All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-01-19 14:19 ` Sameer Pujar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sameer Pujar @ 2020-01-19 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tiwai, perex; +Cc: broonie, alsa-devel, linux-kernel, Sameer Pujar

Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
for codec2codec DAI link.

Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.

Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
 - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
 - capture stream is available for cpu_dai

and vice-versa for capture = 1?

Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
---
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index 74d340d..5aa9c0b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -2855,10 +2855,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
 
 		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
 				playback = 1;
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
 				capture = 1;
 		}
 
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-01-19 14:19 ` Sameer Pujar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sameer Pujar @ 2020-01-19 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tiwai, perex; +Cc: Sameer Pujar, alsa-devel, broonie, linux-kernel

Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
for codec2codec DAI link.

Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.

Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
 - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
 - capture stream is available for cpu_dai

and vice-versa for capture = 1?

Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
---
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index 74d340d..5aa9c0b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -2855,10 +2855,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
 
 		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
 				playback = 1;
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
 				capture = 1;
 		}
 
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Applied "ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai" to the asoc tree
  2020-01-19 14:19 ` [alsa-devel] " Sameer Pujar
@ 2020-01-21 17:28   ` Mark Brown
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-01-21 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sameer Pujar; +Cc: alsa-devel, broonie, linux-kernel, Mark Brown, perex, tiwai

The patch

   ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.5

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

From af4bac11531fbc0b5955fdccbe3f5ea265cd7374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:49:23 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai

Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
for codec2codec DAI link.

Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.

Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
 - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
 - capture stream is available for cpu_dai

and vice-versa for capture = 1?

Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579443563-12287-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index b78f6ff2b1d3..f70bec7815ee 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -2916,10 +2916,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
 
 		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
 				playback = 1;
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
 				capture = 1;
 		}
 
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai" to the asoc tree
@ 2020-01-21 17:28   ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-01-21 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sameer Pujar; +Cc: alsa-devel, Mark Brown, tiwai, linux-kernel

The patch

   ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-5.5

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

From af4bac11531fbc0b5955fdccbe3f5ea265cd7374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 19:49:23 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai

Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
for codec2codec DAI link.

Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.

Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
 - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
 - capture stream is available for cpu_dai

and vice-versa for capture = 1?

Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579443563-12287-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
index b78f6ff2b1d3..f70bec7815ee 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
@@ -2916,10 +2916,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
 
 		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
 				playback = 1;
 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
-			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
+			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
 				capture = 1;
 		}
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
  2020-01-19 14:19 ` [alsa-devel] " Sameer Pujar
@ 2020-01-23  9:55   ` Sameer Pujar
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sameer Pujar @ 2020-01-23  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tiwai, perex; +Cc: spujar, broonie, alsa-devel, linux-kernel


Hi All,
Request for comments if my understanding is right here. Thanks.

On 1/19/2020 7:49 PM, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
> access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
> only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
> for codec2codec DAI link.
>
> Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
> happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
> SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.
>
> Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
>   - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
>   - capture stream is available for cpu_dai
>
> and vice-versa for capture = 1?
>
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> index 74d340d..5aa9c0b 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> @@ -2855,10 +2855,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
>   
>   		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
>   			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
>   				playback = 1;
>   			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
>   				capture = 1;
>   		}
>   


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-01-23  9:55   ` Sameer Pujar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sameer Pujar @ 2020-01-23  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: tiwai, perex; +Cc: spujar, broonie, alsa-devel, linux-kernel


Hi All,
Request for comments if my understanding is right here. Thanks.

On 1/19/2020 7:49 PM, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
> access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
> only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
> for codec2codec DAI link.
>
> Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
> happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
> SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.
>
> Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
>   - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
>   - capture stream is available for cpu_dai
>
> and vice-versa for capture = 1?
>
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> ---
>   sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> index 74d340d..5aa9c0b 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> @@ -2855,10 +2855,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
>   
>   		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
>   			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
>   				playback = 1;
>   			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
>   				capture = 1;
>   		}
>   

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
  2020-01-19 14:19 ` [alsa-devel] " Sameer Pujar
@ 2020-02-17 14:41   ` Stephan Gerhold
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2020-02-17 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sameer Pujar; +Cc: tiwai, perex, alsa-devel, broonie, linux-kernel

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 07:49:23PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
> access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
> only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
> for codec2codec DAI link.
> 
> Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
> happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
> SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.
> 
> Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
>  - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
>  - capture stream is available for cpu_dai
> 
> and vice-versa for capture = 1?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> index 74d340d..5aa9c0b 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> @@ -2855,10 +2855,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
>  
>  		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
>  			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
>  				playback = 1;
>  			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
>  				capture = 1;
>  		}
>  

There are no longer any playback/capture PCMs registered on
qcom/apq8016_sbc with this patch. :(

With this patch:
  $ ls /dev/snd
  controlC0  timer

Without this patch:
  $ ls /dev/snd
  controlC0  pcmC0D0p   pcmC0D1c   timer

(There is exactly one playback-only and capture-only PCM normally...)

The routing looks like this:
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: ASoC: registered pcm #0 WCD multicodec-0
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: multicodec <-> Primary MI2S mapping ok
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: ASoC: registered pcm #1 WCD-Capture multicodec-1
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: multicodec <-> Tertiary MI2S mapping ok
  WCD: connected DAI link 7708000.lpass:Primary Playback -> 771c000.codec:AIF1 Playback
  WCD: connected DAI link 7708000.lpass:Primary Playback -> 200f000.spmi:pm8916@1:codec@f00:PDM Playback
  WCD-Capture: connected DAI link 771c000.codec:AIF1 Capture -> 7708000.lpass:Tertiary Capture
  WCD-Capture: connected DAI link 200f000.spmi:pm8916@1:codec@f00:PDM Capture -> 7708000.lpass:Tertiary Capture

For the playback stream, codec_dai and cpu_dai (lpass) only support SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK.
The same applies to the capture stream.

I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?

Thanks,
Stephan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-02-17 14:41   ` Stephan Gerhold
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2020-02-17 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sameer Pujar; +Cc: linux-kernel, alsa-devel, broonie, tiwai

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 07:49:23PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
> Crash happens in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai() when substream->private_data
> access is made and substream is NULL here. This is seen for DAIs where
> only playback or capture stream is defined. This seems to be happening
> for codec2codec DAI link.
> 
> Both playback and capture are 0 during soc_new_pcm(). This is probably
> happening because cpu_dai and codec_dai are both validated either for
> SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK or SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE.
> 
> Shouldn't be playback = 1 when,
>  - playback stream is available for codec_dai AND
>  - capture stream is available for cpu_dai
> 
> and vice-versa for capture = 1?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> index 74d340d..5aa9c0b 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c
> @@ -2855,10 +2855,10 @@ int soc_new_pcm(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd, int num)
>  
>  		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
>  			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
>  				playback = 1;
>  			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> -			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
> +			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
>  				capture = 1;
>  		}
>  

There are no longer any playback/capture PCMs registered on
qcom/apq8016_sbc with this patch. :(

With this patch:
  $ ls /dev/snd
  controlC0  timer

Without this patch:
  $ ls /dev/snd
  controlC0  pcmC0D0p   pcmC0D1c   timer

(There is exactly one playback-only and capture-only PCM normally...)

The routing looks like this:
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: ASoC: registered pcm #0 WCD multicodec-0
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: multicodec <-> Primary MI2S mapping ok
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: ASoC: registered pcm #1 WCD-Capture multicodec-1
  qcom-apq8016-sbc 7702000.sound: multicodec <-> Tertiary MI2S mapping ok
  WCD: connected DAI link 7708000.lpass:Primary Playback -> 771c000.codec:AIF1 Playback
  WCD: connected DAI link 7708000.lpass:Primary Playback -> 200f000.spmi:pm8916@1:codec@f00:PDM Playback
  WCD-Capture: connected DAI link 771c000.codec:AIF1 Capture -> 7708000.lpass:Tertiary Capture
  WCD-Capture: connected DAI link 200f000.spmi:pm8916@1:codec@f00:PDM Capture -> 7708000.lpass:Tertiary Capture

For the playback stream, codec_dai and cpu_dai (lpass) only support SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK.
The same applies to the capture stream.

I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?

Thanks,
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
  2020-02-17 14:41   ` Stephan Gerhold
@ 2020-02-17 15:43     ` Mark Brown
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-02-17 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephan Gerhold; +Cc: Sameer Pujar, tiwai, perex, alsa-devel, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 371 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:

> I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
> used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?

It is in the normal case, but with a CODEC<->CODEC link (which was what
this was targeting) we need to bodge things by swapping playback and
capture on one end of the link.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-02-17 15:43     ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-02-17 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephan Gerhold; +Cc: linux-kernel, Sameer Pujar, tiwai, alsa-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 371 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:

> I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
> used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?

It is in the normal case, but with a CODEC<->CODEC link (which was what
this was targeting) we need to bodge things by swapping playback and
capture on one end of the link.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
  2020-02-17 15:43     ` Mark Brown
@ 2020-02-17 17:12       ` Stephan Gerhold
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2020-02-17 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown
  Cc: Sameer Pujar, tiwai, perex, alsa-devel, linux-kernel, Jerome Brunet

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:43:01PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> 
> > I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
> > used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?
> 
> It is in the normal case, but with a CODEC<->CODEC link (which was what
> this was targeting) we need to bodge things by swapping playback and
> capture on one end of the link.

I see. Looking at the code again I'm guessing the cause of the crash
"fixed" by this patch is commit a342031cdd08 ("ASoC: create pcm for
codec2codec links as well") where the codec2codec case was sort of
patched in. This is what we had before this patch:

		/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
			&cpu_dai->driver->playback : &cpu_dai->driver->capture;
		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
			&cpu_dai->driver->capture : &cpu_dai->driver->playback;

This does the swapping you mentioned, so I guess rtd->dai_link->params
is only set for the codec2codec case?

		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
				playback = 1;
			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
				capture = 1;
		}

		capture = capture && cpu_capture->channels_min;
		playback = playback && cpu_playback->channels_min;

And this does a part of the check in snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(),
but without the NULL check of cpu_capture/cpu_playback.
(Maybe that is the cause of the crash.)

From my limited understanding, I would say that a much simpler way to
implement this would be:

	/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
	int cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE;
	int cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK;

	for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_playback))
			playback = 1;
		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_capture))
			capture = 1;
	}

since snd_soc_dai_stream_valid() does both the NULL-check and the 
"channels_min" check.

But I'm really not familar with the codec2codec case and am unable to
test it :) What do you think?

Thanks,
Stephan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-02-17 17:12       ` Stephan Gerhold
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2020-02-17 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown; +Cc: alsa-devel, Sameer Pujar, linux-kernel, tiwai, Jerome Brunet

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:43:01PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> 
> > I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
> > used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?
> 
> It is in the normal case, but with a CODEC<->CODEC link (which was what
> this was targeting) we need to bodge things by swapping playback and
> capture on one end of the link.

I see. Looking at the code again I'm guessing the cause of the crash
"fixed" by this patch is commit a342031cdd08 ("ASoC: create pcm for
codec2codec links as well") where the codec2codec case was sort of
patched in. This is what we had before this patch:

		/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
			&cpu_dai->driver->playback : &cpu_dai->driver->capture;
		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
			&cpu_dai->driver->capture : &cpu_dai->driver->playback;

This does the swapping you mentioned, so I guess rtd->dai_link->params
is only set for the codec2codec case?

		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
				playback = 1;
			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
				capture = 1;
		}

		capture = capture && cpu_capture->channels_min;
		playback = playback && cpu_playback->channels_min;

And this does a part of the check in snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(),
but without the NULL check of cpu_capture/cpu_playback.
(Maybe that is the cause of the crash.)

From my limited understanding, I would say that a much simpler way to
implement this would be:

	/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
	int cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE;
	int cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK;

	for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_playback))
			playback = 1;
		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_capture))
			capture = 1;
	}

since snd_soc_dai_stream_valid() does both the NULL-check and the 
"channels_min" check.

But I'm really not familar with the codec2codec case and am unable to
test it :) What do you think?

Thanks,
Stephan
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
  2020-02-17 17:12       ` Stephan Gerhold
@ 2020-02-17 17:19         ` Stephan Gerhold
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2020-02-17 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown
  Cc: Sameer Pujar, tiwai, perex, alsa-devel, linux-kernel, Jerome Brunet

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 06:12:53PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:43:01PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
> > > used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?
> > 
> > It is in the normal case, but with a CODEC<->CODEC link (which was what
> > this was targeting) we need to bodge things by swapping playback and
> > capture on one end of the link.
> 
> I see. Looking at the code again I'm guessing the cause of the crash
> "fixed" by this patch is commit a342031cdd08 ("ASoC: create pcm for
> codec2codec links as well") where the codec2codec case was sort of
> patched in. This is what we had before this patch:
> 
> 		/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
> 		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 			&cpu_dai->driver->playback : &cpu_dai->driver->capture;
> 		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 			&cpu_dai->driver->capture : &cpu_dai->driver->playback;
> 
> This does the swapping you mentioned, so I guess rtd->dai_link->params
> is only set for the codec2codec case?
> 
> 		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
> 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> 			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
> 				playback = 1;
> 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> 			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
> 				capture = 1;
> 		}
> 
> 		capture = capture && cpu_capture->channels_min;
> 		playback = playback && cpu_playback->channels_min;
> 
> And this does a part of the check in snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(),
> but without the NULL check of cpu_capture/cpu_playback.
> (Maybe that is the cause of the crash.)

Uh, no, I am completely wrong here. :)
cpu_capture/cpu_playback cannot actually be NULL...
I should have looked more carefully at snd_soc_dai_stream_valid()...

But I still wonder if the approach below would be easier?

> 
> From my limited understanding, I would say that a much simpler way to
> implement this would be:
> 
> 	/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
> 	int cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE;
> 	int cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK;
> 
> 	for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
> 		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> 		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_playback))
> 			playback = 1;
> 		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> 		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_capture))
> 			capture = 1;
> 	}
> 
> since snd_soc_dai_stream_valid() does both the NULL-check and the 
> "channels_min" check.
> 
> But I'm really not familar with the codec2codec case and am unable to
> test it :) What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-02-17 17:19         ` Stephan Gerhold
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stephan Gerhold @ 2020-02-17 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown; +Cc: alsa-devel, Sameer Pujar, linux-kernel, tiwai, Jerome Brunet

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 06:12:53PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:43:01PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 03:41:20PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm a bit confused about this patch, isn't SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK
> > > used for both cpu_dai and codec_dai in the playback case?
> > 
> > It is in the normal case, but with a CODEC<->CODEC link (which was what
> > this was targeting) we need to bodge things by swapping playback and
> > capture on one end of the link.
> 
> I see. Looking at the code again I'm guessing the cause of the crash
> "fixed" by this patch is commit a342031cdd08 ("ASoC: create pcm for
> codec2codec links as well") where the codec2codec case was sort of
> patched in. This is what we had before this patch:
> 
> 		/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
> 		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 			&cpu_dai->driver->playback : &cpu_dai->driver->capture;
> 		struct snd_soc_pcm_stream *cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 			&cpu_dai->driver->capture : &cpu_dai->driver->playback;
> 
> This does the swapping you mentioned, so I guess rtd->dai_link->params
> is only set for the codec2codec case?
> 
> 		for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
> 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> 			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK))
> 				playback = 1;
> 			if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> 			    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE))
> 				capture = 1;
> 		}
> 
> 		capture = capture && cpu_capture->channels_min;
> 		playback = playback && cpu_playback->channels_min;
> 
> And this does a part of the check in snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(),
> but without the NULL check of cpu_capture/cpu_playback.
> (Maybe that is the cause of the crash.)

Uh, no, I am completely wrong here. :)
cpu_capture/cpu_playback cannot actually be NULL...
I should have looked more carefully at snd_soc_dai_stream_valid()...

But I still wonder if the approach below would be easier?

> 
> From my limited understanding, I would say that a much simpler way to
> implement this would be:
> 
> 	/* Adapt stream for codec2codec links */
> 	int cpu_capture = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE;
> 	int cpu_playback = rtd->dai_link->params ?
> 		SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE : SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK;
> 
> 	for_each_rtd_codec_dai(rtd, i, codec_dai) {
> 		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) &&
> 		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_playback))
> 			playback = 1;
> 		if (snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(codec_dai, SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) &&
> 		    snd_soc_dai_stream_valid(cpu_dai,   cpu_capture))
> 			capture = 1;
> 	}
> 
> since snd_soc_dai_stream_valid() does both the NULL-check and the 
> "channels_min" check.
> 
> But I'm really not familar with the codec2codec case and am unable to
> test it :) What do you think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephan
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
  2020-02-17 17:12       ` Stephan Gerhold
@ 2020-02-17 17:30         ` Mark Brown
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-02-17 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephan Gerhold
  Cc: Sameer Pujar, tiwai, perex, alsa-devel, linux-kernel, Jerome Brunet

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 560 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 06:12:45PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:

> This does the swapping you mentioned, so I guess rtd->dai_link->params
> is only set for the codec2codec case?

Yes, that's the idea.

> From my limited understanding, I would say that a much simpler way to
> implement this would be:
> 
> But I'm really not familar with the codec2codec case and am unable to
> test it :) What do you think?

I think that looks reasonable from just looking at the e-mail without a
context diff and you should submit a patch so others can test!

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai
@ 2020-02-17 17:30         ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2020-02-17 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephan Gerhold
  Cc: alsa-devel, Sameer Pujar, linux-kernel, tiwai, Jerome Brunet


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 560 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 06:12:45PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:

> This does the swapping you mentioned, so I guess rtd->dai_link->params
> is only set for the codec2codec case?

Yes, that's the idea.

> From my limited understanding, I would say that a much simpler way to
> implement this would be:
> 
> But I'm really not familar with the codec2codec case and am unable to
> test it :) What do you think?

I think that looks reasonable from just looking at the e-mail without a
context diff and you should submit a patch so others can test!

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-17 17:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-01-19 14:19 [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai Sameer Pujar
2020-01-19 14:19 ` [alsa-devel] " Sameer Pujar
2020-01-21 17:28 ` Applied "ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2020-01-21 17:28   ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2020-01-23  9:55 ` [RFC] ASoC: soc-pcm: crash in snd_soc_dapm_new_dai Sameer Pujar
2020-01-23  9:55   ` [alsa-devel] " Sameer Pujar
2020-02-17 14:41 ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-02-17 14:41   ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-02-17 15:43   ` Mark Brown
2020-02-17 15:43     ` Mark Brown
2020-02-17 17:12     ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-02-17 17:12       ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-02-17 17:19       ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-02-17 17:19         ` Stephan Gerhold
2020-02-17 17:30       ` Mark Brown
2020-02-17 17:30         ` Mark Brown

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.