All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Praveen Chaudhary <praveen5582@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, fw@strlen.de, kadlec@netfilter.org,
	pablo@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zhenggen Xu <zxu@linkedin.com>, Andy Stracner <astracner@linkedin.com>
Subject: [PATCH] [netfilter]: Fix skb->csum calculation when netfilter manipulation for NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC\DST is done on IPV6 packet.
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:27:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572301675-5403-2-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572301675-5403-1-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com>

No need to update skb->csum in function inet_proto_csum_replace16(),
even if skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, because change in L4
header checksum field and change in IPV6 header cancels each other
for skb->csum calculation.

Signed-off-by: Praveen Chaudhary <pchaudhary@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenggen Xu <zxu@linkedin.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Stracner <astracner@linkedin.com>
---
Changes in V2.
1.) Updating diff as per email discussion with Florian Westphal.
    Since inet_proto_csum_replace16() does incorrect calculation
    for skb->csum in all cases.
2.) Change in Commmit logs.
---
---
 net/core/utils.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/utils.c b/net/core/utils.c
index 6b6e51d..cec9924 100644
--- a/net/core/utils.c
+++ b/net/core/utils.c
@@ -438,6 +438,12 @@ void inet_proto_csum_replace4(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_proto_csum_replace4);
 
+/**
+ * No need to update skb->csum in this function, even if
+ * skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE, because change in
+ * L4 header checksum field and change in IPV6 header
+ * cancels each other for skb->csum calculation.
+ */
 void inet_proto_csum_replace16(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			       const __be32 *from, const __be32 *to,
 			       bool pseudohdr)
@@ -449,9 +455,6 @@ void inet_proto_csum_replace16(__sum16 *sum, struct sk_buff *skb,
 	if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
 		*sum = csum_fold(csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
 				 ~csum_unfold(*sum)));
-		if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE && pseudohdr)
-			skb->csum = ~csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
-						  ~skb->csum);
 	} else if (pseudohdr)
 		*sum = ~csum_fold(csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff),
 				  csum_unfold(*sum)));
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-28 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-28 22:27 [PATCH] [netfilter]: Fix skb->csum calculation when netfilter manipulation for NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC\DST is done on IPV6 packet Praveen Chaudhary
2019-10-28 22:27 ` Praveen Chaudhary [this message]
2019-10-29 16:09   ` Florian Westphal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-23 19:02 [PATCH] " Praveen Chaudhary
2019-10-23 19:02 ` [PATCH] [netfilter]: " Praveen Chaudhary
2019-10-23 19:33   ` Florian Westphal
     [not found]     ` <CAJ_cd4qHM3kqz24Uywpyyz0mPz7axiNZk0Q385ROd4O8XZ11fA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-10-24  1:12       ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1572301675-5403-2-git-send-email-pchaudhary@linkedin.com \
    --to=praveen5582@gmail.com \
    --cc=astracner@linkedin.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=zxu@linkedin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.