All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patchwork <patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org>
To: "Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged (rev2)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:23:02 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <158262618242.5725.3856745661109768895@emeril.freedesktop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225082233.274530-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

== Series Details ==

Series: series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged (rev2)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73885/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_8002 -> Patchwork_16699
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/index.html

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_16699:

### IGT changes ###

#### Suppressed ####

  The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
  They do not affect the overall result.

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc:
    - {fi-tgl-u}:         [INCOMPLETE][1] ([i915#1233]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8002/fi-tgl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/fi-tgl-u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc.html
    - {fi-tgl-dsi}:       [DMESG-FAIL][3] ([i915#1233]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][4]
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8002/fi-tgl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/fi-tgl-dsi/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16699 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_render_linear_blits@basic:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [PASS][5] -> [DMESG-WARN][6] ([CI#94] / [i915#402]) +1 similar issue
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8002/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_render_linear_blits@basic.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/fi-tgl-y/igt@gem_render_linear_blits@basic.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts:
    - fi-skl-lmem:        [TIMEOUT][7] ([fdo#112271]) -> [PASS][8]
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8002/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/fi-skl-lmem/igt@i915_selftest@live_gem_contexts.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
    - fi-kbl-7500u:       [FAIL][9] ([fdo#111096] / [i915#323]) -> [PASS][10]
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8002/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast.html

  * igt@vgem_basic@dmabuf-export:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [DMESG-WARN][11] ([CI#94] / [i915#402]) -> [PASS][12] +1 similar issue
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8002/fi-tgl-y/igt@vgem_basic@dmabuf-export.html
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/fi-tgl-y/igt@vgem_basic@dmabuf-export.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc:
    - fi-tgl-y:           [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([CI#94] / [i915#1233]) -> [DMESG-FAIL][14] ([CI#94])
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_8002/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/fi-tgl-y/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_lrc.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [CI#94]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/i915-infra/issues/94
  [fdo#111096]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111096
  [fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
  [i915#1233]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1233
  [i915#323]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/323
  [i915#402]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/402


Participating hosts (52 -> 44)
------------------------------

  Missing    (8): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-kbl-7560u fi-byt-clapper fi-bsw-nick fi-bdw-samus 


Build changes
-------------

  * CI: CI-20190529 -> None
  * Linux: CI_DRM_8002 -> Patchwork_16699

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_8002: 9a201f217db6b51322008733fbc3e77e16c5dbfe @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_5464: 8cf2f8684992052ab89de1cf328c418224c0c2a7 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
  Patchwork_16699: b79648161fa451aa6a3d33dead10dc62a5dec136 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

b79648161fa4 drm/i915/gem: Check that the context wasn't closed during setup
4161e451abba drm/i915/gt: Prevent allocation on a banned context
bf1b76aeb2d1 drm/i915/gem: Consolidate ctx->engines[] release
eb26b66bdc2e drm/i915/selftests: Be a little more lenient for reset workers
aebf10206b49 drm/i915/selftests: Check recovery from corrupted LRC
72ecc965378b drm/i915/selftests: Verify LRC isolation
e1df2a76132a drm/i915: Protect i915_request_await_start from early waits
3a60eb342c62 drm/i915/gem: Cleanup shadow batch after I915_EXEC_SECURE
fef10565bb54 drm/i915/gt: Pull marking vm as closed underneath the vm->mutex
5a1236317071 drm/i915: Manually acquire engine-wakeref around use of kernel_context
b123d93c63fa drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16699/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-25 10:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-25  8:22 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915: Manually acquire engine-wakeref around use of kernel_context Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/gt: Pull marking vm as closed underneath the vm->mutex Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/gem: Cleanup shadow batch after I915_EXEC_SECURE Chris Wilson
2020-02-25 11:15   ` Matthew Auld
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: Protect i915_request_await_start from early waits Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  9:26   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/selftests: Verify LRC isolation Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/selftests: Check recovery from corrupted LRC Chris Wilson
2020-02-25 18:00   ` Matthew Auld
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/selftests: Be a little more lenient for reset workers Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/gem: Consolidate ctx->engines[] release Chris Wilson
2020-02-26 16:41   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-02-26 17:06     ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/gt: Prevent allocation on a banned context Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/gem: Check that the context wasn't closed during setup Chris Wilson
2020-02-25  8:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged Patchwork
2020-02-25  8:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-02-25  9:57 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged (rev2) Patchwork
2020-02-25 10:23 ` Patchwork [this message]
2020-02-25 11:23 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged Matthew Auld
2020-02-26 13:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915: Drop assertion that active->fence is unchanged (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=158262618242.5725.3856745661109768895@emeril.freedesktop.org \
    --to=patchwork@emeril.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.