[Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 3/8] xen/common: Introduce _xrealloc function

[Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@gmail.com>]

From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>

This patch introduces type-unsafe function which besides
re-allocation handles the following corner cases:
1. if requested size is zero, it will behave like xfree
2. if incoming pointer is not valid (NULL or ZERO_BLOCK_PTR),
   it will behave like xmalloc

If both pointer and size are valid the function will re-allocate and
copy only if requested size doesn't fit in already allocated space.

Subsequent patch will add type-safe helper macros.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
CC: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
CC: Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>

---
Changes since RFC:
   - behave like xmalloc if incoming pointer is ZERO_BLOCK_PTR or NULL
   - return ZERO_BLOCK_PTR after xfree if requested size is zero
   - add patch description
   - use allocator internals to recognize current size of
     the incoming pointer
   - do not re-allocate and copy if requested size fits in already
     allocated space

   ...

   Original patch was initially posted by Sameer Goel:
   https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2017-06/msg00858.html

   This could be considered as another attempt to add it:
   https://www.mail-archive.com/kexec@lists.infradead.org/msg21335.html

   [As it was previously discussed with Julien in IRC]

   The reason for this patch to be an RFC is that patch itself is not
   completely correct and I don't fully understand what/how should
   be done for this patch to be accepted. Or whether community even
   wants this to go in. So, to avoid bike shedding, the first target is
   to collect feedback.

   For everyone who wants more details why this is needed and
   where used, please see next patch of this thread:
   "iommu/arm: Add lightweight iommu_fwspec support"

   In a nutshell, the upcoming "iommu_fwspec" support on ARM
   is going to use xrealloc to expand an array for device IDs.
   We really want to have "iommu_fwspec" support which will give us
   a generic abstract way to add new device to the IOMMU based on
   the generic IOMMU DT binding.
---
 xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c b/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
index e98ad65..eecae2e 100644
--- a/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
+++ b/xen/common/xmalloc_tlsf.c
@@ -598,6 +598,51 @@ void *_xzalloc(unsigned long size, unsigned long align)
     return p ? memset(p, 0, size) : p;
 }
 
+void *_xrealloc(void *ptr, unsigned long size, unsigned long align)
+{
+    unsigned long curr_size, tmp_size;
+    void *p;
+
+    if ( !size )
+    {
+        xfree(ptr);
+        return ZERO_BLOCK_PTR;
+    }
+
+    if ( ptr == NULL || ptr == ZERO_BLOCK_PTR )
+        return _xmalloc(size, align);
+
+    if ( !((unsigned long)ptr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) )
+        curr_size = PFN_ORDER(virt_to_page(ptr)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
+    else
+    {
+        struct bhdr *b;
+        b = (struct bhdr *)((char *)ptr - BHDR_OVERHEAD);
+        curr_size = b->size & BLOCK_SIZE_MASK;
+    }
+
+    ASSERT((align & (align - 1)) == 0);
+    if ( align < MEM_ALIGN )
+        align = MEM_ALIGN;
+    tmp_size = size + align - MEM_ALIGN;
+
+    if ( tmp_size < PAGE_SIZE )
+        tmp_size = ( tmp_size < MIN_BLOCK_SIZE ) ? MIN_BLOCK_SIZE :
+            ROUNDUP_SIZE(tmp_size);
+
+    if ( tmp_size <= curr_size ) /* fits in current block */
+        return ptr;
+
+    p = _xmalloc(size, align);
+    if ( p )
+    {
+        memcpy(p, ptr, min(curr_size, size));
+        xfree(ptr);
+    }
+
+    return p;
+}
+
 void xfree(void *p)
 {
     struct bhdr *b;
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h b/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
index f075d2d..831152f 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ extern void xfree(void *);
 /* Underlying functions */
 extern void *_xmalloc(unsigned long size, unsigned long align);
 extern void *_xzalloc(unsigned long size, unsigned long align);
+extern void *_xrealloc(void *ptr, unsigned long size, unsigned long align);
 
 static inline void *_xmalloc_array(
     unsigned long size, unsigned long align, unsigned long num)
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel