From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B029C072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEF02175B for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389611AbfEXIbz (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 04:31:55 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:39247 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389238AbfEXIby (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 May 2019 04:31:54 -0400 X-UUID: 0f3a5fef5ab14788bd476908908ede21-20190524 X-UUID: 0f3a5fef5ab14788bd476908908ede21-20190524 Received: from mtkexhb02.mediatek.inc [(172.21.101.103)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (mhqrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 663507756; Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:48 +0800 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by mtkmbs01n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:46 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:44 +0800 Message-ID: <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 From: biao huang To: Jose Abreu CC: "davem@davemloft.net" , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , Matthias Brugger , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "yt.shen@mediatek.com" , "jianguo.zhang@mediatek.comi" , "boon.leong.ong@intel.com" Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:44 +0800 In-Reply-To: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> References: <1557802843-31718-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1557802843-31718-2-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1558679617.24897.43.camel@mhfsdcap03> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 08:24 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote: > From: biao huang > Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:33:37 > > > any comments about this patch? > > Can you please test your series on top of this one [1] and let me know > the output of : > # ethtool -t eth0 "ethtol -T eth0"? This patch only affect hash table filter, seems no relation to timestamp. > > Just to make sure that this patch does not introduce any regressions. The > remaining ones of the series look fine by me! > > [1] which one? Did I miss anything here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=109699 > > Thanks, > Jose Miguel Abreu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: biao huang Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:44 +0800 Message-ID: <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1557802843-31718-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1557802843-31718-2-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1558679617.24897.43.camel@mhfsdcap03> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jose Abreu Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , Matthias Brugger , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "yt.shen@mediatek.com" , "jianguo.zhang@mediatek.comi" , "boon.leong.ong@intel.com" List-Id: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 08:24 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote: > From: biao huang > Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:33:37 > > > any comments about this patch? > > Can you please test your series on top of this one [1] and let me know > the output of : > # ethtool -t eth0 "ethtol -T eth0"? This patch only affect hash table filter, seems no relation to timestamp. > > Just to make sure that this patch does not introduce any regressions. The > remaining ones of the series look fine by me! > > [1] which one? Did I miss anything here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=109699 > > Thanks, > Jose Miguel Abreu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541DBC072B5 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 287C720675 for ; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="GJOSm0gP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 287C720675 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=T+fhQ6mJT+IOdr2DsuDKEXxeL3cJJKtQzfk52zT9GV0=; b=GJOSm0gP4BYgGY 5xzAwcA8onZxQukLlSPRdKTXtbdzsuGUV1iVZ6ofYfjBsdCQlJLdrt8VdfmMrxWe/zPzFSO9IwUiD i7tDsiIwao8StCM9OuR18VB/cg6P85zJMUXbqN+QQ46Onl11hQqjgt5lHjYHSQQOswwZuWGd4SwAq Nomyz5sU3/0bZIGY3drxlGV+cxNOWNEALHMoOCJ4RjCB/zF1W3k3+rJsdvvXGCXkwVy25lbys1rLW hCr96ErexpX6ey7bOZSkFwJeyI/SBaMdheg/1x8fYnOgKZN1V4UmwaR4lTAIKr5CF/5TgQJO1YO7f vT/rA6WzmgvED++M3iuQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hU5cP-0001oY-2g; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:32:01 +0000 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.185]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hU5cL-0001ne-3I; Fri, 24 May 2019 08:31:58 +0000 X-UUID: 1b216336aaa5489f85aae0f41523fe82-20190524 X-UUID: 1b216336aaa5489f85aae0f41523fe82-20190524 Received: from mtkcas67.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.45)] by mailgw02.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 742423353; Fri, 24 May 2019 00:31:49 -0800 Received: from MTKMBS01N1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.68) by MTKMBS62N1.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 24 May 2019 01:31:48 -0700 Received: from MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.184) by mtkmbs01n1.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:46 +0800 Received: from [10.17.3.153] (172.27.4.253) by MTKCAS32.mediatek.inc (172.27.4.170) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:44 +0800 Message-ID: <1558686704.24897.45.camel@mhfsdcap03> Subject: RE: [v2, PATCH] net: stmmac: add support for hash table size 128/256 in dwmac4 From: biao huang To: Jose Abreu Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 16:31:44 +0800 In-Reply-To: <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> References: <1557802843-31718-1-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1557802843-31718-2-git-send-email-biao.huang@mediatek.com> <1558679617.24897.43.camel@mhfsdcap03> <78EB27739596EE489E55E81C33FEC33A0B92CDA0@DE02WEMBXB.internal.synopsys.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190524_013157_145283_17DBB2A8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.20 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexandre Torgue , "jianguo.zhang@mediatek.comi" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , "yt.shen@mediatek.com" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "boon.leong.ong@intel.com" , Maxime Coquelin , Matthias Brugger , Giuseppe Cavallaro , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 08:24 +0000, Jose Abreu wrote: > From: biao huang > Date: Fri, May 24, 2019 at 07:33:37 > > > any comments about this patch? > > Can you please test your series on top of this one [1] and let me know > the output of : > # ethtool -t eth0 "ethtol -T eth0"? This patch only affect hash table filter, seems no relation to timestamp. > > Just to make sure that this patch does not introduce any regressions. The > remaining ones of the series look fine by me! > > [1] which one? Did I miss anything here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=109699 > > Thanks, > Jose Miguel Abreu _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel