All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	yu-cheng.yu@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, gorcunov@gmail.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, like.xu@linux.intel.com,
	yao.jin@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V3 12/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all()
Date: Fri,  3 Jul 2020 05:49:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593780569-62993-13-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593780569-62993-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The previous model-specific LBR and Architecture LBR (legacy way) use a
similar method to save/restore the LBR information, which directly
accesses the LBR registers. The codes which read/write a set of LBR
registers can be shared between them.

Factor out two functions which are used to read/write a set of LBR
registers.

Add lbr_info into structure x86_pmu, and use it to replace the hardcoded
LBR INFO MSR, because the LBR INFO MSR address of the previous
model-specific LBR is different from Architecture LBR. The MSR address
should be assigned at boot time. For now, only Sky Lake and later
platforms have the LBR INFO MSR.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c  | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 arch/x86/events/perf_event.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index e3574a8..f47f41e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64(void)
 		wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + i, 0);
 		wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to   + i, 0);
 		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + i, 0);
+			wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + i, 0);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -343,6 +343,11 @@ static __always_inline void wrlbr_to(unsigned int idx, u64 val)
 	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to + idx, val);
 }
 
+static __always_inline void wrlbr_info(unsigned int idx, u64 val)
+{
+	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + idx, val);
+}
+
 static __always_inline u64 rdlbr_from(unsigned int idx)
 {
 	u64 val;
@@ -361,8 +366,44 @@ static __always_inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned int idx)
 	return val;
 }
 
+static __always_inline u64 rdlbr_info(unsigned int idx)
+{
+	u64 val;
+
+	rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + idx, val);
+
+	return val;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void
+wrlbr_all(struct lbr_entry *lbr, unsigned int idx, bool need_info)
+{
+	wrlbr_from(idx, lbr->from);
+	wrlbr_to(idx, lbr->to);
+	if (need_info)
+		wrlbr_info(idx, lbr->info);
+}
+
+static __always_inline bool
+rdlbr_all(struct lbr_entry *lbr, unsigned int idx, bool need_info)
+{
+	u64 from = rdlbr_from(idx);
+
+	/* Don't read invalid entry */
+	if (!from)
+		return false;
+
+	lbr->from = from;
+	lbr->to = rdlbr_to(idx);
+	if (need_info)
+		lbr->info = rdlbr_info(idx);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 {
+	bool need_info = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO;
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
 	int i;
@@ -372,11 +413,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 	mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < task_ctx->valid_lbrs; i++) {
 		lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
-		wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].from);
-		wrlbr_to(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].to);
-
-		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
+		wrlbr_all(&task_ctx->lbr[i], lbr_idx, need_info);
 	}
 
 	for (; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
@@ -384,7 +421,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 		wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, 0);
 		wrlbr_to(lbr_idx, 0);
 		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, 0);
+			wrlbr_info(lbr_idx, 0);
 	}
 
 	wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_tos, tos);
@@ -427,23 +464,19 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
 
 void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
 {
+	bool need_info = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO;
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
 	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
 	unsigned lbr_idx, mask;
-	u64 tos, from;
+	u64 tos;
 	int i;
 
 	mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
 	tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
 	for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
 		lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
-		from = rdlbr_from(lbr_idx);
-		if (!from)
+		if (!rdlbr_all(&task_ctx->lbr[i], lbr_idx, need_info))
 			break;
-		task_ctx->lbr[i].from = from;
-		task_ctx->lbr[i].to = rdlbr_to(lbr_idx);
-		if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
-			rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
 	}
 	task_ctx->valid_lbrs = i;
 	task_ctx->tos = tos;
@@ -689,7 +722,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 		if (lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO && need_info) {
 			u64 info;
 
-			rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, info);
+			info = rdlbr_info(lbr_idx);
 			mis = !!(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
 			pred = !mis;
 			in_tx = !!(info & LBR_INFO_IN_TX);
@@ -1336,6 +1369,7 @@ __init void intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl(void)
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos	 = MSR_LBR_TOS;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_from = MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_to   = MSR_LBR_NHM_TO;
+	x86_pmu.lbr_info = MSR_LBR_INFO_0;
 
 	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask = LBR_SEL_MASK;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map  = hsw_lbr_sel_map;
@@ -1421,7 +1455,7 @@ int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
 	lbr->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
 	lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
 	lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
-	lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? MSR_LBR_INFO_0 : 0;
+	lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index 5689036..06c1fd0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	 * Intel LBR
 	 */
 	unsigned int	lbr_tos, lbr_from, lbr_to,
-			lbr_nr;			   /* LBR base regs and size */
+			lbr_info, lbr_nr;	   /* LBR base regs and size */
 	union {
 		u64	lbr_sel_mask;		   /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
 		u64	lbr_ctl_mask;		   /* LBR_CTL valid bits */
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-03 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03 12:49 [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 01/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-09 23:00     ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-10  9:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 14:09       ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 02/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 03/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 04/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add the function pointers for LBR save and restore kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 05/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 06/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 07/23] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 08/23] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 09/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 10/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Unify the stored format of LBR information kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 11/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Mark the {rd,wr}lbr_{to,from} wrappers __always_inline kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` kan.liang [this message]
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all() tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 13/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out intel_pmu_store_lbr kan.liang
2020-07-03 19:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 20:59     ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 10:25       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 13:32         ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 14:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 22:29       ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-07  7:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 14/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 15/23] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 16/23] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 17/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 18/23] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 19/23] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 20/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-05-27 22:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 21/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 22/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 23/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08  9:51   ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 19:34 ` [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1593780569-62993-13-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.