All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-18  3:50 ` Pan Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pan Zhang @ 2019-12-18  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zhangpan26, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig,
	David1.Zhou, airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel

this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.

patch2:
`num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,

so there is a impossible condition:
'(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
@@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
 	unsigned i;
 	int r;
 
-	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
-				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
 	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
 	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-18  3:50 ` Pan Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pan Zhang @ 2019-12-18  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zhangpan26, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig,
	David1.Zhou, airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: dri-devel, amd-gfx, linux-kernel

this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.

patch2:
`num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,

so there is a impossible condition:
'(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
@@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
 	unsigned i;
 	int r;
 
-	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
-				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
 	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
 	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-18  3:50 ` Pan Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pan Zhang @ 2019-12-18  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: zhangpan26, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig,
	David1.Zhou, airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: dri-devel, amd-gfx, linux-kernel

this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.

patch2:
`num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,

so there is a impossible condition:
'(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
@@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
 	unsigned i;
 	int r;
 
-	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
-				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
 	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
 	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
  2019-12-18  3:50 ` Pan Zhang
  (?)
@ 2019-12-18  9:52   ` Christian König
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2019-12-18  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pan Zhang, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, David1.Zhou, airlied,
	daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel

Am 18.12.19 um 04:50 schrieb Pan Zhang:
> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
>
> patch2:
> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
>
> so there is a impossible condition:
> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

NAK, that calculation is not correct on 32-bit systems.

Christian.

>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>   	unsigned i;
>   	int r;
>   
> -	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
> -				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>   	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>   	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>   	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-18  9:52   ` Christian König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2019-12-18  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pan Zhang, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, David1.Zhou, airlied,
	daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: dri-devel, amd-gfx, linux-kernel

Am 18.12.19 um 04:50 schrieb Pan Zhang:
> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
>
> patch2:
> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
>
> so there is a impossible condition:
> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

NAK, that calculation is not correct on 32-bit systems.

Christian.

>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>   	unsigned i;
>   	int r;
>   
> -	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
> -				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>   	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>   	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>   	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-18  9:52   ` Christian König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2019-12-18  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pan Zhang, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, David1.Zhou, airlied,
	daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: dri-devel, amd-gfx, linux-kernel

Am 18.12.19 um 04:50 schrieb Pan Zhang:
> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
>
> patch2:
> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
>
> so there is a impossible condition:
> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

NAK, that calculation is not correct on 32-bit systems.

Christian.

>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>   	unsigned i;
>   	int r;
>   
> -	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
> -				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>   	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>   	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>   	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
  2019-12-18  3:50 ` Pan Zhang
  (?)
@ 2019-12-18  9:52   ` Michel Dänzer
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michel Dänzer @ 2019-12-18  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pan Zhang, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig,
	David1.Zhou, airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: dri-devel, amd-gfx, linux-kernel

On 2019-12-18 4:50 a.m., Pan Zhang wrote:
> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
> 
> patch2:
> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
> 
> so there is a impossible condition:
> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

While this looks correct for 64-bit, where size_t is unsigned long, on
32-bit it's unsigned int, in which case this isn't dead code.


> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>  	unsigned i;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
> -				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>  	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>  	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-18  9:52   ` Michel Dänzer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michel Dänzer @ 2019-12-18  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pan Zhang, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig,
	David1.Zhou, airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel

On 2019-12-18 4:50 a.m., Pan Zhang wrote:
> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
> 
> patch2:
> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
> 
> so there is a impossible condition:
> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

While this looks correct for 64-bit, where size_t is unsigned long, on
32-bit it's unsigned int, in which case this isn't dead code.


> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>  	unsigned i;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
> -				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>  	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>  	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-18  9:52   ` Michel Dänzer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michel Dänzer @ 2019-12-18  9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pan Zhang, hushiyuan, alexander.deucher, christian.koenig,
	David1.Zhou, airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel

On 2019-12-18 4:50 a.m., Pan Zhang wrote:
> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
> 
> patch2:
> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
> 
> so there is a impossible condition:
> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

While this looks correct for 64-bit, where size_t is unsigned long, on
32-bit it's unsigned int, in which case this isn't dead code.


> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
> @@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>  	unsigned i;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
> -				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>  	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>  	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 


-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               https://redhat.com
Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
  2019-12-18  9:52   ` Michel Dänzer
  (?)
@ 2019-12-19  3:38     ` Pan Zhang
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pan Zhang @ 2019-12-19  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christian.koenig, michel, alexander.deucher, David1.Zhou,
	airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam, zhangpan26,
	hushiyuan
  Cc: amd-gfx, dri-devel, linux-kernel

On 2019-12-18 5:52 p.m., Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:

>> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
>> 
>> patch2:
>> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as 
>> unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
>> 
>> so there is a impossible condition:
>> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

>While this looks correct for 64-bit, where size_t is unsigned long, on 32-bit it's unsigned int, in which case this isn't dead code.

and

On 2019-12-18 5:52 p.m., Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>NAK, that calculation is not correct on 32-bit systems.

>Christian.

Yes, you are right. I just figured this out (because our Server usually uses 64 bits).

thanks.


>>Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>@@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>> 	unsigned i;
>> 	int r;
>> 
>>-	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
>>-				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
>>-		return -EINVAL;
>>-
>> 	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>> 	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>> 	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-19  3:38     ` Pan Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pan Zhang @ 2019-12-19  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christian.koenig, michel, alexander.deucher, David1.Zhou,
	airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam, zhangpan26,
	hushiyuan
  Cc: dri-devel, amd-gfx, linux-kernel

On 2019-12-18 5:52 p.m., Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:

>> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
>> 
>> patch2:
>> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as 
>> unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
>> 
>> so there is a impossible condition:
>> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

>While this looks correct for 64-bit, where size_t is unsigned long, on 32-bit it's unsigned int, in which case this isn't dead code.

and

On 2019-12-18 5:52 p.m., Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>NAK, that calculation is not correct on 32-bit systems.

>Christian.

Yes, you are right. I just figured this out (because our Server usually uses 64 bits).

thanks.


>>Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>@@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>> 	unsigned i;
>> 	int r;
>> 
>>-	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
>>-				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
>>-		return -EINVAL;
>>-
>> 	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>> 	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>> 	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination
@ 2019-12-19  3:38     ` Pan Zhang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Pan Zhang @ 2019-12-19  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: christian.koenig, michel, alexander.deucher, David1.Zhou,
	airlied, daniel, ray.huang, irmoy.das, sam, zhangpan26,
	hushiyuan
  Cc: dri-devel, amd-gfx, linux-kernel

On 2019-12-18 5:52 p.m., Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> wrote:

>> this set adds support for removal of gpu drm dead code.
>> 
>> patch2:
>> `num_entries` is a data of unsigned type(compilers always treat as 
>> unsigned int) and SIZE_MAX == ~0,
>> 
>> so there is a impossible condition:
>> '(num_entries > ((~0) - 56) / 72) => (max(0-u32) > 256204778801521549)'.

>While this looks correct for 64-bit, where size_t is unsigned long, on 32-bit it's unsigned int, in which case this isn't dead code.

and

On 2019-12-18 5:52 p.m., Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>NAK, that calculation is not correct on 32-bit systems.

>Christian.

Yes, you are right. I just figured this out (because our Server usually uses 64 bits).

thanks.


>>Signed-off-by: Pan Zhang <zhangpan26@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c | 4 ----
>>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>index 85b0515..10a7f30 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_bo_list.c
>>@@ -71,10 +71,6 @@ int amdgpu_bo_list_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct drm_file *filp,
>> 	unsigned i;
>> 	int r;
>> 
>>-	if (num_entries > (SIZE_MAX - sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list))
>>-				/ sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry))
>>-		return -EINVAL;
>>-
>> 	size = sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list);
>> 	size += num_entries * sizeof(struct amdgpu_bo_list_entry);
>> 	list = kvmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-19  8:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-12-18  3:50 [PATCH 2/3] gpu: drm: dead code elimination Pan Zhang
2019-12-18  3:50 ` Pan Zhang
2019-12-18  3:50 ` Pan Zhang
2019-12-18  9:52 ` Christian König
2019-12-18  9:52   ` Christian König
2019-12-18  9:52   ` Christian König
2019-12-18  9:52 ` Michel Dänzer
2019-12-18  9:52   ` Michel Dänzer
2019-12-18  9:52   ` Michel Dänzer
2019-12-19  3:38   ` Pan Zhang
2019-12-19  3:38     ` Pan Zhang
2019-12-19  3:38     ` Pan Zhang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.