From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: deadline notice Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:58:21 +0200 Message-ID: <159365803.3qspsHhf2U@xps13> References: <2520130.3p9lvqUWmZ@xps13> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E521@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Iremonger, Bernard" , linville@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C18F5A83 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:59:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wifx6 with SMTP id x6so5226952wif.0 for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 02:59:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E521@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-06-11 09:30, Iremonger, Bernard: > The following patch was submitted on 10th March 2015, but does not seem to be on DPDK patchwork. > > [dpdk-dev] [RFC] af_packet: support port hotplug Good catch. It was classified as RFC: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3963/ A v2 should be sent. Note: [RFC] should be preferred for incomplete patches or trials.