All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: add nat mangle action only for NAT-conntrack
@ 2020-05-29  4:07 wenxu
  2020-05-29 17:56 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: wenxu @ 2020-05-29  4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: paulb; +Cc: netdev, davem

From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>

Currently add nat mangle action with comparing invert and ori tuple.
It is better to check IPS_NAT_MASK flags first to avoid non necessary
memcmp for non-NAT conntrack.

Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
---
 net/sched/act_ct.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
index c50a86a..d621152 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
@@ -198,18 +198,21 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
 					    struct flow_action *action)
 {
 	const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple = &ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple;
+	bool nat = ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK;
 	struct nf_conntrack_tuple target;
 
 	nf_ct_invert_tuple(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
 
 	switch (tuple->src.l3num) {
 	case NFPROTO_IPV4:
-		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
-						      action);
+		if (nat)
+			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
+							      action);
 		break;
 	case NFPROTO_IPV6:
-		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
-						      action);
+		if (nat)
+			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
+							      action);
 		break;
 	default:
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -217,10 +220,14 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
 
 	switch (nf_ct_protonum(ct)) {
 	case IPPROTO_TCP:
-		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target, action);
+		if (nat)
+			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target,
+							     action);
 		break;
 	case IPPROTO_UDP:
-		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target, action);
+		if (nat)
+			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target,
+							     action);
 		break;
 	default:
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: add nat mangle action only for NAT-conntrack
  2020-05-29  4:07 [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: add nat mangle action only for NAT-conntrack wenxu
@ 2020-05-29 17:56 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
  2020-05-30  0:04   ` wenxu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner @ 2020-05-29 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wenxu; +Cc: paulb, netdev, davem

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:07:45PM +0800, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
> 
> Currently add nat mangle action with comparing invert and ori tuple.
> It is better to check IPS_NAT_MASK flags first to avoid non necessary
> memcmp for non-NAT conntrack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
> ---
>  net/sched/act_ct.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> index c50a86a..d621152 100644
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -198,18 +198,21 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
>  					    struct flow_action *action)
>  {
>  	const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple = &ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple;
> +	bool nat = ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK;
>  	struct nf_conntrack_tuple target;

[A]

>  
>  	nf_ct_invert_tuple(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
>  
>  	switch (tuple->src.l3num) {
>  	case NFPROTO_IPV4:
> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
> -						      action);
> +		if (nat)

Why do the same check multiple times, on all actions? As no other
action is performed if not doing a nat, seems at [A] above, it could
just:

if (!nat)
	return 0;

> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
> +							      action);
>  		break;
>  	case NFPROTO_IPV6:
> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
> -						      action);
> +		if (nat)
> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
> +							      action);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> @@ -217,10 +220,14 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
>  
>  	switch (nf_ct_protonum(ct)) {
>  	case IPPROTO_TCP:
> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target, action);
> +		if (nat)
> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target,
> +							     action);
>  		break;
>  	case IPPROTO_UDP:
> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target, action);
> +		if (nat)
> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target,
> +							     action);
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: add nat mangle action only for NAT-conntrack
  2020-05-29 17:56 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
@ 2020-05-30  0:04   ` wenxu
  2020-05-30  5:58     ` wenxu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: wenxu @ 2020-05-30  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner; +Cc: paulb, netdev, davem


在 2020/5/30 1:56, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 写道:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:07:45PM +0800, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
>> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>>
>> Currently add nat mangle action with comparing invert and ori tuple.
>> It is better to check IPS_NAT_MASK flags first to avoid non necessary
>> memcmp for non-NAT conntrack.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>> ---
>>  net/sched/act_ct.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>> index c50a86a..d621152 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>> @@ -198,18 +198,21 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
>>  					    struct flow_action *action)
>>  {
>>  	const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple = &ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple;
>> +	bool nat = ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK;
>>  	struct nf_conntrack_tuple target;
> [A]
>
>>  
>>  	nf_ct_invert_tuple(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
>>  
>>  	switch (tuple->src.l3num) {
>>  	case NFPROTO_IPV4:
>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
>> -						      action);
>> +		if (nat)
> Why do the same check multiple times, on all actions? As no other
> action is performed if not doing a nat, seems at [A] above, it could
> just:
>
> if (!nat)
> 	return 0;

This function is not always return 0.  It is the same for non-nat conntrack.

If the ether proto is not ipv4 or ipv6 and the ip_proto is not tcp and udp,

this function should return -EOPNOTSUPP. Check the nat for each type

is just to following the rule.

>
>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
>> +							      action);
>>  		break;
>>  	case NFPROTO_IPV6:
>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
>> -						      action);
>> +		if (nat)
>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
>> +							      action);
>>  		break;
>>  	default:
>>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> @@ -217,10 +220,14 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
>>  
>>  	switch (nf_ct_protonum(ct)) {
>>  	case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target, action);
>> +		if (nat)
>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target,
>> +							     action);
>>  		break;
>>  	case IPPROTO_UDP:
>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target, action);
>> +		if (nat)
>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target,
>> +							     action);
>>  		break;
>>  	default:
>>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: add nat mangle action only for NAT-conntrack
  2020-05-30  0:04   ` wenxu
@ 2020-05-30  5:58     ` wenxu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: wenxu @ 2020-05-30  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner; +Cc: paulb, netdev, davem


在 2020/5/30 8:04, wenxu 写道:
> 在 2020/5/30 1:56, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 写道:
>> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:07:45PM +0800, wenxu@ucloud.cn wrote:
>>> From: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>>>
>>> Currently add nat mangle action with comparing invert and ori tuple.
>>> It is better to check IPS_NAT_MASK flags first to avoid non necessary
>>> memcmp for non-NAT conntrack.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: wenxu <wenxu@ucloud.cn>
>>> ---
>>>  net/sched/act_ct.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/sched/act_ct.c b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> index c50a86a..d621152 100644
>>> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
>>> @@ -198,18 +198,21 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
>>>  					    struct flow_action *action)
>>>  {
>>>  	const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple = &ct->tuplehash[dir].tuple;
>>> +	bool nat = ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK;
>>>  	struct nf_conntrack_tuple target;
>> [A]
>>
>>>  
>>>  	nf_ct_invert_tuple(&target, &ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple);
>>>  
>>>  	switch (tuple->src.l3num) {
>>>  	case NFPROTO_IPV4:
>>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
>>> -						      action);
>>> +		if (nat)
>> Why do the same check multiple times, on all actions? As no other
>> action is performed if not doing a nat, seems at [A] above, it could
>> just:
>>
>> if (!nat)
>> 	return 0;
> This function is not always return 0.  It is the same for non-nat conntrack.
>
> If the ether proto is not ipv4 or ipv6 and the ip_proto is not tcp and udp,
>
> this function should return -EOPNOTSUPP. Check the nat for each type
>
> is just to following the rule.

Marcelo,

Maybe your are right. This function can any care about the nat conntrack entry and

can totally ignore all the non-nat ones

>
>>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv4(tuple, target,
>>> +							      action);
>>>  		break;
>>>  	case NFPROTO_IPV6:
>>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
>>> -						      action);
>>> +		if (nat)
>>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_ipv6(tuple, target,
>>> +							      action);
>>>  		break;
>>>  	default:
>>>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> @@ -217,10 +220,14 @@ static int tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat(struct net *net,
>>>  
>>>  	switch (nf_ct_protonum(ct)) {
>>>  	case IPPROTO_TCP:
>>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target, action);
>>> +		if (nat)
>>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_tcp(tuple, target,
>>> +							     action);
>>>  		break;
>>>  	case IPPROTO_UDP:
>>> -		tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target, action);
>>> +		if (nat)
>>> +			tcf_ct_flow_table_add_action_nat_udp(tuple, target,
>>> +							     action);
>>>  		break;
>>>  	default:
>>>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> -- 
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-30  5:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-29  4:07 [PATCH] net/sched: act_ct: add nat mangle action only for NAT-conntrack wenxu
2020-05-29 17:56 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2020-05-30  0:04   ` wenxu
2020-05-30  5:58     ` wenxu

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.