* [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
The patch series adds support for power10 PMU hardware.
Patches 1..3 are the clean up patches which refactors the way how
PMU SPR's are stored in core-book3s and in KVM book3s, as well as update
data type for PMU cache_events.
Patches 12 and 13 adds base support for perf extended register
capability in powerpc. Support for extended regs in power10 is
covered in patches 14,15
Other patches includes main changes to support for power10 PMU.
Anju T Sudhakar (2):
powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf
intr_regs
tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in
powerpc
Athira Rajeev (10):
powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR
registers
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
Madhavan Srinivasan (3):
powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
---
Changes from v2 -> v3
- Addressed review comments from Michael Neuling,
Michael Ellerman, Gautham Shenoy and Paul Mackerras
Changes from v1 -> v2
- Added support for extended regs in powerpc
for power9/power10 platform ( patches 12 to 15)
- Addressed change/removal of some event codes
in the PMU driver
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 22 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 9 +
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 9 +-
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 5 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 38 ++-
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 36 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 108 ++++--
arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 91 +++--
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 37 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 23 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 44 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h | 70 ++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 425 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 18 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 8 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 26 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 +-
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 13 +
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 9 +-
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 8 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c | 9 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 55 +++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h | 15 +
40 files changed, 1117 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
The patch series adds support for power10 PMU hardware.
Patches 1..3 are the clean up patches which refactors the way how
PMU SPR's are stored in core-book3s and in KVM book3s, as well as update
data type for PMU cache_events.
Patches 12 and 13 adds base support for perf extended register
capability in powerpc. Support for extended regs in power10 is
covered in patches 14,15
Other patches includes main changes to support for power10 PMU.
Anju T Sudhakar (2):
powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf
intr_regs
tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in
powerpc
Athira Rajeev (10):
powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR
registers
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
Madhavan Srinivasan (3):
powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
---
Changes from v2 -> v3
- Addressed review comments from Michael Neuling,
Michael Ellerman, Gautham Shenoy and Paul Mackerras
Changes from v1 -> v2
- Added support for extended regs in powerpc
for power9/power10 platform ( patches 12 to 15)
- Addressed change/removal of some event codes
in the PMU driver
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 22 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 9 +
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 9 +-
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 5 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 38 ++-
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 36 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 108 ++++--
arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 91 +++--
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 37 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 23 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 44 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h | 70 ++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 425 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 18 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 8 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 26 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 +-
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 13 +
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 9 +-
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 8 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c | 9 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 55 +++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h | 15 +
40 files changed, 1117 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
The patch series adds support for power10 PMU hardware.
Patches 1..3 are the clean up patches which refactors the way how
PMU SPR's are stored in core-book3s and in KVM book3s, as well as update
data type for PMU cache_events.
Patches 12 and 13 adds base support for perf extended register
capability in powerpc. Support for extended regs in power10 is
covered in patches 14,15
Other patches includes main changes to support for power10 PMU.
Anju T Sudhakar (2):
powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf
intr_regs
tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in
powerpc
Athira Rajeev (10):
powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR
registers
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
Madhavan Srinivasan (3):
powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
---
Changes from v2 -> v3
- Addressed review comments from Michael Neuling,
Michael Ellerman, Gautham Shenoy and Paul Mackerras
Changes from v1 -> v2
- Added support for extended regs in powerpc
for power9/power10 platform ( patches 12 to 15)
- Addressed change/removal of some event codes
in the PMU driver
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 22 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 9 +
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 9 +-
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 5 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 38 ++-
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S | 8 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 36 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 108 ++++--
arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 91 +++--
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 37 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 23 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 44 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h | 70 ++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 425 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 18 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 19 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 8 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 26 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 +-
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 13 +
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 9 +-
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 20 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 8 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c | 9 +-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 55 +++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h | 15 +
40 files changed, 1117 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
core-book3s currently uses array to store the MMCR registers as part
of per-cpu `cpu_hw_events`. This patch does a clean up to use `struct`
to store mmcr regs instead of array. This will make code easier to read
and reduces chance of any subtle bug that may come in the future, say
when new registers are added. Patch updates all relevant code that was
using MMCR array ( cpuhw->mmcr[x]) to use newly introduced `struct`.
This includes the PMU driver code for supported platforms (power5
to power9) and ISA macros for counter support functions.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 10 ++++--
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 20 +++++------
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 +--
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 21 +++++++----
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 16 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 24 ++++++-------
10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 3e9703f..f9a3668 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
struct perf_event;
+struct mmcr_regs {
+ unsigned long mmcr0;
+ unsigned long mmcr1;
+ unsigned long mmcr2;
+ unsigned long mmcra;
+};
/*
* This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
* describe the PMU on a particular POWER-family CPU.
@@ -28,7 +34,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
unsigned long add_fields;
unsigned long test_adder;
int (*compute_mmcr)(u64 events[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[]);
int (*get_constraint)(u64 event_id, unsigned long *mskp,
unsigned long *valp);
@@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
unsigned long group_constraint_val;
u64 (*bhrb_filter_map)(u64 branch_sample_type);
void (*config_bhrb)(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter);
- void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
+ void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
int (*limited_pmc_event)(u64 event_id);
u32 flags;
const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index cd6a742..18b1b6a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
struct perf_event *event[MAX_HWEVENTS];
u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
- /*
- * The order of the MMCR array is:
- * - 64-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCRA, MMCR2
- * - 32-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCR2
- */
- unsigned long mmcr[4];
+ struct mmcr_regs mmcr;
struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
@@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ static void ebb_event_add(struct perf_event *event) { }
static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0) { }
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
{
- return cpuhw->mmcr[0];
+ return cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
}
static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
@@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
{
- unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr[0];
+ unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
if (!ebb)
goto out;
@@ -624,7 +619,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
* unfreeze counters, it should not set exclude_xxx in its events and
* instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
*/
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3] | current->thread.mmcr2);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
out:
return mmcr0;
}
@@ -1232,9 +1227,9 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
/*
* Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
- cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
mb();
isync();
}
@@ -1308,18 +1303,18 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* (possibly updated for removal of events).
*/
if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
goto out_enable;
}
/*
* Clear all MMCR settings and recompute them for the new set of events.
*/
- memset(cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
+ memset(&cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
if (ppmu->compute_mmcr(cpuhw->events, cpuhw->n_events, hwc_index,
- cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
+ &cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
/* shouldn't ever get here */
printk(KERN_ERR "oops compute_mmcr failed\n");
goto out;
@@ -1333,11 +1328,11 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
*/
event = cpuhw->event[0];
if (event->attr.exclude_user)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCP;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCP;
if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= freeze_events_kernel;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= freeze_events_kernel;
if (event->attr.exclude_hv)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCHV;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCHV;
}
/*
@@ -1346,12 +1341,12 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* Then unfreeze the events.
*/
ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
| MMCR0_FC);
if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
/*
* Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
@@ -1402,7 +1397,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
}
cpuhw->n_limited = n_lim;
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
out_enable:
pmao_restore_workaround(ebb);
@@ -1418,9 +1413,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
/*
* Enable instruction sampling if necessary
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
mb();
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra);
}
out:
@@ -1550,7 +1545,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
cpuhw->flags[i-1] = cpuhw->flags[i];
}
--cpuhw->n_events;
- ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, cpuhw->mmcr);
+ ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, &cpuhw->mmcr);
if (event->hw.idx) {
write_pmc(event->hw.idx, 0);
event->hw.idx = 0;
@@ -1571,7 +1566,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
}
if (cpuhw->n_events == 0) {
/* disable exceptions if no events are running */
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
}
if (has_branch_stack(event))
@@ -2240,7 +2235,7 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
* XXX might want to use MSR.PM to keep the events frozen until
* we get back out of this interrupt.
*/
- write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr[0]);
+ write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0);
if (nmi)
nmi_exit();
@@ -2262,7 +2257,7 @@ static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
if (ppmu) {
memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(*cpuhw));
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] = MMCR0_FC;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 = MMCR0_FC;
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 4c86da5..2fe63f2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
}
int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
@@ -464,30 +464,30 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
/* pmc_inuse is 1-based */
if (pmc_inuse & 2)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x7c)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
/* If we're not using PMC 5 or 6, freeze them */
if (!(pmc_inuse & 0x60))
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FC56;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FC56;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
- mmcr[3] = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
return 0;
}
-void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
}
static int find_alternative(u64 event, const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT], int size)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
index 63fd4f3..df968fd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
@@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp);
int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[]);
-void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
+void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
int isa207_get_alternatives(u64 event, u64 alt[], int size, unsigned int flags,
const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT]);
void isa207_get_mem_data_src(union perf_mem_data_src *dsrc, u32 flags,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
index 4d5ef92..826de25 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int mpc7450_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
* Compute MMCR0/1/2 values for a set of events.
*/
static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
- unsigned long mmcr[],
+ struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
u8 event_index[N_CLASSES][N_COUNTER];
@@ -321,9 +321,16 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCnCE;
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
+ /*
+ * 32-bit doesn't have an MMCRA and uses SPRN_MMCR2 to define
+ * SPRN_MMCRA. So assign mmcra of cpu_hw_events with `mmcr2`
+ * value to ensure that any write to this SPRN_MMCRA will
+ * use mmcr2 value.
+ */
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcr2;
return 0;
}
@@ -331,12 +338,12 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
* Disable counting by a PMC.
* Note that the pmc argument is 0-based here, not 1-based.
*/
-static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 1)
- mmcr[0] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
+ mmcr->mmcr0 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
else
- mmcr[1] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
}
static int mpc7450_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
index f857454..5f0821e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
@@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ static int power5p_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = 0;
@@ -586,20 +587,20 @@ static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power5p_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
index da52eca..426021d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
@@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ static int power5_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -528,20 +529,20 @@ static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power5_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
index 3929cac..e343a51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int power6_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
* Assign PMC numbers and compute MMCR1 value for a set of events
*/
static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr, struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -243,13 +243,13 @@ static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
if (pmc < 4)
mmcr1 |= (unsigned long)psel << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc);
}
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0xe)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
@@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int p6_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
return nalt;
}
-static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
/* Set PMCxSEL to 0 to disable PMCx */
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power6_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
index a137813..3152336 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
@@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -298,20 +299,20 @@ static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power7_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
index 4035d93..89a90ab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int p970_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
}
static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr0 = 0, mmcr1 = 0, mmcra = 0;
unsigned int pmc, unit, byte, psel;
@@ -393,27 +394,26 @@ static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= 0x2000; /* mark only one IOP per PPC instruction */
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
- int shift, i;
+ int shift;
+ /*
+ * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
+ */
if (pmc <= 1) {
shift = MMCR0_PMC1SEL_SH - 7 * pmc;
- i = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = (mmcr->mmcr0 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
} else {
shift = MMCR1_PMC3SEL_SH - 5 * (pmc - 2);
- i = 1;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = (mmcr->mmcr1 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
}
- /*
- * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
- */
- mmcr[i] = (mmcr[i] & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
}
static int ppc970_generic_events[] = {
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
core-book3s currently uses array to store the MMCR registers as part
of per-cpu `cpu_hw_events`. This patch does a clean up to use `struct`
to store mmcr regs instead of array. This will make code easier to read
and reduces chance of any subtle bug that may come in the future, say
when new registers are added. Patch updates all relevant code that was
using MMCR array ( cpuhw->mmcr[x]) to use newly introduced `struct`.
This includes the PMU driver code for supported platforms (power5
to power9) and ISA macros for counter support functions.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 10 ++++--
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 20 +++++------
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 +--
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 21 +++++++----
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 16 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 24 ++++++-------
10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 3e9703f..f9a3668 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
struct perf_event;
+struct mmcr_regs {
+ unsigned long mmcr0;
+ unsigned long mmcr1;
+ unsigned long mmcr2;
+ unsigned long mmcra;
+};
/*
* This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
* describe the PMU on a particular POWER-family CPU.
@@ -28,7 +34,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
unsigned long add_fields;
unsigned long test_adder;
int (*compute_mmcr)(u64 events[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[]);
int (*get_constraint)(u64 event_id, unsigned long *mskp,
unsigned long *valp);
@@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
unsigned long group_constraint_val;
u64 (*bhrb_filter_map)(u64 branch_sample_type);
void (*config_bhrb)(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter);
- void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
+ void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
int (*limited_pmc_event)(u64 event_id);
u32 flags;
const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index cd6a742..18b1b6a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
struct perf_event *event[MAX_HWEVENTS];
u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
- /*
- * The order of the MMCR array is:
- * - 64-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCRA, MMCR2
- * - 32-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCR2
- */
- unsigned long mmcr[4];
+ struct mmcr_regs mmcr;
struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
@@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ static void ebb_event_add(struct perf_event *event) { }
static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0) { }
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
{
- return cpuhw->mmcr[0];
+ return cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
}
static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
@@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
{
- unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr[0];
+ unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
if (!ebb)
goto out;
@@ -624,7 +619,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
* unfreeze counters, it should not set exclude_xxx in its events and
* instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
*/
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3] | current->thread.mmcr2);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
out:
return mmcr0;
}
@@ -1232,9 +1227,9 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
/*
* Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
- cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
mb();
isync();
}
@@ -1308,18 +1303,18 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* (possibly updated for removal of events).
*/
if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
goto out_enable;
}
/*
* Clear all MMCR settings and recompute them for the new set of events.
*/
- memset(cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
+ memset(&cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
if (ppmu->compute_mmcr(cpuhw->events, cpuhw->n_events, hwc_index,
- cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
+ &cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
/* shouldn't ever get here */
printk(KERN_ERR "oops compute_mmcr failed\n");
goto out;
@@ -1333,11 +1328,11 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
*/
event = cpuhw->event[0];
if (event->attr.exclude_user)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCP;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCP;
if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= freeze_events_kernel;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= freeze_events_kernel;
if (event->attr.exclude_hv)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCHV;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCHV;
}
/*
@@ -1346,12 +1341,12 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* Then unfreeze the events.
*/
ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
| MMCR0_FC);
if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
/*
* Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
@@ -1402,7 +1397,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
}
cpuhw->n_limited = n_lim;
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
out_enable:
pmao_restore_workaround(ebb);
@@ -1418,9 +1413,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
/*
* Enable instruction sampling if necessary
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
mb();
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra);
}
out:
@@ -1550,7 +1545,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
cpuhw->flags[i-1] = cpuhw->flags[i];
}
--cpuhw->n_events;
- ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, cpuhw->mmcr);
+ ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, &cpuhw->mmcr);
if (event->hw.idx) {
write_pmc(event->hw.idx, 0);
event->hw.idx = 0;
@@ -1571,7 +1566,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
}
if (cpuhw->n_events == 0) {
/* disable exceptions if no events are running */
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
}
if (has_branch_stack(event))
@@ -2240,7 +2235,7 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
* XXX might want to use MSR.PM to keep the events frozen until
* we get back out of this interrupt.
*/
- write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr[0]);
+ write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0);
if (nmi)
nmi_exit();
@@ -2262,7 +2257,7 @@ static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
if (ppmu) {
memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(*cpuhw));
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] = MMCR0_FC;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 = MMCR0_FC;
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 4c86da5..2fe63f2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
}
int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
@@ -464,30 +464,30 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
/* pmc_inuse is 1-based */
if (pmc_inuse & 2)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x7c)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
/* If we're not using PMC 5 or 6, freeze them */
if (!(pmc_inuse & 0x60))
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FC56;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FC56;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
- mmcr[3] = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
return 0;
}
-void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
}
static int find_alternative(u64 event, const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT], int size)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
index 63fd4f3..df968fd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
@@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp);
int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[]);
-void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
+void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
int isa207_get_alternatives(u64 event, u64 alt[], int size, unsigned int flags,
const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT]);
void isa207_get_mem_data_src(union perf_mem_data_src *dsrc, u32 flags,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
index 4d5ef92..826de25 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int mpc7450_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
* Compute MMCR0/1/2 values for a set of events.
*/
static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
- unsigned long mmcr[],
+ struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
u8 event_index[N_CLASSES][N_COUNTER];
@@ -321,9 +321,16 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCnCE;
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
+ /*
+ * 32-bit doesn't have an MMCRA and uses SPRN_MMCR2 to define
+ * SPRN_MMCRA. So assign mmcra of cpu_hw_events with `mmcr2`
+ * value to ensure that any write to this SPRN_MMCRA will
+ * use mmcr2 value.
+ */
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcr2;
return 0;
}
@@ -331,12 +338,12 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
* Disable counting by a PMC.
* Note that the pmc argument is 0-based here, not 1-based.
*/
-static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 1)
- mmcr[0] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
+ mmcr->mmcr0 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
else
- mmcr[1] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
}
static int mpc7450_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
index f857454..5f0821e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
@@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ static int power5p_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = 0;
@@ -586,20 +587,20 @@ static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power5p_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
index da52eca..426021d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
@@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ static int power5_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -528,20 +529,20 @@ static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power5_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
index 3929cac..e343a51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int power6_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
* Assign PMC numbers and compute MMCR1 value for a set of events
*/
static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr, struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -243,13 +243,13 @@ static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
if (pmc < 4)
mmcr1 |= (unsigned long)psel << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc);
}
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0xe)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
@@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int p6_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
return nalt;
}
-static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
/* Set PMCxSEL to 0 to disable PMCx */
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power6_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
index a137813..3152336 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
@@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -298,20 +299,20 @@ static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power7_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
index 4035d93..89a90ab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int p970_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
}
static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr0 = 0, mmcr1 = 0, mmcra = 0;
unsigned int pmc, unit, byte, psel;
@@ -393,27 +394,26 @@ static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= 0x2000; /* mark only one IOP per PPC instruction */
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
- int shift, i;
+ int shift;
+ /*
+ * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
+ */
if (pmc <= 1) {
shift = MMCR0_PMC1SEL_SH - 7 * pmc;
- i = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = (mmcr->mmcr0 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
} else {
shift = MMCR1_PMC3SEL_SH - 5 * (pmc - 2);
- i = 1;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = (mmcr->mmcr1 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
}
- /*
- * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
- */
- mmcr[i] = (mmcr[i] & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
}
static int ppc970_generic_events[] = {
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
core-book3s currently uses array to store the MMCR registers as part
of per-cpu `cpu_hw_events`. This patch does a clean up to use `struct`
to store mmcr regs instead of array. This will make code easier to read
and reduces chance of any subtle bug that may come in the future, say
when new registers are added. Patch updates all relevant code that was
using MMCR array ( cpuhw->mmcr[x]) to use newly introduced `struct`.
This includes the PMU driver code for supported platforms (power5
to power9) and ISA macros for counter support functions.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 10 ++++--
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 20 +++++------
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 +--
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 21 +++++++----
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 16 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 24 ++++++-------
10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 3e9703f..f9a3668 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
struct perf_event;
+struct mmcr_regs {
+ unsigned long mmcr0;
+ unsigned long mmcr1;
+ unsigned long mmcr2;
+ unsigned long mmcra;
+};
/*
* This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
* describe the PMU on a particular POWER-family CPU.
@@ -28,7 +34,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
unsigned long add_fields;
unsigned long test_adder;
int (*compute_mmcr)(u64 events[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[]);
int (*get_constraint)(u64 event_id, unsigned long *mskp,
unsigned long *valp);
@@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
unsigned long group_constraint_val;
u64 (*bhrb_filter_map)(u64 branch_sample_type);
void (*config_bhrb)(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter);
- void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
+ void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
int (*limited_pmc_event)(u64 event_id);
u32 flags;
const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index cd6a742..18b1b6a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
struct perf_event *event[MAX_HWEVENTS];
u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
- /*
- * The order of the MMCR array is:
- * - 64-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCRA, MMCR2
- * - 32-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCR2
- */
- unsigned long mmcr[4];
+ struct mmcr_regs mmcr;
struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
@@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ static void ebb_event_add(struct perf_event *event) { }
static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0) { }
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
{
- return cpuhw->mmcr[0];
+ return cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
}
static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
@@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
{
- unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr[0];
+ unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
if (!ebb)
goto out;
@@ -624,7 +619,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
* unfreeze counters, it should not set exclude_xxx in its events and
* instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
*/
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3] | current->thread.mmcr2);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
out:
return mmcr0;
}
@@ -1232,9 +1227,9 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
/*
* Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
- cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
mb();
isync();
}
@@ -1308,18 +1303,18 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* (possibly updated for removal of events).
*/
if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
goto out_enable;
}
/*
* Clear all MMCR settings and recompute them for the new set of events.
*/
- memset(cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
+ memset(&cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
if (ppmu->compute_mmcr(cpuhw->events, cpuhw->n_events, hwc_index,
- cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
+ &cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
/* shouldn't ever get here */
printk(KERN_ERR "oops compute_mmcr failed\n");
goto out;
@@ -1333,11 +1328,11 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
*/
event = cpuhw->event[0];
if (event->attr.exclude_user)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCP;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCP;
if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= freeze_events_kernel;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= freeze_events_kernel;
if (event->attr.exclude_hv)
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCHV;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCHV;
}
/*
@@ -1346,12 +1341,12 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
* Then unfreeze the events.
*/
ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
| MMCR0_FC);
if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
/*
* Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
@@ -1402,7 +1397,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
perf_event_update_userpage(event);
}
cpuhw->n_limited = n_lim;
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
out_enable:
pmao_restore_workaround(ebb);
@@ -1418,9 +1413,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
/*
* Enable instruction sampling if necessary
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
mb();
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2]);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra);
}
out:
@@ -1550,7 +1545,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
cpuhw->flags[i-1] = cpuhw->flags[i];
}
--cpuhw->n_events;
- ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, cpuhw->mmcr);
+ ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, &cpuhw->mmcr);
if (event->hw.idx) {
write_pmc(event->hw.idx, 0);
event->hw.idx = 0;
@@ -1571,7 +1566,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
}
if (cpuhw->n_events = 0) {
/* disable exceptions if no events are running */
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
}
if (has_branch_stack(event))
@@ -2240,7 +2235,7 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
* XXX might want to use MSR.PM to keep the events frozen until
* we get back out of this interrupt.
*/
- write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr[0]);
+ write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0);
if (nmi)
nmi_exit();
@@ -2262,7 +2257,7 @@ static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
if (ppmu) {
memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(*cpuhw));
- cpuhw->mmcr[0] = MMCR0_FC;
+ cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 = MMCR0_FC;
}
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 4c86da5..2fe63f2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
}
int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
@@ -464,30 +464,30 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
/* pmc_inuse is 1-based */
if (pmc_inuse & 2)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x7c)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
/* If we're not using PMC 5 or 6, freeze them */
if (!(pmc_inuse & 0x60))
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FC56;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FC56;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
- mmcr[3] = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
return 0;
}
-void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
}
static int find_alternative(u64 event, const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT], int size)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
index 63fd4f3..df968fd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
@@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp);
int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[]);
-void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
+void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
int isa207_get_alternatives(u64 event, u64 alt[], int size, unsigned int flags,
const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT]);
void isa207_get_mem_data_src(union perf_mem_data_src *dsrc, u32 flags,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
index 4d5ef92..826de25 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int mpc7450_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
* Compute MMCR0/1/2 values for a set of events.
*/
static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
- unsigned long mmcr[],
+ struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
u8 event_index[N_CLASSES][N_COUNTER];
@@ -321,9 +321,16 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCnCE;
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
+ /*
+ * 32-bit doesn't have an MMCRA and uses SPRN_MMCR2 to define
+ * SPRN_MMCRA. So assign mmcra of cpu_hw_events with `mmcr2`
+ * value to ensure that any write to this SPRN_MMCRA will
+ * use mmcr2 value.
+ */
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcr2;
return 0;
}
@@ -331,12 +338,12 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
* Disable counting by a PMC.
* Note that the pmc argument is 0-based here, not 1-based.
*/
-static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 1)
- mmcr[0] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
+ mmcr->mmcr0 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
else
- mmcr[1] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
}
static int mpc7450_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
index f857454..5f0821e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
@@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ static int power5p_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = 0;
@@ -586,20 +587,20 @@ static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power5p_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
index da52eca..426021d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
@@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ static int power5_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -528,20 +529,20 @@ static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power5_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
index 3929cac..e343a51 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int power6_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
* Assign PMC numbers and compute MMCR1 value for a set of events
*/
static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr, struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -243,13 +243,13 @@ static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
if (pmc < 4)
mmcr1 |= (unsigned long)psel << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc);
}
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0xe)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
@@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int p6_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
return nalt;
}
-static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
/* Set PMCxSEL to 0 to disable PMCx */
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power6_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
index a137813..3152336 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
@@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
}
static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
@@ -298,20 +299,20 @@ static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
}
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
if (pmc_inuse & 1)
- mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
- mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
if (pmc <= 3)
- mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
+ mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
}
static int power7_generic_events[] = {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
index 4035d93..89a90ab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
@@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int p970_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
}
static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
- unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
+ unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
+ struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcr0 = 0, mmcr1 = 0, mmcra = 0;
unsigned int pmc, unit, byte, psel;
@@ -393,27 +394,26 @@ static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= 0x2000; /* mark only one IOP per PPC instruction */
/* Return MMCRx values */
- mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
- mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
- mmcr[2] = mmcra;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
+ mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
return 0;
}
-static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
+static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
{
- int shift, i;
+ int shift;
+ /*
+ * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
+ */
if (pmc <= 1) {
shift = MMCR0_PMC1SEL_SH - 7 * pmc;
- i = 0;
+ mmcr->mmcr0 = (mmcr->mmcr0 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
} else {
shift = MMCR1_PMC3SEL_SH - 5 * (pmc - 2);
- i = 1;
+ mmcr->mmcr1 = (mmcr->mmcr1 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
}
- /*
- * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
- */
- mmcr[i] = (mmcr[i] & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
}
static int ppc970_generic_events[] = {
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
cleanup to make code easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +++-
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 12 ++++++------
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 7e2d061..fc115e2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u32 ccr1;
u32 dbsr;
- u64 mmcr[5];
+ u64 mmcr[3];
+ u64 mmcra;
+ u64 mmcrs;
u32 pmc[8];
u32 spmc[2];
u64 siar;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 264e266..e55d847 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x14)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x15)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x16)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 6657dc6..6fa4853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -559,6 +559,8 @@ int main(void)
OFFSET(VCPU_IRQ_PENDING, kvm_vcpu, arch.irq_pending);
OFFSET(VCPU_DBELL_REQ, kvm_vcpu, arch.doorbell_request);
OFFSET(VCPU_MMCR, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcr);
+ OFFSET(VCPU_MMCRA, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcra);
+ OFFSET(VCPU_MMCRS, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcrs);
OFFSET(VCPU_PMC, kvm_vcpu, arch.pmc);
OFFSET(VCPU_SPMC, kvm_vcpu, arch.spmc);
OFFSET(VCPU_SIAR, kvm_vcpu, arch.siar);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 6bf66649..3f90eee 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1679,10 +1679,16 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcrs);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.pmc[i]);
@@ -1900,10 +1906,16 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
+ vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ vcpu->arch.mmcrs = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
vcpu->arch.pmc[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 7194389..702eaa2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -3428,7 +3428,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_PMC6, r9
ld r3, VCPU_MMCR(r4)
ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 8(r4)
- ld r6, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
+ ld r6, VCPU_MMCRA(r4)
ld r7, VCPU_SIAR(r4)
ld r8, VCPU_SDAR(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR1, r5
@@ -3436,14 +3436,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_SIAR, r7
mtspr SPRN_SDAR, r8
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
- ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r4)
+ ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
ld r6, VCPU_SIER(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r5
mtspr SPRN_SIER, r6
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(96)
lwz r7, VCPU_PMC + 24(r4)
lwz r8, VCPU_PMC + 28(r4)
- ld r9, VCPU_MMCR + 32(r4)
+ ld r9, VCPU_MMCRS(r4)
mtspr SPRN_SPMC1, r7
mtspr SPRN_SPMC2, r8
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS, r9
@@ -3551,9 +3551,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
mfspr r8, SPRN_SDAR
std r4, VCPU_MMCR(r9)
std r5, VCPU_MMCR + 8(r9)
- std r6, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
+ std r6, VCPU_MMCRA(r9)
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
- std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r9)
+ std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
std r7, VCPU_SIAR(r9)
std r8, VCPU_SDAR(r9)
@@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(96)
mfspr r8, SPRN_MMCRS
stw r6, VCPU_PMC + 24(r9)
stw r7, VCPU_PMC + 28(r9)
- std r8, VCPU_MMCR + 32(r9)
+ std r8, VCPU_MMCRS(r9)
lis r4, 0x8000
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS, r4
END_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300, 0, 96)
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 264e266..e55d847 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x14)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x15)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x16)
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
cleanup to make code easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +++-
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 12 ++++++------
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 7e2d061..fc115e2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u32 ccr1;
u32 dbsr;
- u64 mmcr[5];
+ u64 mmcr[3];
+ u64 mmcra;
+ u64 mmcrs;
u32 pmc[8];
u32 spmc[2];
u64 siar;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 264e266..e55d847 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x14)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x15)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x16)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 6657dc6..6fa4853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -559,6 +559,8 @@ int main(void)
OFFSET(VCPU_IRQ_PENDING, kvm_vcpu, arch.irq_pending);
OFFSET(VCPU_DBELL_REQ, kvm_vcpu, arch.doorbell_request);
OFFSET(VCPU_MMCR, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcr);
+ OFFSET(VCPU_MMCRA, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcra);
+ OFFSET(VCPU_MMCRS, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcrs);
OFFSET(VCPU_PMC, kvm_vcpu, arch.pmc);
OFFSET(VCPU_SPMC, kvm_vcpu, arch.spmc);
OFFSET(VCPU_SIAR, kvm_vcpu, arch.siar);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 6bf66649..3f90eee 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1679,10 +1679,16 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcrs);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.pmc[i]);
@@ -1900,10 +1906,16 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
+ vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ vcpu->arch.mmcrs = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
vcpu->arch.pmc[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 7194389..702eaa2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -3428,7 +3428,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_PMC6, r9
ld r3, VCPU_MMCR(r4)
ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 8(r4)
- ld r6, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
+ ld r6, VCPU_MMCRA(r4)
ld r7, VCPU_SIAR(r4)
ld r8, VCPU_SDAR(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR1, r5
@@ -3436,14 +3436,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_SIAR, r7
mtspr SPRN_SDAR, r8
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
- ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r4)
+ ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
ld r6, VCPU_SIER(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r5
mtspr SPRN_SIER, r6
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(96)
lwz r7, VCPU_PMC + 24(r4)
lwz r8, VCPU_PMC + 28(r4)
- ld r9, VCPU_MMCR + 32(r4)
+ ld r9, VCPU_MMCRS(r4)
mtspr SPRN_SPMC1, r7
mtspr SPRN_SPMC2, r8
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS, r9
@@ -3551,9 +3551,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
mfspr r8, SPRN_SDAR
std r4, VCPU_MMCR(r9)
std r5, VCPU_MMCR + 8(r9)
- std r6, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
+ std r6, VCPU_MMCRA(r9)
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
- std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r9)
+ std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
std r7, VCPU_SIAR(r9)
std r8, VCPU_SDAR(r9)
@@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(96)
mfspr r8, SPRN_MMCRS
stw r6, VCPU_PMC + 24(r9)
stw r7, VCPU_PMC + 28(r9)
- std r8, VCPU_MMCR + 32(r9)
+ std r8, VCPU_MMCRS(r9)
lis r4, 0x8000
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS, r4
END_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300, 0, 96)
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 264e266..e55d847 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x14)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x15)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x16)
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
cleanup to make code easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 +++-
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 12 ++++++------
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 7e2d061..fc115e2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u32 ccr1;
u32 dbsr;
- u64 mmcr[5];
+ u64 mmcr[3];
+ u64 mmcra;
+ u64 mmcrs;
u32 pmc[8];
u32 spmc[2];
u64 siar;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 264e266..e55d847 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x14)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x15)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x16)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 6657dc6..6fa4853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -559,6 +559,8 @@ int main(void)
OFFSET(VCPU_IRQ_PENDING, kvm_vcpu, arch.irq_pending);
OFFSET(VCPU_DBELL_REQ, kvm_vcpu, arch.doorbell_request);
OFFSET(VCPU_MMCR, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcr);
+ OFFSET(VCPU_MMCRA, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcra);
+ OFFSET(VCPU_MMCRS, kvm_vcpu, arch.mmcrs);
OFFSET(VCPU_PMC, kvm_vcpu, arch.pmc);
OFFSET(VCPU_SPMC, kvm_vcpu, arch.spmc);
OFFSET(VCPU_SIAR, kvm_vcpu, arch.siar);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 6bf66649..3f90eee 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1679,10 +1679,16 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcrs);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.pmc[i]);
@@ -1900,10 +1906,16 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
+ vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
+ vcpu->arch.mmcrs = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
vcpu->arch.pmc[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 7194389..702eaa2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -3428,7 +3428,7 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_PMC6, r9
ld r3, VCPU_MMCR(r4)
ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 8(r4)
- ld r6, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
+ ld r6, VCPU_MMCRA(r4)
ld r7, VCPU_SIAR(r4)
ld r8, VCPU_SDAR(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR1, r5
@@ -3436,14 +3436,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_SIAR, r7
mtspr SPRN_SDAR, r8
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
- ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r4)
+ ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
ld r6, VCPU_SIER(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r5
mtspr SPRN_SIER, r6
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(96)
lwz r7, VCPU_PMC + 24(r4)
lwz r8, VCPU_PMC + 28(r4)
- ld r9, VCPU_MMCR + 32(r4)
+ ld r9, VCPU_MMCRS(r4)
mtspr SPRN_SPMC1, r7
mtspr SPRN_SPMC2, r8
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS, r9
@@ -3551,9 +3551,9 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
mfspr r8, SPRN_SDAR
std r4, VCPU_MMCR(r9)
std r5, VCPU_MMCR + 8(r9)
- std r6, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
+ std r6, VCPU_MMCRA(r9)
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
- std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r9)
+ std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
std r7, VCPU_SIAR(r9)
std r8, VCPU_SDAR(r9)
@@ -3578,7 +3578,7 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(96)
mfspr r8, SPRN_MMCRS
stw r6, VCPU_PMC + 24(r9)
stw r7, VCPU_PMC + 28(r9)
- std r8, VCPU_MMCR + 32(r9)
+ std r8, VCPU_MMCRS(r9)
lis r4, 0x8000
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS, r4
END_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300, 0, 96)
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index 264e266..e55d847 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
-#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x14)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x15)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x16)
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 03/15] powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Events of type PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE was described for Power PMU
as: int (*cache_events)[type][op][result];
where type, op, result values unpacked from the event attribute config
value is used to generate the raw event code at runtime.
So far the event code values which used to create these cache-related
events were within 32 bit and `int` type worked. In power10,
some of the event codes are of 64-bit value and hence update the
Power PMU cache_events to `u64` type in `power_pmu` struct.
Also propagate this change to existing all PMU driver code paths
which are using ppmu->cache_events.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 2 +-
11 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index f9a3668..14b8dc1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
int n_generic;
int *generic_events;
- int (*cache_events)[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+ u64 (*cache_events)[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX];
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 18b1b6a..f4d07b5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ static void hw_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
static int hw_perf_cache_event(u64 config, u64 *eventp)
{
unsigned long type, op, result;
- int ev;
+ u64 ev;
if (!ppmu->cache_events)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
index 5e5a54d..eb8a6aaf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ enum {
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int generic_compat_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 generic_compat_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
index 826de25..1919e9d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int mpc7450_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 mpc7450_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0, 0x225 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0, 0x227 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
index 5f0821e..a62b2cd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power5p_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power5p_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x1c10a8, 0x3c1088 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x2c10a8, 0xc10c3 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
index 426021d..8732b58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power5_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power5_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x4c1090, 0x3c1088 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x3c1090, 0xc10c3 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
index e343a51..0e318cf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* are event codes.
* The "DTLB" and "ITLB" events relate to the DERAT and IERAT.
*/
-static int power6_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power6_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x280030, 0x80080 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x180032, 0x80088 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
index 3152336..5e0bf09 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power7_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power7_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0xc880, 0x400f0 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0, 0x300f0 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
index 3a5fcc2..5282e84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void power8_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power8_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power8_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 08c3ef7..05dae38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power9_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power9_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
index 89a90ab..d35223f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int ppc970_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 ppc970_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x8810, 0x3810 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x7810, 0x813 },
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 03/15] powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Events of type PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE was described for Power PMU
as: int (*cache_events)[type][op][result];
where type, op, result values unpacked from the event attribute config
value is used to generate the raw event code at runtime.
So far the event code values which used to create these cache-related
events were within 32 bit and `int` type worked. In power10,
some of the event codes are of 64-bit value and hence update the
Power PMU cache_events to `u64` type in `power_pmu` struct.
Also propagate this change to existing all PMU driver code paths
which are using ppmu->cache_events.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 2 +-
11 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index f9a3668..14b8dc1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
int n_generic;
int *generic_events;
- int (*cache_events)[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+ u64 (*cache_events)[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX];
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 18b1b6a..f4d07b5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ static void hw_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
static int hw_perf_cache_event(u64 config, u64 *eventp)
{
unsigned long type, op, result;
- int ev;
+ u64 ev;
if (!ppmu->cache_events)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
index 5e5a54d..eb8a6aaf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ enum {
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int generic_compat_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 generic_compat_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
index 826de25..1919e9d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int mpc7450_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 mpc7450_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0, 0x225 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0, 0x227 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
index 5f0821e..a62b2cd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power5p_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power5p_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x1c10a8, 0x3c1088 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x2c10a8, 0xc10c3 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
index 426021d..8732b58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power5_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power5_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x4c1090, 0x3c1088 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x3c1090, 0xc10c3 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
index e343a51..0e318cf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* are event codes.
* The "DTLB" and "ITLB" events relate to the DERAT and IERAT.
*/
-static int power6_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power6_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x280030, 0x80080 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x180032, 0x80088 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
index 3152336..5e0bf09 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power7_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power7_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0xc880, 0x400f0 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0, 0x300f0 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
index 3a5fcc2..5282e84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void power8_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power8_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power8_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 08c3ef7..05dae38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power9_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power9_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
index 89a90ab..d35223f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int ppc970_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 ppc970_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x8810, 0x3810 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x7810, 0x813 },
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 03/15] powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Events of type PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE was described for Power PMU
as: int (*cache_events)[type][op][result];
where type, op, result values unpacked from the event attribute config
value is used to generate the raw event code at runtime.
So far the event code values which used to create these cache-related
events were within 32 bit and `int` type worked. In power10,
some of the event codes are of 64-bit value and hence update the
Power PMU cache_events to `u64` type in `power_pmu` struct.
Also propagate this change to existing all PMU driver code paths
which are using ppmu->cache_events.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 2 +-
11 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index f9a3668..14b8dc1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
int n_generic;
int *generic_events;
- int (*cache_events)[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+ u64 (*cache_events)[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX];
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 18b1b6a..f4d07b5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ static void hw_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
static int hw_perf_cache_event(u64 config, u64 *eventp)
{
unsigned long type, op, result;
- int ev;
+ u64 ev;
if (!ppmu->cache_events)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
index 5e5a54d..eb8a6aaf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/generic-compat-pmu.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ enum {
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int generic_compat_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 generic_compat_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
index 826de25..1919e9d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int mpc7450_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 mpc7450_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0, 0x225 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0, 0x227 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
index 5f0821e..a62b2cd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power5p_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power5p_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x1c10a8, 0x3c1088 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x2c10a8, 0xc10c3 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
index 426021d..8732b58 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@ static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power5_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power5_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x4c1090, 0x3c1088 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x3c1090, 0xc10c3 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
index e343a51..0e318cf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* are event codes.
* The "DTLB" and "ITLB" events relate to the DERAT and IERAT.
*/
-static int power6_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power6_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x280030, 0x80080 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x180032, 0x80088 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
index 3152336..5e0bf09 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power7_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power7_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0xc880, 0x400f0 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0, 0x300f0 },
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
index 3a5fcc2..5282e84 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void power8_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power8_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power8_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 08c3ef7..05dae38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int power9_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 power9_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[ C(L1D) ] = {
[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
index 89a90ab..d35223f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
* 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
* are event codes.
*/
-static int ppc970_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+static u64 ppc970_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
[C(L1D)] = { /* RESULT_ACCESS RESULT_MISS */
[C(OP_READ)] = { 0x8810, 0x3810 },
[C(OP_WRITE)] = { 0x7810, 0x813 },
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
information about the sampled instruction.
Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
unsigned long mmcr1;
unsigned long mmcr2;
unsigned long mmcra;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
};
/*
* This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
#define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
#define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
#define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
+#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
/*
* Values for flags to get_alternatives()
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
unsigned mmcr0;
unsigned used_ebb;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
+ unsigned long sier2;
+ unsigned long sier3;
+
#endif
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
#define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
#define SPRN_MMCR1 798
#define SPRN_MMCR2 785
+#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
#define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
+#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
#define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
#define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
#define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
@@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
#define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
#define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
#define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
+#define SPRN_SIER2 752
+#define SPRN_SIER3 753
+#define SPRN_USIER2 736
+#define SPRN_USIER3 737
#define SPRN_SIAR 796
#define SPRN_SDAR 797
#define SPRN_TACR 888
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
+SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
#endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
@@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
#endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
@@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
#endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
/*
* 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
* and a few other names are different.
+ * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
+ * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
+ * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
+ * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
+ * for 32-bit.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
@@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
#define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
#define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
+#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
+#define SPRN_SIER2 0
+#define SPRN_SIER3 0
#define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
+ current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
+ current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
+ }
}
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
@@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
* instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
*/
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
+
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
+ mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
+ mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
+ }
out:
return mmcr0;
}
@@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
}
+
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
+ mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
+ }
#endif
pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
@@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
goto out_enable;
}
@@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
+
/*
* Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
* to another PMC.
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
information about the sampled instruction.
Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
unsigned long mmcr1;
unsigned long mmcr2;
unsigned long mmcra;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
};
/*
* This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
#define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
#define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
#define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
+#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
/*
* Values for flags to get_alternatives()
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
unsigned mmcr0;
unsigned used_ebb;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
+ unsigned long sier2;
+ unsigned long sier3;
+
#endif
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
#define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
#define SPRN_MMCR1 798
#define SPRN_MMCR2 785
+#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
#define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
+#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
#define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
#define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
#define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
@@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
#define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
#define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
#define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
+#define SPRN_SIER2 752
+#define SPRN_SIER3 753
+#define SPRN_USIER2 736
+#define SPRN_USIER3 737
#define SPRN_SIAR 796
#define SPRN_SDAR 797
#define SPRN_TACR 888
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
+SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
#endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
@@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
#endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
@@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
#endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
/*
* 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
* and a few other names are different.
+ * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
+ * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
+ * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
+ * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
+ * for 32-bit.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
@@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
#define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
#define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
+#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
+#define SPRN_SIER2 0
+#define SPRN_SIER3 0
#define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
+ current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
+ current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
+ }
}
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
@@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
* instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
*/
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
+
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
+ mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
+ mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
+ }
out:
return mmcr0;
}
@@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
}
+
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
+ mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
+ }
#endif
pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
@@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
goto out_enable;
}
@@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
+
/*
* Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
* to another PMC.
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
information about the sampled instruction.
Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
unsigned long mmcr1;
unsigned long mmcr2;
unsigned long mmcra;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
};
/*
* This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
@@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
#define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
#define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
#define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
+#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
/*
* Values for flags to get_alternatives()
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
unsigned mmcr0;
unsigned used_ebb;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
+ unsigned long sier2;
+ unsigned long sier3;
+
#endif
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
#define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
#define SPRN_MMCR1 798
#define SPRN_MMCR2 785
+#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
#define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
+#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
#define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
#define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
#define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
@@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
#define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
#define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
#define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
+#define SPRN_SIER2 752
+#define SPRN_SIER3 753
+#define SPRN_USIER2 736
+#define SPRN_USIER3 737
#define SPRN_SIAR 796
#define SPRN_SDAR 797
#define SPRN_TACR 888
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
+SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
#endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
@@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
#endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
@@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
#endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
/*
* 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
* and a few other names are different.
+ * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
+ * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
+ * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
+ * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
+ * for 32-bit.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
@@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
#define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
#define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
+#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
+#define SPRN_SIER2 0
+#define SPRN_SIER3 0
#define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
+ current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
+ current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
+ }
}
static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
@@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
* instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
*/
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
+
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
+ mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
+ mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
+ }
out:
return mmcr0;
}
@@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
}
+
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
+ pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
+ mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
+ }
#endif
pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
@@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
goto out_enable;
}
@@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
+
/*
* Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
* to another PMC.
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 05/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
PowerISA v3.1 has added new performance monitoring unit (PMU)
special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
Sampled Instruction Event Register A (SIER2)
Sampled Instruction Event Register B (SIER3)
Patch addes support to save/restore these new
SPRs while entering/exiting guest. Also includes
changes to support KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3/SIER2/SIER3.
And adds new SPRs to KVM API documentation.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 5 +++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 5 +++++
9 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 426f945..8cb6eb7 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -2156,9 +2156,12 @@ registers, find a list below:
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 32
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC2 32
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC3 32
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
index 45704f2..078f464 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct kvmppc_host_state {
void __iomem *xive_tima_virt;
u32 saved_xirr;
u64 dabr;
- u64 host_mmcr[7]; /* MMCR 0,1,A, SIAR, SDAR, MMCR2, SIER */
+ u64 host_mmcr[10]; /* MMCR 0,1,A, SIAR, SDAR, MMCR2, SIER, MMCR3, SIER2/3 */
u32 host_pmc[8];
u64 host_purr;
u64 host_spurr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index fc115e2..4f26623 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -637,14 +637,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u32 ccr1;
u32 dbsr;
- u64 mmcr[3];
+ u64 mmcr[4];
u64 mmcra;
u64 mmcrs;
u32 pmc[8];
u32 spmc[2];
u64 siar;
u64 sdar;
- u64 sier;
+ u64 sier[3];
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
u64 tfhar;
u64 texasr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index e55d847..1cc779d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -640,6 +640,11 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_ONLINE (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | 0xbf)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_PTCR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc0)
+/* POWER10 registers */
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc1)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc2)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc3)
+
/* Transactional Memory checkpointed state:
* This is all GPRs, all VSX regs and a subset of SPRs
*/
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 6fa4853..8711c21 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -698,6 +698,9 @@ int main(void)
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SDAR, host_mmcr[4]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_MMCR2, host_mmcr[5]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER, host_mmcr[6]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_MMCR3, host_mmcr[7]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER2, host_mmcr[8]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER3, host_mmcr[9]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC1, host_pmc[0]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC2, host_pmc[1]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC3, host_pmc[2]);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 3f90eee..d650d31 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1689,6 +1689,9 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcrs);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[3]);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.pmc[i]);
@@ -1704,7 +1707,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sdar);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER:
- *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier);
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[0]);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[1]);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[2]);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.iamr);
@@ -1916,6 +1925,9 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
vcpu->arch.mmcrs = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[3]);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
vcpu->arch.pmc[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
@@ -1931,7 +1943,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
vcpu->arch.sdar = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER:
- vcpu->arch.sier = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ vcpu->arch.sier[0] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2:
+ vcpu->arch.sier[1] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3:
+ vcpu->arch.sier[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR:
vcpu->arch.iamr = set_reg_val(id, *val);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
index 63fd81f..59822cb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
@@ -140,6 +140,14 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
std r8, HSTATE_MMCR2(r13)
std r9, HSTATE_SIER(r13)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ mfspr r5, SPRN_MMCR3
+ mfspr r6, SPRN_SIER2
+ mfspr r7, SPRN_SIER3
+ std r5, HSTATE_MMCR3(r13)
+ std r6, HSTATE_SIER2(r13)
+ std r7, HSTATE_SIER3(r13)
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
mfspr r3, SPRN_PMC1
mfspr r5, SPRN_PMC2
mfspr r6, SPRN_PMC3
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 702eaa2..799d6d0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -3436,6 +3436,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_SIAR, r7
mtspr SPRN_SDAR, r8
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r4)
+ ld r6, VCPU_SIER + 8(r4)
+ ld r7, VCPU_SIER + 16(r4)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3, r5
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER2, r6
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER3, r7
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
ld r6, VCPU_SIER(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r5
@@ -3496,6 +3504,14 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r8
mtspr SPRN_SIER, r9
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ ld r5, HSTATE_MMCR3(r13)
+ ld r6, HSTATE_SIER2(r13)
+ ld r7, HSTATE_SIER3(r13)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3, r5
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER2, r6
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER3, r7
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR0, r3
isync
mtlr r0
@@ -3555,6 +3571,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ mfspr r5, SPRN_MMCR3
+ mfspr r6, SPRN_SIER2
+ mfspr r7, SPRN_SIER3
+ std r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r9)
+ std r6, VCPU_SIER + 8(r9)
+ std r7, VCPU_SIER + 16(r9)
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
std r7, VCPU_SIAR(r9)
std r8, VCPU_SDAR(r9)
mfspr r3, SPRN_PMC1
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index e55d847..1cc779d 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -640,6 +640,11 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_ONLINE (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | 0xbf)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_PTCR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc0)
+/* POWER10 registers */
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc1)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc2)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc3)
+
/* Transactional Memory checkpointed state:
* This is all GPRs, all VSX regs and a subset of SPRs
*/
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 05/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
PowerISA v3.1 has added new performance monitoring unit (PMU)
special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
Sampled Instruction Event Register A (SIER2)
Sampled Instruction Event Register B (SIER3)
Patch addes support to save/restore these new
SPRs while entering/exiting guest. Also includes
changes to support KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3/SIER2/SIER3.
And adds new SPRs to KVM API documentation.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 5 +++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 5 +++++
9 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 426f945..8cb6eb7 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -2156,9 +2156,12 @@ registers, find a list below:
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 32
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC2 32
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC3 32
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
index 45704f2..078f464 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct kvmppc_host_state {
void __iomem *xive_tima_virt;
u32 saved_xirr;
u64 dabr;
- u64 host_mmcr[7]; /* MMCR 0,1,A, SIAR, SDAR, MMCR2, SIER */
+ u64 host_mmcr[10]; /* MMCR 0,1,A, SIAR, SDAR, MMCR2, SIER, MMCR3, SIER2/3 */
u32 host_pmc[8];
u64 host_purr;
u64 host_spurr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index fc115e2..4f26623 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -637,14 +637,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u32 ccr1;
u32 dbsr;
- u64 mmcr[3];
+ u64 mmcr[4];
u64 mmcra;
u64 mmcrs;
u32 pmc[8];
u32 spmc[2];
u64 siar;
u64 sdar;
- u64 sier;
+ u64 sier[3];
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
u64 tfhar;
u64 texasr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index e55d847..1cc779d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -640,6 +640,11 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_ONLINE (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | 0xbf)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_PTCR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc0)
+/* POWER10 registers */
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc1)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc2)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc3)
+
/* Transactional Memory checkpointed state:
* This is all GPRs, all VSX regs and a subset of SPRs
*/
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 6fa4853..8711c21 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -698,6 +698,9 @@ int main(void)
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SDAR, host_mmcr[4]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_MMCR2, host_mmcr[5]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER, host_mmcr[6]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_MMCR3, host_mmcr[7]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER2, host_mmcr[8]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER3, host_mmcr[9]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC1, host_pmc[0]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC2, host_pmc[1]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC3, host_pmc[2]);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 3f90eee..d650d31 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1689,6 +1689,9 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcrs);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[3]);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.pmc[i]);
@@ -1704,7 +1707,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sdar);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER:
- *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier);
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[0]);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[1]);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[2]);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.iamr);
@@ -1916,6 +1925,9 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
vcpu->arch.mmcrs = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[3]);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
vcpu->arch.pmc[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
@@ -1931,7 +1943,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
vcpu->arch.sdar = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER:
- vcpu->arch.sier = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ vcpu->arch.sier[0] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2:
+ vcpu->arch.sier[1] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3:
+ vcpu->arch.sier[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR:
vcpu->arch.iamr = set_reg_val(id, *val);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
index 63fd81f..59822cb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
@@ -140,6 +140,14 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
std r8, HSTATE_MMCR2(r13)
std r9, HSTATE_SIER(r13)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ mfspr r5, SPRN_MMCR3
+ mfspr r6, SPRN_SIER2
+ mfspr r7, SPRN_SIER3
+ std r5, HSTATE_MMCR3(r13)
+ std r6, HSTATE_SIER2(r13)
+ std r7, HSTATE_SIER3(r13)
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
mfspr r3, SPRN_PMC1
mfspr r5, SPRN_PMC2
mfspr r6, SPRN_PMC3
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 702eaa2..799d6d0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -3436,6 +3436,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_SIAR, r7
mtspr SPRN_SDAR, r8
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r4)
+ ld r6, VCPU_SIER + 8(r4)
+ ld r7, VCPU_SIER + 16(r4)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3, r5
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER2, r6
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER3, r7
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
ld r6, VCPU_SIER(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r5
@@ -3496,6 +3504,14 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r8
mtspr SPRN_SIER, r9
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ ld r5, HSTATE_MMCR3(r13)
+ ld r6, HSTATE_SIER2(r13)
+ ld r7, HSTATE_SIER3(r13)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3, r5
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER2, r6
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER3, r7
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR0, r3
isync
mtlr r0
@@ -3555,6 +3571,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ mfspr r5, SPRN_MMCR3
+ mfspr r6, SPRN_SIER2
+ mfspr r7, SPRN_SIER3
+ std r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r9)
+ std r6, VCPU_SIER + 8(r9)
+ std r7, VCPU_SIER + 16(r9)
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
std r7, VCPU_SIAR(r9)
std r8, VCPU_SDAR(r9)
mfspr r3, SPRN_PMC1
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index e55d847..1cc779d 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -640,6 +640,11 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_ONLINE (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | 0xbf)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_PTCR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc0)
+/* POWER10 registers */
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc1)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc2)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc3)
+
/* Transactional Memory checkpointed state:
* This is all GPRs, all VSX regs and a subset of SPRs
*/
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 05/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
PowerISA v3.1 has added new performance monitoring unit (PMU)
special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
Sampled Instruction Event Register A (SIER2)
Sampled Instruction Event Register B (SIER3)
Patch addes support to save/restore these new
SPRs while entering/exiting guest. Also includes
changes to support KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3/SIER2/SIER3.
And adds new SPRs to KVM API documentation.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 5 +++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 5 +++++
9 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 426f945..8cb6eb7 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -2156,9 +2156,12 @@ registers, find a list below:
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIAR 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SDAR 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 64
+ PPC KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 64
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 32
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC2 32
PPC KVM_REG_PPC_PMC3 32
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
index 45704f2..078f464 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_book3s_asm.h
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ struct kvmppc_host_state {
void __iomem *xive_tima_virt;
u32 saved_xirr;
u64 dabr;
- u64 host_mmcr[7]; /* MMCR 0,1,A, SIAR, SDAR, MMCR2, SIER */
+ u64 host_mmcr[10]; /* MMCR 0,1,A, SIAR, SDAR, MMCR2, SIER, MMCR3, SIER2/3 */
u32 host_pmc[8];
u64 host_purr;
u64 host_spurr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index fc115e2..4f26623 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -637,14 +637,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u32 ccr1;
u32 dbsr;
- u64 mmcr[3];
+ u64 mmcr[4];
u64 mmcra;
u64 mmcrs;
u32 pmc[8];
u32 spmc[2];
u64 siar;
u64 sdar;
- u64 sier;
+ u64 sier[3];
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
u64 tfhar;
u64 texasr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index e55d847..1cc779d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -640,6 +640,11 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_ONLINE (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | 0xbf)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_PTCR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc0)
+/* POWER10 registers */
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc1)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc2)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc3)
+
/* Transactional Memory checkpointed state:
* This is all GPRs, all VSX regs and a subset of SPRs
*/
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 6fa4853..8711c21 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -698,6 +698,9 @@ int main(void)
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SDAR, host_mmcr[4]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_MMCR2, host_mmcr[5]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER, host_mmcr[6]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_MMCR3, host_mmcr[7]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER2, host_mmcr[8]);
+ HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_SIER3, host_mmcr[9]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC1, host_pmc[0]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC2, host_pmc[1]);
HSTATE_FIELD(HSTATE_PMC3, host_pmc[2]);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 3f90eee..d650d31 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1689,6 +1689,9 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcrs);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[3]);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.pmc[i]);
@@ -1704,7 +1707,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sdar);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER:
- *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier);
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[0]);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[1]);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.sier[2]);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.iamr);
@@ -1916,6 +1925,9 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRS:
vcpu->arch.mmcrs = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[3]);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1 ... KVM_REG_PPC_PMC8:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_PMC1;
vcpu->arch.pmc[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
@@ -1931,7 +1943,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
vcpu->arch.sdar = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER:
- vcpu->arch.sier = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ vcpu->arch.sier[0] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2:
+ vcpu->arch.sier[1] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3:
+ vcpu->arch.sier[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_IAMR:
vcpu->arch.iamr = set_reg_val(id, *val);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
index 63fd81f..59822cb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_interrupts.S
@@ -140,6 +140,14 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
std r8, HSTATE_MMCR2(r13)
std r9, HSTATE_SIER(r13)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ mfspr r5, SPRN_MMCR3
+ mfspr r6, SPRN_SIER2
+ mfspr r7, SPRN_SIER3
+ std r5, HSTATE_MMCR3(r13)
+ std r6, HSTATE_SIER2(r13)
+ std r7, HSTATE_SIER3(r13)
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
mfspr r3, SPRN_PMC1
mfspr r5, SPRN_PMC2
mfspr r6, SPRN_PMC3
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
index 702eaa2..799d6d0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
@@ -3436,6 +3436,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_PMAO_BUG)
mtspr SPRN_SIAR, r7
mtspr SPRN_SDAR, r8
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r4)
+ ld r6, VCPU_SIER + 8(r4)
+ ld r7, VCPU_SIER + 16(r4)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3, r5
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER2, r6
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER3, r7
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
ld r5, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r4)
ld r6, VCPU_SIER(r4)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r5
@@ -3496,6 +3504,14 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
mtspr SPRN_MMCR2, r8
mtspr SPRN_SIER, r9
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ ld r5, HSTATE_MMCR3(r13)
+ ld r6, HSTATE_SIER2(r13)
+ ld r7, HSTATE_SIER3(r13)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3, r5
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER2, r6
+ mtspr SPRN_SIER3, r7
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
mtspr SPRN_MMCR0, r3
isync
mtlr r0
@@ -3555,6 +3571,14 @@ END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
std r10, VCPU_MMCR + 16(r9)
END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)
+BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
+ mfspr r5, SPRN_MMCR3
+ mfspr r6, SPRN_SIER2
+ mfspr r7, SPRN_SIER3
+ std r5, VCPU_MMCR + 24(r9)
+ std r6, VCPU_SIER + 8(r9)
+ std r7, VCPU_SIER + 16(r9)
+END_FTR_SECTION_IFSET(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)
std r7, VCPU_SIAR(r9)
std r8, VCPU_SDAR(r9)
mfspr r3, SPRN_PMC1
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
index e55d847..1cc779d 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
@@ -640,6 +640,11 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
#define KVM_REG_PPC_ONLINE (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U32 | 0xbf)
#define KVM_REG_PPC_PTCR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc0)
+/* POWER10 registers */
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc1)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc2)
+#define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc3)
+
/* Transactional Memory checkpointed state:
* This is all GPRs, all VSX regs and a subset of SPRs
*/
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 06/15] powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
PowerISA v3.1 added three new perfromance
monitoring unit (PMU) speical purpose register (SPR).
They are Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3),
Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2),
Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3).
Patch here adds a new dump function dump_310_sprs
to print these SPR values.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
index 7efe4bc..16f5493 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
@@ -2022,6 +2022,18 @@ static void dump_300_sprs(void)
#endif
}
+static void dump_310_sprs(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return;
+
+ printf("mmcr3 = %.16lx, sier2 = %.16lx, sier3 = %.16lx\n",
+ mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
+
+#endif
+}
+
static void dump_one_spr(int spr, bool show_unimplemented)
{
unsigned long val;
@@ -2076,6 +2088,7 @@ static void super_regs(void)
dump_206_sprs();
dump_207_sprs();
dump_300_sprs();
+ dump_310_sprs();
return;
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 06/15] powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
PowerISA v3.1 added three new perfromance
monitoring unit (PMU) speical purpose register (SPR).
They are Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3),
Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2),
Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3).
Patch here adds a new dump function dump_310_sprs
to print these SPR values.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
index 7efe4bc..16f5493 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
@@ -2022,6 +2022,18 @@ static void dump_300_sprs(void)
#endif
}
+static void dump_310_sprs(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return;
+
+ printf("mmcr3 = %.16lx, sier2 = %.16lx, sier3 = %.16lx\n",
+ mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
+
+#endif
+}
+
static void dump_one_spr(int spr, bool show_unimplemented)
{
unsigned long val;
@@ -2076,6 +2088,7 @@ static void super_regs(void)
dump_206_sprs();
dump_207_sprs();
dump_300_sprs();
+ dump_310_sprs();
return;
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 06/15] powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
PowerISA v3.1 added three new perfromance
monitoring unit (PMU) speical purpose register (SPR).
They are Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3),
Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2),
Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3).
Patch here adds a new dump function dump_310_sprs
to print these SPR values.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 13 +++++++++++++
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
index 7efe4bc..16f5493 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
@@ -2022,6 +2022,18 @@ static void dump_300_sprs(void)
#endif
}
+static void dump_310_sprs(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return;
+
+ printf("mmcr3 = %.16lx, sier2 = %.16lx, sier3 = %.16lx\n",
+ mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
+
+#endif
+}
+
static void dump_one_spr(int spr, bool show_unimplemented)
{
unsigned long val;
@@ -2076,6 +2088,7 @@ static void super_regs(void)
dump_206_sprs();
dump_207_sprs();
dump_300_sprs();
+ dump_310_sprs();
return;
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
(BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
feature at boot for power10.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
#define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
#endif
+/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
+#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
+
/*
* SPRG usage:
*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR_power10
+ bl __init_PMU_ISA31
b 1f
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
@@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
li r5,0
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
blr
+
+__init_PMU_ISA31:
+ li r5,0
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
+ LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
+ blr
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
index 3a40951..f482286 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
@@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
return 1;
}
+static void init_pmu_power10(void)
+{
+ init_pmu_power9();
+
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
+}
+
+static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
+{
+ hfscr_pmu_enable();
+
+ init_pmu_power10();
+ init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
+
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
+
+ cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
+ cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
+ cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
@@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
{"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
{"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
{"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
+ {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
{"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
{"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
{"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
(BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
feature at boot for power10.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
#define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
#endif
+/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
+#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
+
/*
* SPRG usage:
*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR_power10
+ bl __init_PMU_ISA31
b 1f
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
@@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
li r5,0
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
blr
+
+__init_PMU_ISA31:
+ li r5,0
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
+ LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
+ blr
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
index 3a40951..f482286 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
@@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
return 1;
}
+static void init_pmu_power10(void)
+{
+ init_pmu_power9();
+
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
+}
+
+static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
+{
+ hfscr_pmu_enable();
+
+ init_pmu_power10();
+ init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
+
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
+
+ cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
+ cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
+ cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
@@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
{"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
{"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
{"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
+ {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
{"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
{"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
{"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
(BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
feature at boot for power10.
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
#define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
#endif
+/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
+#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
+
/*
* SPRG usage:
*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR_power10
+ bl __init_PMU_ISA31
b 1f
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
@@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
li r5,0
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
blr
+
+__init_PMU_ISA31:
+ li r5,0
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
+ LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
+ blr
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
index 3a40951..f482286 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
@@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
return 1;
}
+static void init_pmu_power10(void)
+{
+ init_pmu_power9();
+
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
+}
+
+static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
+{
+ hfscr_pmu_enable();
+
+ init_pmu_power10();
+ init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
+
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
+
+ cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
+ cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
+ cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
+
+ return 1;
+}
+
static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
@@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
{"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
{"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
{"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
+ {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
{"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
{"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
{"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 08/15] powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Base enablement patch to register performance monitoring
hardware support for power10. Patch introduce the raw event
encoding format, defines the supported list of events, config
fields for the event attributes and their corresponding bit values
which are exported via sysfs.
Patch also enhances the support function in isa207_common.c to
include power10 pmu hardware.
[Enablement of base PMU driver code]
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
[Addition of ISA macros for counter support functions]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix compilation warning for missing prototype for init_power10_pmu]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 +
arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 59 ++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 33 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h | 70 ++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 410 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 566 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
index 53d614e..c02854d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += core-book3s.o bhrb.o
obj64-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += ppc970-pmu.o power5-pmu.o \
power5+-pmu.o power6-pmu.o power7-pmu.o \
isa207-common.o power8-pmu.o power9-pmu.o \
- generic-compat-pmu.o
+ generic-compat-pmu.o power10-pmu.o
obj32-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += mpc7450-pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV) += imc-pmu.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index ca32fc0..0ffb757d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -2332,6 +2332,8 @@ static int __init init_ppc64_pmu(void)
return 0;
else if (!init_power9_pmu())
return 0;
+ else if (!init_power10_pmu())
+ return 0;
else if (!init_ppc970_pmu())
return 0;
else
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
index f755c64..80bbf72 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
@@ -9,4 +9,5 @@
extern int init_power7_pmu(void);
extern int init_power8_pmu(void);
extern int init_power9_pmu(void);
+extern int init_power10_pmu(void);
extern int init_generic_compat_pmu(void);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 2fe63f2..77643f3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ static bool is_event_valid(u64 event)
{
u64 valid_mask = EVENT_VALID_MASK;
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ valid_mask = p10_EVENT_VALID_MASK;
+ else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
valid_mask = p9_EVENT_VALID_MASK;
return !(event & ~valid_mask);
@@ -69,6 +71,14 @@ static inline bool is_event_marked(u64 event)
return false;
}
+static unsigned long sdar_mod_val(u64 event)
+{
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return p10_SDAR_MODE(event);
+
+ return p9_SDAR_MODE(event);
+}
+
static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
{
/*
@@ -79,7 +89,7 @@ static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
* MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] will be programmed as "0b01" for continous sampling
* mode and will be un-changed when setting MMCRA[63] (Marked events).
*
- * Incase of Power9:
+ * Incase of Power9/power10:
* Marked event: MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] will be set to 0b00 ('No Updates'),
* or if group already have any marked events.
* For rest
@@ -90,8 +100,8 @@ static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
if (is_event_marked(event) || (*mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE))
*mmcra &= MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_NO_UPDATES;
- else if (p9_SDAR_MODE(event))
- *mmcra |= p9_SDAR_MODE(event) << MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT;
+ else if (sdar_mod_val(event))
+ *mmcra |= sdar_mod_val(event) << MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT;
else
*mmcra |= MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_DCACHE;
} else
@@ -134,7 +144,11 @@ static bool is_thresh_cmp_valid(u64 event)
/*
* Check the mantissa upper two bits are not zero, unless the
* exponent is also zero. See the THRESH_CMP_MANTISSA doc.
+ * Power10: thresh_cmp is replaced by l2_l3 event select.
*/
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return false;
+
cmp = (event >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
exp = cmp >> 7;
@@ -251,7 +265,12 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
pmc = (event >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
unit = (event >> EVENT_UNIT_SHIFT) & EVENT_UNIT_MASK;
- cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) & EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
+ else
+ cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) &
+ EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
ebb = (event >> EVENT_EBB_SHIFT) & EVENT_EBB_MASK;
if (pmc) {
@@ -283,7 +302,10 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
}
if (unit >= 6 && unit <= 9) {
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && (unit == 6)) {
+ mask |= CNST_L2L3_GROUP_MASK;
+ value |= CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(event >> p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT);
+ } else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
mask |= CNST_CACHE_GROUP_MASK;
value |= CNST_CACHE_GROUP_VAL(event & 0xff);
@@ -367,6 +389,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
unsigned int pmc, pmc_inuse;
int i;
@@ -379,7 +402,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
pmc_inuse |= 1 << pmc;
}
- mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = 0;
+ mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
/* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
@@ -438,8 +461,17 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_THR_CTL_SHIFT;
val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_SEL_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_SEL_MASK;
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_THR_SEL_SHIFT;
- val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
- mmcra |= thresh_cmp_val(val);
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) &
+ EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
+ mmcra |= thresh_cmp_val(val);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && (unit == 6)) {
+ val = (event[i] >> p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_L2L3_SEL_MASK;
+ mmcr2 |= val << p10_L2L3_SEL_SHIFT;
}
if (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB) {
@@ -460,6 +492,14 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCS(pmc);
}
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ if (pmc <= 4) {
+ val = (event[i] >> p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK;
+ mmcr3 |= val << MMCR3_SHIFT(pmc);
+ }
+ }
+
hwc[i] = pmc - 1;
}
@@ -480,6 +520,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr3 = mmcr3;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
index df968fd..044de65 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
@@ -87,6 +87,31 @@
EVENT_LINUX_MASK | \
EVENT_PSEL_MASK))
+/* Contants to support power10 raw encoding format */
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT 22
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK 0x3ull
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE(v) (((v) >> p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT) & \
+ p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK)
+#define p10_EVENT_L2L3_SEL_MASK 0x1f
+#define p10_L2L3_SEL_SHIFT 3
+#define p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT 40
+#define p10_EVENT_THRESH_MASK 0xffffull
+#define p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK 0x3ull
+#define p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK 0x7fffull
+#define p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT 45
+
+#define p10_EVENT_VALID_MASK \
+ ((p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK << p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT | \
+ (p10_EVENT_THRESH_MASK << EVENT_THRESH_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_SAMPLE_MASK << EVENT_SAMPLE_SHIFT) | \
+ (p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK << EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_PMC_MASK << EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_UNIT_MASK << EVENT_UNIT_SHIFT) | \
+ (p9_EVENT_COMBINE_MASK << p9_EVENT_COMBINE_SHIFT) | \
+ (p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK << p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_MARKED_MASK << EVENT_MARKED_SHIFT) | \
+ EVENT_LINUX_MASK | \
+ EVENT_PSEL_MASK))
/*
* Layout of constraint bits:
*
@@ -135,6 +160,9 @@
#define CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL (1ull << 54)
#define CNST_CACHE_PMC4_MASK CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL
+#define CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(v) (((v) & 0x1full) << 55)
+#define CNST_L2L3_GROUP_MASK CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(0x1f)
+
/*
* For NC we are counting up to 4 events. This requires three bits, and we need
* the fifth event to overflow and set the 4th bit. To achieve that we bias the
@@ -191,7 +219,7 @@
#define MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP(v) (((v) >> MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP_SHIFT) &\
MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP_MASK)
-/* MMCR1 Threshold Compare bit constant for power9 */
+/* MMCRA Threshold Compare bit constant for power9 */
#define p9_MMCRA_THR_CMP_SHIFT 45
/* Bits in MMCR2 for PowerISA v2.07 */
@@ -202,6 +230,9 @@
#define MAX_ALT 2
#define MAX_PMU_COUNTERS 6
+/* Bits in MMCR3 for PowerISA v3.10 */
+#define MMCR3_SHIFT(pmc) (49 - (15 * ((pmc) - 1)))
+
#define ISA207_SIER_TYPE_SHIFT 15
#define ISA207_SIER_TYPE_MASK (0x7ull << ISA207_SIER_TYPE_SHIFT)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..60c1b81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
+/*
+ * Performance counter support for POWER10 processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2020 Madhavan Srinivasan, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2020 Athira Rajeev, IBM Corporation.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Power10 event codes.
+ */
+EVENT(PM_RUN_CYC, 0x600f4);
+EVENT(PM_DISP_STALL_CYC, 0x100f8);
+EVENT(PM_EXEC_STALL, 0x30008);
+EVENT(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL, 0x500fa);
+EVENT(PM_BR_CMPL, 0x4d05e);
+EVENT(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL, 0x400f6);
+
+/* All L1 D cache load references counted at finish, gated by reject */
+EVENT(PM_LD_REF_L1, 0x100fc);
+/* Load Missed L1 */
+EVENT(PM_LD_MISS_L1, 0x3e054);
+/* Store Missed L1 */
+EVENT(PM_ST_MISS_L1, 0x300f0);
+/* L1 cache data prefetches */
+EVENT(PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS, 0x1002c);
+/* Demand iCache Miss */
+EVENT(PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS, 0x200fc);
+/* Instruction fetches from L1 */
+EVENT(PM_INST_FROM_L1, 0x04080);
+/* Instruction Demand sectors wriittent into IL1 */
+EVENT(PM_INST_FROM_L1MISS, 0x03f00000001c040);
+/* Instruction prefetch written into IL1 */
+EVENT(PM_IC_PREF_REQ, 0x040a0);
+/* The data cache was reloaded from local core's L3 due to a demand load */
+EVENT(PM_DATA_FROM_L3, 0x01340000001c040);
+/* Demand LD - L3 Miss (not L2 hit and not L3 hit) */
+EVENT(PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS, 0x300fe);
+/* Data PTEG reload */
+EVENT(PM_DTLB_MISS, 0x300fc);
+/* ITLB Reloaded */
+EVENT(PM_ITLB_MISS, 0x400fc);
+
+EVENT(PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, 0x0001e);
+EVENT(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL_ALT, 0x00002);
+
+/*
+ * Memory Access Events
+ *
+ * Primary PMU event used here is PM_MRK_INST_CMPL (0x401e0)
+ * To enable capturing of memory profiling, these MMCRA bits
+ * needs to be programmed and corresponding raw event format
+ * encoding.
+ *
+ * MMCRA bits encoding needed are
+ * SM (Sampling Mode)
+ * EM (Eligibility for Random Sampling)
+ * TECE (Threshold Event Counter Event)
+ * TS (Threshold Start Event)
+ * TE (Threshold End Event)
+ *
+ * Corresponding Raw Encoding bits:
+ * sample [EM,SM]
+ * thresh_sel (TECE)
+ * thresh start (TS)
+ * thresh end (TE)
+ */
+
+EVENT(MEM_LOADS, 0x34340401e0);
+EVENT(MEM_STORES, 0x343c0401e0);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba19f40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Performance counter support for POWER10 processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2020 Madhavan Srinivasan, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2020 Athira Rajeev, IBM Corporation.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "power10-pmu: " fmt
+
+#include "isa207-common.h"
+#include "internal.h"
+
+/*
+ * Raw event encoding for Power10:
+ *
+ * 60 56 52 48 44 40 36 32
+ * | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - |
+ * | | [ ] [ src_match ] [ src_mask ] | [ ] [ l2l3_sel ] [ thresh_ctl ]
+ * | | | | | |
+ * | | *- IFM (Linux) | | thresh start/stop -*
+ * | *- BHRB (Linux) | src_sel
+ * *- EBB (Linux) *invert_bit
+ *
+ * 28 24 20 16 12 8 4 0
+ * | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - |
+ * [ ] [ sample ] [ ] [ ] [ pmc ] [unit ] [ ] m [ pmcxsel ]
+ * | | | | | |
+ * | | | | | *- mark
+ * | | | *- L1/L2/L3 cache_sel |
+ * | | sdar_mode |
+ * | *- sampling mode for marked events *- combine
+ * |
+ * *- thresh_sel
+ *
+ * Below uses IBM bit numbering.
+ *
+ * MMCR1[x:y] = unit (PMCxUNIT)
+ * MMCR1[24] = pmc1combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[25] = pmc1combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[26] = pmc2combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[27] = pmc2combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[28] = pmc3combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[29] = pmc3combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[30] = pmc4combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[31] = pmc4combine[1]
+ *
+ * if pmc == 3 and unit == 0 and pmcxsel[0:6] == 0b0101011
+ * MMCR1[20:27] = thresh_ctl
+ * else if pmc == 4 and unit == 0xf and pmcxsel[0:6] == 0b0101001
+ * MMCR1[20:27] = thresh_ctl
+ * else
+ * MMCRA[48:55] = thresh_ctl (THRESH START/END)
+ *
+ * if thresh_sel:
+ * MMCRA[45:47] = thresh_sel
+ *
+ * if l2l3_sel:
+ * MMCR2[56:60] = l2l3_sel[0:4]
+ *
+ * MMCR1[16] = cache_sel[0]
+ * MMCR1[17] = cache_sel[1]
+ *
+ * if mark:
+ * MMCRA[63] = 1 (SAMPLE_ENABLE)
+ * MMCRA[57:59] = sample[0:2] (RAND_SAMP_ELIG)
+ * MMCRA[61:62] = sample[3:4] (RAND_SAMP_MODE)
+ *
+ * if EBB and BHRB:
+ * MMCRA[32:33] = IFM
+ *
+ * MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] = sdar_mode[0:1]
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Some power10 event codes.
+ */
+#define EVENT(_name, _code) enum{_name = _code}
+
+#include "power10-events-list.h"
+
+#undef EVENT
+
+/* MMCRA IFM bits - POWER10 */
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1 0x0000000040000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+
+/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
+static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
+ { PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
+ { PM_RUN_INST_CMPL_ALT, PM_RUN_INST_CMPL },
+};
+
+static int power10_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
+{
+ int num_alt = 0;
+
+ num_alt = isa207_get_alternatives(event, alt,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(power10_event_alternatives), flags,
+ power10_event_alternatives);
+
+ return num_alt;
+}
+
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cpu-cycles, PM_RUN_CYC);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(instructions, PM_RUN_INST_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(branch-instructions, PM_BR_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(branch-misses, PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cache-references, PM_LD_REF_L1);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cache-misses, PM_LD_MISS_L1);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(mem-loads, MEM_LOADS);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(mem-stores, MEM_STORES);
+
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-load-misses, PM_LD_MISS_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-loads, PM_LD_REF_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-prefetches, PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-store-misses, PM_ST_MISS_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-load-misses, PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-loads, PM_INST_FROM_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-prefetches, PM_IC_PREF_REQ);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(LLC-load-misses, PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(LLC-loads, PM_DATA_FROM_L3);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(branch-load-misses, PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(branch-loads, PM_BR_CMPL);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(dTLB-load-misses, PM_DTLB_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(iTLB-load-misses, PM_ITLB_MISS);
+
+static struct attribute *power10_events_attr[] = {
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_RUN_CYC),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_REF_L1),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_MISS_L1),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(MEM_LOADS),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(MEM_STORES),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_MISS_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_REF_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_ST_MISS_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_INST_FROM_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_IC_PREF_REQ),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DATA_FROM_L3),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_CMPL),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DTLB_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_ITLB_MISS),
+ NULL
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group power10_pmu_events_group = {
+ .name = "events",
+ .attrs = power10_events_attr,
+};
+
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-59");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pmcxsel, "config:0-7");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(mark, "config:8");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(combine, "config:10-11");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(unit, "config:12-15");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pmc, "config:16-19");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cache_sel, "config:20-21");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(sdar_mode, "config:22-23");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(sample_mode, "config:24-28");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_sel, "config:29-31");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_stop, "config:32-35");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_start, "config:36-39");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(l2l3_sel, "config:40-44");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_sel, "config:45-46");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(invert_bit, "config:47");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_mask, "config:48-53");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_match, "config:54-59");
+
+static struct attribute *power10_pmu_format_attr[] = {
+ &format_attr_event.attr,
+ &format_attr_pmcxsel.attr,
+ &format_attr_mark.attr,
+ &format_attr_combine.attr,
+ &format_attr_unit.attr,
+ &format_attr_pmc.attr,
+ &format_attr_cache_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_sdar_mode.attr,
+ &format_attr_sample_mode.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_stop.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_start.attr,
+ &format_attr_l2l3_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_invert_bit.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_mask.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_match.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group power10_pmu_format_group = {
+ .name = "format",
+ .attrs = power10_pmu_format_attr,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group *power10_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
+ &power10_pmu_format_group,
+ &power10_pmu_events_group,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static int power10_generic_events[] = {
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = PM_RUN_CYC,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = PM_RUN_INST_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS] = PM_BR_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES] = PM_LD_MISS_L1,
+};
+
+static u64 power10_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
+{
+ u64 pmu_bhrb_filter = 0;
+
+ /* BHRB and regular PMU events share the same privilege state
+ * filter configuration. BHRB is always recorded along with a
+ * regular PMU event. As the privilege state filter is handled
+ * in the basic PMC configuration of the accompanying regular
+ * PMU event, we ignore any separate BHRB specific request.
+ */
+
+ /* No branch filter requested */
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+
+ /* Invalid branch filter options - HW does not support */
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
+
+ /* Every thing else is unsupported */
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
+{
+ pmu_bhrb_filter &= POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK;
+
+ /* Enable BHRB filter in PMU */
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, (mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA) | pmu_bhrb_filter));
+}
+
+#define C(x) PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##x
+
+/*
+ * Table of generalized cache-related events.
+ * 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
+ * are event codes.
+ */
+static u64 power10_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+ [C(L1D)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_LD_MISS_L1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_ST_MISS_L1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(L1I)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_INST_FROM_L1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_INST_FROM_L1MISS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_IC_PREF_REQ,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(LL)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_DATA_FROM_L3,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(DTLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_DTLB_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(ITLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_ITLB_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(BPU)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_BR_CMPL,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(NODE)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+#undef C
+
+static struct power_pmu power10_pmu = {
+ .name = "POWER10",
+ .n_counter = MAX_PMU_COUNTERS,
+ .add_fields = ISA207_ADD_FIELDS,
+ .test_adder = ISA207_TEST_ADDER,
+ .group_constraint_mask = CNST_CACHE_PMC4_MASK,
+ .group_constraint_val = CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL,
+ .compute_mmcr = isa207_compute_mmcr,
+ .config_bhrb = power10_config_bhrb,
+ .bhrb_filter_map = power10_bhrb_filter_map,
+ .get_constraint = isa207_get_constraint,
+ .get_alternatives = power10_get_alternatives,
+ .get_mem_data_src = isa207_get_mem_data_src,
+ .get_mem_weight = isa207_get_mem_weight,
+ .disable_pmc = isa207_disable_pmc,
+ .flags = PPMU_HAS_SIER | PPMU_ARCH_207S |
+ PPMU_ARCH_310S,
+ .n_generic = ARRAY_SIZE(power10_generic_events),
+ .generic_events = power10_generic_events,
+ .cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
+ .attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
+ .bhrb_nr = 32,
+};
+
+int init_power10_pmu(void)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ /* Comes from cpu_specs[] */
+ if (!cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type ||
+ strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* Tell userspace that EBB is supported */
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features2 |= PPC_FEATURE2_EBB;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 08/15] powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Base enablement patch to register performance monitoring
hardware support for power10. Patch introduce the raw event
encoding format, defines the supported list of events, config
fields for the event attributes and their corresponding bit values
which are exported via sysfs.
Patch also enhances the support function in isa207_common.c to
include power10 pmu hardware.
[Enablement of base PMU driver code]
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
[Addition of ISA macros for counter support functions]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix compilation warning for missing prototype for init_power10_pmu]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 +
arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 59 ++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 33 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h | 70 ++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 410 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 566 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
index 53d614e..c02854d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += core-book3s.o bhrb.o
obj64-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += ppc970-pmu.o power5-pmu.o \
power5+-pmu.o power6-pmu.o power7-pmu.o \
isa207-common.o power8-pmu.o power9-pmu.o \
- generic-compat-pmu.o
+ generic-compat-pmu.o power10-pmu.o
obj32-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += mpc7450-pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV) += imc-pmu.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index ca32fc0..0ffb757d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -2332,6 +2332,8 @@ static int __init init_ppc64_pmu(void)
return 0;
else if (!init_power9_pmu())
return 0;
+ else if (!init_power10_pmu())
+ return 0;
else if (!init_ppc970_pmu())
return 0;
else
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
index f755c64..80bbf72 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
@@ -9,4 +9,5 @@
extern int init_power7_pmu(void);
extern int init_power8_pmu(void);
extern int init_power9_pmu(void);
+extern int init_power10_pmu(void);
extern int init_generic_compat_pmu(void);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 2fe63f2..77643f3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ static bool is_event_valid(u64 event)
{
u64 valid_mask = EVENT_VALID_MASK;
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ valid_mask = p10_EVENT_VALID_MASK;
+ else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
valid_mask = p9_EVENT_VALID_MASK;
return !(event & ~valid_mask);
@@ -69,6 +71,14 @@ static inline bool is_event_marked(u64 event)
return false;
}
+static unsigned long sdar_mod_val(u64 event)
+{
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return p10_SDAR_MODE(event);
+
+ return p9_SDAR_MODE(event);
+}
+
static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
{
/*
@@ -79,7 +89,7 @@ static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
* MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] will be programmed as "0b01" for continous sampling
* mode and will be un-changed when setting MMCRA[63] (Marked events).
*
- * Incase of Power9:
+ * Incase of Power9/power10:
* Marked event: MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] will be set to 0b00 ('No Updates'),
* or if group already have any marked events.
* For rest
@@ -90,8 +100,8 @@ static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
if (is_event_marked(event) || (*mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE))
*mmcra &= MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_NO_UPDATES;
- else if (p9_SDAR_MODE(event))
- *mmcra |= p9_SDAR_MODE(event) << MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT;
+ else if (sdar_mod_val(event))
+ *mmcra |= sdar_mod_val(event) << MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT;
else
*mmcra |= MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_DCACHE;
} else
@@ -134,7 +144,11 @@ static bool is_thresh_cmp_valid(u64 event)
/*
* Check the mantissa upper two bits are not zero, unless the
* exponent is also zero. See the THRESH_CMP_MANTISSA doc.
+ * Power10: thresh_cmp is replaced by l2_l3 event select.
*/
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return false;
+
cmp = (event >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
exp = cmp >> 7;
@@ -251,7 +265,12 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
pmc = (event >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
unit = (event >> EVENT_UNIT_SHIFT) & EVENT_UNIT_MASK;
- cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) & EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
+ else
+ cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) &
+ EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
ebb = (event >> EVENT_EBB_SHIFT) & EVENT_EBB_MASK;
if (pmc) {
@@ -283,7 +302,10 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
}
if (unit >= 6 && unit <= 9) {
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && (unit == 6)) {
+ mask |= CNST_L2L3_GROUP_MASK;
+ value |= CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(event >> p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT);
+ } else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
mask |= CNST_CACHE_GROUP_MASK;
value |= CNST_CACHE_GROUP_VAL(event & 0xff);
@@ -367,6 +389,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
unsigned int pmc, pmc_inuse;
int i;
@@ -379,7 +402,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
pmc_inuse |= 1 << pmc;
}
- mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = 0;
+ mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
/* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
@@ -438,8 +461,17 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_THR_CTL_SHIFT;
val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_SEL_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_SEL_MASK;
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_THR_SEL_SHIFT;
- val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
- mmcra |= thresh_cmp_val(val);
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) &
+ EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
+ mmcra |= thresh_cmp_val(val);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && (unit == 6)) {
+ val = (event[i] >> p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_L2L3_SEL_MASK;
+ mmcr2 |= val << p10_L2L3_SEL_SHIFT;
}
if (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB) {
@@ -460,6 +492,14 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCS(pmc);
}
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ if (pmc <= 4) {
+ val = (event[i] >> p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK;
+ mmcr3 |= val << MMCR3_SHIFT(pmc);
+ }
+ }
+
hwc[i] = pmc - 1;
}
@@ -480,6 +520,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr3 = mmcr3;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
index df968fd..044de65 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
@@ -87,6 +87,31 @@
EVENT_LINUX_MASK | \
EVENT_PSEL_MASK))
+/* Contants to support power10 raw encoding format */
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT 22
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK 0x3ull
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE(v) (((v) >> p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT) & \
+ p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK)
+#define p10_EVENT_L2L3_SEL_MASK 0x1f
+#define p10_L2L3_SEL_SHIFT 3
+#define p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT 40
+#define p10_EVENT_THRESH_MASK 0xffffull
+#define p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK 0x3ull
+#define p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK 0x7fffull
+#define p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT 45
+
+#define p10_EVENT_VALID_MASK \
+ ((p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK << p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT | \
+ (p10_EVENT_THRESH_MASK << EVENT_THRESH_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_SAMPLE_MASK << EVENT_SAMPLE_SHIFT) | \
+ (p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK << EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_PMC_MASK << EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_UNIT_MASK << EVENT_UNIT_SHIFT) | \
+ (p9_EVENT_COMBINE_MASK << p9_EVENT_COMBINE_SHIFT) | \
+ (p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK << p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_MARKED_MASK << EVENT_MARKED_SHIFT) | \
+ EVENT_LINUX_MASK | \
+ EVENT_PSEL_MASK))
/*
* Layout of constraint bits:
*
@@ -135,6 +160,9 @@
#define CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL (1ull << 54)
#define CNST_CACHE_PMC4_MASK CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL
+#define CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(v) (((v) & 0x1full) << 55)
+#define CNST_L2L3_GROUP_MASK CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(0x1f)
+
/*
* For NC we are counting up to 4 events. This requires three bits, and we need
* the fifth event to overflow and set the 4th bit. To achieve that we bias the
@@ -191,7 +219,7 @@
#define MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP(v) (((v) >> MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP_SHIFT) &\
MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP_MASK)
-/* MMCR1 Threshold Compare bit constant for power9 */
+/* MMCRA Threshold Compare bit constant for power9 */
#define p9_MMCRA_THR_CMP_SHIFT 45
/* Bits in MMCR2 for PowerISA v2.07 */
@@ -202,6 +230,9 @@
#define MAX_ALT 2
#define MAX_PMU_COUNTERS 6
+/* Bits in MMCR3 for PowerISA v3.10 */
+#define MMCR3_SHIFT(pmc) (49 - (15 * ((pmc) - 1)))
+
#define ISA207_SIER_TYPE_SHIFT 15
#define ISA207_SIER_TYPE_MASK (0x7ull << ISA207_SIER_TYPE_SHIFT)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..60c1b81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
+/*
+ * Performance counter support for POWER10 processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2020 Madhavan Srinivasan, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2020 Athira Rajeev, IBM Corporation.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Power10 event codes.
+ */
+EVENT(PM_RUN_CYC, 0x600f4);
+EVENT(PM_DISP_STALL_CYC, 0x100f8);
+EVENT(PM_EXEC_STALL, 0x30008);
+EVENT(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL, 0x500fa);
+EVENT(PM_BR_CMPL, 0x4d05e);
+EVENT(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL, 0x400f6);
+
+/* All L1 D cache load references counted at finish, gated by reject */
+EVENT(PM_LD_REF_L1, 0x100fc);
+/* Load Missed L1 */
+EVENT(PM_LD_MISS_L1, 0x3e054);
+/* Store Missed L1 */
+EVENT(PM_ST_MISS_L1, 0x300f0);
+/* L1 cache data prefetches */
+EVENT(PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS, 0x1002c);
+/* Demand iCache Miss */
+EVENT(PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS, 0x200fc);
+/* Instruction fetches from L1 */
+EVENT(PM_INST_FROM_L1, 0x04080);
+/* Instruction Demand sectors wriittent into IL1 */
+EVENT(PM_INST_FROM_L1MISS, 0x03f00000001c040);
+/* Instruction prefetch written into IL1 */
+EVENT(PM_IC_PREF_REQ, 0x040a0);
+/* The data cache was reloaded from local core's L3 due to a demand load */
+EVENT(PM_DATA_FROM_L3, 0x01340000001c040);
+/* Demand LD - L3 Miss (not L2 hit and not L3 hit) */
+EVENT(PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS, 0x300fe);
+/* Data PTEG reload */
+EVENT(PM_DTLB_MISS, 0x300fc);
+/* ITLB Reloaded */
+EVENT(PM_ITLB_MISS, 0x400fc);
+
+EVENT(PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, 0x0001e);
+EVENT(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL_ALT, 0x00002);
+
+/*
+ * Memory Access Events
+ *
+ * Primary PMU event used here is PM_MRK_INST_CMPL (0x401e0)
+ * To enable capturing of memory profiling, these MMCRA bits
+ * needs to be programmed and corresponding raw event format
+ * encoding.
+ *
+ * MMCRA bits encoding needed are
+ * SM (Sampling Mode)
+ * EM (Eligibility for Random Sampling)
+ * TECE (Threshold Event Counter Event)
+ * TS (Threshold Start Event)
+ * TE (Threshold End Event)
+ *
+ * Corresponding Raw Encoding bits:
+ * sample [EM,SM]
+ * thresh_sel (TECE)
+ * thresh start (TS)
+ * thresh end (TE)
+ */
+
+EVENT(MEM_LOADS, 0x34340401e0);
+EVENT(MEM_STORES, 0x343c0401e0);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba19f40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Performance counter support for POWER10 processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2020 Madhavan Srinivasan, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2020 Athira Rajeev, IBM Corporation.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "power10-pmu: " fmt
+
+#include "isa207-common.h"
+#include "internal.h"
+
+/*
+ * Raw event encoding for Power10:
+ *
+ * 60 56 52 48 44 40 36 32
+ * | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - |
+ * | | [ ] [ src_match ] [ src_mask ] | [ ] [ l2l3_sel ] [ thresh_ctl ]
+ * | | | | | |
+ * | | *- IFM (Linux) | | thresh start/stop -*
+ * | *- BHRB (Linux) | src_sel
+ * *- EBB (Linux) *invert_bit
+ *
+ * 28 24 20 16 12 8 4 0
+ * | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - |
+ * [ ] [ sample ] [ ] [ ] [ pmc ] [unit ] [ ] m [ pmcxsel ]
+ * | | | | | |
+ * | | | | | *- mark
+ * | | | *- L1/L2/L3 cache_sel |
+ * | | sdar_mode |
+ * | *- sampling mode for marked events *- combine
+ * |
+ * *- thresh_sel
+ *
+ * Below uses IBM bit numbering.
+ *
+ * MMCR1[x:y] = unit (PMCxUNIT)
+ * MMCR1[24] = pmc1combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[25] = pmc1combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[26] = pmc2combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[27] = pmc2combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[28] = pmc3combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[29] = pmc3combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[30] = pmc4combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[31] = pmc4combine[1]
+ *
+ * if pmc == 3 and unit == 0 and pmcxsel[0:6] == 0b0101011
+ * MMCR1[20:27] = thresh_ctl
+ * else if pmc == 4 and unit == 0xf and pmcxsel[0:6] == 0b0101001
+ * MMCR1[20:27] = thresh_ctl
+ * else
+ * MMCRA[48:55] = thresh_ctl (THRESH START/END)
+ *
+ * if thresh_sel:
+ * MMCRA[45:47] = thresh_sel
+ *
+ * if l2l3_sel:
+ * MMCR2[56:60] = l2l3_sel[0:4]
+ *
+ * MMCR1[16] = cache_sel[0]
+ * MMCR1[17] = cache_sel[1]
+ *
+ * if mark:
+ * MMCRA[63] = 1 (SAMPLE_ENABLE)
+ * MMCRA[57:59] = sample[0:2] (RAND_SAMP_ELIG)
+ * MMCRA[61:62] = sample[3:4] (RAND_SAMP_MODE)
+ *
+ * if EBB and BHRB:
+ * MMCRA[32:33] = IFM
+ *
+ * MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] = sdar_mode[0:1]
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Some power10 event codes.
+ */
+#define EVENT(_name, _code) enum{_name = _code}
+
+#include "power10-events-list.h"
+
+#undef EVENT
+
+/* MMCRA IFM bits - POWER10 */
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1 0x0000000040000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+
+/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
+static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
+ { PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
+ { PM_RUN_INST_CMPL_ALT, PM_RUN_INST_CMPL },
+};
+
+static int power10_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
+{
+ int num_alt = 0;
+
+ num_alt = isa207_get_alternatives(event, alt,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(power10_event_alternatives), flags,
+ power10_event_alternatives);
+
+ return num_alt;
+}
+
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cpu-cycles, PM_RUN_CYC);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(instructions, PM_RUN_INST_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(branch-instructions, PM_BR_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(branch-misses, PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cache-references, PM_LD_REF_L1);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cache-misses, PM_LD_MISS_L1);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(mem-loads, MEM_LOADS);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(mem-stores, MEM_STORES);
+
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-load-misses, PM_LD_MISS_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-loads, PM_LD_REF_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-prefetches, PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-store-misses, PM_ST_MISS_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-load-misses, PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-loads, PM_INST_FROM_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-prefetches, PM_IC_PREF_REQ);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(LLC-load-misses, PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(LLC-loads, PM_DATA_FROM_L3);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(branch-load-misses, PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(branch-loads, PM_BR_CMPL);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(dTLB-load-misses, PM_DTLB_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(iTLB-load-misses, PM_ITLB_MISS);
+
+static struct attribute *power10_events_attr[] = {
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_RUN_CYC),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_REF_L1),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_MISS_L1),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(MEM_LOADS),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(MEM_STORES),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_MISS_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_REF_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_ST_MISS_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_INST_FROM_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_IC_PREF_REQ),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DATA_FROM_L3),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_CMPL),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DTLB_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_ITLB_MISS),
+ NULL
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group power10_pmu_events_group = {
+ .name = "events",
+ .attrs = power10_events_attr,
+};
+
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-59");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pmcxsel, "config:0-7");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(mark, "config:8");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(combine, "config:10-11");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(unit, "config:12-15");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pmc, "config:16-19");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cache_sel, "config:20-21");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(sdar_mode, "config:22-23");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(sample_mode, "config:24-28");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_sel, "config:29-31");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_stop, "config:32-35");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_start, "config:36-39");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(l2l3_sel, "config:40-44");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_sel, "config:45-46");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(invert_bit, "config:47");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_mask, "config:48-53");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_match, "config:54-59");
+
+static struct attribute *power10_pmu_format_attr[] = {
+ &format_attr_event.attr,
+ &format_attr_pmcxsel.attr,
+ &format_attr_mark.attr,
+ &format_attr_combine.attr,
+ &format_attr_unit.attr,
+ &format_attr_pmc.attr,
+ &format_attr_cache_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_sdar_mode.attr,
+ &format_attr_sample_mode.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_stop.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_start.attr,
+ &format_attr_l2l3_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_invert_bit.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_mask.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_match.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group power10_pmu_format_group = {
+ .name = "format",
+ .attrs = power10_pmu_format_attr,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group *power10_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
+ &power10_pmu_format_group,
+ &power10_pmu_events_group,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static int power10_generic_events[] = {
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = PM_RUN_CYC,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = PM_RUN_INST_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS] = PM_BR_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES] = PM_LD_MISS_L1,
+};
+
+static u64 power10_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
+{
+ u64 pmu_bhrb_filter = 0;
+
+ /* BHRB and regular PMU events share the same privilege state
+ * filter configuration. BHRB is always recorded along with a
+ * regular PMU event. As the privilege state filter is handled
+ * in the basic PMC configuration of the accompanying regular
+ * PMU event, we ignore any separate BHRB specific request.
+ */
+
+ /* No branch filter requested */
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+
+ /* Invalid branch filter options - HW does not support */
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
+
+ /* Every thing else is unsupported */
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
+{
+ pmu_bhrb_filter &= POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK;
+
+ /* Enable BHRB filter in PMU */
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, (mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA) | pmu_bhrb_filter));
+}
+
+#define C(x) PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##x
+
+/*
+ * Table of generalized cache-related events.
+ * 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
+ * are event codes.
+ */
+static u64 power10_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+ [C(L1D)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_LD_MISS_L1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_ST_MISS_L1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(L1I)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_INST_FROM_L1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_INST_FROM_L1MISS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_IC_PREF_REQ,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(LL)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_DATA_FROM_L3,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(DTLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_DTLB_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(ITLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_ITLB_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(BPU)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_BR_CMPL,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(NODE)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+#undef C
+
+static struct power_pmu power10_pmu = {
+ .name = "POWER10",
+ .n_counter = MAX_PMU_COUNTERS,
+ .add_fields = ISA207_ADD_FIELDS,
+ .test_adder = ISA207_TEST_ADDER,
+ .group_constraint_mask = CNST_CACHE_PMC4_MASK,
+ .group_constraint_val = CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL,
+ .compute_mmcr = isa207_compute_mmcr,
+ .config_bhrb = power10_config_bhrb,
+ .bhrb_filter_map = power10_bhrb_filter_map,
+ .get_constraint = isa207_get_constraint,
+ .get_alternatives = power10_get_alternatives,
+ .get_mem_data_src = isa207_get_mem_data_src,
+ .get_mem_weight = isa207_get_mem_weight,
+ .disable_pmc = isa207_disable_pmc,
+ .flags = PPMU_HAS_SIER | PPMU_ARCH_207S |
+ PPMU_ARCH_310S,
+ .n_generic = ARRAY_SIZE(power10_generic_events),
+ .generic_events = power10_generic_events,
+ .cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
+ .attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
+ .bhrb_nr = 32,
+};
+
+int init_power10_pmu(void)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ /* Comes from cpu_specs[] */
+ if (!cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type ||
+ strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* Tell userspace that EBB is supported */
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features2 |= PPC_FEATURE2_EBB;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 08/15] powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Base enablement patch to register performance monitoring
hardware support for power10. Patch introduce the raw event
encoding format, defines the supported list of events, config
fields for the event attributes and their corresponding bit values
which are exported via sysfs.
Patch also enhances the support function in isa207_common.c to
include power10 pmu hardware.
[Enablement of base PMU driver code]
Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
[Addition of ISA macros for counter support functions]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix compilation warning for missing prototype for init_power10_pmu]
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 +
arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 59 ++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 33 ++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h | 70 ++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 410 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
7 files changed, 566 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
index 53d614e..c02854d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += core-book3s.o bhrb.o
obj64-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += ppc970-pmu.o power5-pmu.o \
power5+-pmu.o power6-pmu.o power7-pmu.o \
isa207-common.o power8-pmu.o power9-pmu.o \
- generic-compat-pmu.o
+ generic-compat-pmu.o power10-pmu.o
obj32-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += mpc7450-pmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV) += imc-pmu.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index ca32fc0..0ffb757d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -2332,6 +2332,8 @@ static int __init init_ppc64_pmu(void)
return 0;
else if (!init_power9_pmu())
return 0;
+ else if (!init_power10_pmu())
+ return 0;
else if (!init_ppc970_pmu())
return 0;
else
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
index f755c64..80bbf72 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h
@@ -9,4 +9,5 @@
extern int init_power7_pmu(void);
extern int init_power8_pmu(void);
extern int init_power9_pmu(void);
+extern int init_power10_pmu(void);
extern int init_generic_compat_pmu(void);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 2fe63f2..77643f3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -55,7 +55,9 @@ static bool is_event_valid(u64 event)
{
u64 valid_mask = EVENT_VALID_MASK;
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ valid_mask = p10_EVENT_VALID_MASK;
+ else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
valid_mask = p9_EVENT_VALID_MASK;
return !(event & ~valid_mask);
@@ -69,6 +71,14 @@ static inline bool is_event_marked(u64 event)
return false;
}
+static unsigned long sdar_mod_val(u64 event)
+{
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return p10_SDAR_MODE(event);
+
+ return p9_SDAR_MODE(event);
+}
+
static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
{
/*
@@ -79,7 +89,7 @@ static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
* MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] will be programmed as "0b01" for continous sampling
* mode and will be un-changed when setting MMCRA[63] (Marked events).
*
- * Incase of Power9:
+ * Incase of Power9/power10:
* Marked event: MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] will be set to 0b00 ('No Updates'),
* or if group already have any marked events.
* For rest
@@ -90,8 +100,8 @@ static void mmcra_sdar_mode(u64 event, unsigned long *mmcra)
if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
if (is_event_marked(event) || (*mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE))
*mmcra &= MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_NO_UPDATES;
- else if (p9_SDAR_MODE(event))
- *mmcra |= p9_SDAR_MODE(event) << MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT;
+ else if (sdar_mod_val(event))
+ *mmcra |= sdar_mod_val(event) << MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT;
else
*mmcra |= MMCRA_SDAR_MODE_DCACHE;
} else
@@ -134,7 +144,11 @@ static bool is_thresh_cmp_valid(u64 event)
/*
* Check the mantissa upper two bits are not zero, unless the
* exponent is also zero. See the THRESH_CMP_MANTISSA doc.
+ * Power10: thresh_cmp is replaced by l2_l3 event select.
*/
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ return false;
+
cmp = (event >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
exp = cmp >> 7;
@@ -251,7 +265,12 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
pmc = (event >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
unit = (event >> EVENT_UNIT_SHIFT) & EVENT_UNIT_MASK;
- cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) & EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
+ else
+ cache = (event >> EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) &
+ EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK;
ebb = (event >> EVENT_EBB_SHIFT) & EVENT_EBB_MASK;
if (pmc) {
@@ -283,7 +302,10 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
}
if (unit >= 6 && unit <= 9) {
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && (unit = 6)) {
+ mask |= CNST_L2L3_GROUP_MASK;
+ value |= CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(event >> p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT);
+ } else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
mask |= CNST_CACHE_GROUP_MASK;
value |= CNST_CACHE_GROUP_VAL(event & 0xff);
@@ -367,6 +389,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
struct perf_event *pevents[])
{
unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
+ unsigned long mmcr3;
unsigned int pmc, pmc_inuse;
int i;
@@ -379,7 +402,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
pmc_inuse |= 1 << pmc;
}
- mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = 0;
+ mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
/* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
@@ -438,8 +461,17 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_THR_CTL_SHIFT;
val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_SEL_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_SEL_MASK;
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_THR_SEL_SHIFT;
- val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) & EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
- mmcra |= thresh_cmp_val(val);
+ if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ val = (event[i] >> EVENT_THR_CMP_SHIFT) &
+ EVENT_THR_CMP_MASK;
+ mmcra |= thresh_cmp_val(val);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) && (unit = 6)) {
+ val = (event[i] >> p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_L2L3_SEL_MASK;
+ mmcr2 |= val << p10_L2L3_SEL_SHIFT;
}
if (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB) {
@@ -460,6 +492,14 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCS(pmc);
}
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ if (pmc <= 4) {
+ val = (event[i] >> p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT) &
+ p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK;
+ mmcr3 |= val << MMCR3_SHIFT(pmc);
+ }
+ }
+
hwc[i] = pmc - 1;
}
@@ -480,6 +520,7 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
+ mmcr->mmcr3 = mmcr3;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
index df968fd..044de65 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
@@ -87,6 +87,31 @@
EVENT_LINUX_MASK | \
EVENT_PSEL_MASK))
+/* Contants to support power10 raw encoding format */
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT 22
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK 0x3ull
+#define p10_SDAR_MODE(v) (((v) >> p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT) & \
+ p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK)
+#define p10_EVENT_L2L3_SEL_MASK 0x1f
+#define p10_L2L3_SEL_SHIFT 3
+#define p10_L2L3_EVENT_SHIFT 40
+#define p10_EVENT_THRESH_MASK 0xffffull
+#define p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK 0x3ull
+#define p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK 0x7fffull
+#define p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT 45
+
+#define p10_EVENT_VALID_MASK \
+ ((p10_SDAR_MODE_MASK << p10_SDAR_MODE_SHIFT | \
+ (p10_EVENT_THRESH_MASK << EVENT_THRESH_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_SAMPLE_MASK << EVENT_SAMPLE_SHIFT) | \
+ (p10_EVENT_CACHE_SEL_MASK << EVENT_CACHE_SEL_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_PMC_MASK << EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_UNIT_MASK << EVENT_UNIT_SHIFT) | \
+ (p9_EVENT_COMBINE_MASK << p9_EVENT_COMBINE_SHIFT) | \
+ (p10_EVENT_MMCR3_MASK << p10_EVENT_MMCR3_SHIFT) | \
+ (EVENT_MARKED_MASK << EVENT_MARKED_SHIFT) | \
+ EVENT_LINUX_MASK | \
+ EVENT_PSEL_MASK))
/*
* Layout of constraint bits:
*
@@ -135,6 +160,9 @@
#define CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL (1ull << 54)
#define CNST_CACHE_PMC4_MASK CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL
+#define CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(v) (((v) & 0x1full) << 55)
+#define CNST_L2L3_GROUP_MASK CNST_L2L3_GROUP_VAL(0x1f)
+
/*
* For NC we are counting up to 4 events. This requires three bits, and we need
* the fifth event to overflow and set the 4th bit. To achieve that we bias the
@@ -191,7 +219,7 @@
#define MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP(v) (((v) >> MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP_SHIFT) &\
MMCRA_THR_CTR_EXP_MASK)
-/* MMCR1 Threshold Compare bit constant for power9 */
+/* MMCRA Threshold Compare bit constant for power9 */
#define p9_MMCRA_THR_CMP_SHIFT 45
/* Bits in MMCR2 for PowerISA v2.07 */
@@ -202,6 +230,9 @@
#define MAX_ALT 2
#define MAX_PMU_COUNTERS 6
+/* Bits in MMCR3 for PowerISA v3.10 */
+#define MMCR3_SHIFT(pmc) (49 - (15 * ((pmc) - 1)))
+
#define ISA207_SIER_TYPE_SHIFT 15
#define ISA207_SIER_TYPE_MASK (0x7ull << ISA207_SIER_TYPE_SHIFT)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..60c1b81
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-events-list.h
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
+/*
+ * Performance counter support for POWER10 processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2020 Madhavan Srinivasan, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2020 Athira Rajeev, IBM Corporation.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Power10 event codes.
+ */
+EVENT(PM_RUN_CYC, 0x600f4);
+EVENT(PM_DISP_STALL_CYC, 0x100f8);
+EVENT(PM_EXEC_STALL, 0x30008);
+EVENT(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL, 0x500fa);
+EVENT(PM_BR_CMPL, 0x4d05e);
+EVENT(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL, 0x400f6);
+
+/* All L1 D cache load references counted at finish, gated by reject */
+EVENT(PM_LD_REF_L1, 0x100fc);
+/* Load Missed L1 */
+EVENT(PM_LD_MISS_L1, 0x3e054);
+/* Store Missed L1 */
+EVENT(PM_ST_MISS_L1, 0x300f0);
+/* L1 cache data prefetches */
+EVENT(PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS, 0x1002c);
+/* Demand iCache Miss */
+EVENT(PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS, 0x200fc);
+/* Instruction fetches from L1 */
+EVENT(PM_INST_FROM_L1, 0x04080);
+/* Instruction Demand sectors wriittent into IL1 */
+EVENT(PM_INST_FROM_L1MISS, 0x03f00000001c040);
+/* Instruction prefetch written into IL1 */
+EVENT(PM_IC_PREF_REQ, 0x040a0);
+/* The data cache was reloaded from local core's L3 due to a demand load */
+EVENT(PM_DATA_FROM_L3, 0x01340000001c040);
+/* Demand LD - L3 Miss (not L2 hit and not L3 hit) */
+EVENT(PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS, 0x300fe);
+/* Data PTEG reload */
+EVENT(PM_DTLB_MISS, 0x300fc);
+/* ITLB Reloaded */
+EVENT(PM_ITLB_MISS, 0x400fc);
+
+EVENT(PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, 0x0001e);
+EVENT(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL_ALT, 0x00002);
+
+/*
+ * Memory Access Events
+ *
+ * Primary PMU event used here is PM_MRK_INST_CMPL (0x401e0)
+ * To enable capturing of memory profiling, these MMCRA bits
+ * needs to be programmed and corresponding raw event format
+ * encoding.
+ *
+ * MMCRA bits encoding needed are
+ * SM (Sampling Mode)
+ * EM (Eligibility for Random Sampling)
+ * TECE (Threshold Event Counter Event)
+ * TS (Threshold Start Event)
+ * TE (Threshold End Event)
+ *
+ * Corresponding Raw Encoding bits:
+ * sample [EM,SM]
+ * thresh_sel (TECE)
+ * thresh start (TS)
+ * thresh end (TE)
+ */
+
+EVENT(MEM_LOADS, 0x34340401e0);
+EVENT(MEM_STORES, 0x343c0401e0);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba19f40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Performance counter support for POWER10 processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2020 Madhavan Srinivasan, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2020 Athira Rajeev, IBM Corporation.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "power10-pmu: " fmt
+
+#include "isa207-common.h"
+#include "internal.h"
+
+/*
+ * Raw event encoding for Power10:
+ *
+ * 60 56 52 48 44 40 36 32
+ * | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - |
+ * | | [ ] [ src_match ] [ src_mask ] | [ ] [ l2l3_sel ] [ thresh_ctl ]
+ * | | | | | |
+ * | | *- IFM (Linux) | | thresh start/stop -*
+ * | *- BHRB (Linux) | src_sel
+ * *- EBB (Linux) *invert_bit
+ *
+ * 28 24 20 16 12 8 4 0
+ * | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - | - - - - |
+ * [ ] [ sample ] [ ] [ ] [ pmc ] [unit ] [ ] m [ pmcxsel ]
+ * | | | | | |
+ * | | | | | *- mark
+ * | | | *- L1/L2/L3 cache_sel |
+ * | | sdar_mode |
+ * | *- sampling mode for marked events *- combine
+ * |
+ * *- thresh_sel
+ *
+ * Below uses IBM bit numbering.
+ *
+ * MMCR1[x:y] = unit (PMCxUNIT)
+ * MMCR1[24] = pmc1combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[25] = pmc1combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[26] = pmc2combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[27] = pmc2combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[28] = pmc3combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[29] = pmc3combine[1]
+ * MMCR1[30] = pmc4combine[0]
+ * MMCR1[31] = pmc4combine[1]
+ *
+ * if pmc = 3 and unit = 0 and pmcxsel[0:6] = 0b0101011
+ * MMCR1[20:27] = thresh_ctl
+ * else if pmc = 4 and unit = 0xf and pmcxsel[0:6] = 0b0101001
+ * MMCR1[20:27] = thresh_ctl
+ * else
+ * MMCRA[48:55] = thresh_ctl (THRESH START/END)
+ *
+ * if thresh_sel:
+ * MMCRA[45:47] = thresh_sel
+ *
+ * if l2l3_sel:
+ * MMCR2[56:60] = l2l3_sel[0:4]
+ *
+ * MMCR1[16] = cache_sel[0]
+ * MMCR1[17] = cache_sel[1]
+ *
+ * if mark:
+ * MMCRA[63] = 1 (SAMPLE_ENABLE)
+ * MMCRA[57:59] = sample[0:2] (RAND_SAMP_ELIG)
+ * MMCRA[61:62] = sample[3:4] (RAND_SAMP_MODE)
+ *
+ * if EBB and BHRB:
+ * MMCRA[32:33] = IFM
+ *
+ * MMCRA[SDAR_MODE] = sdar_mode[0:1]
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Some power10 event codes.
+ */
+#define EVENT(_name, _code) enum{_name = _code}
+
+#include "power10-events-list.h"
+
+#undef EVENT
+
+/* MMCRA IFM bits - POWER10 */
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1 0x0000000040000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+
+/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
+static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
+ { PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
+ { PM_RUN_INST_CMPL_ALT, PM_RUN_INST_CMPL },
+};
+
+static int power10_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
+{
+ int num_alt = 0;
+
+ num_alt = isa207_get_alternatives(event, alt,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(power10_event_alternatives), flags,
+ power10_event_alternatives);
+
+ return num_alt;
+}
+
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cpu-cycles, PM_RUN_CYC);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(instructions, PM_RUN_INST_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(branch-instructions, PM_BR_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(branch-misses, PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cache-references, PM_LD_REF_L1);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(cache-misses, PM_LD_MISS_L1);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(mem-loads, MEM_LOADS);
+GENERIC_EVENT_ATTR(mem-stores, MEM_STORES);
+
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-load-misses, PM_LD_MISS_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-loads, PM_LD_REF_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-prefetches, PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-dcache-store-misses, PM_ST_MISS_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-load-misses, PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-loads, PM_INST_FROM_L1);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(L1-icache-prefetches, PM_IC_PREF_REQ);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(LLC-load-misses, PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(LLC-loads, PM_DATA_FROM_L3);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(branch-load-misses, PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(branch-loads, PM_BR_CMPL);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(dTLB-load-misses, PM_DTLB_MISS);
+CACHE_EVENT_ATTR(iTLB-load-misses, PM_ITLB_MISS);
+
+static struct attribute *power10_events_attr[] = {
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_RUN_CYC),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_RUN_INST_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_REF_L1),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_MISS_L1),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(MEM_LOADS),
+ GENERIC_EVENT_PTR(MEM_STORES),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_MISS_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_REF_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_ST_MISS_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_INST_FROM_L1),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_IC_PREF_REQ),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DATA_FROM_L3),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_BR_CMPL),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_DTLB_MISS),
+ CACHE_EVENT_PTR(PM_ITLB_MISS),
+ NULL
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group power10_pmu_events_group = {
+ .name = "events",
+ .attrs = power10_events_attr,
+};
+
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-59");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pmcxsel, "config:0-7");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(mark, "config:8");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(combine, "config:10-11");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(unit, "config:12-15");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(pmc, "config:16-19");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cache_sel, "config:20-21");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(sdar_mode, "config:22-23");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(sample_mode, "config:24-28");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_sel, "config:29-31");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_stop, "config:32-35");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_start, "config:36-39");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(l2l3_sel, "config:40-44");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_sel, "config:45-46");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(invert_bit, "config:47");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_mask, "config:48-53");
+PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(src_match, "config:54-59");
+
+static struct attribute *power10_pmu_format_attr[] = {
+ &format_attr_event.attr,
+ &format_attr_pmcxsel.attr,
+ &format_attr_mark.attr,
+ &format_attr_combine.attr,
+ &format_attr_unit.attr,
+ &format_attr_pmc.attr,
+ &format_attr_cache_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_sdar_mode.attr,
+ &format_attr_sample_mode.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_stop.attr,
+ &format_attr_thresh_start.attr,
+ &format_attr_l2l3_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_sel.attr,
+ &format_attr_invert_bit.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_mask.attr,
+ &format_attr_src_match.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute_group power10_pmu_format_group = {
+ .name = "format",
+ .attrs = power10_pmu_format_attr,
+};
+
+static const struct attribute_group *power10_pmu_attr_groups[] = {
+ &power10_pmu_format_group,
+ &power10_pmu_events_group,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static int power10_generic_events[] = {
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = PM_RUN_CYC,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = PM_RUN_INST_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS] = PM_BR_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
+ [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES] = PM_LD_MISS_L1,
+};
+
+static u64 power10_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
+{
+ u64 pmu_bhrb_filter = 0;
+
+ /* BHRB and regular PMU events share the same privilege state
+ * filter configuration. BHRB is always recorded along with a
+ * regular PMU event. As the privilege state filter is handled
+ * in the basic PMC configuration of the accompanying regular
+ * PMU event, we ignore any separate BHRB specific request.
+ */
+
+ /* No branch filter requested */
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+
+ /* Invalid branch filter options - HW does not support */
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
+ return -1;
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
+
+ /* Every thing else is unsupported */
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
+{
+ pmu_bhrb_filter &= POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK;
+
+ /* Enable BHRB filter in PMU */
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, (mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA) | pmu_bhrb_filter));
+}
+
+#define C(x) PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##x
+
+/*
+ * Table of generalized cache-related events.
+ * 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
+ * are event codes.
+ */
+static u64 power10_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+ [C(L1D)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_LD_REF_L1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_LD_MISS_L1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_ST_MISS_L1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_LD_PREFETCH_CACHE_LINE_MISS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(L1I)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_INST_FROM_L1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_L1_ICACHE_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_INST_FROM_L1MISS,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_IC_PREF_REQ,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(LL)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_DATA_FROM_L3,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_DATA_FROM_L3MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = 0,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(DTLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_DTLB_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(ITLB)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = 0,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_ITLB_MISS,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(BPU)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = PM_BR_CMPL,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = PM_BR_MPRED_CMPL,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+ [C(NODE)] = {
+ [C(OP_READ)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_WRITE)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ [C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {
+ [C(RESULT_ACCESS)] = -1,
+ [C(RESULT_MISS)] = -1,
+ },
+ },
+};
+
+#undef C
+
+static struct power_pmu power10_pmu = {
+ .name = "POWER10",
+ .n_counter = MAX_PMU_COUNTERS,
+ .add_fields = ISA207_ADD_FIELDS,
+ .test_adder = ISA207_TEST_ADDER,
+ .group_constraint_mask = CNST_CACHE_PMC4_MASK,
+ .group_constraint_val = CNST_CACHE_PMC4_VAL,
+ .compute_mmcr = isa207_compute_mmcr,
+ .config_bhrb = power10_config_bhrb,
+ .bhrb_filter_map = power10_bhrb_filter_map,
+ .get_constraint = isa207_get_constraint,
+ .get_alternatives = power10_get_alternatives,
+ .get_mem_data_src = isa207_get_mem_data_src,
+ .get_mem_weight = isa207_get_mem_weight,
+ .disable_pmc = isa207_disable_pmc,
+ .flags = PPMU_HAS_SIER | PPMU_ARCH_207S |
+ PPMU_ARCH_310S,
+ .n_generic = ARRAY_SIZE(power10_generic_events),
+ .generic_events = power10_generic_events,
+ .cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
+ .attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
+ .bhrb_nr = 32,
+};
+
+int init_power10_pmu(void)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ /* Comes from cpu_specs[] */
+ if (!cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type ||
+ strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
+
+ /* Tell userspace that EBB is supported */
+ cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features2 |= PPC_FEATURE2_EBB;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 09/15] powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
commit bb19af816025 ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak to
userspace via BHRB buffer") added a check in bhrb_read() to filter
the kernel address from BHRB buffer. This patch modified it to avoid
that check for PowerISA v3.1 based processors, since PowerISA v3.1
allows only MSR[PR]=1 address to be written to BHRB buffer.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 0ffb757d..bd125fe 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -469,8 +469,11 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_read(struct perf_event *event, struct cpu_hw_events *
* addresses at this point. Check the privileges before
* exporting it to userspace (avoid exposure of regions
* where we could have speculative execution)
+ * Incase of ISA v3.1, BHRB will capture only user-space
+ * addresses, hence include a check before filtering code
*/
- if (is_kernel_addr(addr) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
+ if (!(ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) &&
+ is_kernel_addr(addr) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
continue;
/* Branches are read most recent first (ie. mfbhrb 0 is
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 09/15] powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
commit bb19af816025 ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak to
userspace via BHRB buffer") added a check in bhrb_read() to filter
the kernel address from BHRB buffer. This patch modified it to avoid
that check for PowerISA v3.1 based processors, since PowerISA v3.1
allows only MSR[PR]=1 address to be written to BHRB buffer.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 0ffb757d..bd125fe 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -469,8 +469,11 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_read(struct perf_event *event, struct cpu_hw_events *
* addresses at this point. Check the privileges before
* exporting it to userspace (avoid exposure of regions
* where we could have speculative execution)
+ * Incase of ISA v3.1, BHRB will capture only user-space
+ * addresses, hence include a check before filtering code
*/
- if (is_kernel_addr(addr) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
+ if (!(ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) &&
+ is_kernel_addr(addr) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
continue;
/* Branches are read most recent first (ie. mfbhrb 0 is
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 09/15] powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
commit bb19af816025 ("powerpc/perf: Prevent kernel address leak to
userspace via BHRB buffer") added a check in bhrb_read() to filter
the kernel address from BHRB buffer. This patch modified it to avoid
that check for PowerISA v3.1 based processors, since PowerISA v3.1
allows only MSR[PR]=1 address to be written to BHRB buffer.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 0ffb757d..bd125fe 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -469,8 +469,11 @@ static void power_pmu_bhrb_read(struct perf_event *event, struct cpu_hw_events *
* addresses at this point. Check the privileges before
* exporting it to userspace (avoid exposure of regions
* where we could have speculative execution)
+ * Incase of ISA v3.1, BHRB will capture only user-space
+ * addresses, hence include a check before filtering code
*/
- if (is_kernel_addr(addr) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
+ if (!(ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) &&
+ is_kernel_addr(addr) && perf_allow_kernel(&event->attr) != 0)
continue;
/* Branches are read most recent first (ie. mfbhrb 0 is
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 10/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
PowerISA v3.1 introduce filtering support for
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND. The patch adds BHRB filter
support for "ind_call" and "cond" in power10_bhrb_filter_map().
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
index ba19f40..b02aabb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@
/* MMCRA IFM bits - POWER10 */
#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1 0x0000000040000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM2 0x0000000080000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
@@ -233,8 +235,15 @@ static u64 power10_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
return -1;
- if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
- return -1;
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM2;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
return -1;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 10/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
PowerISA v3.1 introduce filtering support for
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND. The patch adds BHRB filter
support for "ind_call" and "cond" in power10_bhrb_filter_map().
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
index ba19f40..b02aabb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@
/* MMCRA IFM bits - POWER10 */
#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1 0x0000000040000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM2 0x0000000080000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
@@ -233,8 +235,15 @@ static u64 power10_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
return -1;
- if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
- return -1;
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM2;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
return -1;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 10/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
PowerISA v3.1 introduce filtering support for
PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND. The patch adds BHRB filter
support for "ind_call" and "cond" in power10_bhrb_filter_map().
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
index ba19f40..b02aabb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -83,6 +83,8 @@
/* MMCRA IFM bits - POWER10 */
#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM1 0x0000000040000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM2 0x0000000080000000UL
+#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
@@ -233,8 +235,15 @@ static u64 power10_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN)
return -1;
- if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL)
- return -1;
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM2;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
+
+ if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_COND) {
+ pmu_bhrb_filter |= POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3;
+ return pmu_bhrb_filter;
+ }
if (branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_CALL)
return -1;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
- unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
+ unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
if (!ppmu)
return;
@@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
mb();
isync();
+ val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
+
/*
* Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
- cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
+ val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
+
+ /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
+ /*
+ * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
+ * instruction sampling or BHRB.
+ */
+ if (val != mmcra) {
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
mb();
isync();
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 77643f3..964437a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
+ /*
+ * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
+ * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
+ */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
/* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
@@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
}
+ /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
+ (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
+ mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
unsigned long srr1;
unsigned long pls;
unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
+ unsigned long mmcra = 0;
struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
bool sprs_saved = false;
@@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
*/
mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
}
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ /*
+ * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
+ * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
+ * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
+ * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
+ * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
+ * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
+ * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
+ * in problem mode.
+ */
+ mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
+ }
+
if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
@@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
- unsigned long mmcra;
-
/*
* We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
* upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
@@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
}
+ /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
+
/*
* DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
* to ensure the PMU starts running.
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
- unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
+ unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
if (!ppmu)
return;
@@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
mb();
isync();
+ val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
+
/*
* Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
- cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
+ val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
+
+ /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
+ /*
+ * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
+ * instruction sampling or BHRB.
+ */
+ if (val != mmcra) {
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
mb();
isync();
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 77643f3..964437a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
+ /*
+ * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
+ * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
+ */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
/* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
@@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
}
+ /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
+ (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
+ mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
unsigned long srr1;
unsigned long pls;
unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
+ unsigned long mmcra = 0;
struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
bool sprs_saved = false;
@@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
*/
mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
}
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ /*
+ * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
+ * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
+ * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
+ * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
+ * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
+ * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
+ * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
+ * in problem mode.
+ */
+ mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
+ }
+
if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
@@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
- unsigned long mmcra;
-
/*
* We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
* upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
@@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
}
+ /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
+
/*
* DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
* to ensure the PMU starts running.
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
{
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
- unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
+ unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
if (!ppmu)
return;
@@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
mb();
isync();
+ val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
+
/*
* Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
*/
- if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
- mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
- cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
+ if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
+ val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
+
+ /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
+ if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
+ val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
+ /*
+ * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
+ * instruction sampling or BHRB.
+ */
+ if (val != mmcra) {
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
mb();
isync();
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
index 77643f3..964437a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
@@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
+ /*
+ * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
+ * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
+ */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
/* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
@@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
}
+ /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
+ (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
+ mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
+
if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
unsigned long srr1;
unsigned long pls;
unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
+ unsigned long mmcra = 0;
struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
bool sprs_saved = false;
@@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
*/
mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
}
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
+ /*
+ * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
+ * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
+ * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
+ * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
+ * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
+ * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
+ * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
+ * in problem mode.
+ */
+ mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
+ }
+
if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
@@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
- unsigned long mmcra;
-
/*
* We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
* upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
@@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
}
+ /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
+
/*
* DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
* to ensure the PMU starts running.
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
`PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
MASK value.
with patch
----------
available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
.... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
.... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
.... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
.... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
.... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
.... r5 0x9c422724be
.... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
.... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
.... r8 0x9e4
.... r9 0x0
.... r10 0x1
.... r11 0x0
.... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
.... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
.... r14 0x0
.... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
.... r16 0x0
.... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
.... r18 0x7e7076607730
.... r19 0x2f
.... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
.... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
.... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
.... r23 0x1
.... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
.... r25 0x80000000
.... r26 0x0
.... r27 0x1
.... r28 0x1
.... r29 0xc000000001be1260
.... r30 0x6008010
.... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
.... nip 0xc00000000012b910
.... msr 0x9000000000009033
.... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
.... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
.... link 0xc00000000012b77c
.... xer 0x0
.... ccr 0x28002222
.... softe 0x1
.... trap 0xf00
.... dar 0x0
.... dsisr 0x80000000000
.... sier 0x0
.... mmcra 0x80000000000
.... mmcr0 0x82008090
.... mmcr1 0x1e000000
.... mmcr2 0x0
... thread: perf:4784
Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 8 +++++++
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 6 +++++
5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 832450a..bf85d1a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
#define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
#define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
+
struct perf_event;
struct mmcr_regs {
@@ -62,6 +65,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
int *blacklist_ev;
/* BHRB entries in the PMU */
int bhrb_nr;
+ /*
+ * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
+ * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
+ */
+ int capabilities;
};
/*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
- PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+ /* Extended registers */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ /* Max regs without the extended regs */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 31c0535..d5a9529 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -2316,6 +2316,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
pmu->name);
power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
+ power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
#ifdef MSR_HV
/*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index a213a0a..b0cf68f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
+u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
#define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
-#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
+#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
@@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
};
+/* Function to return the extended register values */
+static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
+{
+ switch (idx) {
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+ default: return 0;
+ }
+}
+
u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
- return 0;
+ u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
@@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
return 0;
+ if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
+ return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
+
+ /*
+ * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
+ * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX))
+ return 0;
+
return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
#define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
/* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
#define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS 0x00002000
@@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
.cache_events = &power9_cache_events,
.attr_groups = power9_pmu_attr_groups,
.bhrb_nr = 32,
+ .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
};
int init_power9_pmu(void)
@@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
}
}
+ /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+
rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
`PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
MASK value.
with patch
----------
available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
.... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
.... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
.... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
.... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
.... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
.... r5 0x9c422724be
.... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
.... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
.... r8 0x9e4
.... r9 0x0
.... r10 0x1
.... r11 0x0
.... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
.... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
.... r14 0x0
.... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
.... r16 0x0
.... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
.... r18 0x7e7076607730
.... r19 0x2f
.... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
.... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
.... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
.... r23 0x1
.... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
.... r25 0x80000000
.... r26 0x0
.... r27 0x1
.... r28 0x1
.... r29 0xc000000001be1260
.... r30 0x6008010
.... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
.... nip 0xc00000000012b910
.... msr 0x9000000000009033
.... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
.... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
.... link 0xc00000000012b77c
.... xer 0x0
.... ccr 0x28002222
.... softe 0x1
.... trap 0xf00
.... dar 0x0
.... dsisr 0x80000000000
.... sier 0x0
.... mmcra 0x80000000000
.... mmcr0 0x82008090
.... mmcr1 0x1e000000
.... mmcr2 0x0
... thread: perf:4784
Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 8 +++++++
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 6 +++++
5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 832450a..bf85d1a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
#define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
#define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
+
struct perf_event;
struct mmcr_regs {
@@ -62,6 +65,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
int *blacklist_ev;
/* BHRB entries in the PMU */
int bhrb_nr;
+ /*
+ * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
+ * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
+ */
+ int capabilities;
};
/*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
- PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+ /* Extended registers */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ /* Max regs without the extended regs */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 31c0535..d5a9529 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -2316,6 +2316,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
pmu->name);
power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
+ power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
#ifdef MSR_HV
/*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index a213a0a..b0cf68f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
+u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
#define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
-#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
+#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
@@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
};
+/* Function to return the extended register values */
+static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
+{
+ switch (idx) {
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+ default: return 0;
+ }
+}
+
u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
- return 0;
+ u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
@@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
return 0;
+ if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
+ return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
+
+ /*
+ * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
+ * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX))
+ return 0;
+
return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
#define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
/* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
#define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS 0x00002000
@@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
.cache_events = &power9_cache_events,
.attr_groups = power9_pmu_attr_groups,
.bhrb_nr = 32,
+ .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
};
int init_power9_pmu(void)
@@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
}
}
+ /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+
rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
`PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
MASK value.
with patch
----------
available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
.... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
.... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
.... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
.... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
.... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
.... r5 0x9c422724be
.... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
.... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
.... r8 0x9e4
.... r9 0x0
.... r10 0x1
.... r11 0x0
.... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
.... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
.... r14 0x0
.... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
.... r16 0x0
.... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
.... r18 0x7e7076607730
.... r19 0x2f
.... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
.... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
.... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
.... r23 0x1
.... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
.... r25 0x80000000
.... r26 0x0
.... r27 0x1
.... r28 0x1
.... r29 0xc000000001be1260
.... r30 0x6008010
.... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
.... nip 0xc00000000012b910
.... msr 0x9000000000009033
.... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
.... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
.... link 0xc00000000012b77c
.... xer 0x0
.... ccr 0x28002222
.... softe 0x1
.... trap 0xf00
.... dar 0x0
.... dsisr 0x80000000000
.... sier 0x0
.... mmcra 0x80000000000
.... mmcr0 0x82008090
.... mmcr1 0x1e000000
.... mmcr2 0x0
... thread: perf:4784
Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 8 +++++++
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 +
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 6 +++++
5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index 832450a..bf85d1a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
#define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
#define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
+
struct perf_event;
struct mmcr_regs {
@@ -62,6 +65,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
int *blacklist_ev;
/* BHRB entries in the PMU */
int bhrb_nr;
+ /*
+ * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
+ * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
+ */
+ int capabilities;
};
/*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
- PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+ /* Extended registers */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ /* Max regs without the extended regs */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 31c0535..d5a9529 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -2316,6 +2316,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
pmu->name);
power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
+ power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
#ifdef MSR_HV
/*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index a213a0a..b0cf68f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
+u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
#define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
-#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
+#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
@@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
};
+/* Function to return the extended register values */
+static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
+{
+ switch (idx) {
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+ default: return 0;
+ }
+}
+
u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
- return 0;
+ u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
+
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
if (idx = PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
@@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
return 0;
+ if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
+ return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
+
+ /*
+ * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
+ * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX))
+ return 0;
+
return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
}
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
#define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
/* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
#define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS 0x00002000
@@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
.cache_events = &power9_cache_events,
.attr_groups = power9_pmu_attr_groups,
.bhrb_nr = 32,
+ .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
};
int init_power9_pmu(void)
@@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
}
}
+ /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+
rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
version.
Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
`arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 5 ++-
| 9 +----
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
| 15 ++++++++
5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
- PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+ /* Extended registers */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ /* Max regs without the extended regs */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
- [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
};
static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
--git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
index d487007..1a95017 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
@@ -7,17 +7,10 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include "header.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
#include "metricgroup.h"
#include <api/fs/fs.h>
-#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
- asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
- : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
-
-#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
-#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
-#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
-
int
get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
{
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index 0a52429..d64ba0c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,9 +6,15 @@
#include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
#include "../../../util/debug.h"
+#include "../../../util/event.h"
+#include "../../../util/header.h"
+#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
+
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
@@ -55,6 +61,9 @@
SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -163,3 +172,43 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
return SDT_ARG_VALID;
}
+
+uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
+{
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+ .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+ .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+ .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
+ .precise_ip = 1,
+ .disabled = 1,
+ .exclude_kernel = 1,
+ };
+ int fd;
+ u32 version;
+ u64 extended_mask = 0, mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * Get the PVR value to set the extended
+ * mask specific to platform.
+ */
+ version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
+ if (version == PVR_POWER9)
+ extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+ else
+ return mask;
+
+ attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
+ attr.sample_period = 1;
+ event_attr_init(&attr);
+
+ /*
+ * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
+ * returning the register mask to sample.
+ */
+ fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
+ if (fd != -1) {
+ close(fd);
+ mask |= extended_mask;
+ }
+ return mask;
+}
--git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5788eb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+#define __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
+
+#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
+ asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
+ : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
+
+#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
+#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
+#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
+
+#endif /* __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H */
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
version.
Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
`arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 5 ++-
| 9 +----
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
| 15 ++++++++
5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
- PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+ /* Extended registers */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ /* Max regs without the extended regs */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
- [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
};
static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
--git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
index d487007..1a95017 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
@@ -7,17 +7,10 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include "header.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
#include "metricgroup.h"
#include <api/fs/fs.h>
-#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
- asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
- : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
-
-#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
-#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
-#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
-
int
get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
{
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index 0a52429..d64ba0c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,9 +6,15 @@
#include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
#include "../../../util/debug.h"
+#include "../../../util/event.h"
+#include "../../../util/header.h"
+#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
+
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
@@ -55,6 +61,9 @@
SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -163,3 +172,43 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
return SDT_ARG_VALID;
}
+
+uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
+{
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+ .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+ .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+ .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
+ .precise_ip = 1,
+ .disabled = 1,
+ .exclude_kernel = 1,
+ };
+ int fd;
+ u32 version;
+ u64 extended_mask = 0, mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * Get the PVR value to set the extended
+ * mask specific to platform.
+ */
+ version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
+ if (version == PVR_POWER9)
+ extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+ else
+ return mask;
+
+ attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
+ attr.sample_period = 1;
+ event_attr_init(&attr);
+
+ /*
+ * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
+ * returning the register mask to sample.
+ */
+ fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
+ if (fd != -1) {
+ close(fd);
+ mask |= extended_mask;
+ }
+ return mask;
+}
--git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5788eb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+#define __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
+
+#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
+ asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
+ : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
+
+#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
+#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
+#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
+
+#endif /* __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H */
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
version.
Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
`arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 ++++++-
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 5 ++-
| 9 +----
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
| 15 ++++++++
5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f599064..225c64c 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
- PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
+ /* Extended registers */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ /* Max regs without the extended regs */
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
+
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
+
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
- [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
};
static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
--git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
index d487007..1a95017 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
@@ -7,17 +7,10 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <linux/stringify.h>
#include "header.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
#include "metricgroup.h"
#include <api/fs/fs.h>
-#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
- asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
- : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
-
-#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
-#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
-#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
-
int
get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
{
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index 0a52429..d64ba0c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,9 +6,15 @@
#include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
#include "../../../util/debug.h"
+#include "../../../util/event.h"
+#include "../../../util/header.h"
+#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
+#include "utils_header.h"
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
+
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
@@ -55,6 +61,9 @@
SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -163,3 +172,43 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
return SDT_ARG_VALID;
}
+
+uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
+{
+ struct perf_event_attr attr = {
+ .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
+ .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
+ .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
+ .precise_ip = 1,
+ .disabled = 1,
+ .exclude_kernel = 1,
+ };
+ int fd;
+ u32 version;
+ u64 extended_mask = 0, mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
+
+ /*
+ * Get the PVR value to set the extended
+ * mask specific to platform.
+ */
+ version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
+ if (version = PVR_POWER9)
+ extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+ else
+ return mask;
+
+ attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
+ attr.sample_period = 1;
+ event_attr_init(&attr);
+
+ /*
+ * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
+ * returning the register mask to sample.
+ */
+ fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
+ if (fd != -1) {
+ close(fd);
+ mask |= extended_mask;
+ }
+ return mask;
+}
--git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5788eb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+#define __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
+
+#include <linux/stringify.h>
+
+#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
+ asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
+ : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
+
+#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
+#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
+#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
+
+#endif /* __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H */
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 14/15] powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Include capability flag `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` for power10
and expose MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.
Also introduce `PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31` to define extended mask
value at runtime for power10
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix build failure on PPC32 platform]
Suggested-by: Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 12 +++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
/* Max regs without the extended regs */
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index b0cf68f..11b90d5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
+#endif
default: return 0;
}
}
@@ -89,7 +97,9 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31;
+ else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
index b02aabb..f066ed9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
{ PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
@@ -397,6 +399,7 @@ static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
.cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
.attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
.bhrb_nr = 32,
+ .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
};
int init_power10_pmu(void)
@@ -408,6 +411,9 @@ int init_power10_pmu(void)
strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
return -ENODEV;
+ /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
+
rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 14/15] powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Include capability flag `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` for power10
and expose MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.
Also introduce `PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31` to define extended mask
value at runtime for power10
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix build failure on PPC32 platform]
Suggested-by: Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 12 +++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
/* Max regs without the extended regs */
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index b0cf68f..11b90d5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
+#endif
default: return 0;
}
}
@@ -89,7 +97,9 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31;
+ else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
index b02aabb..f066ed9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
{ PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
@@ -397,6 +399,7 @@ static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
.cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
.attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
.bhrb_nr = 32,
+ .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
};
int init_power10_pmu(void)
@@ -408,6 +411,9 @@ int init_power10_pmu(void)
strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
return -ENODEV;
+ /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
+
rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 14/15] powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Include capability flag `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` for power10
and expose MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.
Also introduce `PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31` to define extended mask
value at runtime for power10
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[Fix build failure on PPC32 platform]
Suggested-by: Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.ibm.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 12 +++++++++++-
arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
/* Max regs without the extended regs */
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
index b0cf68f..11b90d5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
@@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
+ case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3:
+ return mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
+#endif
default: return 0;
}
}
@@ -89,7 +97,9 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
- if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
+ if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31;
+ else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
if (idx = PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
index b02aabb..f066ed9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
@@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
#define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
#define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+
/* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
{ PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
@@ -397,6 +399,7 @@ static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
.cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
.attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
.bhrb_nr = 32,
+ .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
};
int init_power10_pmu(void)
@@ -408,6 +411,9 @@ int init_power10_pmu(void)
strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
return -ENODEV;
+ /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
+ PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
+
rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 15/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Added support for supported regs which are new in power10
( MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 ) to sample_reg_mask in the tool side
to use with `-I?` option. Also added PVR check to send extended
mask for power10 at kernel while capturing extended regs in
each sample.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 3 +++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
/* Max regs without the extended regs */
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index 46ed00d..63f3ac9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3] = "mmcr3",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2] = "sier2",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3] = "sier3",
};
static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index d64ba0c..2b6d470 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
+#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
@@ -64,6 +65,9 @@
SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3),
+ SMPL_REG(sier2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2),
+ SMPL_REG(sier3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3),
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -194,6 +198,8 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
if (version == PVR_POWER9)
extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+ else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
+ extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
else
return mask;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 15/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Added support for supported regs which are new in power10
( MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 ) to sample_reg_mask in the tool side
to use with `-I?` option. Also added PVR check to send extended
mask for power10 at kernel while capturing extended regs in
each sample.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 3 +++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
/* Max regs without the extended regs */
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index 46ed00d..63f3ac9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3] = "mmcr3",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2] = "sier2",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3] = "sier3",
};
static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index d64ba0c..2b6d470 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
+#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
@@ -64,6 +65,9 @@
SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3),
+ SMPL_REG(sier2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2),
+ SMPL_REG(sier3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3),
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -194,6 +198,8 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
if (version == PVR_POWER9)
extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+ else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
+ extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
else
return mask;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* [v3 15/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
@ 2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-17 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Added support for supported regs which are new in power10
( MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 ) to sample_reg_mask in the tool side
to use with `-I?` option. Also added PVR check to send extended
mask for power10 at kernel while capturing extended regs in
each sample.
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 3 +++
tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
--- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
+ PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
/* Max regs without the extended regs */
PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
};
@@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
+/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
+#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
+#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
#endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
index 46ed00d..63f3ac9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3] = "mmcr3",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2] = "sier2",
+ [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3] = "sier3",
};
static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
index d64ba0c..2b6d470 100644
--- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
+#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
@@ -64,6 +65,9 @@
SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
+ SMPL_REG(mmcr3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3),
+ SMPL_REG(sier2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2),
+ SMPL_REG(sier3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3),
SMPL_REG_END
};
@@ -194,6 +198,8 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
if (version = PVR_POWER9)
extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
+ else if (version = PVR_POWER10)
+ extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
else
return mask;
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-07-19 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe
Cc: kbuild-all, clang-built-linux, linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey,
kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7960 bytes --]
Hi Athira,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Athira-Rajeev/powerpc-perf-Add-support-for-power10-PMU-Hardware/20200717-224353
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r024-20200719 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ed6b578040a85977026c93bf4188f996148f3218)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:221:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:542:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
#define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:223:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:543:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
#define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:225:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsb
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:544:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
#define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:227:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:545:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
#define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:229:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:546:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
#define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:16:5: error: expected identifier or '('
u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
^
include/linux/perf_regs.h:16:32: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK'
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
^
12 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +16 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
15
> 16 u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
17
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30999 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-07-19 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kbuild-all, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
clang-built-linux, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7960 bytes --]
Hi Athira,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Athira-Rajeev/powerpc-perf-Add-support-for-power10-PMU-Hardware/20200717-224353
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r024-20200719 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ed6b578040a85977026c93bf4188f996148f3218)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:221:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:542:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
#define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:223:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:543:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
#define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:225:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsb
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:544:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
#define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:227:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:545:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
#define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:229:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:546:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
#define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:16:5: error: expected identifier or '('
u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
^
include/linux/perf_regs.h:16:32: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK'
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
^
12 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +16 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
15
> 16 u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
17
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30999 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-07-19 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8106 bytes --]
Hi Athira,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Athira-Rajeev/powerpc-perf-Add-support-for-power10-PMU-Hardware/20200717-224353
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r024-20200719 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ed6b578040a85977026c93bf4188f996148f3218)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:221:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:542:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
#define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:223:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:543:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
#define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:225:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsb
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:544:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
#define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:227:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:545:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
#define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:229:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:546:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
#define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:16:5: error: expected identifier or '('
u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
^
include/linux/perf_regs.h:16:32: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK'
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
^
12 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +16 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
15
> 16 u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
17
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30999 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2020-07-19 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe
Cc: kbuild-all, clang-built-linux, linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey,
kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7960 bytes --]
Hi Athira,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Athira-Rajeev/powerpc-perf-Add-support-for-power10-PMU-Hardware/20200717-224353
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc64-randconfig-r024-20200719 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ed6b578040a85977026c93bf4188f996148f3218)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:221:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:542:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
#define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:223:1: note: expanded from here
__do_insl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:543:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
#define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:225:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsb
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:544:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
#define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:227:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsw
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:545:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
#define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
__do_##name al; \
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<scratch space>:229:1: note: expanded from here
__do_outsl
^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:546:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
#define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:16:5: error: expected identifier or '('
u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
^
include/linux/perf_regs.h:16:32: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK'
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
^
12 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +16 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
15
> 16 u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
17
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 30999 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
@ 2020-07-20 8:09 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-20 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: ego, Michael Neuling, maddy, kbuild-all, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
clang-built-linux, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9901 bytes --]
> On 19-Jul-2020, at 4:47 PM, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Athira,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
> [also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Athira-Rajeev/powerpc-perf-Add-support-for-power10-PMU-Hardware/20200717-224353
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> config: powerpc64-randconfig-r024-20200719 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ed6b578040a85977026c93bf4188f996148f3218)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
> # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:221:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_insw
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:542:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
> #define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:223:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_insl
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:543:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
> #define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:225:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_outsb
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:544:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
> #define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:227:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_outsw
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:545:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
> #define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:229:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_outsl
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:546:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
> #define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:16:5: error: expected identifier or '('
> u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> ^
> include/linux/perf_regs.h:16:32: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK'
> #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
> ^
> 12 warnings and 1 error generated.
>
> vim +16 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>
> 15
>> 16 u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> 17
Hi,
This patch defines PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
in arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h and this header file is included conditionally based on
CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS in arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h.
So build breaks happens with config having CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS set
and without CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS.
This will be fixed by defining PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK in perf_event.h as below:
—
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
index eed3954082fa..b1c3a91aa6fa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -38,4 +38,6 @@
/* To support perf_regs sier update */
extern bool is_sier_available(void);
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index bf85d1a0b59e..5d368e81445f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -15,9 +15,6 @@
#define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
#define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
-extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
-#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
-
struct perf_event;
struct mmcr_regs {
—
We also need this patch by Madhavan Sirinivasan : https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=183203
to solve similar build break with `is_sier_available`
Thanks
Athira
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> <.config.gz>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 22169 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-20 8:09 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-20 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild-all
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9903 bytes --]
> On 19-Jul-2020, at 4:47 PM, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Athira,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
> [also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core v5.8-rc5 next-20200717]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Athira-Rajeev/powerpc-perf-Add-support-for-power10-PMU-Hardware/20200717-224353
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> config: powerpc64-randconfig-r024-20200719 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ed6b578040a85977026c93bf4188f996148f3218)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # install powerpc64 cross compiling tool for clang build
> # apt-get install binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=powerpc64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:45:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insw, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:221:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_insw
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:542:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insw'
> #define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:47:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(insl, (unsigned long p, void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:223:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_insl
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:543:56: note: expanded from macro '__do_insl'
> #define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:49:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsb, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:225:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_outsb
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:544:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsb'
> #define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:51:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsw, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:227:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_outsw
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:545:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsw'
> #define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> In file included from arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:10:
> In file included from include/linux/perf_event.h:57:
> In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
> In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
> In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:10:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/hardirq.h:6:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:604:
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:53:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> DEF_PCI_AC_NORET(outsl, (unsigned long p, const void *b, unsigned long c),
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:601:3: note: expanded from macro 'DEF_PCI_AC_NORET'
> __do_##name al; \
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> <scratch space>:229:1: note: expanded from here
> __do_outsl
> ^
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:546:58: note: expanded from macro '__do_outsl'
> #define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c:16:5: error: expected identifier or '('
> u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> ^
> include/linux/perf_regs.h:16:32: note: expanded from macro 'PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK'
> #define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
> ^
> 12 warnings and 1 error generated.
>
> vim +16 arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>
> 15
>> 16 u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> 17
Hi,
This patch defines PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
in arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h and this header file is included conditionally based on
CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS in arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h.
So build breaks happens with config having CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS set
and without CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS.
This will be fixed by defining PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK in perf_event.h as below:
—
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
index eed3954082fa..b1c3a91aa6fa 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -38,4 +38,6 @@
/* To support perf_regs sier update */
extern bool is_sier_available(void);
+extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
+#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
index bf85d1a0b59e..5d368e81445f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
@@ -15,9 +15,6 @@
#define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
#define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
-extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
-#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
-
struct perf_event;
struct mmcr_regs {
—
We also need this patch by Madhavan Sirinivasan : https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=183203
to solve similar build break with `is_sier_available`
Thanks
Athira
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
> <.config.gz>
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.htm --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 22169 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-20 10:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Gautham R Shenoy @ 2020-07-20 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:23AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
>
> BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
>
> By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
>
> This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
For arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[..snip..]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> unsigned long srr1;
> unsigned long pls;
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> bool sprs_saved = false;
>
> @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> */
> mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> + /*
> + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> + * in problem mode.
> + */
> + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> + }
> +
> if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
>
> if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> - unsigned long mmcra;
> -
> /*
> * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> }
>
> + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> +
> /*
> * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> * to ensure the PMU starts running.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-20 10:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Gautham R Shenoy @ 2020-07-20 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:23AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
>
> BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
>
> By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
>
> This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
For arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[..snip..]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> unsigned long srr1;
> unsigned long pls;
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> bool sprs_saved = false;
>
> @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> */
> mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> + /*
> + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> + * in problem mode.
> + */
> + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> + }
> +
> if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
>
> if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> - unsigned long mmcra;
> -
> /*
> * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> }
>
> + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> +
> /*
> * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> * to ensure the PMU starts running.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-20 10:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Gautham R Shenoy @ 2020-07-20 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:23AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
>
> BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
>
> By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
>
> This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
For arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
[..snip..]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> unsigned long srr1;
> unsigned long pls;
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> bool sprs_saved = false;
>
> @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> */
> mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> + /*
> + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> + * in problem mode.
> + */
> + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> + }
> +
> if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
>
> if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> - unsigned long mmcra;
> -
> /*
> * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> }
>
> + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> +
> /*
> * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> * to ensure the PMU starts running.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-21 3:42 ` Jordan Niethe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-21 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:48 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> core-book3s currently uses array to store the MMCR registers as part
> of per-cpu `cpu_hw_events`. This patch does a clean up to use `struct`
> to store mmcr regs instead of array. This will make code easier to read
> and reduces chance of any subtle bug that may come in the future, say
> when new registers are added. Patch updates all relevant code that was
> using MMCR array ( cpuhw->mmcr[x]) to use newly introduced `struct`.
> This includes the PMU driver code for supported platforms (power5
> to power9) and ISA macros for counter support functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 10 ++++--
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 20 +++++------
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 +--
> arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 21 +++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 16 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 24 ++++++-------
> 10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 3e9703f..f9a3668 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
>
> struct perf_event;
>
> +struct mmcr_regs {
> + unsigned long mmcr0;
> + unsigned long mmcr1;
> + unsigned long mmcr2;
> + unsigned long mmcra;
> +};
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> * describe the PMU on a particular POWER-family CPU.
> @@ -28,7 +34,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> unsigned long add_fields;
> unsigned long test_adder;
> int (*compute_mmcr)(u64 events[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
> int (*get_constraint)(u64 event_id, unsigned long *mskp,
> unsigned long *valp);
> @@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> unsigned long group_constraint_val;
> u64 (*bhrb_filter_map)(u64 branch_sample_type);
> void (*config_bhrb)(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter);
> - void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
> + void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
> int (*limited_pmc_event)(u64 event_id);
> u32 flags;
> const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index cd6a742..18b1b6a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> struct perf_event *event[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> - /*
> - * The order of the MMCR array is:
> - * - 64-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCRA, MMCR2
> - * - 32-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCR2
> - */
> - unsigned long mmcr[4];
> + struct mmcr_regs mmcr;
> struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
> @@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ static void ebb_event_add(struct perf_event *event) { }
> static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0) { }
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> {
> - return cpuhw->mmcr[0];
> + return cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
> }
>
> static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
> @@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> {
> - unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr[0];
> + unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
>
> if (!ebb)
> goto out;
> @@ -624,7 +619,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * unfreeze counters, it should not set exclude_xxx in its events and
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3] | current->thread.mmcr2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -1232,9 +1227,9 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> /*
> * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> - cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mb();
> isync();
> }
> @@ -1308,18 +1303,18 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> * (possibly updated for removal of events).
> */
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> /*
> * Clear all MMCR settings and recompute them for the new set of events.
> */
> - memset(cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
> + memset(&cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
>
> if (ppmu->compute_mmcr(cpuhw->events, cpuhw->n_events, hwc_index,
> - cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
> + &cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
> /* shouldn't ever get here */
> printk(KERN_ERR "oops compute_mmcr failed\n");
> goto out;
> @@ -1333,11 +1328,11 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> */
> event = cpuhw->event[0];
> if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCP;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCP;
> if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= freeze_events_kernel;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= freeze_events_kernel;
> if (event->attr.exclude_hv)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCHV;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCHV;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1346,12 +1341,12 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> * Then unfreeze the events.
> */
> ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
> | MMCR0_FC);
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> @@ -1402,7 +1397,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> }
> cpuhw->n_limited = n_lim;
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
>
> out_enable:
> pmao_restore_workaround(ebb);
> @@ -1418,9 +1413,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> /*
> * Enable instruction sampling if necessary
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> mb();
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra);
> }
>
> out:
> @@ -1550,7 +1545,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
> cpuhw->flags[i-1] = cpuhw->flags[i];
> }
> --cpuhw->n_events;
> - ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, cpuhw->mmcr);
> + ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, &cpuhw->mmcr);
> if (event->hw.idx) {
> write_pmc(event->hw.idx, 0);
> event->hw.idx = 0;
> @@ -1571,7 +1566,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
> }
> if (cpuhw->n_events == 0) {
> /* disable exceptions if no events are running */
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
> }
>
> if (has_branch_stack(event))
> @@ -2240,7 +2235,7 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * XXX might want to use MSR.PM to keep the events frozen until
> * we get back out of this interrupt.
> */
> - write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr[0]);
> + write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0);
>
> if (nmi)
> nmi_exit();
> @@ -2262,7 +2257,7 @@ static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>
> if (ppmu) {
> memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(*cpuhw));
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] = MMCR0_FC;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 = MMCR0_FC;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 4c86da5..2fe63f2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
> }
>
> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
> @@ -464,30 +464,30 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>
> /* pmc_inuse is 1-based */
> if (pmc_inuse & 2)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x7c)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>
> /* If we're not using PMC 5 or 6, freeze them */
> if (!(pmc_inuse & 0x60))
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FC56;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FC56;
>
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> - mmcr[3] = mmcr2;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
> }
>
> static int find_alternative(u64 event, const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT], int size)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> index 63fd4f3..df968fd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
>
> int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp);
> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
> int isa207_get_alternatives(u64 event, u64 alt[], int size, unsigned int flags,
> const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT]);
> void isa207_get_mem_data_src(union perf_mem_data_src *dsrc, u32 flags,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> index 4d5ef92..826de25 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int mpc7450_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> * Compute MMCR0/1/2 values for a set of events.
> */
> static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> - unsigned long mmcr[],
> + struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> u8 event_index[N_CLASSES][N_COUNTER];
> @@ -321,9 +321,16 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCnCE;
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcr2;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
Will this mmcr->mmcr2 be used anywere, or will it always use mmcr->mmcra?
> + /*
> + * 32-bit doesn't have an MMCRA and uses SPRN_MMCR2 to define
> + * SPRN_MMCRA. So assign mmcra of cpu_hw_events with `mmcr2`
> + * value to ensure that any write to this SPRN_MMCRA will
> + * use mmcr2 value.
> + */
Something like this comment would probably be useful to near the struct mmcr.
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcr2;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -331,12 +338,12 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> * Disable counting by a PMC.
> * Note that the pmc argument is 0-based here, not 1-based.
> */
> -static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 1)
> - mmcr[0] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> + mmcr->mmcr0 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> else
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> }
>
> static int mpc7450_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> index f857454..5f0821e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ static int power5p_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> @@ -586,20 +587,20 @@ static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power5p_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> index da52eca..426021d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ static int power5_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -528,20 +529,20 @@ static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power5_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> index 3929cac..e343a51 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int power6_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> * Assign PMC numbers and compute MMCR1 value for a set of events
> */
> static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr, struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -243,13 +243,13 @@ static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> if (pmc < 4)
> mmcr1 |= (unsigned long)psel << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc);
> }
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0xe)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int p6_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> return nalt;
> }
>
> -static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> /* Set PMCxSEL to 0 to disable PMCx */
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power6_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> index a137813..3152336 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -298,20 +299,20 @@ static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power7_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> index 4035d93..89a90ab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int p970_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> }
>
> static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0, mmcr1 = 0, mmcra = 0;
> unsigned int pmc, unit, byte, psel;
> @@ -393,27 +394,26 @@ static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> mmcra |= 0x2000; /* mark only one IOP per PPC instruction */
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> - int shift, i;
> + int shift;
>
> + /*
> + * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
> + */
> if (pmc <= 1) {
> shift = MMCR0_PMC1SEL_SH - 7 * pmc;
> - i = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = (mmcr->mmcr0 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> } else {
> shift = MMCR1_PMC3SEL_SH - 5 * (pmc - 2);
> - i = 1;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = (mmcr->mmcr1 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> }
> - /*
> - * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
> - */
> - mmcr[i] = (mmcr[i] & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> }
>
> static int ppc970_generic_events[] = {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
@ 2020-07-21 3:42 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-21 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme,
jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:48 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> core-book3s currently uses array to store the MMCR registers as part
> of per-cpu `cpu_hw_events`. This patch does a clean up to use `struct`
> to store mmcr regs instead of array. This will make code easier to read
> and reduces chance of any subtle bug that may come in the future, say
> when new registers are added. Patch updates all relevant code that was
> using MMCR array ( cpuhw->mmcr[x]) to use newly introduced `struct`.
> This includes the PMU driver code for supported platforms (power5
> to power9) and ISA macros for counter support functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 10 ++++--
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 20 +++++------
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 +--
> arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 21 +++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 16 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 24 ++++++-------
> 10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 3e9703f..f9a3668 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
>
> struct perf_event;
>
> +struct mmcr_regs {
> + unsigned long mmcr0;
> + unsigned long mmcr1;
> + unsigned long mmcr2;
> + unsigned long mmcra;
> +};
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> * describe the PMU on a particular POWER-family CPU.
> @@ -28,7 +34,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> unsigned long add_fields;
> unsigned long test_adder;
> int (*compute_mmcr)(u64 events[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
> int (*get_constraint)(u64 event_id, unsigned long *mskp,
> unsigned long *valp);
> @@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> unsigned long group_constraint_val;
> u64 (*bhrb_filter_map)(u64 branch_sample_type);
> void (*config_bhrb)(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter);
> - void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
> + void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
> int (*limited_pmc_event)(u64 event_id);
> u32 flags;
> const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index cd6a742..18b1b6a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> struct perf_event *event[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> - /*
> - * The order of the MMCR array is:
> - * - 64-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCRA, MMCR2
> - * - 32-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCR2
> - */
> - unsigned long mmcr[4];
> + struct mmcr_regs mmcr;
> struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
> @@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ static void ebb_event_add(struct perf_event *event) { }
> static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0) { }
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> {
> - return cpuhw->mmcr[0];
> + return cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
> }
>
> static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
> @@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> {
> - unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr[0];
> + unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
>
> if (!ebb)
> goto out;
> @@ -624,7 +619,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * unfreeze counters, it should not set exclude_xxx in its events and
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3] | current->thread.mmcr2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -1232,9 +1227,9 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> /*
> * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> - cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mb();
> isync();
> }
> @@ -1308,18 +1303,18 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> * (possibly updated for removal of events).
> */
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> /*
> * Clear all MMCR settings and recompute them for the new set of events.
> */
> - memset(cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
> + memset(&cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
>
> if (ppmu->compute_mmcr(cpuhw->events, cpuhw->n_events, hwc_index,
> - cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
> + &cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
> /* shouldn't ever get here */
> printk(KERN_ERR "oops compute_mmcr failed\n");
> goto out;
> @@ -1333,11 +1328,11 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> */
> event = cpuhw->event[0];
> if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCP;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCP;
> if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= freeze_events_kernel;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= freeze_events_kernel;
> if (event->attr.exclude_hv)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCHV;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCHV;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1346,12 +1341,12 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> * Then unfreeze the events.
> */
> ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
> | MMCR0_FC);
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> @@ -1402,7 +1397,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> }
> cpuhw->n_limited = n_lim;
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
>
> out_enable:
> pmao_restore_workaround(ebb);
> @@ -1418,9 +1413,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> /*
> * Enable instruction sampling if necessary
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> mb();
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra);
> }
>
> out:
> @@ -1550,7 +1545,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
> cpuhw->flags[i-1] = cpuhw->flags[i];
> }
> --cpuhw->n_events;
> - ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, cpuhw->mmcr);
> + ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, &cpuhw->mmcr);
> if (event->hw.idx) {
> write_pmc(event->hw.idx, 0);
> event->hw.idx = 0;
> @@ -1571,7 +1566,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
> }
> if (cpuhw->n_events == 0) {
> /* disable exceptions if no events are running */
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
> }
>
> if (has_branch_stack(event))
> @@ -2240,7 +2235,7 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * XXX might want to use MSR.PM to keep the events frozen until
> * we get back out of this interrupt.
> */
> - write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr[0]);
> + write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0);
>
> if (nmi)
> nmi_exit();
> @@ -2262,7 +2257,7 @@ static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>
> if (ppmu) {
> memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(*cpuhw));
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] = MMCR0_FC;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 = MMCR0_FC;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 4c86da5..2fe63f2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
> }
>
> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
> @@ -464,30 +464,30 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>
> /* pmc_inuse is 1-based */
> if (pmc_inuse & 2)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x7c)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>
> /* If we're not using PMC 5 or 6, freeze them */
> if (!(pmc_inuse & 0x60))
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FC56;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FC56;
>
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> - mmcr[3] = mmcr2;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
> }
>
> static int find_alternative(u64 event, const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT], int size)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> index 63fd4f3..df968fd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
>
> int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp);
> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
> int isa207_get_alternatives(u64 event, u64 alt[], int size, unsigned int flags,
> const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT]);
> void isa207_get_mem_data_src(union perf_mem_data_src *dsrc, u32 flags,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> index 4d5ef92..826de25 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int mpc7450_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> * Compute MMCR0/1/2 values for a set of events.
> */
> static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> - unsigned long mmcr[],
> + struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> u8 event_index[N_CLASSES][N_COUNTER];
> @@ -321,9 +321,16 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCnCE;
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcr2;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
Will this mmcr->mmcr2 be used anywere, or will it always use mmcr->mmcra?
> + /*
> + * 32-bit doesn't have an MMCRA and uses SPRN_MMCR2 to define
> + * SPRN_MMCRA. So assign mmcra of cpu_hw_events with `mmcr2`
> + * value to ensure that any write to this SPRN_MMCRA will
> + * use mmcr2 value.
> + */
Something like this comment would probably be useful to near the struct mmcr.
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcr2;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -331,12 +338,12 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> * Disable counting by a PMC.
> * Note that the pmc argument is 0-based here, not 1-based.
> */
> -static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 1)
> - mmcr[0] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> + mmcr->mmcr0 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> else
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> }
>
> static int mpc7450_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> index f857454..5f0821e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ static int power5p_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> @@ -586,20 +587,20 @@ static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power5p_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> index da52eca..426021d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ static int power5_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -528,20 +529,20 @@ static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power5_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> index 3929cac..e343a51 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int power6_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> * Assign PMC numbers and compute MMCR1 value for a set of events
> */
> static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr, struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -243,13 +243,13 @@ static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> if (pmc < 4)
> mmcr1 |= (unsigned long)psel << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc);
> }
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0xe)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int p6_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> return nalt;
> }
>
> -static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> /* Set PMCxSEL to 0 to disable PMCx */
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power6_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> index a137813..3152336 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -298,20 +299,20 @@ static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power7_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> index 4035d93..89a90ab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int p970_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> }
>
> static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0, mmcr1 = 0, mmcra = 0;
> unsigned int pmc, unit, byte, psel;
> @@ -393,27 +394,26 @@ static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> mmcra |= 0x2000; /* mark only one IOP per PPC instruction */
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> - int shift, i;
> + int shift;
>
> + /*
> + * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
> + */
> if (pmc <= 1) {
> shift = MMCR0_PMC1SEL_SH - 7 * pmc;
> - i = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = (mmcr->mmcr0 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> } else {
> shift = MMCR1_PMC3SEL_SH - 5 * (pmc - 2);
> - i = 1;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = (mmcr->mmcr1 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> }
> - /*
> - * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
> - */
> - mmcr[i] = (mmcr[i] & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> }
>
> static int ppc970_generic_events[] = {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
@ 2020-07-21 3:42 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-21 3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:48 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> core-book3s currently uses array to store the MMCR registers as part
> of per-cpu `cpu_hw_events`. This patch does a clean up to use `struct`
> to store mmcr regs instead of array. This will make code easier to read
> and reduces chance of any subtle bug that may come in the future, say
> when new registers are added. Patch updates all relevant code that was
> using MMCR array ( cpuhw->mmcr[x]) to use newly introduced `struct`.
> This includes the PMU driver code for supported platforms (power5
> to power9) and ISA macros for counter support functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 10 ++++--
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 20 +++++------
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 +--
> arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 21 +++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 16 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
> arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 24 ++++++-------
> 10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 3e9703f..f9a3668 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
>
> struct perf_event;
>
> +struct mmcr_regs {
> + unsigned long mmcr0;
> + unsigned long mmcr1;
> + unsigned long mmcr2;
> + unsigned long mmcra;
> +};
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> * describe the PMU on a particular POWER-family CPU.
> @@ -28,7 +34,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> unsigned long add_fields;
> unsigned long test_adder;
> int (*compute_mmcr)(u64 events[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
> int (*get_constraint)(u64 event_id, unsigned long *mskp,
> unsigned long *valp);
> @@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> unsigned long group_constraint_val;
> u64 (*bhrb_filter_map)(u64 branch_sample_type);
> void (*config_bhrb)(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter);
> - void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
> + void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
> int (*limited_pmc_event)(u64 event_id);
> u32 flags;
> const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index cd6a742..18b1b6a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> struct perf_event *event[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
> - /*
> - * The order of the MMCR array is:
> - * - 64-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCRA, MMCR2
> - * - 32-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCR2
> - */
> - unsigned long mmcr[4];
> + struct mmcr_regs mmcr;
> struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
> u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
> @@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ static void ebb_event_add(struct perf_event *event) { }
> static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0) { }
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> {
> - return cpuhw->mmcr[0];
> + return cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
> }
>
> static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
> @@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> {
> - unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr[0];
> + unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
>
> if (!ebb)
> goto out;
> @@ -624,7 +619,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * unfreeze counters, it should not set exclude_xxx in its events and
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3] | current->thread.mmcr2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -1232,9 +1227,9 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> /*
> * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> - cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mb();
> isync();
> }
> @@ -1308,18 +1303,18 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> * (possibly updated for removal of events).
> */
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> /*
> * Clear all MMCR settings and recompute them for the new set of events.
> */
> - memset(cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
> + memset(&cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
>
> if (ppmu->compute_mmcr(cpuhw->events, cpuhw->n_events, hwc_index,
> - cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
> + &cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
> /* shouldn't ever get here */
> printk(KERN_ERR "oops compute_mmcr failed\n");
> goto out;
> @@ -1333,11 +1328,11 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> */
> event = cpuhw->event[0];
> if (event->attr.exclude_user)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCP;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCP;
> if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= freeze_events_kernel;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= freeze_events_kernel;
> if (event->attr.exclude_hv)
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCHV;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCHV;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1346,12 +1341,12 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> * Then unfreeze the events.
> */
> ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
> | MMCR0_FC);
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> @@ -1402,7 +1397,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
> }
> cpuhw->n_limited = n_lim;
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
>
> out_enable:
> pmao_restore_workaround(ebb);
> @@ -1418,9 +1413,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> /*
> * Enable instruction sampling if necessary
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> mb();
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2]);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra);
> }
>
> out:
> @@ -1550,7 +1545,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
> cpuhw->flags[i-1] = cpuhw->flags[i];
> }
> --cpuhw->n_events;
> - ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, cpuhw->mmcr);
> + ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, &cpuhw->mmcr);
> if (event->hw.idx) {
> write_pmc(event->hw.idx, 0);
> event->hw.idx = 0;
> @@ -1571,7 +1566,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
> }
> if (cpuhw->n_events = 0) {
> /* disable exceptions if no events are running */
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
> }
>
> if (has_branch_stack(event))
> @@ -2240,7 +2235,7 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> * XXX might want to use MSR.PM to keep the events frozen until
> * we get back out of this interrupt.
> */
> - write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr[0]);
> + write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0);
>
> if (nmi)
> nmi_exit();
> @@ -2262,7 +2257,7 @@ static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>
> if (ppmu) {
> memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(*cpuhw));
> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] = MMCR0_FC;
> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 = MMCR0_FC;
> }
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 4c86da5..2fe63f2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
> }
>
> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
> @@ -464,30 +464,30 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>
> /* pmc_inuse is 1-based */
> if (pmc_inuse & 2)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x7c)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>
> /* If we're not using PMC 5 or 6, freeze them */
> if (!(pmc_inuse & 0x60))
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FC56;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FC56;
>
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> - mmcr[3] = mmcr2;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
> }
>
> static int find_alternative(u64 event, const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT], int size)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> index 63fd4f3..df968fd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
> @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
>
> int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp);
> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
> int isa207_get_alternatives(u64 event, u64 alt[], int size, unsigned int flags,
> const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT]);
> void isa207_get_mem_data_src(union perf_mem_data_src *dsrc, u32 flags,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> index 4d5ef92..826de25 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int mpc7450_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> * Compute MMCR0/1/2 values for a set of events.
> */
> static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> - unsigned long mmcr[],
> + struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> u8 event_index[N_CLASSES][N_COUNTER];
> @@ -321,9 +321,16 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCnCE;
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcr2;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
Will this mmcr->mmcr2 be used anywere, or will it always use mmcr->mmcra?
> + /*
> + * 32-bit doesn't have an MMCRA and uses SPRN_MMCR2 to define
> + * SPRN_MMCRA. So assign mmcra of cpu_hw_events with `mmcr2`
> + * value to ensure that any write to this SPRN_MMCRA will
> + * use mmcr2 value.
> + */
Something like this comment would probably be useful to near the struct mmcr.
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcr2;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -331,12 +338,12 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
> * Disable counting by a PMC.
> * Note that the pmc argument is 0-based here, not 1-based.
> */
> -static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 1)
> - mmcr[0] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> + mmcr->mmcr0 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> else
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
> }
>
> static int mpc7450_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> index f857454..5f0821e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
> @@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ static int power5p_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> @@ -586,20 +587,20 @@ static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power5p_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> index da52eca..426021d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ static int power5_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -528,20 +529,20 @@ static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power5_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> index 3929cac..e343a51 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int power6_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> * Assign PMC numbers and compute MMCR1 value for a set of events
> */
> static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr, struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -243,13 +243,13 @@ static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> if (pmc < 4)
> mmcr1 |= (unsigned long)psel << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc);
> }
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0xe)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int p6_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> return nalt;
> }
>
> -static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> /* Set PMCxSEL to 0 to disable PMCx */
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power6_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> index a137813..3152336 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
> }
>
> static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
> @@ -298,20 +299,20 @@ static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> }
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> if (pmc <= 3)
> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
> }
>
> static int power7_generic_events[] = {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> index 4035d93..89a90ab 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int p970_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
> }
>
> static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
> {
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0, mmcr1 = 0, mmcra = 0;
> unsigned int pmc, unit, byte, psel;
> @@ -393,27 +394,26 @@ static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> mmcra |= 0x2000; /* mark only one IOP per PPC instruction */
>
> /* Return MMCRx values */
> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
> +static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
> {
> - int shift, i;
> + int shift;
>
> + /*
> + * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
> + */
> if (pmc <= 1) {
> shift = MMCR0_PMC1SEL_SH - 7 * pmc;
> - i = 0;
> + mmcr->mmcr0 = (mmcr->mmcr0 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> } else {
> shift = MMCR1_PMC3SEL_SH - 5 * (pmc - 2);
> - i = 1;
> + mmcr->mmcr1 = (mmcr->mmcr1 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> }
> - /*
> - * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
> - */
> - mmcr[i] = (mmcr[i] & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
> }
>
> static int ppc970_generic_events[] = {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2020-07-21 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
> cleanup to make code easier to read.
Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
changing the user ABI is not. This part:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>
> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
patch.
Regards,
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2020-07-21 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
> cleanup to make code easier to read.
Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
changing the user ABI is not. This part:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>
> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
patch.
Regards,
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2020-07-21 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
> cleanup to make code easier to read.
Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
changing the user ABI is not. This part:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>
> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
patch.
Regards,
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
@ 2020-07-21 6:14 ` kajoljain
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>
> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
>
> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
> MASK value.
>
> with patch
> ----------
>
> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
>
> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
> .... r5 0x9c422724be
> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
> .... r8 0x9e4
> .... r9 0x0
> .... r10 0x1
> .... r11 0x0
> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
> .... r14 0x0
> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
> .... r16 0x0
> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
> .... r19 0x2f
> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
> .... r23 0x1
> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
> .... r25 0x80000000
> .... r26 0x0
> .... r27 0x1
> .... r28 0x1
> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
> .... r30 0x6008010
> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
> .... xer 0x0
> .... ccr 0x28002222
> .... softe 0x1
> .... trap 0xf00
> .... dar 0x0
> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
> .... sier 0x0
> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
> .... mmcr2 0x0
> ... thread: perf:4784
>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
Patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 8 +++++++
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 6 +++++
> 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 832450a..bf85d1a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
> #define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
> #define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
>
> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
> +
> struct perf_event;
>
> struct mmcr_regs {
> @@ -62,6 +65,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
> int *blacklist_ev;
> /* BHRB entries in the PMU */
> int bhrb_nr;
> + /*
> + * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
> + * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
> + */
> + int capabilities;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index f599064..225c64c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
> - PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
> + /* Extended registers */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
> +
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index 31c0535..d5a9529 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -2316,6 +2316,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
> pmu->name);
>
> power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
> + power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
>
> #ifdef MSR_HV
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> index a213a0a..b0cf68f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> #include <asm/perf_regs.h>
>
> +u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +
> #define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
>
> -#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
> +#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
>
> static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
> @@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
> };
>
> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
> +{
> + switch (idx) {
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
> + default: return 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
> - return 0;
> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>
> if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
> return 0;
>
> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
> + * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX))
> + return 0;
> +
> return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
> #define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
> #define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
>
> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +
> /* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
> #define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS 0x00002000
>
> @@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
> .cache_events = &power9_cache_events,
> .attr_groups = power9_pmu_attr_groups,
> .bhrb_nr = 32,
> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
> };
>
> int init_power9_pmu(void)
> @@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> +
> rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
@ 2020-07-21 6:15 ` kajoljain
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
> version.
>
> Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
> `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
> these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 ++++++-
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 5 ++-
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c | 9 +----
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h | 15 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index f599064..225c64c 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
> - PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
> + /* Extended registers */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
> +
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
> - [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
> };
>
> static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
> index d487007..1a95017 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
> @@ -7,17 +7,10 @@
> #include <string.h>
> #include <linux/stringify.h>
> #include "header.h"
> +#include "utils_header.h"
> #include "metricgroup.h"
> #include <api/fs/fs.h>
>
> -#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
> - asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
> - : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
> -
> -#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
> -#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
> -#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
> -
> int
> get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
> {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index 0a52429..d64ba0c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -6,9 +6,15 @@
>
> #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
> #include "../../../util/debug.h"
> +#include "../../../util/event.h"
> +#include "../../../util/header.h"
> +#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
> +#include "utils_header.h"
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
> +#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
> +
> const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
> SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
> @@ -55,6 +61,9 @@
> SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
> SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
> SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
> SMPL_REG_END
> };
>
> @@ -163,3 +172,43 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
>
> return SDT_ARG_VALID;
> }
> +
> +uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
> +{
> + struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> + .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> + .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
> + .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
> + .precise_ip = 1,
> + .disabled = 1,
> + .exclude_kernel = 1,
> + };
> + int fd;
> + u32 version;
> + u64 extended_mask = 0, mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
> +
> + /*
> + * Get the PVR value to set the extended
> + * mask specific to platform.
> + */
> + version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
> + if (version == PVR_POWER9)
> + extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> + else
> + return mask;
> +
> + attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
> + attr.sample_period = 1;
> + event_attr_init(&attr);
> +
> + /*
> + * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
> + * returning the register mask to sample.
> + */
> + fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> + if (fd != -1) {
> + close(fd);
> + mask |= extended_mask;
> + }
> + return mask;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5788eb1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
> +#define __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
> +
> +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> +
> +#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
> + asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
> + : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
> +
> +#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
> +#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
> +#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 14/15] powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
@ 2020-07-21 6:15 ` kajoljain
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Include capability flag `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` for power10
> and expose MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.
> Also introduce `PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31` to define extended mask
> value at runtime for power10
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Fix build failure on PPC32 platform]
> Suggested-by: Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
> /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> @@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>
> /* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> #define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
>
> #define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> index b0cf68f..11b90d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
> return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
> case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
> return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
> +#endif
> default: return 0;
> }
> }
> @@ -89,7 +97,9 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
>
> - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31;
> + else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>
> if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
> index b02aabb..f066ed9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
> #define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
> #define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
>
> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +
> /* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
> static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
> { PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
> @@ -397,6 +399,7 @@ static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
> .cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
> .attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
> .bhrb_nr = 32,
> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
> };
>
> int init_power10_pmu(void)
> @@ -408,6 +411,9 @@ int init_power10_pmu(void)
> strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
> +
> rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 15/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
@ 2020-07-21 6:16 ` kajoljain
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Added support for supported regs which are new in power10
> ( MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 ) to sample_reg_mask in the tool side
> to use with `-I?` option. Also added PVR check to send extended
> mask for power10 at kernel while capturing extended regs in
> each sample.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 3 +++
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
> /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> @@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>
> /* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> #define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
>
> #define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> index 46ed00d..63f3ac9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3] = "mmcr3",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2] = "sier2",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3] = "sier3",
> };
>
> static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index d64ba0c..2b6d470 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
> #define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
> +#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
>
> const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
> @@ -64,6 +65,9 @@
> SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
> SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
> SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3),
> + SMPL_REG(sier2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2),
> + SMPL_REG(sier3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3),
> SMPL_REG_END
> };
>
> @@ -194,6 +198,8 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
> version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
> if (version == PVR_POWER9)
> extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> + else if (version == PVR_POWER10)
> + extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
> else
> return mask;
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-21 6:14 ` kajoljain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>
> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
>
> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
> MASK value.
>
> with patch
> ----------
>
> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
>
> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
> .... r5 0x9c422724be
> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
> .... r8 0x9e4
> .... r9 0x0
> .... r10 0x1
> .... r11 0x0
> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
> .... r14 0x0
> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
> .... r16 0x0
> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
> .... r19 0x2f
> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
> .... r23 0x1
> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
> .... r25 0x80000000
> .... r26 0x0
> .... r27 0x1
> .... r28 0x1
> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
> .... r30 0x6008010
> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
> .... xer 0x0
> .... ccr 0x28002222
> .... softe 0x1
> .... trap 0xf00
> .... dar 0x0
> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
> .... sier 0x0
> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
> .... mmcr2 0x0
> ... thread: perf:4784
>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
Patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 8 +++++++
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 6 +++++
> 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 832450a..bf85d1a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
> #define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
> #define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
>
> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
> +
> struct perf_event;
>
> struct mmcr_regs {
> @@ -62,6 +65,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
> int *blacklist_ev;
> /* BHRB entries in the PMU */
> int bhrb_nr;
> + /*
> + * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
> + * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
> + */
> + int capabilities;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index f599064..225c64c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
> - PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
> + /* Extended registers */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
> +
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index 31c0535..d5a9529 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -2316,6 +2316,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
> pmu->name);
>
> power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
> + power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
>
> #ifdef MSR_HV
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> index a213a0a..b0cf68f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> #include <asm/perf_regs.h>
>
> +u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +
> #define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
>
> -#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
> +#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
>
> static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
> @@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
> };
>
> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
> +{
> + switch (idx) {
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
> + default: return 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
> - return 0;
> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>
> if (idx = PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
> return 0;
>
> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
> +
> + /*
> + * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
> + * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
> + */
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX))
> + return 0;
> +
> return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
> #define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
> #define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
>
> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +
> /* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
> #define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS 0x00002000
>
> @@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
> .cache_events = &power9_cache_events,
> .attr_groups = power9_pmu_attr_groups,
> .bhrb_nr = 32,
> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
> };
>
> int init_power9_pmu(void)
> @@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
> }
> }
>
> + /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> +
> rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
@ 2020-07-21 6:15 ` kajoljain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
> version.
>
> Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
> `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
> these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Decide extended mask at run time based on platform]
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 ++++++-
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 5 ++-
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c | 9 +----
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h | 15 ++++++++
> 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index f599064..225c64c 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
> - PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
> + /* Extended registers */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
> +
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> index e18a355..46ed00d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> @@ -64,7 +64,10 @@
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_DAR] = "dar",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR] = "dsisr",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER] = "sier",
> - [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra"
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA] = "mmcra",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
> };
>
> static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
> index d487007..1a95017 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
> @@ -7,17 +7,10 @@
> #include <string.h>
> #include <linux/stringify.h>
> #include "header.h"
> +#include "utils_header.h"
> #include "metricgroup.h"
> #include <api/fs/fs.h>
>
> -#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
> - asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
> - : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
> -
> -#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
> -#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
> -#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
> -
> int
> get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
> {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index 0a52429..d64ba0c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -6,9 +6,15 @@
>
> #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h"
> #include "../../../util/debug.h"
> +#include "../../../util/event.h"
> +#include "../../../util/header.h"
> +#include "../../../perf-sys.h"
> +#include "utils_header.h"
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
> +#define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
> +
> const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
> SMPL_REG(r1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R1),
> @@ -55,6 +61,9 @@
> SMPL_REG(dsisr, PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR),
> SMPL_REG(sier, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER),
> SMPL_REG(mmcra, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
> SMPL_REG_END
> };
>
> @@ -163,3 +172,43 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op)
>
> return SDT_ARG_VALID;
> }
> +
> +uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
> +{
> + struct perf_event_attr attr = {
> + .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> + .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
> + .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR,
> + .precise_ip = 1,
> + .disabled = 1,
> + .exclude_kernel = 1,
> + };
> + int fd;
> + u32 version;
> + u64 extended_mask = 0, mask = PERF_REGS_MASK;
> +
> + /*
> + * Get the PVR value to set the extended
> + * mask specific to platform.
> + */
> + version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
> + if (version = PVR_POWER9)
> + extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> + else
> + return mask;
> +
> + attr.sample_regs_intr = extended_mask;
> + attr.sample_period = 1;
> + event_attr_init(&attr);
> +
> + /*
> + * check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before
> + * returning the register mask to sample.
> + */
> + fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
> + if (fd != -1) {
> + close(fd);
> + mask |= extended_mask;
> + }
> + return mask;
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..5788eb1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/utils_header.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +#ifndef __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
> +#define __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H
> +
> +#include <linux/stringify.h>
> +
> +#define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
> + asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
> + : "=r" (rval)); rval; })
> +
> +#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F /* Processor Version Register */
> +#define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
> +#define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_UTIL_HEADER_H */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 14/15] powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform
@ 2020-07-21 6:15 ` kajoljain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Include capability flag `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` for power10
> and expose MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 registers as part of extended regs.
> Also introduce `PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31` to define extended mask
> value at runtime for power10
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [Fix build failure on PPC32 platform]
> Suggested-by: Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
> /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> @@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>
> /* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> #define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
>
> #define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> index b0cf68f..11b90d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,14 @@ static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
> return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
> case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
> return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
> +#endif
> default: return 0;
> }
> }
> @@ -89,7 +97,9 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
>
> - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31;
> + else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>
> if (idx = PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
> index b02aabb..f066ed9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power10-pmu.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
> #define POWER10_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
> #define POWER10_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
>
> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> +
> /* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
> static const unsigned int power10_event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
> { PM_RUN_CYC_ALT, PM_RUN_CYC },
> @@ -397,6 +399,7 @@ static void power10_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
> .cache_events = &power10_cache_events,
> .attr_groups = power10_pmu_attr_groups,
> .bhrb_nr = 32,
> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
> };
>
> int init_power10_pmu(void)
> @@ -408,6 +411,9 @@ int init_power10_pmu(void)
> strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc64/power10"))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
> +
> rc = register_power_pmu(&power10_pmu);
> if (rc)
> return rc;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 15/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10
@ 2020-07-21 6:16 ` kajoljain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-21 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> Added support for supported regs which are new in power10
> ( MMCR3, SIER2, SIER3 ) to sample_reg_mask in the tool side
> to use with `-I?` option. Also added PVR check to send extended
> mask for power10 at kernel while capturing extended regs in
> each sample.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 6 ++++++
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 3 +++
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
> diff --git a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> index 225c64c..bdf5f10 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2,
> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3,
> /* Max regs without the extended regs */
> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
> };
> @@ -60,6 +63,9 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>
> /* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
> #define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_31 */
> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
>
> #define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_31 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3 + 1)
> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> index 46ed00d..63f3ac9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0] = "mmcr0",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1] = "mmcr1",
> [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2] = "mmcr2",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3] = "mmcr3",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2] = "sier2",
> + [PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3] = "sier3",
> };
>
> static inline const char *perf_reg_name(int id)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> index d64ba0c..2b6d470 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>
> #define PVR_POWER9 0x004E
> +#define PVR_POWER10 0x0080
>
> const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = {
> SMPL_REG(r0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0),
> @@ -64,6 +65,9 @@
> SMPL_REG(mmcr0, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0),
> SMPL_REG(mmcr1, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1),
> SMPL_REG(mmcr2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2),
> + SMPL_REG(mmcr3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR3),
> + SMPL_REG(sier2, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER2),
> + SMPL_REG(sier3, PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER3),
> SMPL_REG_END
> };
>
> @@ -194,6 +198,8 @@ uint64_t arch__intr_reg_mask(void)
> version = (((mfspr(SPRN_PVR)) >> 16) & 0xFFFF);
> if (version = PVR_POWER9)
> extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
> + else if (version = PVR_POWER10)
> + extended_mask = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_31;
> else
> return mask;
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 2:09 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
-1 siblings, 2 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-22 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras
Cc: ego, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3591 bytes --]
> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>
> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>
> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
> patch.
Hi Paul
Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
Please suggest if this looks good
Thanks
Athira
—
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
index 3f90eee261fc..b10bb404f0d5 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
@@ -1679,10 +1679,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
+ *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[2]);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
*val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
break;
@@ -1906,10 +1909,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
- case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
+ case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
+ vcpu->arch.mmcr[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
+ break;
case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
break;
—
>
> Regards,
> Paul.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 11048 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
2020-07-21 3:42 ` Jordan Niethe
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 2:15 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-22 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 25536 bytes --]
> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:12 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:48 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> core-book3s currently uses array to store the MMCR registers as part
>> of per-cpu `cpu_hw_events`. This patch does a clean up to use `struct`
>> to store mmcr regs instead of array. This will make code easier to read
>> and reduces chance of any subtle bug that may come in the future, say
>> when new registers are added. Patch updates all relevant code that was
>> using MMCR array ( cpuhw->mmcr[x]) to use newly introduced `struct`.
>> This includes the PMU driver code for supported platforms (power5
>> to power9) and ISA macros for counter support functions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 10 ++++--
>> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 53 +++++++++++++---------------
>> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 20 +++++------
>> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h | 4 +--
>> arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c | 21 +++++++----
>> arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
>> arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
>> arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c | 16 ++++-----
>> arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c | 17 ++++-----
>> arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c | 24 ++++++-------
>> 10 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> index 3e9703f..f9a3668 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
>>
>> struct perf_event;
>>
>> +struct mmcr_regs {
>> + unsigned long mmcr0;
>> + unsigned long mmcr1;
>> + unsigned long mmcr2;
>> + unsigned long mmcra;
>> +};
>> /*
>> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
>> * describe the PMU on a particular POWER-family CPU.
>> @@ -28,7 +34,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
>> unsigned long add_fields;
>> unsigned long test_adder;
>> int (*compute_mmcr)(u64 events[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
>> int (*get_constraint)(u64 event_id, unsigned long *mskp,
>> unsigned long *valp);
>> @@ -41,7 +47,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
>> unsigned long group_constraint_val;
>> u64 (*bhrb_filter_map)(u64 branch_sample_type);
>> void (*config_bhrb)(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter);
>> - void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
>> + void (*disable_pmc)(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
>> int (*limited_pmc_event)(u64 event_id);
>> u32 flags;
>> const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> index cd6a742..18b1b6a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> @@ -37,12 +37,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>> struct perf_event *event[MAX_HWEVENTS];
>> u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS];
>> unsigned int flags[MAX_HWEVENTS];
>> - /*
>> - * The order of the MMCR array is:
>> - * - 64-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCRA, MMCR2
>> - * - 32-bit, MMCR0, MMCR1, MMCR2
>> - */
>> - unsigned long mmcr[4];
>> + struct mmcr_regs mmcr;
>> struct perf_event *limited_counter[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
>> u8 limited_hwidx[MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS];
>> u64 alternatives[MAX_HWEVENTS][MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES];
>> @@ -121,7 +116,7 @@ static void ebb_event_add(struct perf_event *event) { }
>> static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0) { }
>> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
>> {
>> - return cpuhw->mmcr[0];
>> + return cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
>> }
>>
>> static inline void power_pmu_bhrb_enable(struct perf_event *event) {}
>> @@ -590,7 +585,7 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
>>
>> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
>> {
>> - unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr[0];
>> + unsigned long mmcr0 = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0;
>>
>> if (!ebb)
>> goto out;
>> @@ -624,7 +619,7 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
>> * unfreeze counters, it should not set exclude_xxx in its events and
>> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
>> */
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3] | current->thread.mmcr2);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
>> out:
>> return mmcr0;
>> }
>> @@ -1232,9 +1227,9 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> /*
>> * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
>> */
>> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
>> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
>> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
>> - cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
>> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
>> mb();
>> isync();
>> }
>> @@ -1308,18 +1303,18 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> * (possibly updated for removal of events).
>> */
>> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
>> goto out_enable;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> * Clear all MMCR settings and recompute them for the new set of events.
>> */
>> - memset(cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
>> + memset(&cpuhw->mmcr, 0, sizeof(cpuhw->mmcr));
>>
>> if (ppmu->compute_mmcr(cpuhw->events, cpuhw->n_events, hwc_index,
>> - cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
>> + &cpuhw->mmcr, cpuhw->event)) {
>> /* shouldn't ever get here */
>> printk(KERN_ERR "oops compute_mmcr failed\n");
>> goto out;
>> @@ -1333,11 +1328,11 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> */
>> event = cpuhw->event[0];
>> if (event->attr.exclude_user)
>> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCP;
>> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCP;
>> if (event->attr.exclude_kernel)
>> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= freeze_events_kernel;
>> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= freeze_events_kernel;
>> if (event->attr.exclude_hv)
>> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FCHV;
>> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FCHV;
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -1346,12 +1341,12 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> * Then unfreeze the events.
>> */
>> ppc_set_pmu_inuse(1);
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2] & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr[1]);
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr[0] & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 & ~(MMCR0_PMC1CE | MMCR0_PMCjCE))
>> | MMCR0_FC);
>> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr[3]);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>>
>> /*
>> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
>> @@ -1402,7 +1397,7 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> perf_event_update_userpage(event);
>> }
>> cpuhw->n_limited = n_lim;
>> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
>> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE;
>>
>> out_enable:
>> pmao_restore_workaround(ebb);
>> @@ -1418,9 +1413,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> /*
>> * Enable instruction sampling if necessary
>> */
>> - if (cpuhw->mmcr[2] & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
>> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
>> mb();
>> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr[2]);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra);
>> }
>>
>> out:
>> @@ -1550,7 +1545,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
>> cpuhw->flags[i-1] = cpuhw->flags[i];
>> }
>> --cpuhw->n_events;
>> - ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, cpuhw->mmcr);
>> + ppmu->disable_pmc(event->hw.idx - 1, &cpuhw->mmcr);
>> if (event->hw.idx) {
>> write_pmc(event->hw.idx, 0);
>> event->hw.idx = 0;
>> @@ -1571,7 +1566,7 @@ static void power_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int ef_flags)
>> }
>> if (cpuhw->n_events == 0) {
>> /* disable exceptions if no events are running */
>> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
>> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 &= ~(MMCR0_PMXE | MMCR0_FCECE);
>> }
>>
>> if (has_branch_stack(event))
>> @@ -2240,7 +2235,7 @@ static void __perf_event_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> * XXX might want to use MSR.PM to keep the events frozen until
>> * we get back out of this interrupt.
>> */
>> - write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr[0]);
>> + write_mmcr0(cpuhw, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0);
>>
>> if (nmi)
>> nmi_exit();
>> @@ -2262,7 +2257,7 @@ static int power_pmu_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>
>> if (ppmu) {
>> memset(cpuhw, 0, sizeof(*cpuhw));
>> - cpuhw->mmcr[0] = MMCR0_FC;
>> + cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr0 = MMCR0_FC;
>> }
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
>> index 4c86da5..2fe63f2 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
>> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp)
>> }
>>
>> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> {
>> unsigned long mmcra, mmcr1, mmcr2, unit, combine, psel, cache, val;
>> @@ -464,30 +464,30 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> }
>>
>> /* Return MMCRx values */
>> - mmcr[0] = 0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>>
>> /* pmc_inuse is 1-based */
>> if (pmc_inuse & 2)
>> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>>
>> if (pmc_inuse & 0x7c)
>> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>>
>> /* If we're not using PMC 5 or 6, freeze them */
>> if (!(pmc_inuse & 0x60))
>> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_FC56;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_FC56;
>>
>> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
>> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
>> - mmcr[3] = mmcr2;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
>> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
>> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
>> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
>> {
>> if (pmc <= 3)
>> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SHIFT(pmc + 1));
>> }
>>
>> static int find_alternative(u64 event, const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT], int size)
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
>> index 63fd4f3..df968fd 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.h
>> @@ -217,9 +217,9 @@
>>
>> int isa207_get_constraint(u64 event, unsigned long *maskp, unsigned long *valp);
>> int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[],
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> struct perf_event *pevents[]);
>> -void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[]);
>> +void isa207_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr);
>> int isa207_get_alternatives(u64 event, u64 alt[], int size, unsigned int flags,
>> const unsigned int ev_alt[][MAX_ALT]);
>> void isa207_get_mem_data_src(union perf_mem_data_src *dsrc, u32 flags,
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
>> index 4d5ef92..826de25 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/mpc7450-pmu.c
>> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int mpc7450_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
>> * Compute MMCR0/1/2 values for a set of events.
>> */
>> static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
>> - unsigned long mmcr[],
>> + struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> {
>> u8 event_index[N_CLASSES][N_COUNTER];
>> @@ -321,9 +321,16 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
>> mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCnCE;
>>
>> /* Return MMCRx values */
>> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
>> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
>> - mmcr[2] = mmcr2;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
>> + mmcr->mmcr2 = mmcr2;
> Will this mmcr->mmcr2 be used anywere, or will it always use mmcr->mmcra?
Hi Jordan
We will be actually using mmcr->mmcra in the core-book3s for mpc7450-pmu.c
I have still assigned mmcr->mmcr2 so that it will work for any future changes if made in corebook
>> + /*
>> + * 32-bit doesn't have an MMCRA and uses SPRN_MMCR2 to define
>> + * SPRN_MMCRA. So assign mmcra of cpu_hw_events with `mmcr2`
>> + * value to ensure that any write to this SPRN_MMCRA will
>> + * use mmcr2 value.
>> + */
> Something like this comment would probably be useful to near the struct mmcr.
Sure, I will add this information
Thanks for your suggestion
Athira
>> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcr2;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -331,12 +338,12 @@ static int mpc7450_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev, unsigned int hwc[],
>> * Disable counting by a PMC.
>> * Note that the pmc argument is 0-based here, not 1-based.
>> */
>> -static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
>> +static void mpc7450_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
>> {
>> if (pmc <= 1)
>> - mmcr[0] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
>> else
>> - mmcr[1] &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(pmcsel_mask[pmc] << pmcsel_shift[pmc]);
>> }
>>
>> static int mpc7450_generic_events[] = {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
>> index f857454..5f0821e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5+-pmu.c
>> @@ -448,7 +448,8 @@ static int power5p_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
>> }
>>
>> static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> {
>> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
>> unsigned long mmcra = 0;
>> @@ -586,20 +587,20 @@ static int power5p_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> }
>>
>> /* Return MMCRx values */
>> - mmcr[0] = 0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
>> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
>> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
>> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
>> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
>> +static void power5p_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
>> {
>> if (pmc <= 3)
>> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> }
>>
>> static int power5p_generic_events[] = {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
>> index da52eca..426021d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power5-pmu.c
>> @@ -379,7 +379,8 @@ static int power5_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
>> }
>>
>> static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> {
>> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
>> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
>> @@ -528,20 +529,20 @@ static int power5_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> }
>>
>> /* Return MMCRx values */
>> - mmcr[0] = 0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
>> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
>> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
>> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
>> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
>> +static void power5_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
>> {
>> if (pmc <= 3)
>> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0x7fUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> }
>>
>> static int power5_generic_events[] = {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
>> index 3929cac..e343a51 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power6-pmu.c
>> @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ static int power6_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
>> * Assign PMC numbers and compute MMCR1 value for a set of events
>> */
>> static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr, struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> {
>> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
>> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
>> @@ -243,13 +243,13 @@ static int p6_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> if (pmc < 4)
>> mmcr1 |= (unsigned long)psel << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc);
>> }
>> - mmcr[0] = 0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
>> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 0xe)
>> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
>> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
>> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -457,11 +457,11 @@ static int p6_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
>> return nalt;
>> }
>>
>> -static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
>> +static void p6_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
>> {
>> /* Set PMCxSEL to 0 to disable PMCx */
>> if (pmc <= 3)
>> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> }
>>
>> static int power6_generic_events[] = {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
>> index a137813..3152336 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power7-pmu.c
>> @@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ static int power7_marked_instr_event(u64 event)
>> }
>>
>> static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> {
>> unsigned long mmcr1 = 0;
>> unsigned long mmcra = MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS | MMCRA_SDAR_ERAT_MISS;
>> @@ -298,20 +299,20 @@ static int power7_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> }
>>
>> /* Return MMCRx values */
>> - mmcr[0] = 0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = 0;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 1)
>> - mmcr[0] = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = MMCR0_PMC1CE;
>> if (pmc_inuse & 0x3e)
>> - mmcr[0] |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
>> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 |= MMCR0_PMCjCE;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
>> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
>> +static void power7_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
>> {
>> if (pmc <= 3)
>> - mmcr[1] &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 &= ~(0xffUL << MMCR1_PMCSEL_SH(pmc));
>> }
>>
>> static int power7_generic_events[] = {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
>> index 4035d93..89a90ab 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/ppc970-pmu.c
>> @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ static int p970_get_alternatives(u64 event, unsigned int flags, u64 alt[])
>> }
>>
>> static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> - unsigned int hwc[], unsigned long mmcr[], struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> + unsigned int hwc[], struct mmcr_regs *mmcr,
>> + struct perf_event *pevents[])
>> {
>> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0, mmcr1 = 0, mmcra = 0;
>> unsigned int pmc, unit, byte, psel;
>> @@ -393,27 +394,26 @@ static int p970_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>> mmcra |= 0x2000; /* mark only one IOP per PPC instruction */
>>
>> /* Return MMCRx values */
>> - mmcr[0] = mmcr0;
>> - mmcr[1] = mmcr1;
>> - mmcr[2] = mmcra;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = mmcr0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = mmcr1;
>> + mmcr->mmcra = mmcra;
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, unsigned long mmcr[])
>> +static void p970_disable_pmc(unsigned int pmc, struct mmcr_regs *mmcr)
>> {
>> - int shift, i;
>> + int shift;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
>> + */
>> if (pmc <= 1) {
>> shift = MMCR0_PMC1SEL_SH - 7 * pmc;
>> - i = 0;
>> + mmcr->mmcr0 = (mmcr->mmcr0 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
>> } else {
>> shift = MMCR1_PMC3SEL_SH - 5 * (pmc - 2);
>> - i = 1;
>> + mmcr->mmcr1 = (mmcr->mmcr1 & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
>> }
>> - /*
>> - * Setting the PMCxSEL field to 0x08 disables PMC x.
>> - */
>> - mmcr[i] = (mmcr[i] & ~(0x1fUL << shift)) | (0x08UL << shift);
>> }
>>
>> static int ppc970_generic_events[] = {
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 56934 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
>
> Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
>
> MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
> control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
> information about the sampled instruction.
>
> Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
> handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
> to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
> This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
> event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
> for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
> unsigned long mmcr1;
> unsigned long mmcr2;
> unsigned long mmcra;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> };
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
be consistent.
>
> /*
> * Values for flags to get_alternatives()
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned mmcr0;
>
> unsigned used_ebb;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> + unsigned long sier2;
> + unsigned long sier3;
> +
> #endif
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
> #define SPRN_MMCR1 798
> #define SPRN_MMCR2 785
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
> #define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
> +#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
> #define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
> #define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
> #define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
> @@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
> #define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
> #define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
> #define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 752
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 753
> +#define SPRN_USIER2 736
> +#define SPRN_USIER3 737
> #define SPRN_SIAR 796
> #define SPRN_SDAR 797
> #define SPRN_TACR 888
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> @@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
>
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
> +SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
> #endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
>
>
> @@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> @@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> /*
> * 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
> * and a few other names are different.
> + * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
> + * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
> + * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
> + * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
> + * for 32-bit.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>
> @@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> #define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
>
> #define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
here, or is there no need?
> + current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
> + current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
> + }
> }
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> @@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
> + }
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
> }
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
> + mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
> + }
> #endif
> pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
> @@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> @@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> +
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> * to another PMC.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme,
jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
>
> Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
>
> MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
> control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
> information about the sampled instruction.
>
> Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
> handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
> to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
> This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
> event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
> for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
> unsigned long mmcr1;
> unsigned long mmcr2;
> unsigned long mmcra;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> };
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
be consistent.
>
> /*
> * Values for flags to get_alternatives()
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned mmcr0;
>
> unsigned used_ebb;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> + unsigned long sier2;
> + unsigned long sier3;
> +
> #endif
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
> #define SPRN_MMCR1 798
> #define SPRN_MMCR2 785
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
> #define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
> +#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
> #define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
> #define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
> #define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
> @@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
> #define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
> #define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
> #define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 752
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 753
> +#define SPRN_USIER2 736
> +#define SPRN_USIER3 737
> #define SPRN_SIAR 796
> #define SPRN_SDAR 797
> #define SPRN_TACR 888
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> @@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
>
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
> +SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
> #endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
>
>
> @@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> @@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> /*
> * 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
> * and a few other names are different.
> + * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
> + * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
> + * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
> + * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
> + * for 32-bit.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>
> @@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> #define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
>
> #define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
here, or is there no need?
> + current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
> + current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
> + }
> }
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> @@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
> + }
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
> }
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
> + mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
> + }
> #endif
> pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
> @@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> @@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> +
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> * to another PMC.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
>
> Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
>
> MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
> control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
> information about the sampled instruction.
>
> Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
> handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
> to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
> This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
> event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
> for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
> unsigned long mmcr1;
> unsigned long mmcr2;
> unsigned long mmcra;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> };
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
be consistent.
>
> /*
> * Values for flags to get_alternatives()
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned mmcr0;
>
> unsigned used_ebb;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> + unsigned long sier2;
> + unsigned long sier3;
> +
> #endif
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
> #define SPRN_MMCR1 798
> #define SPRN_MMCR2 785
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
> #define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
> +#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
> #define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
> #define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
> #define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
> @@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
> #define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
> #define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
> #define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 752
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 753
> +#define SPRN_USIER2 736
> +#define SPRN_USIER3 737
> #define SPRN_SIAR 796
> #define SPRN_SDAR 797
> #define SPRN_TACR 888
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> @@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
>
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
> +SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
> #endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
>
>
> @@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> @@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> /*
> * 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
> * and a few other names are different.
> + * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
> + * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
> + * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
> + * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
> + * for 32-bit.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>
> @@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> #define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
>
> #define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
here, or is there no need?
> + current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
> + current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
> + }
> }
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> @@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
> + }
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
> }
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
> + mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
> + }
> #endif
> pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
> @@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> @@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> +
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> * to another PMC.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-22 2:09 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, Paul Mackerras
Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, Michael Neuling, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>>
>> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
>> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>>
>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>
>> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
>> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
>> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
>> patch.
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
> Please suggest if this looks good
I did the same patch I think in my testing branch, it's here:
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/commit/daea78154eff1b7e2f36be05a8f95feb5a588912
Can you please check that matches what you sent.
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 3f90eee261fc..b10bb404f0d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -1679,10 +1679,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
> break;
> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
> break;
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[2]);
> + break;
> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
> break;
> @@ -1906,10 +1909,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
> vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
> vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + vcpu->arch.mmcr[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> + break;
> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
> vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> —
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, Paul Mackerras
Cc: ego, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>>
>> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
>> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>>
>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>
>> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
>> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
>> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
>> patch.
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
> Please suggest if this looks good
I did the same patch I think in my testing branch, it's here:
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/commit/daea78154eff1b7e2f36be05a8f95feb5a588912
Can you please check that matches what you sent.
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 3f90eee261fc..b10bb404f0d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -1679,10 +1679,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
> break;
> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
> break;
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[2]);
> + break;
> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
> break;
> @@ -1906,10 +1909,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
> vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
> vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + vcpu->arch.mmcr[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> + break;
> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
> vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> —
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, Paul Mackerras
Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, Michael Neuling, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>>
>> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
>> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>>
>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>
>> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
>> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
>> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
>> patch.
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
> Please suggest if this looks good
I did the same patch I think in my testing branch, it's here:
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/commit/daea78154eff1b7e2f36be05a8f95feb5a588912
Can you please check that matches what you sent.
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 3f90eee261fc..b10bb404f0d5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -1679,10 +1679,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
> break;
> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
> break;
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[2]);
> + break;
> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
> break;
> @@ -1906,10 +1909,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
> vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
> vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
> + vcpu->arch.mmcr[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> + break;
> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
> vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
> break;
> —
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras, Athira Rajeev
Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>
> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>
> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
> patch.
I assume we don't have a KVM unit test that would have caught this?
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras, Athira Rajeev
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>
> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>
> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
> patch.
I assume we don't have a KVM unit test that would have caught this?
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras, Athira Rajeev
Cc: linuxppc-dev, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>
> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>
> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
> patch.
I assume we don't have a KVM unit test that would have caught this?
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 4:41 ` Jordan Niethe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>
> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
> feature at boot for power10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
> +
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
which will overwrite that?
Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
> +{
> + init_pmu_power9();
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> +{
> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
> +
> + init_pmu_power10();
> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
@ 2020-07-22 4:41 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme,
jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>
> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
> feature at boot for power10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
> +
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
which will overwrite that?
Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
> +{
> + init_pmu_power9();
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> +{
> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
> +
> + init_pmu_power10();
> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
@ 2020-07-22 4:41 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>
> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
> feature at boot for power10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
> +
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
which will overwrite that?
Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
> +{
> + init_pmu_power9();
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> +{
> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
> +
> + init_pmu_power10();
> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-22 2:09 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
1 sibling, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2020-07-22 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev, maddy, Michael Neuling, kvm-ppc,
kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>
>
> > On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
> >> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
> >> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
> >> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
> >> cleanup to make code easier to read.
> >
> > Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
> > changing the user ABI is not. This part:
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
> >>
> >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
> >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
> >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> >
> > means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
> > broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
> > acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
> > patch.
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
> Please suggest if this looks good
Yes, that looks fine.
By the way, is the new MMCRS register here at all related to the MMCRS
that there used to be on POWER8, but which wasn't present (as far as I
know) on POWER9?
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2020-07-22 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: ego, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>
>
> > On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
> >> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
> >> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
> >> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
> >> cleanup to make code easier to read.
> >
> > Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
> > changing the user ABI is not. This part:
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
> >>
> >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
> >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
> >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> >
> > means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
> > broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
> > acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
> > patch.
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
> Please suggest if this looks good
Yes, that looks fine.
By the way, is the new MMCRS register here at all related to the MMCRS
that there used to be on POWER8, but which wasn't present (as far as I
know) on POWER9?
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Paul Mackerras @ 2020-07-22 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev, maddy, Michael Neuling, kvm-ppc,
kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>
>
> > On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
> >> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
> >> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
> >> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
> >> cleanup to make code easier to read.
> >
> > Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
> > changing the user ABI is not. This part:
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> >> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
> >>
> >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
> >> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
> >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> >> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
> >> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
> >
> > means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
> > broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
> > acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
> > patch.
>
> Hi Paul
>
> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
> Please suggest if this looks good
Yes, that looks fine.
By the way, is the new MMCRS register here at all related to the MMCRS
that there used to be on POWER8, but which wasn't present (as far as I
know) on POWER9?
Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 5:49 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-22 5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman
Cc: ego, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, svaidyan, kvm-ppc, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4301 bytes --]
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:07 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> writes:
>>> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>>>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>>>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>>>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>>>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>>>
>>> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
>>> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>>>
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>>
>>> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
>>> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
>>> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
>>> patch.
>>
>> Hi Paul
>>
>> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
>> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
>> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
>> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
>> Please suggest if this looks good
>
> I did the same patch I think in my testing branch, it's here:
>
> https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/commit/daea78154eff1b7e2f36be05a8f95feb5a588912 <https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/commit/daea78154eff1b7e2f36be05a8f95feb5a588912>
>
>
> Can you please check that matches what you sent.
Hi Michael,
Yes, it matches. Thanks for making this change.
>
> cheers
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> index 3f90eee261fc..b10bb404f0d5 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
>> @@ -1679,10 +1679,13 @@ static int kvmppc_get_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
>> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
>> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.uamor);
>> break;
>> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
>> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
>> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
>> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[i]);
>> break;
>> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
>> + *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcr[2]);
>> + break;
>> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
>> *val = get_reg_val(id, vcpu->arch.mmcra);
>> break;
>> @@ -1906,10 +1909,13 @@ static int kvmppc_set_one_reg_hv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id,
>> case KVM_REG_PPC_UAMOR:
>> vcpu->arch.uamor = set_reg_val(id, *val);
>> break;
>> - case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
>> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 ... KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1:
>> i = id - KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0;
>> vcpu->arch.mmcr[i] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
>> break;
>> + case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2:
>> + vcpu->arch.mmcr[2] = set_reg_val(id, *val);
>> + break;
>> case KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA:
>> vcpu->arch.mmcra = set_reg_val(id, *val);
>> break;
>> —
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Paul.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 14788 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 6:03 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2020-07-22 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras, Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev, maddy, Michael Neuling, kvm-ppc,
kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
On 7/22/20 10:24 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>
>>> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>>>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>>>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>>>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>>>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>>> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
>>> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>>>
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
>>> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
>>> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
>>> patch.
>> Hi Paul
>>
>> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
>> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
>> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
>> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
>> Please suggest if this looks good
> Yes, that looks fine.
>
> By the way, is the new MMCRS register here at all related to the MMCRS
Hi Paul,
We have only split the current array (mmcr[]) and separated it to mmcra
and mmcrs.
Only new spr that is added is mmcr3 (for Power10).
Maddy
> that there used to be on POWER8, but which wasn't present (as far as I
> know) on POWER9?
>
> Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 6:03 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2020-07-22 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras, Athira Rajeev
Cc: ego, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev
On 7/22/20 10:24 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>
>>> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>>>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>>>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>>>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>>>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>>> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
>>> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>>>
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
>>> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
>>> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
>>> patch.
>> Hi Paul
>>
>> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
>> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
>> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
>> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
>> Please suggest if this looks good
> Yes, that looks fine.
>
> By the way, is the new MMCRS register here at all related to the MMCRS
Hi Paul,
We have only split the current array (mmcr[]) and separated it to mmcra
and mmcrs.
Only new spr that is added is mmcr3 (for Power10).
Maddy
> that there used to be on POWER8, but which wasn't present (as far as I
> know) on POWER9?
>
> Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
@ 2020-07-22 6:03 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2020-07-22 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Mackerras, Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, linuxppc-dev, maddy, Michael Neuling, kvm-ppc,
kvm, ego, svaidyan, acme, jolsa
On 7/22/20 10:24 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 07:39:26AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>
>>> On 21-Jul-2020, at 9:24 AM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 10:38:14AM -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> Currently `kvm_vcpu_arch` stores all Monitor Mode Control registers
>>>> in a flat array in order: mmcr0, mmcr1, mmcra, mmcr2, mmcrs
>>>> Split this to give mmcra and mmcrs its own entries in vcpu and
>>>> use a flat array for mmcr0 to mmcr2. This patch implements this
>>>> cleanup to make code easier to read.
>>> Changing the way KVM stores these values internally is fine, but
>>> changing the user ABI is not. This part:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> index 264e266..e55d847 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>>>> @@ -510,8 +510,8 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
>>>>
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR0 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x10)
>>>> #define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x11)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> -#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x12)
>>>> +#define KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x13)
>>> means that existing userspace programs that used to work would now be
>>> broken. That is not acceptable (breaking the user ABI is only ever
>>> acceptable with a very compelling reason). So NAK to this part of the
>>> patch.
>> Hi Paul
>>
>> Thanks for checking the patch. I understood your point on user ABI breakage that this particular change can cause.
>> I will retain original KVM_REG_PPC_MMCRA and KVM_REG_PPC_MMCR2 order in `kvm.h`
>> And with that, additionally I will need below change ( on top of current patch ) for my clean up updates for kvm cpu MMCR to work,
>> Because now mmcra and mmcrs will have its own entries in vcpu and is not part of the mmcr[] array
>> Please suggest if this looks good
> Yes, that looks fine.
>
> By the way, is the new MMCRS register here at all related to the MMCRS
Hi Paul,
We have only split the current array (mmcr[]) and separated it to mmcra
and mmcrs.
Only new spr that is added is mmcr3 (for Power10).
Maddy
> that there used to be on POWER8, but which wasn't present (as far as I
> know) on POWER9?
>
> Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
2020-07-22 4:41 ` Jordan Niethe
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 7:55 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
-1 siblings, 2 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-22 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7014 bytes --]
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:11 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
>> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
>> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
>> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
>> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>>
>> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
>> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
>> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
>> feature at boot for power10.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
>> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
>> #endif
>>
>> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
>> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
> Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
Hi Jordan
Ok, the definition of MMCRA is under #ifdef for 64 bit . if I move definition of MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE along with other SPR's, I also
need to define this for 32-bit to satisfy core-book3s to compile as below:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
index 900ada10762c..7e271657b412 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
@@ -888,6 +888,8 @@
#define MMCRA_SLOT 0x07000000UL /* SLOT bits (37-39) */
#define MMCRA_SLOT_SHIFT 24
#define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0x00000001UL /* enable sampling */
+/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
+#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
#define POWER6_MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x0000080000000000ULL /* SDAR/SIAR synced */
#define POWER6_MMCRA_SIHV 0x0000040000000000ULL
#define POWER6_MMCRA_SIPR 0x0000020000000000ULL
@@ -1068,9 +1070,6 @@
#define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
#endif
-/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
-#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
-
/*
* SPRG usage:
*
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
index 36baae666387..88068f20827c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static unsigned int freeze_events_kernel = MMCR0_FCS;
#define SPRN_SIER2 0
#define SPRN_SIER3 0
#define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
+#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0
static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
>> +
>> /*
>> * SPRG usage:
>> *
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
>> mflr r11
>> bl __init_FSCR_power10
>> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
> which will overwrite that?
> Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
Thanks for this nice catch ! When I rebased code initial phase, we didn’t had power10 part filled in.
It was a miss from my side in adding PMu init functions and thanks for pointing this out.
Below patch will call __init_PMU functions in setup and restore. Please check if this looks good
--
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
index efdcfa714106..e672a6c5fd7c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR_power10
+ bl __init_PMU
+ bl __init_PMU_ISA31
+ bl __init_PMU_HV
b 1f
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
@@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
_GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power10)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR_power10
+ bl __init_PMU
+ bl __init_PMU_ISA31
+ bl __init_PMU_HV
b 1f
_GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power9)
@@ -233,3 +239,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
li r5,0
mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
blr
+
+__init_PMU_ISA31:
+ li r5,0
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
+ LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
+ mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
+ blr
—
>> b 1f
>>
>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
>> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
>> li r5,0
>> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
>> blr
>> +
>> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
>> + li r5,0
>> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
>> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
>> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
>> + blr
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
>> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
>> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
>> +{
>> + init_pmu_power9();
>> +
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
>> +{
>> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
>> +
>> + init_pmu_power10();
>> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
>> +
>> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
>> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
>> +
>> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
>> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
>> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
>> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
>> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
>> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
>> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
>> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
>> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
>> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
>> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 23836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 8:07 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 10:52 ` Jordan Niethe
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-22 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9478 bytes --]
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 9:48 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
>> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
>>
>> Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
>> Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
>> Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
>>
>> MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
>> control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
>> information about the sampled instruction.
>>
>> Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
>> handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
>> to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
>> This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
>> event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
>> for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
>> unsigned long mmcr1;
>> unsigned long mmcr2;
>> unsigned long mmcra;
>> + unsigned long mmcr3;
>> };
>> /*
>> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
>> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
>> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
>> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
>> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
>> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
> We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
> be consistent.
>>
Ok,
This change will need to be done in all places which are currently using PPMU_ARCH_310S
>> /*
>> * Values for flags to get_alternatives()
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
>> unsigned mmcr0;
>>
>> unsigned used_ebb;
>> + unsigned long mmcr3;
>> + unsigned long sier2;
>> + unsigned long sier3;
>> +
>> #endif
>> };
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> @@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
>> #define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
>> #define SPRN_MMCR1 798
>> #define SPRN_MMCR2 785
>> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
>> #define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
>> +#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
>> #define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
>> #define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
>> #define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
>> @@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
>> #define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
>> #define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
>> #define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
>> +#define SPRN_SIER2 752
>> +#define SPRN_SIER3 753
>> +#define SPRN_USIER2 736
>> +#define SPRN_USIER3 737
>> #define SPRN_SIAR 796
>> #define SPRN_SDAR 797
>> #define SPRN_TACR 888
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
>> @@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
>> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
>>
>> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
>> +SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
>>
>> static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
>> #endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
>>
>>
>> @@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
>> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
>> device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
>> + device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>>
>> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
>> @@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
>> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
>> device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
>> + device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>>
>> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>> /*
>> * 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
>> * and a few other names are different.
>> + * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
>> + * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
>> + * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
>> + * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
>> + * for 32-bit.
>> */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>>
>> @@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
>> #define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
>>
>> #define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
>> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
>> +#define SPRN_SIER2 0
>> +#define SPRN_SIER3 0
>> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
>>
>> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
>> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
>> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
>> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
>> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
>> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
> Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
> here, or is there no need?
Jordan
We don’t need user mask for MMCR3 and other new SPRs ( SIER2/3) . Incase of MMCR3, we dont have any Freeze control bits and incase of SIER2/3, it is similar to SIER (where HW handles the masking of the bits), hence we didn't add any user_mask for these SPRs
Thanks
Athira
>> + current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
>> + current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
>> @@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
>> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
>> */
>> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
>> +
>> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
>> + }
>> out:
>> return mmcr0;
>> }
>> @@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
>> pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
>> mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
>> }
>> +
>> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
>> + pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
>> + mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
>> + }
>> #endif
>> pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
>> mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
>> @@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
>> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
>> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
>> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
>> goto out_enable;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
>> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
>> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>>
>> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
>> +
>> /*
>> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
>> * to another PMC.
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 23566 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
2020-07-22 7:55 ` Athira Rajeev
@ 2020-07-22 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, Jordan Niethe
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:11 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
>> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
>>> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
>>> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
>>> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
>>> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>>>
>>> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
>>> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
>>> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
>>> feature at boot for power10.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
>>> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
>>> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>> Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
>
>
> Hi Jordan
>
> Ok, the definition of MMCRA is under #ifdef for 64 bit . if I move definition of MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE along with other SPR's, I also
> need to define this for 32-bit to satisfy core-book3s to compile as below:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 900ada10762c..7e271657b412 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@
> #define MMCRA_SLOT 0x07000000UL /* SLOT bits (37-39) */
> #define MMCRA_SLOT_SHIFT 24
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0x00000001UL /* enable sampling */
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
I changed it to:
#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x2000000000UL // BHRB disable bit for ISA v3.1
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>>> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
>>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
>>> mflr r11
>>> bl __init_FSCR_power10
>>> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>> So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
>> which will overwrite that?
>> Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
>
> Thanks for this nice catch ! When I rebased code initial phase, we didn’t had power10 part filled in.
> It was a miss from my side in adding PMu init functions and thanks for pointing this out.
> Below patch will call __init_PMU functions in setup and restore. Please check if this looks good
Actually those changes should be in a separate patch.
This one is wiring up DT CPU features, the cpu setup routines are not
used by DT CPU features.
So please send a new patch I can insert into the series that adds the
cpu_setup_power.S changes.
cheers
> --
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa714106..e672a6c5fd7c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +239,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
@ 2020-07-22 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, Jordan Niethe
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:11 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
>> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
>>> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
>>> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
>>> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
>>> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>>>
>>> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
>>> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
>>> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
>>> feature at boot for power10.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>>> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
>>> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
>>> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>> Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
>
>
> Hi Jordan
>
> Ok, the definition of MMCRA is under #ifdef for 64 bit . if I move definition of MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE along with other SPR's, I also
> need to define this for 32-bit to satisfy core-book3s to compile as below:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 900ada10762c..7e271657b412 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@
> #define MMCRA_SLOT 0x07000000UL /* SLOT bits (37-39) */
> #define MMCRA_SLOT_SHIFT 24
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0x00000001UL /* enable sampling */
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
I changed it to:
#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x2000000000UL // BHRB disable bit for ISA v3.1
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>>> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
>>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
>>> mflr r11
>>> bl __init_FSCR_power10
>>> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>> So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
>> which will overwrite that?
>> Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
>
> Thanks for this nice catch ! When I rebased code initial phase, we didn’t had power10 part filled in.
> It was a miss from my side in adding PMu init functions and thanks for pointing this out.
> Below patch will call __init_PMU functions in setup and restore. Please check if this looks good
Actually those changes should be in a separate patch.
This one is wiring up DT CPU features, the cpu setup routines are not
used by DT CPU features.
So please send a new patch I can insert into the series that adds the
cpu_setup_power.S changes.
cheers
> --
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa714106..e672a6c5fd7c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +239,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
2020-07-22 7:55 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm,
kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:55 PM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:11 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>
> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
> feature at boot for power10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>
> Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
>
>
>
> Hi Jordan
>
> Ok, the definition of MMCRA is under #ifdef for 64 bit . if I move definition of MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE along with other SPR's, I also
> need to define this for 32-bit to satisfy core-book3s to compile as below:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 900ada10762c..7e271657b412 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@
> #define MMCRA_SLOT 0x07000000UL /* SLOT bits (37-39) */
> #define MMCRA_SLOT_SHIFT 24
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0x00000001UL /* enable sampling */
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x0000080000000000ULL /* SDAR/SIAR synced */
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIHV 0x0000040000000000ULL
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIPR 0x0000020000000000ULL
> @@ -1068,9 +1070,6 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
>
>
> -/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> -#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
> -
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index 36baae666387..88068f20827c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static unsigned int freeze_events_kernel = MMCR0_FCS;
> #define SPRN_SIER2 0
> #define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0
>
>
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>
>
>
> +
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>
> So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
> which will overwrite that?
> Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
>
>
> Thanks for this nice catch ! When I rebased code initial phase, we didn’t had power10 part filled in.
> It was a miss from my side in adding PMu init functions and thanks for pointing this out.
> Below patch will call __init_PMU functions in setup and restore. Please check if this looks good
>
> --
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa714106..e672a6c5fd7c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
Won't you also need to change where the label 1 is:
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR
-1: bl __init_PMU
- bl __init_hvmode_206
+ bl __init_PMU
+1: bl __init_hvmode_206
mtlr r11
beqlr
li r0,0
> @@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +239,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
>
> —
>
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
> +{
> + init_pmu_power9();
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> +{
> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
> +
> + init_pmu_power10();
> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
@ 2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:55 PM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:11 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>
> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
> feature at boot for power10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>
> Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
>
>
>
> Hi Jordan
>
> Ok, the definition of MMCRA is under #ifdef for 64 bit . if I move definition of MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE along with other SPR's, I also
> need to define this for 32-bit to satisfy core-book3s to compile as below:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 900ada10762c..7e271657b412 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@
> #define MMCRA_SLOT 0x07000000UL /* SLOT bits (37-39) */
> #define MMCRA_SLOT_SHIFT 24
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0x00000001UL /* enable sampling */
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x0000080000000000ULL /* SDAR/SIAR synced */
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIHV 0x0000040000000000ULL
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIPR 0x0000020000000000ULL
> @@ -1068,9 +1070,6 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
>
>
> -/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> -#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
> -
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index 36baae666387..88068f20827c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static unsigned int freeze_events_kernel = MMCR0_FCS;
> #define SPRN_SIER2 0
> #define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0
>
>
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>
>
>
> +
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>
> So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
> which will overwrite that?
> Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
>
>
> Thanks for this nice catch ! When I rebased code initial phase, we didn’t had power10 part filled in.
> It was a miss from my side in adding PMu init functions and thanks for pointing this out.
> Below patch will call __init_PMU functions in setup and restore. Please check if this looks good
>
> --
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa714106..e672a6c5fd7c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
Won't you also need to change where the label 1 is:
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR
-1: bl __init_PMU
- bl __init_hvmode_206
+ bl __init_PMU
+1: bl __init_hvmode_206
mtlr r11
beqlr
li r0,0
> @@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +239,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
>
> —
>
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
> +{
> + init_pmu_power9();
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> +{
> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
> +
> + init_pmu_power10();
> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
@ 2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm,
kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:55 PM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:11 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>
> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
> feature at boot for power10.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>
> Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
>
>
>
> Hi Jordan
>
> Ok, the definition of MMCRA is under #ifdef for 64 bit . if I move definition of MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE along with other SPR's, I also
> need to define this for 32-bit to satisfy core-book3s to compile as below:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 900ada10762c..7e271657b412 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@
> #define MMCRA_SLOT 0x07000000UL /* SLOT bits (37-39) */
> #define MMCRA_SLOT_SHIFT 24
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0x00000001UL /* enable sampling */
> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x0000080000000000ULL /* SDAR/SIAR synced */
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIHV 0x0000040000000000ULL
> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIPR 0x0000020000000000ULL
> @@ -1068,9 +1070,6 @@
> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
> #endif
>
>
>
> -/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
> -#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
> -
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index 36baae666387..88068f20827c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static unsigned int freeze_events_kernel = MMCR0_FCS;
> #define SPRN_SIER2 0
> #define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0
>
>
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
>
>
>
> +
> /*
> * SPRG usage:
> *
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>
> So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
> which will overwrite that?
> Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
>
>
> Thanks for this nice catch ! When I rebased code initial phase, we didn’t had power10 part filled in.
> It was a miss from my side in adding PMu init functions and thanks for pointing this out.
> Below patch will call __init_PMU functions in setup and restore. Please check if this looks good
>
> --
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> index efdcfa714106..e672a6c5fd7c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
Won't you also need to change where the label 1 is:
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
_GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
mflr r11
bl __init_FSCR
-1: bl __init_PMU
- bl __init_hvmode_206
+ bl __init_PMU
+1: bl __init_hvmode_206
mtlr r11
beqlr
li r0,0
> @@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power10)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR_power10
> + bl __init_PMU
> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
> + bl __init_PMU_HV
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +239,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
>
> —
>
> b 1f
>
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
> li r5,0
> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
> blr
> +
> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
> + li r5,0
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
> + blr
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
> +{
> + init_pmu_power9();
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> +{
> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
> +
> + init_pmu_power10();
> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
> +
> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
2020-07-22 8:07 ` Athira Rajeev
@ 2020-07-22 10:52 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:07 PM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 9:48 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
>
> Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
>
> MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
> control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
> information about the sampled instruction.
>
> Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
> handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
> to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
> This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
> event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
> for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
> unsigned long mmcr1;
> unsigned long mmcr2;
> unsigned long mmcra;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> };
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
>
> We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
> be consistent.
>
>
>
> Ok,
> This change will need to be done in all places which are currently using PPMU_ARCH_310S
>
> /*
> * Values for flags to get_alternatives()
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned mmcr0;
>
> unsigned used_ebb;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> + unsigned long sier2;
> + unsigned long sier3;
> +
> #endif
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
> #define SPRN_MMCR1 798
> #define SPRN_MMCR2 785
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
> #define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
> +#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
> #define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
> #define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
> #define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
> @@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
> #define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
> #define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
> #define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 752
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 753
> +#define SPRN_USIER2 736
> +#define SPRN_USIER3 737
> #define SPRN_SIAR 796
> #define SPRN_SDAR 797
> #define SPRN_TACR 888
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> @@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
>
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
> +SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
> #endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
>
>
> @@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> @@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> /*
> * 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
> * and a few other names are different.
> + * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
> + * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
> + * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
> + * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
> + * for 32-bit.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>
> @@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> #define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
>
> #define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
>
> Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
> here, or is there no need?
>
>
> Jordan
>
> We don’t need user mask for MMCR3 and other new SPRs ( SIER2/3) . Incase of MMCR3, we dont have any Freeze control bits and incase of SIER2/3, it is similar to SIER (where HW handles the masking of the bits), hence we didn't add any user_mask for these SPRs
Okay thank you for explaining that.
>
> Thanks
> Athira
>
> + current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
> + current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
> + }
> }
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> @@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
> + }
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
> }
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
> + mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
> + }
> #endif
> pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
> @@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> @@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> +
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> * to another PMC.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-22 10:52 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-22 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:07 PM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 9:48 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>
> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
>
> Monitor Mode Control Register 3 (MMCR3)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 2 (SIER2)
> Sampled Instruction Event Register 3 (SIER3)
>
> MMCR3 is added for further sampling related configuration
> control. SIER2/SIER3 are added to provide additional
> information about the sampled instruction.
>
> Patch adds new PPMU flag called "PPMU_ARCH_310S" to support
> handling of these new SPRs, updates the struct thread_struct
> to include these new SPRs, include MMCR3 in struct mmcr_regs.
> This is needed to support programming of MMCR3 SPR during
> event_[enable/disable]. Patch also adds the sysfs support
> for the MMCR3 SPR along with SPRN_ macros for these new pmu sprs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++++
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 49 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct mmcr_regs {
> unsigned long mmcr1;
> unsigned long mmcr2;
> unsigned long mmcra;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> };
> /*
> * This struct provides the constants and functions needed to
> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
>
> We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
> be consistent.
>
>
>
> Ok,
> This change will need to be done in all places which are currently using PPMU_ARCH_310S
>
> /*
> * Values for flags to get_alternatives()
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index 52a6783..a466e94 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -272,6 +272,10 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned mmcr0;
>
> unsigned used_ebb;
> + unsigned long mmcr3;
> + unsigned long sier2;
> + unsigned long sier3;
> +
> #endif
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> index 88e6c78..21a1b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
> @@ -876,7 +876,9 @@
> #define MMCR0_FCHV 0x00000001UL /* freeze conditions in hypervisor mode */
> #define SPRN_MMCR1 798
> #define SPRN_MMCR2 785
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 754
> #define SPRN_UMMCR2 769
> +#define SPRN_UMMCR3 738
> #define SPRN_MMCRA 0x312
> #define MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x80000000UL /* SDAR synced with SIAR */
> #define MMCRA_SDAR_DCACHE_MISS 0x40000000UL
> @@ -918,6 +920,10 @@
> #define SIER_SIHV 0x1000000 /* Sampled MSR_HV */
> #define SIER_SIAR_VALID 0x0400000 /* SIAR contents valid */
> #define SIER_SDAR_VALID 0x0200000 /* SDAR contents valid */
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 752
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 753
> +#define SPRN_USIER2 736
> +#define SPRN_USIER3 737
> #define SPRN_SIAR 796
> #define SPRN_SDAR 797
> #define SPRN_TACR 888
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> index 571b325..46b4ebc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
> @@ -622,8 +622,10 @@ void ppc_enable_pmcs(void)
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(pmc8, SPRN_PMC8);
>
> SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcra, SPRN_MMCRA);
> +SYSFS_PMCSETUP(mmcr3, SPRN_MMCR3);
>
> static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcra, 0600, show_mmcra, store_mmcra);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(mmcr3, 0600, show_mmcr3, store_mmcr3);
> #endif /* HAS_PPC_PMC56 */
>
>
> @@ -886,6 +888,9 @@ static int register_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_create_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> @@ -980,6 +985,9 @@ static int unregister_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_MMCRA))
> device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcra);
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + device_remove_file(s, &dev_attr_mmcr3);
> #endif /* CONFIG_PMU_SYSFS */
>
> if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_PURR)) {
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> /*
> * 32-bit doesn't have MMCRA but does have an MMCR2,
> * and a few other names are different.
> + * Also 32-bit doesn't have MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3.
> + * Define them as zero knowing that any code path accessing
> + * these registers (via mtspr/mfspr) are done under ppmu flag
> + * check for PPMU_ARCH_310S and we will not enter that code path
> + * for 32-bit.
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
>
> @@ -85,6 +90,9 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
> #define MMCR0_PMCC_U6 0
>
> #define SPRN_MMCRA SPRN_MMCR2
> +#define SPRN_MMCR3 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER2 0
> +#define SPRN_SIER3 0
> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
>
> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
>
> Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
> here, or is there no need?
>
>
> Jordan
>
> We don’t need user mask for MMCR3 and other new SPRs ( SIER2/3) . Incase of MMCR3, we dont have any Freeze control bits and incase of SIER2/3, it is similar to SIER (where HW handles the masking of the bits), hence we didn't add any user_mask for these SPRs
Okay thank you for explaining that.
>
> Thanks
> Athira
>
> + current->thread.sier2 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER2);
> + current->thread.sier3 = mfspr(SPRN_SIER3);
> + }
> }
>
> static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> @@ -620,6 +633,12 @@ static unsigned long ebb_switch_in(bool ebb, struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw)
> * instead manage the MMCR2 entirely by itself.
> */
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2 | current->thread.mmcr2);
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, current->thread.mmcr3);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER2, current->thread.sier2);
> + mtspr(SPRN_SIER3, current->thread.sier3);
> + }
> out:
> return mmcr0;
> }
> @@ -840,6 +859,11 @@ void perf_event_print_debug(void)
> pr_info("EBBRR: %016lx BESCR: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_EBBRR), mfspr(SPRN_BESCR));
> }
> +
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
> + pr_info("MMCR3: %016lx SIER2: %016lx SIER3: %016lx\n",
> + mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3), mfspr(SPRN_SIER2), mfspr(SPRN_SIER3));
> + }
> #endif
> pr_info("SIAR: %016lx SDAR: %016lx SIER: %016lx\n",
> mfspr(SPRN_SIAR), sdar, sier);
> @@ -1305,6 +1329,8 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (!cpuhw->n_added) {
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR1, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr1);
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> goto out_enable;
> }
>
> @@ -1348,6 +1374,9 @@ static void power_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_207S)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR2, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr2);
>
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, cpuhw->mmcr.mmcr3);
> +
> /*
> * Read off any pre-existing events that need to move
> * to another PMC.
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
@ 2020-07-22 12:03 ` Michael Ellerman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe, Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme,
jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
>> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
...
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
>> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
>> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
>> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
>> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
> We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
> be consistent.
The "S" is no longer needed as there's no Book S vs Book E distinction
in ISA v3.1.
So I changed it to PPMU_ARCH_31.
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
>> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
>> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
>> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
>> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
>> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
> Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
> here, or is there no need?
mmcr0 and mmcr2 are visible via ptrace, so masking them here means we
don't expose any bits to userspace via ptrace that aren't also visible
by reading the register.
So at least while mmcr3 is not exposed via ptrace it's safe to not mask
it, if there are even any sensitive bits in it.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
@ 2020-07-22 12:03 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-22 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe, Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme,
jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:02 AM Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> PowerISA v3.1 includes new performance monitoring unit(PMU)
>> special purpose registers (SPRs). They are
...
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> index 14b8dc1..832450a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ struct power_pmu {
>> #define PPMU_HAS_SIER 0x00000040 /* Has SIER */
>> #define PPMU_ARCH_207S 0x00000080 /* PMC is architecture v2.07S */
>> #define PPMU_NO_SIAR 0x00000100 /* Do not use SIAR */
>> +#define PPMU_ARCH_310S 0x00000200 /* Has MMCR3, SIER2 and SIER3 */
> We elsewhere have CPU_FTR_ARCH_31, so should this be PPMU_ARCH_31S to
> be consistent.
The "S" is no longer needed as there's no Book S vs Book E distinction
in ISA v3.1.
So I changed it to PPMU_ARCH_31.
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> index f4d07b5..ca32fc0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> @@ -581,6 +589,11 @@ static void ebb_switch_out(unsigned long mmcr0)
>> current->thread.sdar = mfspr(SPRN_SDAR);
>> current->thread.mmcr0 = mmcr0 & MMCR0_USER_MASK;
>> current->thread.mmcr2 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2) & MMCR2_USER_MASK;
>> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S) {
>> + current->thread.mmcr3 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR3);
> Like MMCR0_USER_MASK and MMCR2_USER_MASK do we need a MMCR3_USER_MASK
> here, or is there no need?
mmcr0 and mmcr2 are visible via ptrace, so masking them here means we
don't expose any bits to userspace via ptrace that aren't also visible
by reading the register.
So at least while mmcr3 is not exposed via ptrace it's safe to not mask
it, if there are even any sensitive bits in it.
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs
2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
(?)
(?)
@ 2020-07-22 12:28 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-22 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jordan Niethe
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8112 bytes --]
> On 22-Jul-2020, at 4:19 PM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 5:55 PM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com <mailto:atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22-Jul-2020, at 10:11 AM, Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:13 AM Athira Rajeev
>> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Add power10 feature function to dt_cpu_ftrs.c along
>> with a power10 specific init() to initialize pmu sprs,
>> sets the oprofile_cpu_type and cpu_features. This will
>> enable performance monitoring unit(PMU) for Power10
>> in CPU features with "performance-monitor-power10".
>>
>> For PowerISA v3.1, BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode
>> Control Register A (MMCRA) bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable
>> (BHRBRD)". This patch initializes MMCRA BHRBRD to disable BHRB
>> feature at boot for power10.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h | 3 +++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S | 8 ++++++++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> index 21a1b2d..900ada1 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> @@ -1068,6 +1068,9 @@
>> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
>> #endif
>>
>> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
>> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>>
>> Shouldn't this go under SPRN_MMCRA with the other MMCRA_*.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Jordan
>>
>> Ok, the definition of MMCRA is under #ifdef for 64 bit . if I move definition of MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE along with other SPR's, I also
>> need to define this for 32-bit to satisfy core-book3s to compile as below:
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> index 900ada10762c..7e271657b412 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/reg.h
>> @@ -888,6 +888,8 @@
>> #define MMCRA_SLOT 0x07000000UL /* SLOT bits (37-39) */
>> #define MMCRA_SLOT_SHIFT 24
>> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0x00000001UL /* enable sampling */
>> +/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
>> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SDSYNC 0x0000080000000000ULL /* SDAR/SIAR synced */
>> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIHV 0x0000040000000000ULL
>> #define POWER6_MMCRA_SIPR 0x0000020000000000ULL
>> @@ -1068,9 +1070,6 @@
>> #define MMCR0_PMC2_LOADMISSTIME 0x5
>> #endif
>>
>>
>>
>> -/* BHRB disable bit for PowerISA v3.10 */
>> -#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0x0000002000000000
>> -
>> /*
>> * SPRG usage:
>> *
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> index 36baae666387..88068f20827c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static unsigned int freeze_events_kernel = MMCR0_FCS;
>> #define SPRN_SIER2 0
>> #define SPRN_SIER3 0
>> #define MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE 0
>> +#define MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE 0
>>
>>
>>
>> static inline unsigned long perf_ip_adjust(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> {
>>
>>
>>
>> +
>> /*
>> * SPRG usage:
>> *
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> index efdcfa7..b8e0d1e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> @@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
>> mflr r11
>> bl __init_FSCR_power10
>> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>>
>> So we set MMCRA here but then aren't we still going to call __init_PMU
>> which will overwrite that?
>> Would this setting MMCRA also need to be handled in __restore_cpu_power10?
>>
>>
>> Thanks for this nice catch ! When I rebased code initial phase, we didn’t had power10 part filled in.
>> It was a miss from my side in adding PMu init functions and thanks for pointing this out.
>> Below patch will call __init_PMU functions in setup and restore. Please check if this looks good
>>
>> --
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> index efdcfa714106..e672a6c5fd7c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
>> @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power8)
>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
>> mflr r11
>> bl __init_FSCR_power10
>> + bl __init_PMU
>> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>> + bl __init_PMU_HV
>> b 1f
>>
>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
>
> Won't you also need to change where the label 1 is:
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cpu_setup_power.S
> @@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power10)
> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
> mflr r11
> bl __init_FSCR
> -1: bl __init_PMU
> - bl __init_hvmode_206
> + bl __init_PMU
> +1: bl __init_hvmode_206
> mtlr r11
> beqlr
> li r0,0
HI Jordan
I will address these comments and include changes for cpu_setup_power.S in a separate patch as suggested by Michael Ellerman
Thanks
Athira
>
>> @@ -124,6 +127,9 @@ _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
>> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power10)
>> mflr r11
>> bl __init_FSCR_power10
>> + bl __init_PMU
>> + bl __init_PMU_ISA31
>> + bl __init_PMU_HV
>> b 1f
>>
>> _GLOBAL(__restore_cpu_power9)
>> @@ -233,3 +239,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
>> li r5,0
>> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
>> blr
>> +
>> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
>> + li r5,0
>> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
>> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
>> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
>> + blr
>>
>> —
>>
>> b 1f
>>
>> _GLOBAL(__setup_cpu_power9)
>> @@ -233,3 +234,10 @@ __init_PMU_ISA207:
>> li r5,0
>> mtspr SPRN_MMCRS,r5
>> blr
>> +
>> +__init_PMU_ISA31:
>> + li r5,0
>> + mtspr SPRN_MMCR3,r5
>> + LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE(r5, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE)
>> + mtspr SPRN_MMCRA,r5
>> + blr
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
>> index 3a40951..f482286 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dt_cpu_ftrs.c
>> @@ -450,6 +450,31 @@ static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power9(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +static void init_pmu_power10(void)
>> +{
>> + init_pmu_power9();
>> +
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCR3, 0);
>> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init feat_enable_pmu_power10(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
>> +{
>> + hfscr_pmu_enable();
>> +
>> + init_pmu_power10();
>> + init_pmu_registers = init_pmu_power10;
>> +
>> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_features |= CPU_FTR_MMCRA;
>> + cur_cpu_spec->cpu_user_features |= PPC_FEATURE_PSERIES_PERFMON_COMPAT;
>> +
>> + cur_cpu_spec->num_pmcs = 6;
>> + cur_cpu_spec->pmc_type = PPC_PMC_IBM;
>> + cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type = "ppc64/power10";
>> +
>> + return 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int __init feat_enable_tm(struct dt_cpu_feature *f)
>> {
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_TRANSACTIONAL_MEM
>> @@ -639,6 +664,7 @@ struct dt_cpu_feature_match {
>> {"pc-relative-addressing", feat_enable, 0},
>> {"machine-check-power9", feat_enable_mce_power9, 0},
>> {"performance-monitor-power9", feat_enable_pmu_power9, 0},
>> + {"performance-monitor-power10", feat_enable_pmu_power10, 0},
>> {"event-based-branch-v3", feat_enable, 0},
>> {"random-number-generator", feat_enable, 0},
>> {"system-call-vectored", feat_disable, 0},
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 26517 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-23 1:26 ` Jordan Niethe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-23 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm,
kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:26 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
>
> BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
>
> By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
>
> This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
> static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
> - unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
> + unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
>
> if (!ppmu)
> return;
> @@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> mb();
> isync();
>
> + val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
> +
> /*
> * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> - cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
> + val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
> +
> + /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> + /*
> + * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
> + * instruction sampling or BHRB.
> + */
> + if (val != mmcra) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> mb();
> isync();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 77643f3..964437a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>
> mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
> + * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
> + */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> /* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
> for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
> pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
> @@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
> }
>
> + /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
> + (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
> + mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
> mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> unsigned long srr1;
> unsigned long pls;
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> bool sprs_saved = false;
>
> @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> */
> mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> + /*
> + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> + * in problem mode.
> + */
> + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
If the only thing that needs to happen is set MMCRA[BHRBRD], why save the MMCRA?
> + }
> +
> if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
>
> if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> - unsigned long mmcra;
> -
> /*
> * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> }
>
> + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> +
> /*
> * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> * to ensure the PMU starts running.
Just below here we have:
mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
mmcra |= PPC_BIT(60);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
mmcra &= ~PPC_BIT(60);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
It seems MMCRA[BHRBRD] could just be OR'd in someway similar to this
for ISA v3.1?
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-23 1:26 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-23 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:26 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
>
> BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
>
> By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
>
> This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
> static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
> - unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
> + unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
>
> if (!ppmu)
> return;
> @@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> mb();
> isync();
>
> + val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
> +
> /*
> * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> - cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
> + val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
> +
> + /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> + /*
> + * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
> + * instruction sampling or BHRB.
> + */
> + if (val != mmcra) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> mb();
> isync();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 77643f3..964437a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>
> mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
> + * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
> + */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> /* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
> for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
> pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
> @@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
> }
>
> + /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
> + (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
> + mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
> mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> unsigned long srr1;
> unsigned long pls;
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> bool sprs_saved = false;
>
> @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> */
> mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> + /*
> + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> + * in problem mode.
> + */
> + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
If the only thing that needs to happen is set MMCRA[BHRBRD], why save the MMCRA?
> + }
> +
> if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
>
> if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> - unsigned long mmcra;
> -
> /*
> * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> }
>
> + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> +
> /*
> * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> * to ensure the PMU starts running.
Just below here we have:
mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
mmcra |= PPC_BIT(60);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
mmcra &= ~PPC_BIT(60);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
It seems MMCRA[BHRBRD] could just be OR'd in someway similar to this
for ISA v3.1?
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-23 1:26 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-23 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm,
kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:26 AM Athira Rajeev
<atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
>
> BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
>
> By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
>
> This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
>
> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
> static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
> - unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
> + unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
>
> if (!ppmu)
> return;
> @@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> mb();
> isync();
>
> + val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
> +
> /*
> * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> */
> - if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> - cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
> + val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
> +
> + /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
> + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> + val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> + /*
> + * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
> + * instruction sampling or BHRB.
> + */
> + if (val != mmcra) {
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> mb();
> isync();
> }
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 77643f3..964437a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>
> mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
> + * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
> + */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> /* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
> for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
> pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
> @@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
> }
>
> + /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
> + (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
> + mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> +
> if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
> mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> unsigned long srr1;
> unsigned long pls;
> unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> bool sprs_saved = false;
>
> @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> */
> mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> + /*
> + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> + * in problem mode.
> + */
> + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
If the only thing that needs to happen is set MMCRA[BHRBRD], why save the MMCRA?
> + }
> +
> if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
>
> if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> - unsigned long mmcra;
> -
> /*
> * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> }
>
> + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> +
> /*
> * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> * to ensure the PMU starts running.
Just below here we have:
mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
mmcra |= PPC_BIT(60);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
mmcra &= ~PPC_BIT(60);
mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
It seems MMCRA[BHRBRD] could just be OR'd in someway similar to this
for ISA v3.1?
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
2020-07-23 1:26 ` Jordan Niethe
(?)
@ 2020-07-23 1:28 ` Jordan Niethe
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-23 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm,
kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:26 AM Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:26 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
> >
> > BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> > bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> > whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> > bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
> >
> > By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> > to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> > compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> > hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
> >
> > This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> > ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> > runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> > restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> > if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
> > static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > {
> > struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
> > - unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
> > + unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
> >
> > if (!ppmu)
> > return;
> > @@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > mb();
> > isync();
> >
> > + val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> > */
> > - if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> > - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> > - cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> > + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
> > + val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
> > +
> > + /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
> > + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> > + val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
> > + * instruction sampling or BHRB.
> > + */
> > + if (val != mmcra) {
> > + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> > mb();
> > isync();
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > index 77643f3..964437a 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > @@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> >
> > mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
> > + * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
> > + */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> > + mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > /* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
> > for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
> > pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
> > @@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> > mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
> > }
> >
> > + /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
> > + (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
> > + mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
> > mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > unsigned long srr1;
> > unsigned long pls;
> > unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> > + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> > struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> > bool sprs_saved = false;
> >
> > @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > */
> > mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> > + /*
> > + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> > + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> > + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> > + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> > + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> > + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> > + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> > + * in problem mode.
> > + */
> > + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> If the only thing that needs to happen is set MMCRA[BHRBRD], why save the MMCRA?
> > + }
> > +
> > if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> > sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> > sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> > @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
> >
> > if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> > - unsigned long mmcra;
> > -
> > /*
> > * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> > * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> > @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> > }
> >
> > + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> > + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> > +
> > /*
> > * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> > * to ensure the PMU starts running.
> Just below here we have:
> mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> mmcra |= PPC_BIT(60);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> mmcra &= ~PPC_BIT(60);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> It seems MMCRA[BHRBRD] could just be OR'd in someway similar to this
> for ISA v3.1?
Oh wait the user could have cleared it, just ignore me.
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-23 1:28 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-23 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:26 AM Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:26 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
> >
> > BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> > bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> > whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> > bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
> >
> > By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> > to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> > compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> > hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
> >
> > This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> > ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> > runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> > restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> > if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
> > static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > {
> > struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
> > - unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
> > + unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
> >
> > if (!ppmu)
> > return;
> > @@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > mb();
> > isync();
> >
> > + val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> > */
> > - if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> > - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> > - cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> > + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
> > + val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
> > +
> > + /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
> > + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> > + val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
> > + * instruction sampling or BHRB.
> > + */
> > + if (val != mmcra) {
> > + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> > mb();
> > isync();
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > index 77643f3..964437a 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > @@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> >
> > mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
> > + * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
> > + */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> > + mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > /* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
> > for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
> > pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
> > @@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> > mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
> > }
> >
> > + /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
> > + (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
> > + mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
> > mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > unsigned long srr1;
> > unsigned long pls;
> > unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> > + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> > struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> > bool sprs_saved = false;
> >
> > @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > */
> > mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> > + /*
> > + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> > + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> > + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> > + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> > + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> > + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> > + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> > + * in problem mode.
> > + */
> > + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> If the only thing that needs to happen is set MMCRA[BHRBRD], why save the MMCRA?
> > + }
> > +
> > if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> > sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> > sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> > @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
> >
> > if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> > - unsigned long mmcra;
> > -
> > /*
> > * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> > * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> > @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> > }
> >
> > + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> > + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> > +
> > /*
> > * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> > * to ensure the PMU starts running.
> Just below here we have:
> mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> mmcra |= PPC_BIT(60);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> mmcra &= ~PPC_BIT(60);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> It seems MMCRA[BHRBRD] could just be OR'd in someway similar to this
> for ISA v3.1?
Oh wait the user could have cleared it, just ignore me.
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
@ 2020-07-23 1:28 ` Jordan Niethe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Jordan Niethe @ 2020-07-23 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: Michael Ellerman, Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm,
kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:26 AM Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 1:26 AM Athira Rajeev
> <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > PowerISA v3.1 has few updates for the Branch History Rolling Buffer(BHRB).
> >
> > BHRB disable is controlled via Monitor Mode Control Register A (MMCRA)
> > bit, namely "BHRB Recording Disable (BHRBRD)". This field controls
> > whether BHRB entries are written when BHRB recording is enabled by other
> > bits. This patch implements support for this BHRB disable bit.
> >
> > By setting 0b1 to this bit will disable the BHRB and by setting 0b0
> > to this bit will have BHRB enabled. This addresses backward
> > compatibility (for older OS), since this bit will be cleared and
> > hardware will be writing to BHRB by default.
> >
> > This patch addresses changes to set MMCRA (BHRBRD) at boot for power10
> > ( there by the core will run faster) and enable this feature only on
> > runtime ie, on explicit need from user. Also save/restore MMCRA in the
> > restore path of state-loss idle state to make sure we keep BHRB disabled
> > if it was not enabled on request at runtime.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> > arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > index bd125fe..31c0535 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> > @@ -1218,7 +1218,7 @@ static void write_mmcr0(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw, unsigned long mmcr0)
> > static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > {
> > struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw;
> > - unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val;
> > + unsigned long flags, mmcr0, val, mmcra;
> >
> > if (!ppmu)
> > return;
> > @@ -1251,12 +1251,24 @@ static void power_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > mb();
> > isync();
> >
> > + val = mmcra = cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra;
> > +
> > /*
> > * Disable instruction sampling if it was enabled
> > */
> > - if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE) {
> > - mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA,
> > - cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE);
> > + if (cpuhw->mmcr.mmcra & MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE)
> > + val &= ~MMCRA_SAMPLE_ENABLE;
> > +
> > + /* Disable BHRB via mmcra (BHRBRD) for p10 */
> > + if (ppmu->flags & PPMU_ARCH_310S)
> > + val |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Write SPRN_MMCRA if mmcra has either disabled
> > + * instruction sampling or BHRB.
> > + */
> > + if (val != mmcra) {
> > + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> > mb();
> > isync();
> > }
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > index 77643f3..964437a 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> > @@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> >
> > mmcra = mmcr1 = mmcr2 = mmcr3 = 0;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Disable bhrb unless explicitly requested
> > + * by setting MMCRA (BHRBRD) bit.
> > + */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> > + mmcra |= MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > /* Second pass: assign PMCs, set all MMCR1 fields */
> > for (i = 0; i < n_ev; ++i) {
> > pmc = (event[i] >> EVENT_PMC_SHIFT) & EVENT_PMC_MASK;
> > @@ -479,6 +486,11 @@ int isa207_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
> > mmcra |= val << MMCRA_IFM_SHIFT;
> > }
> >
> > + /* set MMCRA (BHRBRD) to 0 if there is user request for BHRB */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31) &&
> > + (has_branch_stack(pevents[i]) || (event[i] & EVENT_WANTS_BHRB)))
> > + mmcra &= ~MMCRA_BHRB_DISABLE;
> > +
> > if (pevents[i]->attr.exclude_user)
> > mmcr2 |= MMCR2_FCP(pmc);
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > index 2dd4673..1c9d0a9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/idle.c
> > @@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > unsigned long srr1;
> > unsigned long pls;
> > unsigned long mmcr0 = 0;
> > + unsigned long mmcra = 0;
> > struct p9_sprs sprs = {}; /* avoid false used-uninitialised */
> > bool sprs_saved = false;
> >
> > @@ -657,6 +658,21 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > */
> > mmcr0 = mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> > }
> > +
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31)) {
> > + /*
> > + * POWER10 uses MMCRA (BHRBRD) as BHRB disable bit.
> > + * If the user hasn't asked for the BHRB to be
> > + * written, the value of MMCRA[BHRBRD] is 1.
> > + * On wakeup from stop, MMCRA[BHRBD] will be 0,
> > + * since it is previleged resource and will be lost.
> > + * Thus, if we do not save and restore the MMCRA[BHRBD],
> > + * hardware will be needlessly writing to the BHRB
> > + * in problem mode.
> > + */
> > + mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> If the only thing that needs to happen is set MMCRA[BHRBRD], why save the MMCRA?
> > + }
> > +
> > if ((psscr & PSSCR_RL_MASK) >= pnv_first_spr_loss_level) {
> > sprs.lpcr = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR);
> > sprs.hfscr = mfspr(SPRN_HFSCR);
> > @@ -700,8 +716,6 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR));
> >
> > if ((srr1 & SRR1_WAKESTATE) != SRR1_WS_NOLOSS) {
> > - unsigned long mmcra;
> > -
> > /*
> > * We don't need an isync after the mtsprs here because the
> > * upcoming mtmsrd is execution synchronizing.
> > @@ -721,6 +735,10 @@ static unsigned long power9_idle_stop(unsigned long psscr, bool mmu_on)
> > mtspr(SPRN_MMCR0, mmcr0);
> > }
> >
> > + /* Reload MMCRA to restore BHRB disable bit for POWER10 */
> > + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_31))
> > + mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> > +
> > /*
> > * DD2.2 and earlier need to set then clear bit 60 in MMCRA
> > * to ensure the PMU starts running.
> Just below here we have:
> mmcra = mfspr(SPRN_MMCRA);
> mmcra |= PPC_BIT(60);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> mmcra &= ~PPC_BIT(60);
> mtspr(SPRN_MMCRA, mmcra);
> It seems MMCRA[BHRBRD] could just be OR'd in someway similar to this
> for ISA v3.1?
Oh wait the user could have cleared it, just ignore me.
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-21 6:14 ` kajoljain
@ 2020-07-23 5:56 ` kajoljain
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-23 5:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
>> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
>> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
>> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>>
>> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
>> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
>>
>> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
>> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
>> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
>> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
>> MASK value.
>>
>> with patch
>> ----------
>>
>> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
>> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
>> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
>> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
>>
>> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
>> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
>> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
>> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
>> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
>> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
>> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
>> .... r5 0x9c422724be
>> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
>> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
>> .... r8 0x9e4
>> .... r9 0x0
>> .... r10 0x1
>> .... r11 0x0
>> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
>> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
>> .... r14 0x0
>> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
>> .... r16 0x0
>> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
>> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
>> .... r19 0x2f
>> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
>> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
>> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
>> .... r23 0x1
>> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
>> .... r25 0x80000000
>> .... r26 0x0
>> .... r27 0x1
>> .... r28 0x1
>> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
>> .... r30 0x6008010
>> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
>> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
>> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
>> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
>> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
>> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
>> .... xer 0x0
>> .... ccr 0x28002222
>> .... softe 0x1
>> .... trap 0xf00
>> .... dar 0x0
>> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
>> .... sier 0x0
>> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
>> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
>> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
>> .... mmcr2 0x0
>> ... thread: perf:4784
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>
> Patch looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
patches if they seems fine to you.
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
>
> Thanks,
> Kajol Jain
>
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 8 +++++++
>> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
>> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 +
>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 6 +++++
>> 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> index 832450a..bf85d1a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
>> #define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
>> #define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
>>
>> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
>> +#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
>> +
>> struct perf_event;
>>
>> struct mmcr_regs {
>> @@ -62,6 +65,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
>> int *blacklist_ev;
>> /* BHRB entries in the PMU */
>> int bhrb_nr;
>> + /*
>> + * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
>> + * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
>> + */
>> + int capabilities;
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> index f599064..225c64c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>> PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
>> PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
>> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
>> - PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
>> + /* Extended registers */
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
>> + /* Max regs without the extended regs */
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
>> };
>> +
>> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
>> +
>> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
>> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
>> +
>> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
>> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> index 31c0535..d5a9529 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> @@ -2316,6 +2316,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
>> pmu->name);
>>
>> power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
>> + power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
>>
>> #ifdef MSR_HV
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>> index a213a0a..b0cf68f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>> @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/perf_regs.h>
>>
>> +u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
>> +
>> #define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
>>
>> -#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
>> +#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
>>
>> static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
>> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
>> @@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
>> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
>> };
>>
>> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
>> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
>> +{
>> + switch (idx) {
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
>> + default: return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> {
>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
>> - return 0;
>> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>>
>> if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
>> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
>> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
>> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
>> + * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
>> + */
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
>> index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
>> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
>> #define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
>> #define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
>>
>> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
>> +
>> /* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
>> #define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS 0x00002000
>>
>> @@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
>> .cache_events = &power9_cache_events,
>> .attr_groups = power9_pmu_attr_groups,
>> .bhrb_nr = 32,
>> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
>> };
>>
>> int init_power9_pmu(void)
>> @@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
>> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
>> +
>> rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
>> if (rc)
>> return rc;
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-23 5:56 ` kajoljain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: kajoljain @ 2020-07-23 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe, acme, jolsa
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
>> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
>> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
>> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>>
>> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
>> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
>>
>> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
>> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
>> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
>> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
>> MASK value.
>>
>> with patch
>> ----------
>>
>> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
>> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
>> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
>> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
>>
>> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
>> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
>> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
>> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
>> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
>> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
>> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
>> .... r5 0x9c422724be
>> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
>> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
>> .... r8 0x9e4
>> .... r9 0x0
>> .... r10 0x1
>> .... r11 0x0
>> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
>> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
>> .... r14 0x0
>> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
>> .... r16 0x0
>> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
>> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
>> .... r19 0x2f
>> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
>> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
>> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
>> .... r23 0x1
>> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
>> .... r25 0x80000000
>> .... r26 0x0
>> .... r27 0x1
>> .... r28 0x1
>> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
>> .... r30 0x6008010
>> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
>> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
>> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
>> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
>> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
>> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
>> .... xer 0x0
>> .... ccr 0x28002222
>> .... softe 0x1
>> .... trap 0xf00
>> .... dar 0x0
>> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
>> .... sier 0x0
>> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
>> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
>> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
>> .... mmcr2 0x0
>> ... thread: perf:4784
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>
> Patch looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
patches if they seems fine to you.
Thanks,
Kajol Jain
>
> Thanks,
> Kajol Jain
>
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h | 8 +++++++
>> arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h | 14 +++++++++++-
>> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 1 +
>> arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c | 6 +++++
>> 5 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> index 832450a..bf85d1a 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/perf_event_server.h
>> @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
>> #define MAX_EVENT_ALTERNATIVES 8
>> #define MAX_LIMITED_HWCOUNTERS 2
>>
>> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
>> +#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK
>> +
>> struct perf_event;
>>
>> struct mmcr_regs {
>> @@ -62,6 +65,11 @@ struct power_pmu {
>> int *blacklist_ev;
>> /* BHRB entries in the PMU */
>> int bhrb_nr;
>> + /*
>> + * set this flag with `PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS` if
>> + * the pmu supports extended perf regs capability
>> + */
>> + int capabilities;
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> index f599064..225c64c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
>> @@ -48,6 +48,18 @@ enum perf_event_powerpc_regs {
>> PERF_REG_POWERPC_DSISR,
>> PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER,
>> PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA,
>> - PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX,
>> + /* Extended registers */
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0,
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1,
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2,
>> + /* Max regs without the extended regs */
>> + PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX = PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA + 1,
>> };
>> +
>> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK ((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1)
>> +
>> +/* PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK value for CPU_FTR_ARCH_300 */
>> +#define PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300 (((1ULL << (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)) - 1) - PERF_REG_PMU_MASK)
>> +
>> +#define PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300 (PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2 + 1)
>> #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_PERF_REGS_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> index 31c0535..d5a9529 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
>> @@ -2316,6 +2316,7 @@ int register_power_pmu(struct power_pmu *pmu)
>> pmu->name);
>>
>> power_pmu.attr_groups = ppmu->attr_groups;
>> + power_pmu.capabilities |= (ppmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS);
>>
>> #ifdef MSR_HV
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>> index a213a0a..b0cf68f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/perf_regs.c
>> @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@
>> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
>> #include <asm/perf_regs.h>
>>
>> +u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
>> +
>> #define PT_REGS_OFFSET(id, r) [id] = offsetof(struct pt_regs, r)
>>
>> -#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX) - 1))
>> +#define REG_RESERVED (~(PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK | PERF_REG_PMU_MASK))
>>
>> static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX] = {
>> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_R0, gpr[0]),
>> @@ -69,10 +71,26 @@
>> PT_REGS_OFFSET(PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCRA, dsisr),
>> };
>>
>> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
>> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
>> +{
>> + switch (idx) {
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
>> + default: return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> {
>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
>> - return 0;
>> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>>
>> if (idx = PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
>> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
>> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
>> return 0;
>>
>> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
>> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * If the idx is referring to value beyond the
>> + * supported registers, return 0 with a warning
>> + */
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
>> index 05dae38..2a57e93 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
>> @@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ enum {
>> #define POWER9_MMCRA_IFM3 0x00000000C0000000UL
>> #define POWER9_MMCRA_BHRB_MASK 0x00000000C0000000UL
>>
>> +extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
>> +
>> /* Nasty Power9 specific hack */
>> #define PVR_POWER9_CUMULUS 0x00002000
>>
>> @@ -434,6 +436,7 @@ static void power9_config_bhrb(u64 pmu_bhrb_filter)
>> .cache_events = &power9_cache_events,
>> .attr_groups = power9_pmu_attr_groups,
>> .bhrb_nr = 32,
>> + .capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS,
>> };
>>
>> int init_power9_pmu(void)
>> @@ -457,6 +460,9 @@ int init_power9_pmu(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> + /* Set the PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK here */
>> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK = PERF_REG_PMU_MASK_300;
>> +
>> rc = register_power_pmu(&power9_pmu);
>> if (rc)
>> return rc;
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-23 5:56 ` kajoljain
(?)
@ 2020-07-23 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2020-07-23 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kajoljain
Cc: Athira Rajeev, mpe, jolsa, ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
Em Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:14:16AM +0530, kajoljain escreveu:
>
>
> On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
> >> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
> >> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
> >> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
> >>
> >> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
> >> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
> >>
> >> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
> >> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
> >> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
> >> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
> >> MASK value.
> >>
> >> with patch
> >> ----------
> >>
> >> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
> >> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
> >> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
> >> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
> >>
> >> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
> >> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
> >> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
> >> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
> >> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
> >> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
> >> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
> >> .... r5 0x9c422724be
> >> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
> >> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
> >> .... r8 0x9e4
> >> .... r9 0x0
> >> .... r10 0x1
> >> .... r11 0x0
> >> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
> >> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
> >> .... r14 0x0
> >> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
> >> .... r16 0x0
> >> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
> >> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
> >> .... r19 0x2f
> >> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
> >> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
> >> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
> >> .... r23 0x1
> >> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
> >> .... r25 0x80000000
> >> .... r26 0x0
> >> .... r27 0x1
> >> .... r28 0x1
> >> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
> >> .... r30 0x6008010
> >> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
> >> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
> >> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
> >> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
> >> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
> >> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
> >> .... xer 0x0
> >> .... ccr 0x28002222
> >> .... softe 0x1
> >> .... trap 0xf00
> >> .... dar 0x0
> >> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
> >> .... sier 0x0
> >> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
> >> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
> >> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
> >> .... mmcr2 0x0
> >> ... thread: perf:4784
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
> >> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Patch looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
> Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
> patches if they seems fine to you.
Can you please clarify something here, I think I saw a kernel build bot
complaint followed by a fix, in these cases I think, for reviewer's
sake, that this would entail a v4 patchkit? One that has no such build
issues?
Or have I got something wrong?
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-23 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2020-07-23 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kajoljain
Cc: ego, mikey, Athira Rajeev, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, maddy, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev
Em Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:14:16AM +0530, kajoljain escreveu:
>
>
> On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
> >> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
> >> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
> >> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
> >>
> >> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
> >> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
> >>
> >> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
> >> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
> >> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
> >> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
> >> MASK value.
> >>
> >> with patch
> >> ----------
> >>
> >> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
> >> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
> >> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
> >> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
> >>
> >> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
> >> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
> >> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
> >> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
> >> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
> >> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
> >> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
> >> .... r5 0x9c422724be
> >> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
> >> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
> >> .... r8 0x9e4
> >> .... r9 0x0
> >> .... r10 0x1
> >> .... r11 0x0
> >> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
> >> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
> >> .... r14 0x0
> >> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
> >> .... r16 0x0
> >> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
> >> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
> >> .... r19 0x2f
> >> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
> >> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
> >> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
> >> .... r23 0x1
> >> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
> >> .... r25 0x80000000
> >> .... r26 0x0
> >> .... r27 0x1
> >> .... r28 0x1
> >> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
> >> .... r30 0x6008010
> >> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
> >> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
> >> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
> >> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
> >> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
> >> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
> >> .... xer 0x0
> >> .... ccr 0x28002222
> >> .... softe 0x1
> >> .... trap 0xf00
> >> .... dar 0x0
> >> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
> >> .... sier 0x0
> >> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
> >> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
> >> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
> >> .... mmcr2 0x0
> >> ... thread: perf:4784
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
> >> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Patch looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
> Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
> patches if they seems fine to you.
Can you please clarify something here, I think I saw a kernel build bot
complaint followed by a fix, in these cases I think, for reviewer's
sake, that this would entail a v4 patchkit? One that has no such build
issues?
Or have I got something wrong?
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-23 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2020-07-23 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kajoljain
Cc: Athira Rajeev, mpe, jolsa, ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc,
svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
Em Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:14:16AM +0530, kajoljain escreveu:
>
>
> On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
> >> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
> >> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
> >> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
> >>
> >> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
> >> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
> >>
> >> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
> >> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
> >> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
> >> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
> >> MASK value.
> >>
> >> with patch
> >> ----------
> >>
> >> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
> >> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
> >> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
> >> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
> >>
> >> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
> >> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
> >> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
> >> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
> >> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
> >> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
> >> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
> >> .... r5 0x9c422724be
> >> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
> >> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
> >> .... r8 0x9e4
> >> .... r9 0x0
> >> .... r10 0x1
> >> .... r11 0x0
> >> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
> >> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
> >> .... r14 0x0
> >> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
> >> .... r16 0x0
> >> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
> >> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
> >> .... r19 0x2f
> >> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
> >> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
> >> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
> >> .... r23 0x1
> >> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
> >> .... r25 0x80000000
> >> .... r26 0x0
> >> .... r27 0x1
> >> .... r28 0x1
> >> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
> >> .... r30 0x6008010
> >> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
> >> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
> >> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
> >> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
> >> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
> >> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
> >> .... xer 0x0
> >> .... ccr 0x28002222
> >> .... softe 0x1
> >> .... trap 0xf00
> >> .... dar 0x0
> >> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
> >> .... sier 0x0
> >> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
> >> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
> >> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
> >> .... mmcr2 0x0
> >> ... thread: perf:4784
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
> >> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > Patch looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
> Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
> patches if they seems fine to you.
Can you please clarify something here, I think I saw a kernel build bot
complaint followed by a fix, in these cases I think, for reviewer's
sake, that this would entail a v4 patchkit? One that has no such build
issues?
Or have I got something wrong?
- Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-23 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
(?)
@ 2020-07-24 8:25 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-24 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: kajoljain, Michael Ellerman, Jiri Olsa, Gautham R Shenoy,
Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
> On 23-Jul-2020, at 8:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:14:16AM +0530, kajoljain escreveu:
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
>>>> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
>>>> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
>>>> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>>>>
>>>> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
>>>> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
>>>>
>>>> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
>>>> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
>>>> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
>>>> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
>>>> MASK value.
>>>>
>>>> with patch
>>>> ----------
>>>>
>>>> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
>>>> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
>>>> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
>>>> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
>>>>
>>>> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
>>>> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
>>>> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
>>>> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
>>>> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
>>>> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
>>>> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
>>>> .... r5 0x9c422724be
>>>> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
>>>> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
>>>> .... r8 0x9e4
>>>> .... r9 0x0
>>>> .... r10 0x1
>>>> .... r11 0x0
>>>> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
>>>> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
>>>> .... r14 0x0
>>>> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
>>>> .... r16 0x0
>>>> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
>>>> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
>>>> .... r19 0x2f
>>>> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
>>>> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
>>>> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
>>>> .... r23 0x1
>>>> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
>>>> .... r25 0x80000000
>>>> .... r26 0x0
>>>> .... r27 0x1
>>>> .... r28 0x1
>>>> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
>>>> .... r30 0x6008010
>>>> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
>>>> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
>>>> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
>>>> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
>>>> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
>>>> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
>>>> .... xer 0x0
>>>> .... ccr 0x28002222
>>>> .... softe 0x1
>>>> .... trap 0xf00
>>>> .... dar 0x0
>>>> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
>>>> .... sier 0x0
>>>> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
>>>> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
>>>> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
>>>> .... mmcr2 0x0
>>>> ... thread: perf:4784
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Patch looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
>> Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
>> patches if they seems fine to you.
>
> Can you please clarify something here, I think I saw a kernel build bot
> complaint followed by a fix, in these cases I think, for reviewer's
> sake, that this would entail a v4 patchkit? One that has no such build
> issues?
>
> Or have I got something wrong?
Hi Arnaldo,
yes you are right, I will send version 4 as a new series with changes to add support for extended regs and including fix for the build issue.
Thanks for your response.
Athira
>
> - Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-24 8:25 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-24 8:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kajoljain,
kvm-ppc, svaidyan, Jiri Olsa, linuxppc-dev
> On 23-Jul-2020, at 8:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:14:16AM +0530, kajoljain escreveu:
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
>>>> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
>>>> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
>>>> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>>>>
>>>> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
>>>> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
>>>>
>>>> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
>>>> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
>>>> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
>>>> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
>>>> MASK value.
>>>>
>>>> with patch
>>>> ----------
>>>>
>>>> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
>>>> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
>>>> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
>>>> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
>>>>
>>>> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
>>>> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
>>>> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
>>>> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
>>>> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
>>>> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
>>>> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
>>>> .... r5 0x9c422724be
>>>> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
>>>> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
>>>> .... r8 0x9e4
>>>> .... r9 0x0
>>>> .... r10 0x1
>>>> .... r11 0x0
>>>> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
>>>> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
>>>> .... r14 0x0
>>>> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
>>>> .... r16 0x0
>>>> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
>>>> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
>>>> .... r19 0x2f
>>>> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
>>>> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
>>>> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
>>>> .... r23 0x1
>>>> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
>>>> .... r25 0x80000000
>>>> .... r26 0x0
>>>> .... r27 0x1
>>>> .... r28 0x1
>>>> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
>>>> .... r30 0x6008010
>>>> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
>>>> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
>>>> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
>>>> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
>>>> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
>>>> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
>>>> .... xer 0x0
>>>> .... ccr 0x28002222
>>>> .... softe 0x1
>>>> .... trap 0xf00
>>>> .... dar 0x0
>>>> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
>>>> .... sier 0x0
>>>> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
>>>> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
>>>> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
>>>> .... mmcr2 0x0
>>>> ... thread: perf:4784
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Patch looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
>> Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
>> patches if they seems fine to you.
>
> Can you please clarify something here, I think I saw a kernel build bot
> complaint followed by a fix, in these cases I think, for reviewer's
> sake, that this would entail a v4 patchkit? One that has no such build
> issues?
>
> Or have I got something wrong?
Hi Arnaldo,
yes you are right, I will send version 4 as a new series with changes to add support for extended regs and including fix for the build issue.
Thanks for your response.
Athira
>
> - Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-24 8:25 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-24 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Cc: kajoljain, Michael Ellerman, Jiri Olsa, Gautham R Shenoy,
Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, linuxppc-dev
> On 23-Jul-2020, at 8:26 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:14:16AM +0530, kajoljain escreveu:
>>
>>
>> On 7/21/20 11:32 AM, kajoljain wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>>>> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add support for perf extended register capability in powerpc.
>>>> The capability flag PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS, is used to indicate the
>>>> PMU which support extended registers. The generic code define the mask
>>>> of extended registers as 0 for non supported architectures.
>>>>
>>>> Patch adds extended regs support for power9 platform by
>>>> exposing MMCR0, MMCR1 and MMCR2 registers.
>>>>
>>>> REG_RESERVED mask needs update to include extended regs.
>>>> `PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK`, contains mask value of the supported registers,
>>>> is defined at runtime in the kernel based on platform since the supported
>>>> registers may differ from one processor version to another and hence the
>>>> MASK value.
>>>>
>>>> with patch
>>>> ----------
>>>>
>>>> available registers: r0 r1 r2 r3 r4 r5 r6 r7 r8 r9 r10 r11
>>>> r12 r13 r14 r15 r16 r17 r18 r19 r20 r21 r22 r23 r24 r25 r26
>>>> r27 r28 r29 r30 r31 nip msr orig_r3 ctr link xer ccr softe
>>>> trap dar dsisr sier mmcra mmcr0 mmcr1 mmcr2
>>>>
>>>> PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 4784/4784: 0 period: 1 addr: 0
>>>> ... intr regs: mask 0xffffffffffff ABI 64-bit
>>>> .... r0 0xc00000000012b77c
>>>> .... r1 0xc000003fe5e03930
>>>> .... r2 0xc000000001b0e000
>>>> .... r3 0xc000003fdcddf800
>>>> .... r4 0xc000003fc7880000
>>>> .... r5 0x9c422724be
>>>> .... r6 0xc000003fe5e03908
>>>> .... r7 0xffffff63bddc8706
>>>> .... r8 0x9e4
>>>> .... r9 0x0
>>>> .... r10 0x1
>>>> .... r11 0x0
>>>> .... r12 0xc0000000001299c0
>>>> .... r13 0xc000003ffffc4800
>>>> .... r14 0x0
>>>> .... r15 0x7fffdd8b8b00
>>>> .... r16 0x0
>>>> .... r17 0x7fffdd8be6b8
>>>> .... r18 0x7e7076607730
>>>> .... r19 0x2f
>>>> .... r20 0xc00000001fc26c68
>>>> .... r21 0xc0002041e4227e00
>>>> .... r22 0xc00000002018fb60
>>>> .... r23 0x1
>>>> .... r24 0xc000003ffec4d900
>>>> .... r25 0x80000000
>>>> .... r26 0x0
>>>> .... r27 0x1
>>>> .... r28 0x1
>>>> .... r29 0xc000000001be1260
>>>> .... r30 0x6008010
>>>> .... r31 0xc000003ffebb7218
>>>> .... nip 0xc00000000012b910
>>>> .... msr 0x9000000000009033
>>>> .... orig_r3 0xc00000000012b86c
>>>> .... ctr 0xc0000000001299c0
>>>> .... link 0xc00000000012b77c
>>>> .... xer 0x0
>>>> .... ccr 0x28002222
>>>> .... softe 0x1
>>>> .... trap 0xf00
>>>> .... dar 0x0
>>>> .... dsisr 0x80000000000
>>>> .... sier 0x0
>>>> .... mmcra 0x80000000000
>>>> .... mmcr0 0x82008090
>>>> .... mmcr1 0x1e000000
>>>> .... mmcr2 0x0
>>>> ... thread: perf:4784
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> [Defined PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK at run time to add support for different platforms ]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Patch looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> Hi Arnaldo and Jiri,
>> Please let me know if you have any comments on these patches. Can you pull/ack these
>> patches if they seems fine to you.
>
> Can you please clarify something here, I think I saw a kernel build bot
> complaint followed by a fix, in these cases I think, for reviewer's
> sake, that this would entail a v4 patchkit? One that has no such build
> issues?
>
> Or have I got something wrong?
Hi Arnaldo,
yes you are right, I will send version 4 as a new series with changes to add support for extended regs and including fix for the build issue.
Thanks for your response.
Athira
>
> - Arnaldo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-24 11:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2020-07-24 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev, Ravi Bangoria
Hi Athira,
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
> version.
>
> Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
> `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
> these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
It seems this patch has a regression.
Without this patch:
$ sudo ./perf record -I
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.458 MB perf.data (318 samples) ]
With this patch:
$ sudo ./perf record -I
Error:
dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat'
Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
@ 2020-07-24 11:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2020-07-24 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, Ravi Bangoria, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme,
jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Hi Athira,
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
> version.
>
> Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
> `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
> these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
It seems this patch has a regression.
Without this patch:
$ sudo ./perf record -I
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.458 MB perf.data (318 samples) ]
With this patch:
$ sudo ./perf record -I
Error:
dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat'
Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
@ 2020-07-24 11:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2020-07-24 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev, Ravi Bangoria
Hi Athira,
On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
> version.
>
> Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
> `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
> these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
It seems this patch has a regression.
Without this patch:
$ sudo ./perf record -I
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.458 MB perf.data (318 samples) ]
With this patch:
$ sudo ./perf record -I
Error:
dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat'
Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-24 12:26 ` Ravi Bangoria
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2020-07-24 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev, Ravi Bangoria
Hi Athira,
> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
> +{
> + switch (idx) {
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
> + default: return 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
> - return 0;
> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX should be initialized. otherwise ...
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>
> if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
> return 0;
>
> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
On non p9/p10 machine, PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX may contain random value which will
allow user to pass this if condition unintentionally.
Neat: PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX is a local variable so it should be in lowercase.
Any specific reason to define it in capital?
Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-24 12:26 ` Ravi Bangoria
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2020-07-24 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, Ravi Bangoria, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme,
jolsa, linuxppc-dev
Hi Athira,
> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
> +{
> + switch (idx) {
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
> + default: return 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
> - return 0;
> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX should be initialized. otherwise ...
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>
> if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
> return 0;
>
> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
On non p9/p10 machine, PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX may contain random value which will
allow user to pass this if condition unintentionally.
Neat: PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX is a local variable so it should be in lowercase.
Any specific reason to define it in capital?
Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-24 12:26 ` Ravi Bangoria
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2020-07-24 12:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev
Cc: mpe, ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa,
linuxppc-dev, Ravi Bangoria
Hi Athira,
> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
> +{
> + switch (idx) {
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
> + default: return 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> {
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
> - return 0;
> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX should be initialized. otherwise ...
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>
> if (idx = PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
> return 0;
>
> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
On non p9/p10 machine, PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX may contain random value which will
allow user to pass this if condition unintentionally.
Neat: PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX is a local variable so it should be in lowercase.
Any specific reason to define it in capital?
Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
(?)
@ 2020-07-24 13:24 ` Michael Ellerman
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe
Cc: ego, kvm, jolsa, svaidyan, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, linuxppc-dev, acme
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:38:12 -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> The patch series adds support for power10 PMU hardware.
>
> Patches 1..3 are the clean up patches which refactors the way how
> PMU SPR's are stored in core-book3s and in KVM book3s, as well as update
> data type for PMU cache_events.
>
> Patches 12 and 13 adds base support for perf extended register
> capability in powerpc. Support for extended regs in power10 is
> covered in patches 14,15
>
> [...]
Patches 1-11 applied to powerpc/next.
[01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/78d76819e6f04672989506e7792895a51438516e
[02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7e4a145e5b675d5a9182f756950f001eaa256795
[03/15] powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9d4fc86dcd510dab5521a6c891f9bf379b85a7e0
[04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/c718547e4a92d74089f862457adf1f617c498e16
[05/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/5752fe0b811bb3cee531c52074921c6dd09dc42d
[06/15] powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1979ae8c7215718c7a98f038bad0122034ad6529
[07/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 PMU feature to DT CPU features
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9908c826d5ed150637a3a4c0eec5146a0c438f21
[08/15] powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a64e697cef23b3d24bac700f6d66c8e2bf8efccc
[09/15] powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/bfe3b1945d5e0531103b3d4ab3a367a1a156d99a
[10/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/80350a4bac992e3404067d31ff901ae9ff76aaa8
[11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1cade527f6e9bec6a6412d0641643c359ada8096
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware
@ 2020-07-24 13:24 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe
Cc: ego, mikey, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan, acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:38:12 -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> The patch series adds support for power10 PMU hardware.
>
> Patches 1..3 are the clean up patches which refactors the way how
> PMU SPR's are stored in core-book3s and in KVM book3s, as well as update
> data type for PMU cache_events.
>
> Patches 12 and 13 adds base support for perf extended register
> capability in powerpc. Support for extended regs in power10 is
> covered in patches 14,15
>
> [...]
Patches 1-11 applied to powerpc/next.
[01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/78d76819e6f04672989506e7792895a51438516e
[02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7e4a145e5b675d5a9182f756950f001eaa256795
[03/15] powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9d4fc86dcd510dab5521a6c891f9bf379b85a7e0
[04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/c718547e4a92d74089f862457adf1f617c498e16
[05/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/5752fe0b811bb3cee531c52074921c6dd09dc42d
[06/15] powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1979ae8c7215718c7a98f038bad0122034ad6529
[07/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 PMU feature to DT CPU features
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9908c826d5ed150637a3a4c0eec5146a0c438f21
[08/15] powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a64e697cef23b3d24bac700f6d66c8e2bf8efccc
[09/15] powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/bfe3b1945d5e0531103b3d4ab3a367a1a156d99a
[10/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/80350a4bac992e3404067d31ff901ae9ff76aaa8
[11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1cade527f6e9bec6a6412d0641643c359ada8096
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware
@ 2020-07-24 13:24 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2020-07-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Athira Rajeev, mpe
Cc: ego, kvm, jolsa, svaidyan, maddy, mikey, kvm-ppc, linuxppc-dev, acme
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:38:12 -0400, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> The patch series adds support for power10 PMU hardware.
>
> Patches 1..3 are the clean up patches which refactors the way how
> PMU SPR's are stored in core-book3s and in KVM book3s, as well as update
> data type for PMU cache_events.
>
> Patches 12 and 13 adds base support for perf extended register
> capability in powerpc. Support for extended regs in power10 is
> covered in patches 14,15
>
> [...]
Patches 1-11 applied to powerpc/next.
[01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/78d76819e6f04672989506e7792895a51438516e
[02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7e4a145e5b675d5a9182f756950f001eaa256795
[03/15] powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9d4fc86dcd510dab5521a6c891f9bf379b85a7e0
[04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/c718547e4a92d74089f862457adf1f617c498e16
[05/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/5752fe0b811bb3cee531c52074921c6dd09dc42d
[06/15] powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1979ae8c7215718c7a98f038bad0122034ad6529
[07/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 PMU feature to DT CPU features
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9908c826d5ed150637a3a4c0eec5146a0c438f21
[08/15] powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a64e697cef23b3d24bac700f6d66c8e2bf8efccc
[09/15] powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/bfe3b1945d5e0531103b3d4ab3a367a1a156d99a
[10/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/80350a4bac992e3404067d31ff901ae9ff76aaa8
[11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1cade527f6e9bec6a6412d0641643c359ada8096
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
2020-07-24 11:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
@ 2020-07-24 18:14 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-24 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Bangoria
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
> On 24-Jul-2020, at 4:32 PM, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Athira,
>
> On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
>> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
>> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
>> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
>> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
>> version.
>> Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
>> `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
>> these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
>
> It seems this patch has a regression.
>
> Without this patch:
>
> $ sudo ./perf record -I
> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.458 MB perf.data (318 samples) ]
>
> With this patch:
>
> $ sudo ./perf record -I
> Error:
> dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat'
Hi Ravi,
Thanks for reviewing this patch and also testing. The above issue happens since
commit 0a892c1c9472 ("perf record: Add dummy event during system wide synthesis”) which adds a dummy event.
The fix for this issue is currently discussed here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/19/413
So once this fix is in, the issue will be resolved.
Thanks
Athira
>
> Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
2020-07-24 12:26 ` Ravi Bangoria
@ 2020-07-24 18:25 ` Athira Rajeev
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-24 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Bangoria
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
> On 24-Jul-2020, at 5:56 PM, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Athira,
>
>> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
>> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
>> +{
>> + switch (idx) {
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
>> + default: return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> {
>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
>> - return 0;
>> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
>
> PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX should be initialized. otherwise ...
>
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>> if (idx == PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
>> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
>> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
>> return 0;
>> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
>> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
>
> On non p9/p10 machine, PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX may contain random value which will
> allow user to pass this if condition unintentionally.
>
> Neat: PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX is a local variable so it should be in lowercase.
> Any specific reason to define it in capital?
Hi Ravi
There is no specific reason. I will include both these changes in next version
Thanks
Athira Rajeev
>
> Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc
@ 2020-07-24 18:14 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-24 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Bangoria
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252", Size: 1541 bytes --]
> On 24-Jul-2020, at 4:32 PM, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Athira,
>
> On 7/17/20 8:08 PM, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>> From: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Add extended regs to sample_reg_mask in the tool side to use
>> with `-I?` option. Perf tools side uses extended mask to display
>> the platform supported register names (with -I? option) to the user
>> and also send this mask to the kernel to capture the extended registers
>> in each sample. Hence decide the mask value based on the processor
>> version.
>> Currently definitions for `mfspr`, `SPRN_PVR` are part of
>> `arch/powerpc/util/header.c`. Move this to a header file so that
>> these definitions can be re-used in other source files as well.
>
> It seems this patch has a regression.
>
> Without this patch:
>
> $ sudo ./perf record -I
> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.458 MB perf.data (318 samples) ]
>
> With this patch:
>
> $ sudo ./perf record -I
> Error:
> dummy:HG: PMU Hardware doesn't support sampling/overflow-interrupts. Try 'perf stat'
Hi Ravi,
Thanks for reviewing this patch and also testing. The above issue happens since
commit 0a892c1c9472 ("perf record: Add dummy event during system wide synthesis”) which adds a dummy event.
The fix for this issue is currently discussed here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/19/413
So once this fix is in, the issue will be resolved.
Thanks
Athira
>
> Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
* Re: [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs
@ 2020-07-24 18:25 ` Athira Rajeev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 131+ messages in thread
From: Athira Rajeev @ 2020-07-24 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ravi Bangoria
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy, Michael Neuling, maddy, kvm, kvm-ppc, svaidyan,
acme, jolsa, linuxppc-dev
> On 24-Jul-2020, at 5:56 PM, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Athira,
>
>> +/* Function to return the extended register values */
>> +static u64 get_ext_regs_value(int idx)
>> +{
>> + switch (idx) {
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR0:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR0);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR1:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR1);
>> + case PERF_REG_POWERPC_MMCR2:
>> + return mfspr(SPRN_MMCR2);
>> + default: return 0;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> {
>> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX))
>> - return 0;
>> + u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX;
>
> PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX should be initialized. otherwise ...
>
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
>> + PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX = PERF_REG_MAX_ISA_300;
>> if (idx = PERF_REG_POWERPC_SIER &&
>> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FSL_EMB_PERF_EVENT) ||
>> @@ -85,6 +103,16 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
>> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32)))
>> return 0;
>> + if (idx >= PERF_REG_POWERPC_MAX && idx < PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX)
>> + return get_ext_regs_value(idx);
>
> On non p9/p10 machine, PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX may contain random value which will
> allow user to pass this if condition unintentionally.
>
> Neat: PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MAX is a local variable so it should be in lowercase.
> Any specific reason to define it in capital?
Hi Ravi
There is no specific reason. I will include both these changes in next version
Thanks
Athira Rajeev
>
> Ravi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 131+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-24 18:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 131+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-17 14:38 [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 01/15] powerpc/perf: Update cpu_hw_event to use `struct` for storing MMCR registers Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-21 3:42 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-21 3:42 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-21 3:42 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 2:15 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 02/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Cleanup updates for kvm vcpu MMCR Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-07-21 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-07-22 2:09 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 4:37 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 5:49 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-07-22 4:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-07-22 6:03 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2020-07-22 6:15 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2020-07-22 6:03 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2020-07-22 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 03/15] powerpc/perf: Update Power PMU cache_events to u64 type Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 04/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for ISA3.1 PMU SPRs Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 4:18 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 8:07 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 10:52 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 10:52 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 12:03 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 12:03 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 05/15] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Save/restore new PMU registers Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 06/15] powerpc/xmon: Add PowerISA v3.1 PMU SPRs Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 07/15] powerpc/perf: Add power10_feat to dt_cpu_ftrs Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 4:41 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 4:41 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 4:41 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 7:55 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-22 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 10:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 10:49 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-22 12:28 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 08/15] powerpc/perf: power10 Performance Monitoring support Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 09/15] powerpc/perf: Ignore the BHRB kernel address filtering for P10 Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 10/15] powerpc/perf: Add Power10 BHRB filter support for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL/COND Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 11/15] powerpc/perf: BHRB control to disable BHRB logic when not used Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-20 10:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 10:17 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-20 10:05 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2020-07-23 1:26 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-23 1:26 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-23 1:26 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-23 1:28 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-23 1:28 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-23 1:28 ` Jordan Niethe
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 12/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for outputting extended regs in perf intr_regs Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-19 11:17 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-20 8:09 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-20 8:09 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-21 6:02 ` kajoljain
2020-07-21 6:14 ` kajoljain
2020-07-23 5:44 ` kajoljain
2020-07-23 5:56 ` kajoljain
2020-07-23 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-07-23 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-07-23 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-07-24 8:25 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-24 8:37 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-24 8:25 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-24 12:26 ` Ravi Bangoria
2020-07-24 12:38 ` Ravi Bangoria
2020-07-24 12:26 ` Ravi Bangoria
2020-07-24 18:13 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-24 18:25 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 13/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended register capability in powerpc Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-21 6:03 ` kajoljain
2020-07-21 6:15 ` kajoljain
2020-07-24 11:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
2020-07-24 11:14 ` Ravi Bangoria
2020-07-24 11:02 ` Ravi Bangoria
2020-07-24 18:02 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-24 18:14 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 14/15] powerpc/perf: Add extended regs support for power10 platform Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-21 6:03 ` kajoljain
2020-07-21 6:15 ` kajoljain
2020-07-17 14:38 ` [v3 15/15] tools/perf: Add perf tools support for extended regs in power10 Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-17 14:38 ` Athira Rajeev
2020-07-21 6:04 ` kajoljain
2020-07-21 6:16 ` kajoljain
2020-07-24 13:24 ` [v3 00/15] powerpc/perf: Add support for power10 PMU Hardware Michael Ellerman
2020-07-24 13:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-24 13:24 ` Michael Ellerman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.