+
+	gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 20);
+	if (gpio_range) {
+		func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH;
+		pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(23, 20);
+	}
+
+	return stmfx_function_enable(pctl->stmfx, func);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl;
+	u32 n;
+	int irq, ret;
+
+	pctl = devm_kzalloc(stmfx->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pctl)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
+
+	pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
+
+	if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (irq <= 0) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+
+	mutex_init(&pctl->lock);
+
+	/* Register pin controller */
+	pctl->pctl_desc.name = "stmfx-pinctrl";
+	pctl->pctl_desc.pctlops = &stmfx_pinctrl_ops;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.confops = &stmfx_pinconf_ops;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.pins = stmfx_pins;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pins);
+	pctl->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+	ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(pctl->dev, &pctl->pctl_desc,
+					     pctl, &pctl->pctl_dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl registration failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl->pctl_dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl enable failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* Register gpio controller */
+	pctl->gpio_chip.label = "stmfx-gpio";
+	pctl->gpio_chip.parent = pctl->dev;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.get_direction = stmfx_gpio_get_direction;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.direction_input = stmfx_gpio_direction_input;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.direction_output = stmfx_gpio_direction_output;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.get = stmfx_gpio_get;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.set = stmfx_gpio_set;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.set_config = gpiochip_generic_config;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
+
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "gpio_chip registration failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(pctl);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	pctl->irq_chip.name = dev_name(pctl->dev);
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_mask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_unmask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_set_type = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_lock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
+	for_each_clear_bit(n, &pctl->gpio_valid_mask, pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio)
+		clear_bit(n, pctl->gpio_chip.valid_mask);
+
+	ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip,
+					  0, handle_bad_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot add irqchip to gpiochip\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pctl->dev, irq, NULL,
+					stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn,
+					IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					pctl->irq_chip.name, pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot request irq%d\n", irq);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip, irq);
+
+	dev_info(pctl->dev,
+		 "%ld GPIOs available\n", hweight_long(pctl->gpio_valid_mask));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+	return stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
+				      STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
+				      STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
+				      STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPO_SET,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers backup failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers restoration failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+			 stmfx_pinctrl_suspend, stmfx_pinctrl_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl", },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_pinctrl_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver stmfx_pinctrl_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+		.of_match_table = stmfx_pinctrl_of_match,
+		.pm = &stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = stmfx_pinctrl_probe,
+	.remove = stmfx_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(stmfx_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX pinctrl/GPIO driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig         |  12 +
 drivers/pinctrl/Makefile        |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c | 820 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 833 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
index 2764d71..ab2eab7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
@@ -265,6 +265,18 @@ config PINCTRL_ST
 	select PINCONF
 	select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
 
+config PINCTRL_STMFX
+	tristate "STMicroelectronics STMFX GPIO expander pinctrl driver"
+	select GENERIC_PINCONF
+	select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
+	select MFD_STMFX
+	help
+	  Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX)
+	  GPIO expander.
+	  This provides a GPIO interface supporting inputs and outputs,
+	  and configuring push-pull, open-drain, and can also be used as
+	  interrupt-controller.
+
 config PINCTRL_U300
 	bool "U300 pin controller driver"
 	depends on ARCH_U300
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
index 712184b..c188e0f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Makefile
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LANTIQ)	+= pinctrl-lantiq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_LPC18XX)	+= pinctrl-lpc18xx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_TB10X)	+= pinctrl-tb10x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ST) 	+= pinctrl-st.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_STMFX) 	+= pinctrl-stmfx.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_ZYNQ)	+= pinctrl-zynq.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_INGENIC)	+= pinctrl-ingenic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PINCTRL_RK805)	+= pinctrl-rk805.o
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc1bb0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
@@ -0,0 +1,820 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Driver for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2019 STMicroelectronics
+ * Author(s): Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>.
+ */
+#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/stmfx.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinconf.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/pinmux.h>
+
+#include "core.h"
+#include "pinctrl-utils.h"
+
+/* GPIOs expander */
+/* GPIO_STATE1 0x10, GPIO_STATE2 0x11, GPIO_STATE3 0x12 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE		STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1 /* R */
+/* GPIO_DIR1 0x60, GPIO_DIR2 0x61, GPIO_DIR3 0x63 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR		STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_TYPE1 0x64, GPIO_TYPE2 0x65, GPIO_TYPE3 0x66 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE		STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* GPIO_PUPD1 0x68, GPIO_PUPD2 0x69, GPIO_PUPD3 0x6A */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD		STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_SET1 0x6C, GPO_SET2 0x6D, GPO_SET3 0x6E */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_SET		STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1 /* RW */
+/* GPO_CLR1 0x70, GPO_CLR2 0x71, GPO_CLR3 0x72 */
+#define STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR		STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_SRC1 0x48, IRQ_GPI_SRC2 0x49, IRQ_GPI_SRC3 0x4A */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_EVT1 0x4C, IRQ_GPI_EVT2 0x4D, IRQ_GPI_EVT3 0x4E */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 0x50, IRQ_GPI_TYPE2 0x51, IRQ_GPI_TYPE3 0x52 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE1 /* RW */
+/* IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 0x0C, IRQ_GPI_PENDING2 0x0D, IRQ_GPI_PENDING3 0x0E*/
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING	STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1 /* R */
+/* IRQ_GPI_ACK1 0x54, IRQ_GPI_ACK2 0x55, IRQ_GPI_ACK3 0x56 */
+#define STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK		STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_ACK1 /* RW */
+
+#define NR_GPIO_REGS			3
+#define NR_GPIOS_PER_REG		8
+#define get_reg(offset)			((offset) / NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_shift(offset)		((offset) % NR_GPIOS_PER_REG)
+#define get_mask(offset)		(BIT(get_shift(offset)))
+
+/*
+ * STMFX pinctrl can have up to 24 pins if STMFX other functions are not used.
+ * Pins availability is managed thanks to gpio-ranges property.
+ */
+static const struct pinctrl_pin_desc stmfx_pins[] = {
+	PINCTRL_PIN(0, "gpio0"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(1, "gpio1"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(2, "gpio2"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(3, "gpio3"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(4, "gpio4"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(5, "gpio5"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(6, "gpio6"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(7, "gpio7"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(8, "gpio8"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(9, "gpio9"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(10, "gpio10"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(11, "gpio11"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(12, "gpio12"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(13, "gpio13"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(14, "gpio14"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(15, "gpio15"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(16, "agpio0"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(17, "agpio1"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(18, "agpio2"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(19, "agpio3"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(20, "agpio4"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(21, "agpio5"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(22, "agpio6"),
+	PINCTRL_PIN(23, "agpio7"),
+};
+
+struct stmfx_pinctrl {
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct stmfx *stmfx;
+	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev;
+	struct pinctrl_desc pctl_desc;
+	struct gpio_chip gpio_chip;
+	struct irq_chip irq_chip;
+	struct mutex lock; /* IRQ bus lock */
+	unsigned long gpio_valid_mask;
+	/* Cache of IRQ_GPI_* registers for bus_lock */
+	u8 irq_gpi_src[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_gpi_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_gpi_evt[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 irq_toggle_edge[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+	/* Backup of GPIO_* registers for suspend/resume */
+	u8 bkp_gpio_state[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_dir[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_type[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 bkp_gpio_pupd[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+#endif
+};
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	u32 value;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &value);
+
+	return ret ? ret : !!(value & mask);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = value ? STMFX_REG_GPO_SET : STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR;
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg + get_reg(offset),
+			  mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &val);
+	/*
+	 * On stmfx, gpio pins direction is (0)input, (1)output.
+	 * .get_direction returns 0=out, 1=in
+	 */
+
+	return ret ? ret : !(val & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gc,
+				       unsigned int offset, int value)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	stmfx_gpio_set(gc, offset, value);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 pupd, mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &pupd);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return !!(pupd & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset, u32 pupd)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, pupd ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 type, mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_read(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, &type);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return !!(type & mask);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set_type(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+				  unsigned int offset, u32 type)
+{
+	u32 reg = STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE + get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+
+	return regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map, reg, mask, type ? mask : 0);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+			     unsigned int pin, unsigned long *config)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	u32 param = pinconf_to_config_param(*config);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	u32 dir, type, pupd;
+	u32 arg = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+	if (!range)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return dir;
+	type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, pin);
+	if (type < 0)
+		return type;
+	pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, pin);
+	if (pupd < 0)
+		return pupd;
+
+	switch (param) {
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+		if ((!dir && (!type || !pupd)) || (dir && !type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+		if (dir && type && !pupd)
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+		if (type && pupd)
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+		if ((!dir && type) || (dir && !type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+		if ((!dir && !type) || (dir && type))
+			arg = 1;
+		break;
+	case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+		if (dir)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+
+		arg = ret;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	*config = pinconf_to_config_packed(param, arg);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
+			     unsigned long *configs, unsigned int num_configs)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	enum pin_config_param param;
+	u32 arg;
+	int dir, i, ret;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, pin);
+	if (!range) {
+		dev_err(pctldev->dev, "pin %d is not available\n", pin);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, pin);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return dir;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_configs; i++) {
+		param = pinconf_to_config_param(configs[i]);
+		arg = pinconf_to_config_argument(configs[i]);
+
+		switch (param) {
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT:
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE:
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
+			ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 0);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
+			ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_pupd(pctl, pin, 1);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN:
+			if (!dir)
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+			else
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL:
+			if (!dir)
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 0);
+			else
+				ret = stmfx_pinconf_set_type(pctl, pin, 1);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT:
+			ret = stmfx_gpio_direction_output(&pctl->gpio_chip,
+							  pin, arg);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
+			break;
+		default:
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+				   struct seq_file *s, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range;
+	int dir, type, pupd, val;
+
+	range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin_nolock(pctldev, offset);
+	if (!range)
+		return;
+
+	dir = stmfx_gpio_get_direction(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (dir < 0)
+		return;
+	type = stmfx_pinconf_get_type(pctl, offset);
+	if (type < 0)
+		return;
+	pupd = stmfx_pinconf_get_pupd(pctl, offset);
+	if (pupd < 0)
+		return;
+	val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (val < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (!dir) {
+		seq_printf(s, "output %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+		if (type)
+			seq_printf(s, "open drain %s internal pull-up ",
+				   pupd ? "with" : "without");
+		else
+			seq_puts(s, "push pull no pull ");
+	} else {
+		seq_printf(s, "input %s ", val ? "high" : "low");
+		if (type)
+			seq_printf(s, "with internal pull-%s ",
+				   pupd ? "up" : "down");
+		else
+			seq_printf(s, "%s ", pupd ? "floating" : "analog");
+	}
+}
+
+static const struct pinconf_ops stmfx_pinconf_ops = {
+	.pin_config_get		= stmfx_pinconf_get,
+	.pin_config_set		= stmfx_pinconf_set,
+	.pin_config_dbg_show	= stmfx_pinconf_dbg_show,
+};
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const char *stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+						unsigned int selector)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
+					unsigned int selector,
+					const unsigned int **pins,
+					unsigned int *num_pins)
+{
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static const struct pinctrl_ops stmfx_pinctrl_ops = {
+	.get_groups_count = stmfx_pinctrl_get_groups_count,
+	.get_group_name = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_name,
+	.get_group_pins = stmfx_pinctrl_get_group_pins,
+	.dt_node_to_map = pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin,
+	.dt_free_map = pinctrl_utils_free_map,
+};
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] &= ~mask;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	pctl->irq_gpi_src[reg] |= mask;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int type)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_NONE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] |= mask;
+		irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_edge_irq);
+	} else {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_evt[reg] &= ~mask;
+		irq_set_handler_locked(data, handle_level_irq);
+	}
+
+	if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) || (type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+	else
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+
+	/*
+	 * In case of (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), we need to know current
+	 * GPIO value to set the right edge trigger. But in atomic context
+	 * here we can't access registers over I2C. That's why (type &
+	 * IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) will be managed in .irq_sync_unlock.
+	 */
+
+	if ((type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH) == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
+		pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] |= mask;
+	else
+		pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] &= mask;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+
+	mutex_lock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+	struct gpio_chip *gpio_chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = gpiochip_get_data(gpio_chip);
+	u32 reg = get_reg(data->hwirq);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(data->hwirq);
+
+	/*
+	 * In case of IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH), read the current GPIO value
+	 * (this couldn't be done in .irq_set_type because of atomic context)
+	 * to set the right irq trigger type.
+	 */
+	if (pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask) {
+		if (stmfx_gpio_get(gpio_chip, data->hwirq))
+			pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= ~mask;
+		else
+			pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+	}
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&pctl->lock);
+}
+
+static void stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl,
+					     unsigned int offset)
+{
+	u32 reg = get_reg(offset);
+	u32 mask = get_mask(offset);
+	int val;
+
+	if (!(pctl->irq_toggle_edge[reg] & mask))
+		return;
+
+	val = stmfx_gpio_get(&pctl->gpio_chip, offset);
+	if (val < 0)
+		return;
+
+	if (val) {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] &= mask;
+		regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+				  STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+				  mask, 0);
+
+	} else {
+		pctl->irq_gpi_type[reg] |= mask;
+		regmap_write_bits(pctl->stmfx->map,
+				  STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE + reg,
+				  mask, mask);
+	}
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = (struct stmfx_pinctrl *)dev_id;
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = &pctl->gpio_chip;
+	u8 pending[NR_GPIO_REGS];
+	u8 src[NR_GPIO_REGS] = {0, 0, 0};
+	unsigned long n, status;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING,
+			       &pending, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	status = *(unsigned long *)pending;
+	for_each_set_bit(n, &status, gc->ngpio) {
+		handle_nested_irq(irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, n));
+		stmfx_pinctrl_irq_toggle_trigger(pctl, n);
+	}
+
+	regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+			  pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	struct pinctrl_gpio_range *gpio_range;
+	struct pinctrl_dev *pctl_dev = pctl->pctl_dev;
+	u32 func = STMFX_FUNC_GPIO;
+
+	pctl->gpio_valid_mask = GENMASK(15, 0);
+
+	gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 16);
+	if (gpio_range) {
+		func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW;
+		pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(19, 16);
+	}
+
+	gpio_range = pinctrl_find_gpio_range_from_pin(pctl_dev, 20);
+	if (gpio_range) {
+		func |= STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH;
+		pctl->gpio_valid_mask |= GENMASK(23, 20);
+	}
+
+	return stmfx_function_enable(pctl->stmfx, func);
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl;
+	u32 n;
+	int irq, ret;
+
+	pctl = devm_kzalloc(stmfx->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pctl)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
+
+	pctl->dev = &pdev->dev;
+	pctl->stmfx = stmfx;
+
+	if (!of_find_property(np, "gpio-ranges", NULL)) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "missing required gpio-ranges property\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (irq <= 0) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+
+	mutex_init(&pctl->lock);
+
+	/* Register pin controller */
+	pctl->pctl_desc.name = "stmfx-pinctrl";
+	pctl->pctl_desc.pctlops = &stmfx_pinctrl_ops;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.confops = &stmfx_pinconf_ops;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.pins = stmfx_pins;
+	pctl->pctl_desc.npins = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pins);
+	pctl->pctl_desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+
+	ret = devm_pinctrl_register_and_init(pctl->dev, &pctl->pctl_desc,
+					     pctl, &pctl->pctl_dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl registration failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = pinctrl_enable(pctl->pctl_dev);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "pinctrl enable failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* Register gpio controller */
+	pctl->gpio_chip.label = "stmfx-gpio";
+	pctl->gpio_chip.parent = pctl->dev;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.get_direction = stmfx_gpio_get_direction;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.direction_input = stmfx_gpio_direction_input;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.direction_output = stmfx_gpio_direction_output;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.get = stmfx_gpio_get;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.set = stmfx_gpio_set;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.set_config = gpiochip_generic_config;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.base = -1;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio = pctl->pctl_desc.npins;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.can_sleep = true;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.of_node = np;
+	pctl->gpio_chip.need_valid_mask = true;
+
+	ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(pctl->dev, &pctl->gpio_chip, pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "gpio_chip registration failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_gpio_function_enable(pctl);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	pctl->irq_chip.name = dev_name(pctl->dev);
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_mask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_mask;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_unmask = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_unmask;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_set_type = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_set_type;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_lock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_lock;
+	pctl->irq_chip.irq_bus_sync_unlock = stmfx_pinctrl_irq_bus_sync_unlock;
+	for_each_clear_bit(n, &pctl->gpio_valid_mask, pctl->gpio_chip.ngpio)
+		clear_bit(n, pctl->gpio_chip.valid_mask);
+
+	ret = gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip,
+					  0, handle_bad_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot add irqchip to gpiochip\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(pctl->dev, irq, NULL,
+					stmfx_pinctrl_irq_thread_fn,
+					IRQF_ONESHOT,
+					pctl->irq_chip.name, pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "cannot request irq%d\n", irq);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&pctl->gpio_chip, &pctl->irq_chip, irq);
+
+	dev_info(pctl->dev,
+		 "%ld GPIOs available\n", hweight_long(pctl->gpio_valid_mask));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+	return stmfx_function_disable(stmfx,
+				      STMFX_FUNC_GPIO |
+				      STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_LOW |
+				      STMFX_FUNC_ALTGPIO_HIGH);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_read(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+			       &pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_DIR,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_dir, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_TYPE,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPIO_PUPD,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_pupd, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_GPO_SET,
+				pctl->bkp_gpio_state, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_EVT,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_evt, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_TYPE,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_type, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ret = regmap_bulk_write(pctl->stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC,
+				pctl->irq_gpi_src, NR_GPIO_REGS);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_backup_regs(pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers backup failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stmfx_pinctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct stmfx_pinctrl *pctl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = stmfx_pinctrl_restore_regs(pctl);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(pctl->dev, "registers restoration failure\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+			 stmfx_pinctrl_suspend, stmfx_pinctrl_resume);
+
+static const struct of_device_id stmfx_pinctrl_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl", },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_pinctrl_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver stmfx_pinctrl_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
+		.of_match_table = stmfx_pinctrl_of_match,
+		.pm = &stmfx_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops,
+	},
+	.probe = stmfx_pinctrl_probe,
+	.remove = stmfx_pinctrl_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(stmfx_pinctrl_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX pinctrl/GPIO driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32746g-eval. It is connected on i2c1.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 8c081ea..203faf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 #include "stm32f746.dtsi"
 #include "stm32f746-pinctrl.dtsi"
 #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
 
 / {
 	model = "STMicroelectronics STM32746g-EVAL board";
@@ -114,6 +115,22 @@
 	i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
 	i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
 	status = "okay";
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &rtc {
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32746g-eval. It is connected on i2c1.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 8c081ea..203faf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 #include "stm32f746.dtsi"
 #include "stm32f746-pinctrl.dtsi"
 #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
 
 / {
 	model = "STMicroelectronics STM32746g-EVAL board";
@@ -114,6 +115,22 @@
 	i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
 	i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
 	status = "okay";
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &rtc {
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32746g-eval. It is connected on i2c1.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 8c081ea..203faf0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 #include "stm32f746.dtsi"
 #include "stm32f746-pinctrl.dtsi"
 #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
 
 / {
 	model = "STMicroelectronics STM32746g-EVAL board";
@@ -114,6 +115,22 @@
 	i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
 	i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
 	status = "okay";
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &rtc {
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 6/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

The joystick (B3) on stm32746g-eval uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-up),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 203faf0..b86ad83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -86,6 +86,43 @@
 		};
 	};
 
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+	};
+
 	usbotg_hs_phy: usb-phy {
 		#phy-cells = <0>;
 		compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
@@ -129,6 +166,12 @@
 			interrupt-controller;
 			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-up;
+			};
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 6/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

The joystick (B3) on stm32746g-eval uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-up),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 203faf0..b86ad83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -86,6 +86,43 @@
 		};
 	};
 
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+	};
+
 	usbotg_hs_phy: usb-phy {
 		#phy-cells = <0>;
 		compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
@@ -129,6 +166,12 @@
 			interrupt-controller;
 			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-up;
+			};
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 6/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

The joystick (B3) on stm32746g-eval uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-up),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index 203faf0..b86ad83 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -86,6 +86,43 @@
 		};
 	};
 
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
+		};
+	};
+
 	usbotg_hs_phy: usb-phy {
 		#phy-cells = <0>;
 		compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
@@ -129,6 +166,12 @@
 			interrupt-controller;
 			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-up;
+			};
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

Orange (LD2) and blue (LD4) leds on stm32746g-eval are connected on
STMFX gpio expander, offset 17 and 19.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index b86ad83..a5fa73f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
 			gpios = <&gpiof 10 1>;
 			linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
 		};
+		orange {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+		};
 		red {
 			gpios = <&gpiob 7 1>;
 		};
+		blue {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+		};
 	};
 
 	gpio_keys {
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

Orange (LD2) and blue (LD4) leds on stm32746g-eval are connected on
STMFX gpio expander, offset 17 and 19.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index b86ad83..a5fa73f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
 			gpios = <&gpiof 10 1>;
 			linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
 		};
+		orange {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+		};
 		red {
 			gpios = <&gpiob 7 1>;
 		};
+		blue {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+		};
 	};
 
 	gpio_keys {
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

Orange (LD2) and blue (LD4) leds on stm32746g-eval are connected on
STMFX gpio expander, offset 17 and 19.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
index b86ad83..a5fa73f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts
@@ -69,9 +69,15 @@
 			gpios = <&gpiof 10 1>;
 			linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
 		};
+		orange {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 17 1>;
+		};
 		red {
 			gpios = <&gpiob 7 1>;
 		};
+		blue {
+			gpios = <&stmfx_pinctrl 19 1>;
+		};
 	};
 
 	gpio_keys {
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 8/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32mp157c-ev1. It is connected on i2c2.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 063ee8a..3a6f033 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -99,6 +99,22 @@
 	i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
 	i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
 	status = "okay";
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c5 {
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 8/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32mp157c-ev1. It is connected on i2c2.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 063ee8a..3a6f033 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -99,6 +99,22 @@
 	i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
 	i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
 	status = "okay";
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c5 {
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 8/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

This patch adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
(STMFX) on stm32mp157c-ev1. It is connected on i2c2.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 063ee8a..3a6f033 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -99,6 +99,22 @@
 	i2c-scl-rising-time-ns = <185>;
 	i2c-scl-falling-time-ns = <20>;
 	status = "okay";
+
+	stmfx: stmfx@42 {
+		compatible = "st,stmfx-0300";
+		reg = <0x42>;
+		interrupts = <8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		interrupt-parent = <&gpioi>;
+
+		stmfx_pinctrl: stmfx-pin-controller {
+			compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl";
+			gpio-controller;
+			#gpio-cells = <2>;
+			interrupt-controller;
+			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
+			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+		};
+	};
 };
 
 &i2c5 {
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 9/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

The joystick (B1) on stm32mp157c-ev1 uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-down),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 3a6f033..6d6b692 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 
 #include "stm32mp157c-ed1.dts"
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
 
 / {
 	model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter on eval mother";
@@ -21,6 +22,43 @@
 		ethernet0 = &ethernet0;
 	};
 
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+	};
+
 	panel_backlight: panel-backlight {
 		compatible = "gpio-backlight";
 		gpios = <&gpiod 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
@@ -113,6 +151,12 @@
 			interrupt-controller;
 			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-down;
+			};
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.7.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 9/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

The joystick (B1) on stm32mp157c-ev1 uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-down),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 3a6f033..6d6b692 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 
 #include "stm32mp157c-ed1.dts"
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
 
 / {
 	model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter on eval mother";
@@ -21,6 +22,43 @@
 		ethernet0 = &ethernet0;
 	};
 
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+	};
+
 	panel_backlight: panel-backlight {
 		compatible = "gpio-backlight";
 		gpios = <&gpiod 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
@@ -113,6 +151,12 @@
 			interrupt-controller;
 			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-down;
+			};
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v4 9/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
@ 2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie Delaunay @ 2019-02-27  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre Torgue, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, linux-kernel, linux-gpio,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

The joystick (B1) on stm32mp157c-ev1 uses gpios on STMFX gpio expander.
These gpios need a pin configuration (push-pull and bias-pull-down),
described under stmfx_pinctrl node.

Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
index 3a6f033..6d6b692 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 
 #include "stm32mp157c-ed1.dts"
 #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
 
 / {
 	model = "STMicroelectronics STM32MP157C eval daughter on eval mother";
@@ -21,6 +22,43 @@
 		ethernet0 = &ethernet0;
 	};
 
+	joystick {
+		compatible = "gpio-keys";
+		#size-cells = <0>;
+		pinctrl-0 = <&joystick_pins>;
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		button-0 {
+			label = "JoySel";
+			linux,code = <KEY_ENTER>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-1 {
+			label = "JoyDown";
+			linux,code = <KEY_DOWN>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-2 {
+			label = "JoyLeft";
+			linux,code = <KEY_LEFT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-3 {
+			label = "JoyRight";
+			linux,code = <KEY_RIGHT>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+		button-4 {
+			label = "JoyUp";
+			linux,code = <KEY_UP>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&stmfx_pinctrl>;
+			interrupts = <4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+		};
+	};
+
 	panel_backlight: panel-backlight {
 		compatible = "gpio-backlight";
 		gpios = <&gpiod 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
@@ -113,6 +151,12 @@
 			interrupt-controller;
 			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
 			gpio-ranges = <&stmfx_pinctrl 0 0 24>;
+
+			joystick_pins: joystick {
+				pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2", "gpio3", "gpio4";
+				drive-push-pull;
+				bias-pull-down;
+			};
 		};
 	};
 };
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
  2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27 13:55     ` Linus Walleij
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2019-02-27 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay
  Cc: Mark Rutland,
	open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,
	Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones, linux-stm32, Linux ARM

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:

> This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
> Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
> STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
> The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I assume Lee will merge the whole patch set through the MFD
tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27 13:55     ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2019-02-27 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay
  Cc: Lee Jones, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
	Maxime Coquelin, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM, linux-kernel,
	open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,
	Linux ARM, linux-stm32

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:

> This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
> Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
> STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
> The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I assume Lee will merge the whole patch set through the MFD
tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
@ 2019-02-27 13:55     ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2019-02-27 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay
  Cc: Mark Rutland,
	open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,
	Alexandre Torgue, linux-kernel, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM,
	Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones, linux-stm32, Linux ARM

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:35 AM Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:

> This patch adds pinctrl/GPIO driver for STMicroelectronics
> Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) GPIO expander.
> STMFX is an I2C slave controller, offering up to 24 GPIOs.
> The driver relies on generic pin config interface to configure the GPIOs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

I assume Lee will merge the whole patch set through the MFD
tree.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-02-27 23:55     ` Rob Herring
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-27 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27 23:55     ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-27 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32, Amelie Delaunay

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-27 23:55     ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-27 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Amelie Delaunay, Alexandre Torgue,
	Linus Walleij, linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin,
	Lee Jones, linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> 

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
@ 2019-02-28  8:51   ` Alexandre Torgue
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Torgue @ 2019-02-28  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay, Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring,
	Mark Rutland, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-stm32, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree

Hi Amélie

On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> 
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
> 
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
> 
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
>    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
>    in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> 
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
>    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
>    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
>    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
>    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> 

DT patches looks good. I'll take them in STM32 soc tree as soon as Lee 
takes driver part.

Regards
Alex


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-02-28  8:51   ` Alexandre Torgue
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Torgue @ 2019-02-28  8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay, Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring,
	Mark Rutland, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

Hi Amélie

On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> 
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
> 
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
> 
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
>    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
>    in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> 
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
>    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
>    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
>    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
>    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> 

DT patches looks good. I'll take them in STM32 soc tree as soon as Lee 
takes driver part.

Regards
Alex


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  2019-02-27 23:55     ` Rob Herring
  (?)
@ 2019-02-28  8:53       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is 
identical to v3.

I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side 
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change 
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.

Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28  8:53       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is 
identical to v3.

I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side 
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change 
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.

Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28  8:53       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> 

I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is 
identical to v3.

I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side 
effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change 
between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.

Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  2019-02-28  8:53       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  (?)
@ 2019-02-28 14:41         ` Rob Herring
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-28 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie DELAUNAY
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:41         ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-28 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie DELAUNAY
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:41         ` Rob Herring
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2019-02-28 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie DELAUNAY
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> >> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
> >> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> >> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >>
> >
> > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> >
> > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
> >
>
> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
> identical to v3.
>
> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>
> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?

No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.

Rob

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
  2019-02-28 14:41         ` Rob Herring
  (?)
@ 2019-02-28 14:59           ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
> 
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
> 
> Rob
> 

Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.

Regards,
Amelie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:59           ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
> 
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
> 
> Rob
> 

Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.

Regards,
Amelie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
@ 2019-02-28 14:59           ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-02-28 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Maxime Coquelin, Lee Jones,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On 2/28/19 3:41 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:54 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/28/19 12:55 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 10:34:46 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
>>>> This patch adds documentation of device tree bindings for the
>>>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) MFD core.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
>>> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
>>> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>
>>
>> I'm sorry Rob, I forgot to add your Reviewed-by on this patch, which is
>> identical to v3.
>>
>> I reposted the whole series, due to changes in MFD driver with side
>> effect in pinctrl driver, but bindings (MFD and pinctrl) didn't change
>> between the two versions. I stated the changes in cover letter.
>>
>> Should I have removed the bindings patches from the series ?
> 
> No, as the series should be applied together. You just need to add the
> Reviewed-by so I can ignore it.
> 
> Rob
> 

Noted. I will ensure not to forget any tag next time.

Regards,
Amelie
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
  2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
  (?)
@ 2019-03-29  8:48   ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-03-29  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre TORGUE, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

Hi,

A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be 
taken in STM32 soc tree).

Regards,
Amelie

On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> 
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
> 
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
> 
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
>    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
>    in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> 
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
>    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
>    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
>    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
>    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
>   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
>   drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
>   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
>   drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
>   11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
>   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-03-29  8:48   ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-03-29  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre TORGUE, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

Hi,

A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be 
taken in STM32 soc tree).

Regards,
Amelie

On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> 
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
> 
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
> 
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
>    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
>    in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> 
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
>    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
>    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
>    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
>    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
>   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
>   drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
>   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
>   drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
>   11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
>   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-03-29  8:48   ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-03-29  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland,
	Alexandre TORGUE, Maxime Coquelin
  Cc: linux-gpio, linux-stm32, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree

Hi,

A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be 
taken in STM32 soc tree).

Regards,
Amelie

On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> 
> STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> features:
> - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> - resistive touchscreen controller,
> - IDD measurement.
> 
> I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> registers STMFX features MFD children.
> 
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
>    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> - mfd: fix typos
> - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> Changes in v3:
> - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
>    in this function
> Changes in v2:
> - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> - improve regmap configuration
> - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> 
> Amelie Delaunay (9):
>    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
>    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
>    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
>    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
>    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
>   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
>   drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
>   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
>   drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
>   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
>   11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
>   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>   create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> 
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
  2019-03-29  8:48   ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  (?)
@ 2019-04-01 10:19     ` Lee Jones
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-01 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie DELAUNAY
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be 
> taken in STM32 soc tree).

I currently have over 100 reviews in my backlog.

Please be patient.  You are on the list.

> On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> > This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> > (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> > 
> > STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> > features:
> > - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> > - resistive touchscreen controller,
> > - IDD measurement.
> > 
> > I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> > registers STMFX features MFD children.
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> > - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> > - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> >    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> > - mfd: fix typos
> > - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> > - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> > - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > Changes in v3:
> > - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> > - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> >    in this function
> > Changes in v2:
> > - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> > - improve regmap configuration
> > - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> > 
> > Amelie Delaunay (9):
> >    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> >    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> >    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> >    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > 
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
> >   drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
> >   drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
> >   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
> >   drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
> >   drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
> >   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
> >   11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> >   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-04-01 10:19     ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-01 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie DELAUNAY
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be 
> taken in STM32 soc tree).

I currently have over 100 reviews in my backlog.

Please be patient.  You are on the list.

> On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> > This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> > (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> > 
> > STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> > features:
> > - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> > - resistive touchscreen controller,
> > - IDD measurement.
> > 
> > I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> > registers STMFX features MFD children.
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> > - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> > - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> >    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> > - mfd: fix typos
> > - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> > - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> > - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > Changes in v3:
> > - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> > - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> >    in this function
> > Changes in v2:
> > - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> > - improve regmap configuration
> > - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> > 
> > Amelie Delaunay (9):
> >    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> >    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> >    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> >    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > 
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
> >   drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
> >   drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
> >   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
> >   drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
> >   drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
> >   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
> >   11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> >   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander
@ 2019-04-01 10:19     ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-01 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie DELAUNAY
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> A gentle ping on this series (mfd + pinctrl patches, DT patches will be 
> taken in STM32 soc tree).

I currently have over 100 reviews in my backlog.

Please be patient.  You are on the list.

> On 2/27/19 10:34 AM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> > This series adds support for STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander
> > (STMFX), used on some STM32 discovery and evaluation boards.
> > 
> > STMFX is an STM32L152 slave controller whose firmware embeds the following
> > features:
> > - I/O expander (16 GPIOs + 8 extra if the other features are not enabled),
> > - resistive touchscreen controller,
> > - IDD measurement.
> > 
> > I2C stuff and chip initialization is based on an MFD parent driver, which
> > registers STMFX features MFD children.
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - mfd: move registers #define into the header
> > - mfd: merge stmfx and stmfx_ddata structures into one stmfx structure
> > - mfd: change stmfx_chip_init/exit and stmfx_irq_init/exit args: use
> >    i2c_client struct and i2c_get_clientdata
> > - mfd: fix typos
> > - mfd: add MFD cells for IDD and TS features
> > - pinctrl: rework registers #define
> > - dts: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > Changes in v3:
> > - fix MFD interrupt bindings
> > - fix drivers/mfd/stmfx.c:103:8: warning: 'mask' may be used uninitialized
> >    in this function
> > Changes in v2:
> > - move to MFD parent driver for i2c stuff and chip initialization
> > - improve regmap configuration
> > - take advantage of the use of gpio-ranges
> > 
> > Amelie Delaunay (9):
> >    dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings
> >    mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
> >    dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings
> >    pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds on stm32746g-eval
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> >    ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick support on stm32mp157c-ev1
> > 
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt    |  28 +
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt  | 116 +++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32746g-eval.dts               |  66 ++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts              |  60 ++
> >   drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  13 +
> >   drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   2 +-
> >   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c                                | 568 ++++++++++++++
> >   drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig                            |  12 +
> >   drivers/pinctrl/Makefile                           |   1 +
> >   drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c                    | 820 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h                          | 123 ++++
> >   11 files changed, 1808 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/stmfx.txt
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.txt
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
> >   create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-stmfx.c
> >   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> > 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
  2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
@ 2019-04-03 10:01     ` Lee Jones
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-03 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre Torgue,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:

> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
> STMFX functions are not used
> - Main MCU IDD measurement
> - Resistive touchscreen controller
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
>  drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.

Just a couple of nits below.

[...]

> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	u32 id;
> +	u8 version[2];
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				dev_err(&client->dev,
> +					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);

Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.

In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.

> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	} else {

	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
		stmfx->vdd = NULL;
	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
	}

	if (stmfx->vdd) {

> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +

[...]

> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
> +};

Please move everything from here --------------->

> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
> +	{
> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
> +		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
> +		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
> +		.name = "stmfx-idd",
> +		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
> +		.name = "stmfx-ts",
> +		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> +	switch (reg) {
> +	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
> +		return true;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> +	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits	= 8,
> +	.reg_stride	= 1,
> +	.val_bits	= 8,
> +	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
> +	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
> +	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
> +	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> +};

----------------------->

... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.

> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!stmfx)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
> +
> +	stmfx->dev = dev;
> +
> +	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> +			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (client->irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
> +		ret = client->irq;
> +		goto err_chip_exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_chip_exit;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
> +		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
> +		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
> +	}

Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.

...

Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()?  That
does exactly the same thing.  So you can get this back from the client
via i2c_get_clientdata().  No need to send it though platform data.

> +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
> +				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_irq_exit;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_irq_exit:
> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +err_chip_exit:
> +	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +
> +	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> +			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

'\n' here.

> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> +			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> +			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> +			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

'\n' here.

> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> +			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> +			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

'\n' here.

> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
> +			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);

Don't think you need a separate function for this.  Just move the
regmap_raw_write() commands here.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> +		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
> +				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);

As above.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "stmfx-core",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
> +		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
> +	},
> +	.probe = stmfx_probe,
> +	.remove = stmfx_remove,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

[...]

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-04-03 10:01     ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2019-04-03 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amelie Delaunay
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre Torgue, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:

> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
> STMFX functions are not used
> - Main MCU IDD measurement
> - Resistive touchscreen controller
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
>  drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
>  drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h

Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.

Just a couple of nits below.

[...]

> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +	u32 id;
> +	u8 version[2];
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				dev_err(&client->dev,
> +					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);

Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.

In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.

> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	} else {

	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
		stmfx->vdd = NULL;
	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
	}

	if (stmfx->vdd) {

> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +

[...]

> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
> +};

Please move everything from here --------------->

> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
> +	{
> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
> +		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
> +		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
> +		.name = "stmfx-idd",
> +		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
> +		.name = "stmfx-ts",
> +		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> +	switch (reg) {
> +	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
> +		return true;
> +	default:
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> +	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits	= 8,
> +	.reg_stride	= 1,
> +	.val_bits	= 8,
> +	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
> +	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
> +	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
> +	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
> +};

----------------------->

... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.

> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> +		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!stmfx)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
> +
> +	stmfx->dev = dev;
> +
> +	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> +			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (client->irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
> +		ret = client->irq;
> +		goto err_chip_exit;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_chip_exit;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
> +		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
> +		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
> +	}

Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.

...

Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()?  That
does exactly the same thing.  So you can get this back from the client
via i2c_get_clientdata().  No need to send it though platform data.

> +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
> +				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
> +				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_irq_exit;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err_irq_exit:
> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +err_chip_exit:
> +	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
> +
> +	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> +			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

'\n' here.

> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> +			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> +			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
> +			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

'\n' here.

> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
> +			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
> +			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

'\n' here.

> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
> +			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);

Don't think you need a separate function for this.  Just move the
regmap_raw_write() commands here.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> +		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
> +				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);

As above.

> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
> +	{},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name = "stmfx-core",
> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
> +		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
> +	},
> +	.probe = stmfx_probe,
> +	.remove = stmfx_remove,
> +};
> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

[...]

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
  2019-04-03 10:01     ` Lee Jones
  (?)
@ 2019-04-04 13:22       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-04-04 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On 4/3/19 12:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> 
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
>> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
>> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
>> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
>> STMFX functions are not used
>> - Main MCU IDD measurement
>> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
>>   drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
>>   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> 
> Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
> 
> Just a couple of nits below.
> 
> [...]
> 

Thanks for reviewing.

>> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	u32 id;
>> +	u8 version[2];
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
>> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +				dev_err(&client->dev,
>> +					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
> 
> Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
> 
> In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
> 

Ok, "Can't get VDD regulator" instead of "No VDD regulator found" is 
more accurate.

>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
> 
> 	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> 		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> 	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
> 		stmfx->vdd = NULL;
> 	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
> 		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
> 		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> 	}
> 
> 	if (stmfx->vdd) {
> 
>> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
>> +};
> 
> Please move everything from here --------------->
> 
>> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-idd",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-ts",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> +	switch (reg) {
>> +	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
>> +		return true;
>> +	default:
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> +	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
>> +	.reg_bits	= 8,
>> +	.reg_stride	= 1,
>> +	.val_bits	= 8,
>> +	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
>> +	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
>> +	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
>> +	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> +};
> 
> ----------------------->
> 
> ... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
> 

I'll move the regmap_config & mfx_cell declarations just below the includes.

>> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> +		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!stmfx)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
>> +
>> +	stmfx->dev = dev;
>> +
>> +	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
>> +			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (client->irq < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> +		ret = client->irq;
>> +		goto err_chip_exit;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_chip_exit;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
>> +		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
>> +		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
>> +	}
> 
> Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
> 
> ...
> 
> Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()?  That
> does exactly the same thing.  So you can get this back from the client
> via i2c_get_clientdata().  No need to send it though platform data.
> 

Yes, I agree. I'll remove this loop and use 
dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) in child drivers.

>> +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>> +				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
>> +				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_irq_exit;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_irq_exit:
>> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +err_chip_exit:
>> +	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +
>> +	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> +			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> +			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> +			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> +			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> +			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> +			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
>> +			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
> 
> Don't think you need a separate function for this.  Just move the
> regmap_raw_write() commands here.
> 

I used a separate function to have only one dev_err in case of 
backup/restore failure.

>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
>> +				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
> 
> As above.
> 
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.name = "stmfx-core",
>> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
>> +		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
>> +	},
>> +	.probe = stmfx_probe,
>> +	.remove = stmfx_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> 
> [...]
> 

I am prepare a v5. Is it OK for you if I keep the backup/restore 
separate functions ?

Regards,
Amelie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-04-04 13:22       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-04-04 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Mark Rutland, Alexandre TORGUE,
	Maxime Coquelin, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, devicetree,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-stm32

On 4/3/19 12:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> 
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
>> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
>> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
>> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
>> STMFX functions are not used
>> - Main MCU IDD measurement
>> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
>>   drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
>>   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> 
> Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
> 
> Just a couple of nits below.
> 
> [...]
> 

Thanks for reviewing.

>> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	u32 id;
>> +	u8 version[2];
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
>> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +				dev_err(&client->dev,
>> +					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
> 
> Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
> 
> In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
> 

Ok, "Can't get VDD regulator" instead of "No VDD regulator found" is 
more accurate.

>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
> 
> 	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> 		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> 	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
> 		stmfx->vdd = NULL;
> 	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
> 		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
> 		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> 	}
> 
> 	if (stmfx->vdd) {
> 
>> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
>> +};
> 
> Please move everything from here --------------->
> 
>> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-idd",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-ts",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> +	switch (reg) {
>> +	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
>> +		return true;
>> +	default:
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> +	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
>> +	.reg_bits	= 8,
>> +	.reg_stride	= 1,
>> +	.val_bits	= 8,
>> +	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
>> +	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
>> +	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
>> +	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> +};
> 
> ----------------------->
> 
> ... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
> 

I'll move the regmap_config & mfx_cell declarations just below the includes.

>> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> +		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!stmfx)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
>> +
>> +	stmfx->dev = dev;
>> +
>> +	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
>> +			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (client->irq < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> +		ret = client->irq;
>> +		goto err_chip_exit;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_chip_exit;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
>> +		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
>> +		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
>> +	}
> 
> Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
> 
> ...
> 
> Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()?  That
> does exactly the same thing.  So you can get this back from the client
> via i2c_get_clientdata().  No need to send it though platform data.
> 

Yes, I agree. I'll remove this loop and use 
dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) in child drivers.

>> +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>> +				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
>> +				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_irq_exit;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_irq_exit:
>> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +err_chip_exit:
>> +	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +
>> +	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> +			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> +			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> +			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> +			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> +			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> +			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
>> +			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
> 
> Don't think you need a separate function for this.  Just move the
> regmap_raw_write() commands here.
> 

I used a separate function to have only one dev_err in case of 
backup/restore failure.

>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
>> +				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
> 
> As above.
> 
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.name = "stmfx-core",
>> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
>> +		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
>> +	},
>> +	.probe = stmfx_probe,
>> +	.remove = stmfx_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> 
> [...]
> 

I am prepare a v5. Is it OK for you if I keep the backup/restore 
separate functions ?

Regards,
Amelie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver
@ 2019-04-04 13:22       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Amelie DELAUNAY @ 2019-04-04 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Alexandre TORGUE, Linus Walleij,
	linux-kernel, linux-gpio, Rob Herring, Maxime Coquelin,
	linux-stm32, linux-arm-kernel

On 4/3/19 12:01 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> 
>> STMicroelectronics Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) is a slave controller
>> using I2C for communication with the main MCU. Main features are:
>> - 16 fast GPIOs individually configurable in input/output
>> - 8 alternate GPIOs individually configurable in input/output when other
>> STMFX functions are not used
>> - Main MCU IDD measurement
>> - Resistive touchscreen controller
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig       |  13 ++
>>   drivers/mfd/Makefile      |   2 +-
>>   drivers/mfd/stmfx.c       | 568 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h | 123 ++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 705 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/stmfx.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/stmfx.h
> 
> Very nice first attempt for what is a pretty complex driver.
> 
> Just a couple of nits below.
> 
> [...]
> 

Thanks for reviewing.

>> +static int stmfx_chip_init(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> +	u32 id;
>> +	u8 version[2];
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	stmfx->vdd = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, "vdd");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret != -ENODEV) {
>> +			if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +				dev_err(&client->dev,
>> +					"No VDD regulator found:%d\n", ret);
> 
> Actually -ENODEV means this, which is okay.
> 
> In this case we failed to obtain a provided regulator.
> 

Ok, "Can't get VDD regulator" instead of "No VDD regulator found" is 
more accurate.

>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	} else {
> 
> 	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> 		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> 	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd) && PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd) == -ENODEV) {
> 		stmfx->vdd = NULL;
> 	} else (IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd))) {
> 		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get VDD regulator:%d\n", ret);
> 		return PTR_ERR(stmfx->vdd);
> 	}
> 
> 	if (stmfx->vdd) {
> 
>> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&client->dev, "VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> [...]
> 
>> +static const struct resource stmfx_ts_resources[] = {
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_DET),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_NE),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_TH),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_FULL),
>> +	DEFINE_RES_IRQ(STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN_TS_OVF),
>> +};
> 
> Please move everything from here --------------->
> 
>> +static struct mfd_cell stmfx_cells[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-pinctrl",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-pinctrl",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_pinctrl_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_pinctrl_resources),
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-idd",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-idd",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_idd_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_idd_resources),
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.of_compatible = "st,stmfx-0300-ts",
>> +		.name = "stmfx-ts",
>> +		.resources = stmfx_ts_resources,
>> +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_ts_resources),
>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_volatile(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> +	switch (reg) {
>> +	case STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_PENDING:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_PENDING3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPIO_STATE3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_IRQ_GPI_SRC3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_SET3:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR1:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR2:
>> +	case STMFX_REG_GPO_CLR3:
>> +		return true;
>> +	default:
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool stmfx_reg_writeable(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
>> +{
>> +	return (reg >= STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_config stmfx_regmap_config = {
>> +	.reg_bits	= 8,
>> +	.reg_stride	= 1,
>> +	.val_bits	= 8,
>> +	.max_register	= STMFX_REG_MAX,
>> +	.volatile_reg	= stmfx_reg_volatile,
>> +	.writeable_reg	= stmfx_reg_writeable,
>> +	.cache_type	= REGCACHE_RBTREE,
>> +};
> 
> ----------------------->
> 
> ... to here, up to the top, just below the includes.
> 

I'll move the regmap_config & mfx_cell declarations just below the includes.

>> +static int stmfx_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> +		       const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> +{
>> +	struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx;
>> +	int i, ret;
>> +
>> +	stmfx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*stmfx), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!stmfx)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	i2c_set_clientdata(client, stmfx);
>> +
>> +	stmfx->dev = dev;
>> +
>> +	stmfx->map = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &stmfx_regmap_config);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(stmfx->map)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(stmfx->map);
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate register map: %d\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mutex_init(&stmfx->lock);
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_chip_init(client);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
>> +			return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (client->irq < 0) {
>> +		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> +		ret = client->irq;
>> +		goto err_chip_exit;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_irq_init(client);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_chip_exit;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells); i++) {
>> +		stmfx_cells[i].platform_data = stmfx;
>> +		stmfx_cells[i].pdata_size = sizeof(struct stmfx);
>> +	}
> 
> Pass this though dev_get_drvdata() instead.
> 
> ...
> 
> Actually, didn't you already set this with i2c_set_clientdata()?  That
> does exactly the same thing.  So you can get this back from the client
> via i2c_get_clientdata().  No need to send it though platform data.
> 

Yes, I agree. I'll remove this loop and use 
dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent) in child drivers.

>> +	ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
>> +				   stmfx_cells, ARRAY_SIZE(stmfx_cells), NULL,
>> +				   0, stmfx->irq_domain);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto err_irq_exit;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +
>> +err_irq_exit:
>> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +err_chip_exit:
>> +	stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>> +{
>> +	stmfx_irq_exit(client);
>> +
>> +	return stmfx_chip_exit(client);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> +static int stmfx_backup_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> +			      &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_read(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> +			      &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> +			      sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_restore_regs(struct stmfx *stmfx)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_SYS_CTRL,
>> +			       &stmfx->bkp_sysctrl, sizeof(stmfx->bkp_sysctrl));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_OUT_PIN,
>> +			       &stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin,
>> +			       sizeof(stmfx->bkp_irqoutpin));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
> 
> '\n' here.
> 
>> +	ret = regmap_raw_write(stmfx->map, STMFX_REG_IRQ_SRC_EN,
>> +			       &stmfx->irq_src, sizeof(stmfx->irq_src));
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_suspend(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_backup_regs(stmfx);
> 
> Don't think you need a separate function for this.  Just move the
> regmap_raw_write() commands here.
> 

I used a separate function to have only one dev_err in case of 
backup/restore failure.

>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers backup failure\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = regulator_disable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int stmfx_resume(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct stmfx *stmfx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(stmfx->vdd)) {
>> +		ret = regulator_enable(stmfx->vdd);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(stmfx->dev,
>> +				"VDD enable failed: %d\n", ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = stmfx_restore_regs(stmfx);
> 
> As above.
> 
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(stmfx->dev, "Registers restoration failure\n");
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stmfx_dev_pm_ops, stmfx_suspend, stmfx_resume);
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id stmfx_of_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "st,stmfx-0300", },
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stmfx_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct i2c_driver stmfx_driver = {
>> +	.driver = {
>> +		.name = "stmfx-core",
>> +		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(stmfx_of_match),
>> +		.pm = &stmfx_dev_pm_ops,
>> +	},
>> +	.probe = stmfx_probe,
>> +	.remove = stmfx_remove,
>> +};
>> +module_i2c_driver(stmfx_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMFX core driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> 
> [...]
> 

I am prepare a v5. Is it OK for you if I keep the backup/restore 
separate functions ?

Regards,
Amelie
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-04-04 13:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-27  9:34 [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core bindings Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27 23:55   ` Rob Herring
2019-02-27 23:55     ` Rob Herring
2019-02-27 23:55     ` Rob Herring
2019-02-28  8:53     ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-02-28  8:53       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-02-28  8:53       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-02-28 14:41       ` Rob Herring
2019-02-28 14:41         ` Rob Herring
2019-02-28 14:41         ` Rob Herring
2019-02-28 14:59         ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-02-28 14:59           ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-02-28 14:59           ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] mfd: Add ST Multi-Function eXpander (STMFX) core driver Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-04-03 10:01   ` Lee Jones
2019-04-03 10:01     ` Lee Jones
2019-04-04 13:22     ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-04-04 13:22       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-04-04 13:22       ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: document the STMFX pinctrl bindings Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] pinctrl: Add STMFX GPIO expander Pinctrl/GPIO driver Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27 13:55   ` Linus Walleij
2019-02-27 13:55     ` Linus Walleij
2019-02-27 13:55     ` Linus Walleij
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32746g-eval Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick " Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add orange and blue leds " Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add STMFX support on stm32mp157c-ev1 Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] ARM: dts: stm32: add joystick " Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-27  9:34   ` Amelie Delaunay
2019-02-28  8:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Introduce STMFX I2C Multi-Function eXpander Alexandre Torgue
2019-02-28  8:51   ` Alexandre Torgue
2019-03-29  8:48 ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-03-29  8:48   ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-03-29  8:48   ` Amelie DELAUNAY
2019-04-01 10:19   ` Lee Jones
2019-04-01 10:19     ` Lee Jones
2019-04-01 10:19     ` Lee Jones

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.