All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: timers/core] posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 10:27:55 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <158305847525.28353.4345801491752820779.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878skmvdts.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>

The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     60f2ceaa8111d9ec51af87bde4a6809f2b3235e4
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/60f2ceaa8111d9ec51af87bde4a6809f2b3235e4
Author:        Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:09:19 -06:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Sun, 01 Mar 2020 11:21:44 +01:00

posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group

As of e78c3496790e ("time, signal: Protect resource use statistics
with seqlock") cpu_clock_sample_group no longers needs siglock
protection.  Unfortunately no one realized it at the time.

Remove the extra locking that is for cpu_clock_sample_group and not
for cpu_clock_sample.  This significantly simplifies the code.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/878skmvdts.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org

---
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 66 ++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 46cc188..40c2d83 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -718,31 +718,10 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timer, struct itimerspec64 *itp
 	/*
 	 * Sample the clock to take the difference with the expiry time.
 	 */
-	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
+	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
 		now = cpu_clock_sample(clkid, p);
-	} else {
-		struct sighand_struct *sighand;
-		unsigned long flags;
-
-		/*
-		 * Protect against sighand release/switch in exit/exec and
-		 * also make timer sampling safe if it ends up calling
-		 * thread_group_cputime().
-		 */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
-			/*
-			 * The process has been reaped.
-			 * We can't even collect a sample any more.
-			 * Disarm the timer, nothing else to do.
-			 */
-			cpu_timer_setexpires(ctmr, 0);
-			return;
-		} else {
-			now = cpu_clock_sample_group(clkid, p, false);
-			unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		}
-	}
+	else
+		now = cpu_clock_sample_group(clkid, p, false);
 
 	if (now < expires) {
 		itp->it_value = ns_to_timespec64(expires - now);
@@ -986,43 +965,22 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_rearm(struct k_itimer *timer)
 	/*
 	 * Fetch the current sample and update the timer's expiry time.
 	 */
-	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
+	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
 		now = cpu_clock_sample(clkid, p);
-		bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
-		if (unlikely(p->exit_state))
-			return;
-
-		/* Protect timer list r/w in arm_timer() */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		if (!sighand)
-			return;
-	} else {
-		/*
-		 * Protect arm_timer() and timer sampling in case of call to
-		 * thread_group_cputime().
-		 */
-		sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
-		if (unlikely(sighand == NULL)) {
-			/*
-			 * The process has been reaped.
-			 * We can't even collect a sample any more.
-			 */
-			cpu_timer_setexpires(ctmr, 0);
-			return;
-		} else if (unlikely(p->exit_state) && thread_group_empty(p)) {
-			/* If the process is dying, no need to rearm */
-			goto unlock;
-		}
+	else
 		now = cpu_clock_sample_group(clkid, p, true);
-		bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
-		/* Leave the sighand locked for the call below.  */
-	}
+
+	bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
+
+	/* Protect timer list r/w in arm_timer() */
+	sighand = lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
+	if (unlikely(sighand == NULL))
+		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * Now re-arm for the new expiry time.
 	 */
 	arm_timer(timer);
-unlock:
 	unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-01 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28 17:07 [PATCH 0/5] posix-cpu-timers: Graceful handling of reaped processes Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-28 17:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] posix-cpu-timers: cpu_clock_sample_group no longer needs siglock Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-01 10:27   ` [tip: timers/core] posix-cpu-timers: cpu_clock_sample_group() " tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-28 17:09 ` [PATCH 2/5] posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-01 10:27   ` tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2020-02-28 17:09 ` [PATCH 3/5] posix-cpu-timers: Pass the task into arm_timer Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-01 10:27   ` [tip: timers/core] posix-cpu-timers: Pass the task into arm_timer() tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-28 17:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] posix-cpu-timers: Store a reference to a pid not a task Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-01 10:27   ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-04  8:57   ` tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-28 17:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] posix-cpu-timers: Stop disabling timers on mt-exec Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-01 10:27   ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman
2020-03-04  8:57   ` tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman
2020-02-29 20:49 [tip: timers/core] posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_group tip-bot2 for Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=158305847525.28353.4345801491752820779.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.