All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: qianjun.kernel@gmail.com
To: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
	luto@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, urezki@gmail.com
Cc: laoar.shao@gmail.com, jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] Softirq:avoid large sched delay from the pending softirqs
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:08:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1595250506-9769-1-git-send-email-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com> (raw)

From: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>

When get the pending softirqs, it need to process all the pending
softirqs in the while loop. If the processing time of each pending
softirq is need more than 2 msec in this loop, or one of the softirq
will running a long time, according to the original code logic, it
will process all the pending softirqs without wakeuping ksoftirqd,
which will cause a relatively large scheduling delay on the
corresponding CPU, which we do not wish to see. The patch will check
the total time to process pending softirq, if the time exceeds 2 ms
we need to wakeup the ksofirqd to aviod large sched delay.

Signed-off-by: jun qian <qianjun.kernel@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index c4201b7f..f8e5be9 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ void __local_bh_enable_ip(unsigned long ip, unsigned int cnt)
  * we want to handle softirqs as soon as possible, but they
  * should not be able to lock up the box.
  */
-#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME  msecs_to_jiffies(2)
+#define MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME 2000	/* In microseconds */
 #define MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 10
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
@@ -248,7 +248,8 @@ static inline void lockdep_softirq_end(bool in_hardirq) { }
 
 asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 {
-	unsigned long end = jiffies + MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME;
+	ktime_t end, start;
+	s64 delta;
 	unsigned long old_flags = current->flags;
 	int max_restart = MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART;
 	struct softirq_action *h;
@@ -256,6 +257,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 	__u32 pending;
 	int softirq_bit;
 
+	start = ktime_get();
+
 	/*
 	 * Mask out PF_MEMALLOC as the current task context is borrowed for the
 	 * softirq. A softirq handled, such as network RX, might set PF_MEMALLOC
@@ -299,6 +302,15 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 		}
 		h++;
 		pending >>= softirq_bit;
+
+		end = ktime_get();
+		delta = ktime_to_us(end - start);
+		/*
+		 * the softirq's action has been running for too much time
+		 * so it may need to wakeup the ksoftirqd
+		 */
+		if (delta > MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME && need_resched())
+			break;
 	}
 
 	if (__this_cpu_read(ksoftirqd) == current)
@@ -307,7 +319,9 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 
 	pending = local_softirq_pending();
 	if (pending) {
-		if (time_before(jiffies, end) && !need_resched() &&
+		end = ktime_get();
+		delta = ktime_to_us(end - start);
+		if (delta < MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME && !need_resched() &&
 		    --max_restart)
 			goto restart;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-07-20 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-20 13:08 qianjun.kernel [this message]
2020-07-22  4:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2] Softirq:avoid large sched delay from the pending softirqs jun qian
2020-07-22 18:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23  4:48   ` jun qian
2020-07-23  9:17 ` [Softirq] a76eadba0d: WARNING:at_net/mac80211/rx.c:#ieee80211_rx_napi[mac80211] kernel test robot
2020-07-23 10:58   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-23 13:57     ` jun qian
2020-07-23 14:35       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-24  5:35         ` jun qian
2020-07-24 23:31           ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1595250506-9769-1-git-send-email-qianjun.kernel@gmail.com \
    --to=qianjun.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.