All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix
@ 2020-01-08 14:55 Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING Paolo Bonzini
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-01-08 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kwolf, qemu-block

Peter Lieven noticed that reqs->overlap_offset and reqs->overlap_bytes
are written outside bs->reqs_lock.  Patch 3 fixes it, while patches 1
and 2 are preparatory cleanups.

v1->v2: fix comment in patch 2, commit message in patch 3 [Kevin]

Paolo Bonzini (3):
  block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING
  block/io: wait for serialising requests when a request becomes
    serialising
  block/io: take bs->reqs_lock in bdrv_mark_request_serialising

 block/file-posix.c        |   1 -
 block/io.c                | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 include/block/block.h     |  12 ----
 include/block/block_int.h |   3 +-
 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/3] block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING
  2020-01-08 14:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-01-08 14:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block/io: wait for serialising requests when a request becomes serialising Paolo Bonzini
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-01-08 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kwolf, qemu-block

It is unused since commit 00e30f0 ("block/backup: use backup-top instead
of write notifiers", 2019-10-01), drop it to simplify the code.

While at it, drop redundant assertions on flags.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 block/io.c            | 18 ++++--------------
 include/block/block.h | 12 ------------
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index f75777f..b3a67fe 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -1445,8 +1445,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_aligned_preadv(BdrvChild *child,
      * potential fallback support, if we ever implement any read flags
      * to pass through to drivers.  For now, there aren't any
      * passthrough flags.  */
-    assert(!(flags & ~(BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING | BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ |
-                       BDRV_REQ_PREFETCH)));
+    assert(!(flags & ~(BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ | BDRV_REQ_PREFETCH)));
 
     /* Handle Copy on Read and associated serialisation */
     if (flags & BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ) {
@@ -1458,12 +1457,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_aligned_preadv(BdrvChild *child,
         bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bdrv_get_cluster_size(bs));
     }
 
-    /* BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING is only for write operation */
-    assert(!(flags & BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING));
-
-    if (!(flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING)) {
-        bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
-    }
+    bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
 
     if (flags & BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ) {
         int64_t pnum;
@@ -1711,7 +1705,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_preadv_part(BdrvChild *child,
     bdrv_inc_in_flight(bs);
 
     /* Don't do copy-on-read if we read data before write operation */
-    if (atomic_read(&bs->copy_on_read) && !(flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING)) {
+    if (atomic_read(&bs->copy_on_read)) {
         flags |= BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ;
     }
 
@@ -1852,8 +1846,6 @@ bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
         return -EPERM;
     }
 
-    /* BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING is only for read operation */
-    assert(!(flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING));
     assert(!(bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE));
     assert((bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_NO_IO) == 0);
     assert(!(flags & ~BDRV_REQ_MASK));
@@ -3222,9 +3214,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_copy_range_internal(
 
         /* BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING is only for write operation */
         assert(!(read_flags & BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING));
-        if (!(read_flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING)) {
-            bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(&req);
-        }
+        bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(&req);
 
         ret = src->bs->drv->bdrv_co_copy_range_from(src->bs,
                                                     src, src_offset,
diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h
index e9dcfef..23c7642 100644
--- a/include/block/block.h
+++ b/include/block/block.h
@@ -51,18 +51,6 @@ typedef enum {
      */
     BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP          = 0x4,
 
-    /*
-     * The BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING flag is only valid for reads and means that
-     * we don't want wait_serialising_requests() during the read operation.
-     *
-     * This flag is used for backup copy-on-write operations, when we need to
-     * read old data before write (write notifier triggered). It is okay since
-     * we already waited for other serializing requests in the initiating write
-     * (see bdrv_aligned_pwritev), and it is necessary if the initiating write
-     * is already serializing (without the flag, the read would deadlock
-     * waiting for the serialising write to complete).
-     */
-    BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING     = 0x8,
     BDRV_REQ_FUA                = 0x10,
     BDRV_REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED   = 0x20,
 
-- 
1.8.3.1




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/3] block/io: wait for serialising requests when a request becomes serialising
  2020-01-08 14:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-01-08 14:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block/io: take bs->reqs_lock in bdrv_mark_request_serialising Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-14 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Stefan Hajnoczi
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-01-08 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kwolf, qemu-block

Marking without waiting would not result in actual serialising behavior.
Thus, make a call bdrv_mark_request_serialising sufficient for
serialisation to happen.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 block/file-posix.c        |  1 -
 block/io.c                | 40 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 include/block/block_int.h |  3 +--
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index 1b805bd..2b08b02 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -2753,7 +2753,6 @@ raw_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int bytes,
         req->overlap_bytes = req->bytes;
 
         bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bs->bl.request_alignment);
-        bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
     }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index b3a67fe..c466df8 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #define MAX_BOUNCE_BUFFER (32768 << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)
 
 static void bdrv_parent_cb_resize(BlockDriverState *bs);
+static bool coroutine_fn bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self);
 static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
     int64_t offset, int bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags);
 
@@ -715,7 +716,7 @@ static void tracked_request_begin(BdrvTrackedRequest *req,
     qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&bs->reqs_lock);
 }
 
-void bdrv_mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align)
+bool bdrv_mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align)
 {
     int64_t overlap_offset = req->offset & ~(align - 1);
     uint64_t overlap_bytes = ROUND_UP(req->offset + req->bytes, align)
@@ -728,18 +729,7 @@ void bdrv_mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align)
 
     req->overlap_offset = MIN(req->overlap_offset, overlap_offset);
     req->overlap_bytes = MAX(req->overlap_bytes, overlap_bytes);
-}
-
-static bool is_request_serialising_and_aligned(BdrvTrackedRequest *req)
-{
-    /*
-     * If the request is serialising, overlap_offset and overlap_bytes are set,
-     * so we can check if the request is aligned. Otherwise, don't care and
-     * return false.
-     */
-
-    return req->serialising && (req->offset == req->overlap_offset) &&
-           (req->bytes == req->overlap_bytes);
+    return bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -823,7 +813,7 @@ void bdrv_dec_in_flight(BlockDriverState *bs)
     bdrv_wakeup(bs);
 }
 
-bool coroutine_fn bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self)
+static bool coroutine_fn bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self)
 {
     BlockDriverState *bs = self->bs;
     BdrvTrackedRequest *req;
@@ -1455,10 +1445,10 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_aligned_preadv(BdrvChild *child,
          * it ensures that the CoR read and write operations are atomic and
          * guest writes cannot interleave between them. */
         bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bdrv_get_cluster_size(bs));
+    } else {
+        bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
     }
 
-    bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
-
     if (flags & BDRV_REQ_COPY_ON_READ) {
         int64_t pnum;
 
@@ -1851,13 +1841,19 @@ bdrv_co_write_req_prepare(BdrvChild *child, int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes,
     assert(!(flags & ~BDRV_REQ_MASK));
 
     if (flags & BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING) {
-        bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bdrv_get_cluster_size(bs));
+        waited = bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bdrv_get_cluster_size(bs));
+        /*
+         * For a misaligned request we should have already waited earlier,
+         * because we come after bdrv_padding_rmw_read which must be called
+         * with the request already marked as serialising.
+         */
+        assert(!waited ||
+               (req->offset == req->overlap_offset &&
+                req->bytes == req->overlap_bytes));
+    } else {
+        bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
     }
 
-    waited = bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
-
-    assert(!waited || !req->serialising ||
-           is_request_serialising_and_aligned(req));
     assert(req->overlap_offset <= offset);
     assert(offset + bytes <= req->overlap_offset + req->overlap_bytes);
     assert(end_sector <= bs->total_sectors || child->perm & BLK_PERM_RESIZE);
@@ -2019,7 +2015,6 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_zero_pwritev(BdrvChild *child,
     padding = bdrv_init_padding(bs, offset, bytes, &pad);
     if (padding) {
         bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, align);
-        bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
 
         bdrv_padding_rmw_read(child, req, &pad, true);
 
@@ -2122,7 +2117,6 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_pwritev_part(BdrvChild *child,
 
     if (bdrv_pad_request(bs, &qiov, &qiov_offset, &offset, &bytes, &pad)) {
         bdrv_mark_request_serialising(&req, align);
-        bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(&req);
         bdrv_padding_rmw_read(child, &req, &pad, false);
     }
 
diff --git a/include/block/block_int.h b/include/block/block_int.h
index dd033d0..640fb82 100644
--- a/include/block/block_int.h
+++ b/include/block/block_int.h
@@ -999,8 +999,7 @@ extern unsigned int bdrv_drain_all_count;
 void bdrv_apply_subtree_drain(BdrvChild *child, BlockDriverState *new_parent);
 void bdrv_unapply_subtree_drain(BdrvChild *child, BlockDriverState *old_parent);
 
-bool coroutine_fn bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self);
-void bdrv_mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align);
+bool coroutine_fn bdrv_mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align);
 BdrvTrackedRequest *coroutine_fn bdrv_co_get_self_request(BlockDriverState *bs);
 
 int get_tmp_filename(char *filename, int size);
-- 
1.8.3.1




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 3/3] block/io: take bs->reqs_lock in bdrv_mark_request_serialising
  2020-01-08 14:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block/io: wait for serialising requests when a request becomes serialising Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-01-08 14:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
  2020-01-14 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Stefan Hajnoczi
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-01-08 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel; +Cc: kwolf, qemu-block

bdrv_mark_request_serialising is writing the overlap_offset and
overlap_bytes fields of BdrvTrackedRequest.  Take bs->reqs_lock
for the whole duration of it, and not just when waiting for
serialising requests, so that tracked_request_overlaps does not
look at a half-updated request.

The new code does not unlock/relock around retries.  This is unnecessary
because a retry is always preceded by a CoQueue wait, which already
releases and reacquires bs->reqs_lock.

Reported-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 block/io.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index c466df8..1eb2b2b 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@
 #define MAX_BOUNCE_BUFFER (32768 << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS)
 
 static void bdrv_parent_cb_resize(BlockDriverState *bs);
-static bool coroutine_fn bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self);
 static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
     int64_t offset, int bytes, BdrvRequestFlags flags);
 
@@ -716,12 +715,69 @@ static void tracked_request_begin(BdrvTrackedRequest *req,
     qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&bs->reqs_lock);
 }
 
+static bool tracked_request_overlaps(BdrvTrackedRequest *req,
+                                     int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes)
+{
+    /*        aaaa   bbbb */
+    if (offset >= req->overlap_offset + req->overlap_bytes) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    /* bbbb   aaaa        */
+    if (req->overlap_offset >= offset + bytes) {
+        return false;
+    }
+    return true;
+}
+
+static bool coroutine_fn
+bdrv_wait_serialising_requests_locked(BlockDriverState *bs,
+                                      BdrvTrackedRequest *self)
+{
+    BdrvTrackedRequest *req;
+    bool retry;
+    bool waited = false;
+
+    do {
+        retry = false;
+        QLIST_FOREACH(req, &bs->tracked_requests, list) {
+            if (req == self || (!req->serialising && !self->serialising)) {
+                continue;
+            }
+            if (tracked_request_overlaps(req, self->overlap_offset,
+                                         self->overlap_bytes))
+            {
+                /* Hitting this means there was a reentrant request, for
+                 * example, a block driver issuing nested requests.  This must
+                 * never happen since it means deadlock.
+                 */
+                assert(qemu_coroutine_self() != req->co);
+
+                /* If the request is already (indirectly) waiting for us, or
+                 * will wait for us as soon as it wakes up, then just go on
+                 * (instead of producing a deadlock in the former case). */
+                if (!req->waiting_for) {
+                    self->waiting_for = req;
+                    qemu_co_queue_wait(&req->wait_queue, &bs->reqs_lock);
+                    self->waiting_for = NULL;
+                    retry = true;
+                    waited = true;
+                    break;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    } while (retry);
+    return waited;
+}
+
 bool bdrv_mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align)
 {
+    BlockDriverState *bs = req->bs;
     int64_t overlap_offset = req->offset & ~(align - 1);
     uint64_t overlap_bytes = ROUND_UP(req->offset + req->bytes, align)
                                - overlap_offset;
+    bool waited;
 
+    qemu_co_mutex_lock(&bs->reqs_lock);
     if (!req->serialising) {
         atomic_inc(&req->bs->serialising_in_flight);
         req->serialising = true;
@@ -729,7 +785,9 @@ bool bdrv_mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align)
 
     req->overlap_offset = MIN(req->overlap_offset, overlap_offset);
     req->overlap_bytes = MAX(req->overlap_bytes, overlap_bytes);
-    return bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(req);
+    waited = bdrv_wait_serialising_requests_locked(bs, req);
+    qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&bs->reqs_lock);
+    return waited;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -783,20 +841,6 @@ static int bdrv_get_cluster_size(BlockDriverState *bs)
     }
 }
 
-static bool tracked_request_overlaps(BdrvTrackedRequest *req,
-                                     int64_t offset, uint64_t bytes)
-{
-    /*        aaaa   bbbb */
-    if (offset >= req->overlap_offset + req->overlap_bytes) {
-        return false;
-    }
-    /* bbbb   aaaa        */
-    if (req->overlap_offset >= offset + bytes) {
-        return false;
-    }
-    return true;
-}
-
 void bdrv_inc_in_flight(BlockDriverState *bs)
 {
     atomic_inc(&bs->in_flight);
@@ -816,45 +860,15 @@ void bdrv_dec_in_flight(BlockDriverState *bs)
 static bool coroutine_fn bdrv_wait_serialising_requests(BdrvTrackedRequest *self)
 {
     BlockDriverState *bs = self->bs;
-    BdrvTrackedRequest *req;
-    bool retry;
     bool waited = false;
 
     if (!atomic_read(&bs->serialising_in_flight)) {
         return false;
     }
 
-    do {
-        retry = false;
-        qemu_co_mutex_lock(&bs->reqs_lock);
-        QLIST_FOREACH(req, &bs->tracked_requests, list) {
-            if (req == self || (!req->serialising && !self->serialising)) {
-                continue;
-            }
-            if (tracked_request_overlaps(req, self->overlap_offset,
-                                         self->overlap_bytes))
-            {
-                /* Hitting this means there was a reentrant request, for
-                 * example, a block driver issuing nested requests.  This must
-                 * never happen since it means deadlock.
-                 */
-                assert(qemu_coroutine_self() != req->co);
-
-                /* If the request is already (indirectly) waiting for us, or
-                 * will wait for us as soon as it wakes up, then just go on
-                 * (instead of producing a deadlock in the former case). */
-                if (!req->waiting_for) {
-                    self->waiting_for = req;
-                    qemu_co_queue_wait(&req->wait_queue, &bs->reqs_lock);
-                    self->waiting_for = NULL;
-                    retry = true;
-                    waited = true;
-                    break;
-                }
-            }
-        }
-        qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&bs->reqs_lock);
-    } while (retry);
+    qemu_co_mutex_lock(&bs->reqs_lock);
+    waited = bdrv_wait_serialising_requests_locked(bs, self);
+    qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&bs->reqs_lock);
 
     return waited;
 }
-- 
1.8.3.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix
  2020-01-08 14:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Paolo Bonzini
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block/io: take bs->reqs_lock in bdrv_mark_request_serialising Paolo Bonzini
@ 2020-01-14 16:28 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
  2020-01-14 19:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2020-01-14 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: kwolf, qemu-devel, qemu-block

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 980 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:55:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Peter Lieven noticed that reqs->overlap_offset and reqs->overlap_bytes
> are written outside bs->reqs_lock.  Patch 3 fixes it, while patches 1
> and 2 are preparatory cleanups.
> 
> v1->v2: fix comment in patch 2, commit message in patch 3 [Kevin]
> 
> Paolo Bonzini (3):
>   block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING
>   block/io: wait for serialising requests when a request becomes
>     serialising
>   block/io: take bs->reqs_lock in bdrv_mark_request_serialising
> 
>  block/file-posix.c        |   1 -
>  block/io.c                | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  include/block/block.h     |  12 ----
>  include/block/block_int.h |   3 +-
>  4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)

Is it possible to trigger the bug somehow?

Can you implement a test case?

Thanks, applied to my block tree:
https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block

Stefan

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix
  2020-01-14 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2020-01-14 19:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2020-01-14 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Hajnoczi; +Cc: kwolf, qemu-devel, qemu-block


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1060 bytes --]

On 14/01/20 17:28, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 03:55:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Peter Lieven noticed that reqs->overlap_offset and reqs->overlap_bytes
>> are written outside bs->reqs_lock.  Patch 3 fixes it, while patches 1
>> and 2 are preparatory cleanups.
>>
>> v1->v2: fix comment in patch 2, commit message in patch 3 [Kevin]
>>
>> Paolo Bonzini (3):
>>   block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING
>>   block/io: wait for serialising requests when a request becomes
>>     serialising
>>   block/io: take bs->reqs_lock in bdrv_mark_request_serialising
>>
>>  block/file-posix.c        |   1 -
>>  block/io.c                | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  include/block/block.h     |  12 ----
>>  include/block/block_int.h |   3 +-
>>  4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
> Is it possible to trigger the bug somehow?
> 
> Can you implement a test case?

No, it was found by inspection only, and it's actually protected by the
AioContext lock for now.

Paolo


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-01-14 19:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-08 14:55 [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] block: eliminate BDRV_REQ_NO_SERIALISING Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] block/io: wait for serialising requests when a request becomes serialising Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-08 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] block/io: take bs->reqs_lock in bdrv_mark_request_serialising Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-14 16:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] block/io: serialising request clean up and locking fix Stefan Hajnoczi
2020-01-14 19:39   ` Paolo Bonzini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.