All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/execlists: Cancel banned contexts on schedule-out
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 11:03:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <157078819822.31572.2072181009668279197@skylake-alporthouse-com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9b171f6-be40-fb86-99e0-3bfe5f69404e@linux.intel.com>

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-10-11 10:47:26)
> 
> On 10/10/2019 08:14, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On completion of a banned context, scrub the context image so that we do
> 
> s/completion/schedule out/ like in the subject line? Otherwise I 
> struggle to understand how banned context is completing. Presumably it 
> was banned because it keeps hanging.

Ok, I had the CS completion event in mind, but i915_request_completed()
does muddle the waters.
 
> > not replay the active payload. The intent is that we skip banned
> > payloads on request submission so that the timeline advancement
> > continues on in the background. However, if we are returning to a
> > preempted request, i915_request_skip() is ineffective and instead we
> > need to patch up the context image so that it continues from the start
> > of the next request.
> 
> But if the context is banned why do we want to continue from the start 
> of the next request? Don't we want to zap all submitted so far?

We scrub the payload, but the request itself is still a vital part of
the web of dependencies. That is we still execute the semaphores and
breadcrumbs of the cancelled requests to maintain global ordering.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-11 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-10  7:14 [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Note the addition of timeslicing to the pretend scheduler Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915/execlists: Leave tell-tales as to why pending[] is bad Chris Wilson
2019-10-11  8:39   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: Expose engine properties via sysfs Chris Wilson
2019-10-11  8:44   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11  8:49     ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-11  9:04       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11  9:40   ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/execlists: Force preemption Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Mark up "sentinel" requests Chris Wilson
2019-10-11  8:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915/gt: Introduce barrier pulses along engines Chris Wilson
2019-10-11  9:11   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11  9:52     ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/execlists: Cancel banned contexts on schedule-out Chris Wilson
2019-10-11  9:47   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11 10:03     ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2019-10-11 10:15     ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-11 10:40       ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-11 11:16   ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2019-10-11 13:10     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11 14:10       ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: Cancel non-persistent contexts on close Chris Wilson
2019-10-11 13:55   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11 14:22     ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-11 15:41       ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Replace hangcheck by heartbeats Chris Wilson
2019-10-11 14:24   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11 15:06     ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  7:14 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Flush idle barriers when waiting Chris Wilson
2019-10-11 14:56   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11 15:11     ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-14 13:08       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-14 13:38         ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-23 15:33         ` Chris Wilson
2019-10-23 15:33           ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-10-10  8:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Note the addition of timeslicing to the pretend scheduler Patchwork
2019-10-10  8:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-10 16:19 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-11  8:16 ` [PATCH 01/10] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-10-11  9:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Note the addition of timeslicing to the pretend scheduler (rev2) Patchwork
2019-10-11 11:39 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [01/10] drm/i915: Note the addition of timeslicing to the pretend scheduler (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=157078819822.31572.2072181009668279197@skylake-alporthouse-com \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.