From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40F9C433DF for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D818720702 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728225AbgGGLMN (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:12:13 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:40432 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728067AbgGGLMH (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:12:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 067B2eeq027154; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:12:02 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 324fapwpn6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:12:01 -0400 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 067B49Qc033743; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:12:01 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 324fapwpmr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:12:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 067B0bPm017543; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:00 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 324bugnghv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:12:00 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 067BC0o250659836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:00 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035A6B2067; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F789B2065; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sofia.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.70.202]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: by sofia.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BE1E2E48C8; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:41:54 +0530 (IST) From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" To: Nicholas Piggin , Anton Blanchard , Nathan Lynch , Michael Ellerman , Michael Neuling , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "Gautham R. Shenoy" Subject: [PATCH 3/5] cpuidle-pseries : Fixup exit latency for CEDE(0) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:41:37 +0530 Message-Id: <1594120299-31389-4-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1594120299-31389-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1594120299-31389-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-07_06:2020-07-07,2020-07-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2007070081 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" We are currently assuming that CEDE(0) has exit latency 10us, since there is no way for us to query from the platform. However, if the wakeup latency of an Extended CEDE state is smaller than 10us, then we can be sure that the exit latency of CEDE(0) cannot be more than that. that. In this patch, we fix the exit latency of CEDE(0) if we discover an Extended CEDE state with wakeup latency smaller than 10us. The new value is 1us lesser than the smallest wakeup latency among the Extended CEDE states. Benchmark results: ebizzy: 2 ebizzy threads bound to the same big-core. 25% improvement in the avg records/s with patch. x without_patch * with_patch N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 10 2491089 5834307 5398375 4244335 1596244.9 * 10 2893813 5834474 5832448 5327281.3 1055941.4 context_switch2 : There is no major regression observed with this patch as seen from the context_switch2 benchmark. context_switch2 across CPU0 CPU1 (Both belong to same big-core, but different small cores). We observe a minor 0.14% regression in the number of context-switches (higher is better). x without_patch * with_patch N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 500 348872 362236 354712 354745.69 2711.827 * 500 349422 361452 353942 354215.4 2576.9258 context_switch2 across CPU0 CPU8 (Different big-cores). We observe a 0.37% improvement in the number of context-switches (higher is better). x without_patch * with_patch N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 500 287956 294940 288896 288977.23 646.59295 * 500 288300 294646 289582 290064.76 1161.9992 schbench: No major difference could be seen until the 99.9th percentile. Without-patch Latency percentiles (usec) 50.0th: 29 75.0th: 39 90.0th: 49 95.0th: 59 *99.0th: 13104 99.5th: 14672 99.9th: 15824 min=0, max=17993 With-patch: Latency percentiles (usec) 50.0th: 29 75.0th: 40 90.0th: 50 95.0th: 61 *99.0th: 13648 99.5th: 14768 99.9th: 15664 min=0, max=29812 Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy --- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c index c13549b..502f906 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c @@ -353,12 +353,42 @@ static int pseries_cpuidle_driver_init(void) static int add_pseries_idle_states(void) { int nr_states = 2; /* By default we have snooze, CEDE */ + int i; + u64 min_latency_us = dedicated_states[1].exit_latency; /* CEDE latency */ if (parse_cede_parameters()) return nr_states; - pr_info("cpuidle : Skipping the %d Extended CEDE idle states\n", - nr_xcede_records); + for (i = 0; i < nr_xcede_records; i++) { + u64 latency_tb = xcede_records[i].wakeup_latency_tb_ticks; + u64 latency_us = tb_to_ns(latency_tb) / NSEC_PER_USEC; + + if (latency_us < min_latency_us) + min_latency_us = latency_us; + } + + /* + * We are currently assuming that CEDE(0) has exit latency + * 10us, since there is no way for us to query from the + * platform. + * + * However, if the wakeup latency of an Extended CEDE state is + * smaller than 10us, then we can be sure that CEDE(0) + * requires no more than that. + * + * Perform the fix-up. + */ + if (min_latency_us < dedicated_states[1].exit_latency) { + u64 cede0_latency = min_latency_us - 1; + + if (cede0_latency <= 0) + cede0_latency = min_latency_us; + + dedicated_states[1].exit_latency = cede0_latency; + dedicated_states[1].target_residency = 10 * (cede0_latency); + pr_info("cpuidle : Fixed up CEDE exit latency to %llu us\n", + cede0_latency); + } return nr_states; } -- 1.9.4 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54E8C433E4 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7243520738 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:22:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7243520738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1Klc0fzWzDqZ1 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 21:22:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1KX62P2lzDqYM for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 21:12:06 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1KX618jTz9Cvh for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 21:12:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 4B1KX56yMWz9sRW; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 21:12:05 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1KX53nSKz9sTZ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 21:12:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 067B2eeq027154; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:12:02 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 324fapwpn6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:12:01 -0400 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 067B49Qc033743; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 07:12:01 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 324fapwpmr-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:12:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 067B0bPm017543; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:00 GMT Received: from b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.23]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 324bugnghv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:12:00 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 067BC0o250659836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:00 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035A6B2067; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:12:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F789B2065; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sofia.ibm.com (unknown [9.85.70.202]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: by sofia.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7BE1E2E48C8; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:41:54 +0530 (IST) From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" To: Nicholas Piggin , Anton Blanchard , Nathan Lynch , Michael Ellerman , Michael Neuling , Vaidyanathan Srinivasan Subject: [PATCH 3/5] cpuidle-pseries : Fixup exit latency for CEDE(0) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:41:37 +0530 Message-Id: <1594120299-31389-4-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1594120299-31389-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1594120299-31389-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235, 18.0.687 definitions=2020-07-07_06:2020-07-07, 2020-07-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 cotscore=-2147483648 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2004280000 definitions=main-2007070081 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Gautham R. Shenoy" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" We are currently assuming that CEDE(0) has exit latency 10us, since there is no way for us to query from the platform. However, if the wakeup latency of an Extended CEDE state is smaller than 10us, then we can be sure that the exit latency of CEDE(0) cannot be more than that. that. In this patch, we fix the exit latency of CEDE(0) if we discover an Extended CEDE state with wakeup latency smaller than 10us. The new value is 1us lesser than the smallest wakeup latency among the Extended CEDE states. Benchmark results: ebizzy: 2 ebizzy threads bound to the same big-core. 25% improvement in the avg records/s with patch. x without_patch * with_patch N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 10 2491089 5834307 5398375 4244335 1596244.9 * 10 2893813 5834474 5832448 5327281.3 1055941.4 context_switch2 : There is no major regression observed with this patch as seen from the context_switch2 benchmark. context_switch2 across CPU0 CPU1 (Both belong to same big-core, but different small cores). We observe a minor 0.14% regression in the number of context-switches (higher is better). x without_patch * with_patch N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 500 348872 362236 354712 354745.69 2711.827 * 500 349422 361452 353942 354215.4 2576.9258 context_switch2 across CPU0 CPU8 (Different big-cores). We observe a 0.37% improvement in the number of context-switches (higher is better). x without_patch * with_patch N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 500 287956 294940 288896 288977.23 646.59295 * 500 288300 294646 289582 290064.76 1161.9992 schbench: No major difference could be seen until the 99.9th percentile. Without-patch Latency percentiles (usec) 50.0th: 29 75.0th: 39 90.0th: 49 95.0th: 59 *99.0th: 13104 99.5th: 14672 99.9th: 15824 min=0, max=17993 With-patch: Latency percentiles (usec) 50.0th: 29 75.0th: 40 90.0th: 50 95.0th: 61 *99.0th: 13648 99.5th: 14768 99.9th: 15664 min=0, max=29812 Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy --- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c index c13549b..502f906 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c @@ -353,12 +353,42 @@ static int pseries_cpuidle_driver_init(void) static int add_pseries_idle_states(void) { int nr_states = 2; /* By default we have snooze, CEDE */ + int i; + u64 min_latency_us = dedicated_states[1].exit_latency; /* CEDE latency */ if (parse_cede_parameters()) return nr_states; - pr_info("cpuidle : Skipping the %d Extended CEDE idle states\n", - nr_xcede_records); + for (i = 0; i < nr_xcede_records; i++) { + u64 latency_tb = xcede_records[i].wakeup_latency_tb_ticks; + u64 latency_us = tb_to_ns(latency_tb) / NSEC_PER_USEC; + + if (latency_us < min_latency_us) + min_latency_us = latency_us; + } + + /* + * We are currently assuming that CEDE(0) has exit latency + * 10us, since there is no way for us to query from the + * platform. + * + * However, if the wakeup latency of an Extended CEDE state is + * smaller than 10us, then we can be sure that CEDE(0) + * requires no more than that. + * + * Perform the fix-up. + */ + if (min_latency_us < dedicated_states[1].exit_latency) { + u64 cede0_latency = min_latency_us - 1; + + if (cede0_latency <= 0) + cede0_latency = min_latency_us; + + dedicated_states[1].exit_latency = cede0_latency; + dedicated_states[1].target_residency = 10 * (cede0_latency); + pr_info("cpuidle : Fixed up CEDE exit latency to %llu us\n", + cede0_latency); + } return nr_states; } -- 1.9.4