[PATCH v7 1/6] Check gpio pin number and use binary search in mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup()

* [PATCH v7 1/6] Check gpio pin number and use binary search in mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup()
@ 2019-12-31 13:41 ` Light Hsieh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 30+ messages in thread
From: Light Hsieh @ 2019-12-31 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linus.walleij
  Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-gpio, linux-kernel, sean.wang,
	kuohong.wang, Light Hsieh

1. Check if gpio pin number is in valid range to prevent from get invalid
   pointer 'desc' in the following code:
	desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];

2. Improve  mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup()
2.1 Modify mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup() to use binary search for accelerating
     search.
2.2 Correct message after the following check fail:
    if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) {
		rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field];
    The original message is:
    	"Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n"
    However, the check is on soc chip level, not on pin level yet.
    So the message is corrected as:
    	"Not support field %d for this soc\n"

Change-Id: I498a18df73e6a693e0e35635d5b92b8dc9c063ac
---
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++------
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c         | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
index 20e1c89..d63e05e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c
@@ -68,32 +68,44 @@ static int mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw,
 {
 	const struct mtk_pin_field_calc *c, *e;
 	const struct mtk_pin_reg_calc *rc;
+	int start = 0, end, check;
+	bool found = false;
 	u32 bits;
 
 	if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) {
 		rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field];
 	} else {
 		dev_dbg(hw->dev,
-			"Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n",
-			field, desc->number, desc->name);
+			"Not support field %d for this soc\n", field);
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 	}
 
+	end = rc->nranges - 1;
 	c = rc->range;
 	e = c + rc->nranges;
 
-	while (c < e) {
-		if (desc->number >= c->s_pin && desc->number <= c->e_pin)
+	while (start <= end) {
+		check = (start + end) >> 1;
+		if (desc->number >= rc->range[check].s_pin
+		 && desc->number <= rc->range[check].e_pin) {
+			found = true;
+			break;
+		} else if (start == end)
 			break;
-		c++;
+		else if (desc->number < rc->range[check].s_pin)
+			end = check - 1;
+		else
+			start = check + 1;
 	}
 
-	if (c >= e) {
+	if (!found) {
 		dev_dbg(hw->dev, "Not support field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n",
 			field, desc->number, desc->name);
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 	}
 
+	c = rc->range + check;
+
 	if (c->i_base > hw->nbase - 1) {
 		dev_err(hw->dev,
 			"Invalid base for field %d for pin = %d (%s)\n",
@@ -182,6 +194,9 @@ int mtk_hw_set_value(struct mtk_pinctrl *hw, const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
+	if (value < 0 || value > pf.mask)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	if (!pf.next)
 		mtk_rmw(hw, pf.index, pf.offset, pf.mask << pf.bitpos,
 			(value & pf.mask) << pf.bitpos);
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
index 923264d..3e13ae7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	int val, val2, err, reg, ret = 1;
 	const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
 
+	if (pin >= hw->soc->npins)
+		return -EINVAL;
 	desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
 
 	switch (param) {
@@ -206,6 +208,10 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
 	int err = 0;
 	u32 reg;
 
+	if (pin >= hw->soc->npins) {
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto err;
+	}
 	desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
 
 	switch ((u32)param) {
@@ -693,6 +699,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
 	const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
 	int value, err;
 
+	if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
 
 	err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DIR, &value);
@@ -708,6 +717,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
 	const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
 	int value, err;
 
+	if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
 
 	err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DI, &value);
@@ -722,6 +734,9 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value)
 	struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
 	const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
 
+	if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+		return;
+
 	desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
 
 	mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DO, !!value);
@@ -729,12 +744,22 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value)
 
 static int mtk_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
 {
+	struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+	if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	return pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(chip->base + gpio);
 }
 
 static int mtk_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio,
 				     int value)
 {
+	struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+	if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	mtk_gpio_set(chip, gpio, value);
 
 	return pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(chip->base + gpio);
-- 
1.8.1.1.dirty

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 30+ messages in thread