From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B40C43603 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6563214AF for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:06:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576073205; bh=z8jnYxWhJti1C82LXr7ZrPi2K2GdfH45voy3hfaPz8c=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=giIhAgcuPAWWLTGjemqaVID9JqI7tNo6QPGuY3amfgGwGUgkVHSepOa0ZrS+ifOEw Zw31fYc8roUwdGQ3ffLnxlOCirzc67rvWqerwx80iIqt3gESvNUFJhjW6sGIeh4qb3 Pdb+2bmGTebrHX10pzFtsqBs3WvphjqWRh9QE8i4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729671AbfLKOGp (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:06:45 -0500 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.24]:36047 "EHLO wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729664AbfLKOGp (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:06:45 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9B5A34; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:06:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:06:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vtcXkx uF/hK0EWaXKtcPWifRyNfViQvm1U9OwPeKf5M=; b=pAU+NHH692eXqW65FeJqv3 ggysME4ds4Ow6BAezYU2t5n95M4ubHBVoxohTM/FjSCfBbmAORY4RyFmScCpkolt k9t6cswBSsK041wWAwkiFVQbH8I+/Qf0TBQRyNZX2KEjga9/rZFkgws1e1a9vFjT aBDnfhQ6ExIR05TzIB1st1cZgwOyll3ycICbs8hrrTvCqSAYG+VL5q6t/fgxqjEz 8CCBmi5QC/qDvjvyTI1yhGu02Evl0q1/eYA616vWv7ED7RUVrJta0FTXL16tOARK IqGOVy5BybG4VIvDaN/8orRpZL8BiFSh3XqKYsnOwl5H4hQyPx/B1BikHnSO+VyA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrudelhedgheehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvffhfffkgggtgfesthekredttd dtlfenucfhrhhomhepoehgrhgvghhkhheslhhinhhugihfohhunhgurghtihhonhdrohhr gheqnecukfhppeekfedrkeeirdekledruddtjeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepvd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 862263060112; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:06:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: WTF: patch "[PATCH] net: wireless: ti: wl1251 use new SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.4-stable tree? To: hns@goldelico.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org Cc: From: Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:42 +0100 Message-ID: <15760732020175@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.4-stable tree. I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst. I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to and let me know why this patch should be applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be seen again. thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From d8620bbc32541a30f84154007defad917f5179f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:30:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] net: wireless: ti: wl1251 use new SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251 definition SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251 is now defined in mmc/sdio_ids.h separately from SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI for wl1271. Fixes: 884f38607897 ("mmc: core: move some sdio IDs out of quirks file") Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller Acked-by: Kalle Valo Cc: # v4.11+ Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c index f1224b948f83..ac677309dab6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static void wl1251_sdio_interrupt(struct sdio_func *func) } static const struct sdio_device_id wl1251_devices[] = { - { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_TI_WL1251) }, + { SDIO_DEVICE(SDIO_VENDOR_ID_TI_WL1251, SDIO_DEVICE_ID_TI_WL1251) }, {} }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, wl1251_devices);