From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36291C433E1 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED266204EA for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 16:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="b/6H4pwD" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED266204EA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:49128 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6cvH-0007PK-22 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 12:51:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6clr-0007X6-Pc; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 12:41:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1042.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042]:54095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k6clq-0002fS-6w; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 12:41:35 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-x1042.google.com with SMTP id l60so4661744pjb.3; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:41:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=OQuHkgiSAag0FaRCedSN1Lrezlh8zBNDZa5YbEmYI+E=; b=b/6H4pwDjKf3Bn0itTfx55DAd5teyk8GKzf2tQvYVcGzV8R2M8VzshOnEa2mTCurub DKspAI09nCUbyodbg2GOWposA+BRuxSqK2HRuitWh3ZoAI3AzxEIQnaFcAf8a8vVLbwT 3YPh7ODQoDMuvOzJ7xNYPJkHoz6US/I7VLdzpUnE6qchL39/uBqn1BFGkXAFsBK0GQiF OoLkrR4PknrLmizI6SJwTXtc6EqsK2P6dkK5tgRWAfLitkAGVQxzMbEPf6C5j4U0R8hi uKvI/SLHZcAjjdQWPd9Cy077BCVc8B7+SEGdUbbNMaJ+tJRUIF/KYGPDAV3mOhgWV55p phYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=OQuHkgiSAag0FaRCedSN1Lrezlh8zBNDZa5YbEmYI+E=; b=po28C0nc6tLetKfFqTZHnKDxWwSOHg+HoEESNGiHyuHS1yPENcWL3fv98YfpA9X9Vw pA3DfnY8Q5wZpCOko1IFz4N4AUJwAN7bIjag9GcjfQnBpILlMX3fiPCRYWVjFFe0CUR+ Rhjr/X/TyAOzZVKvryM8wM0Z5e3v67E+OVD/+djsnOf4njaj7IO04i5akdFsHwdHDSvX NKyf3sr5t/8/Aug7ZBFDlRg6Nj9WkZ3uFI1I1QQHJX5RzT5X9rosVSgyc915xiuXJcki YxiR+XqEoY5cgjheLbrZZuoT8Vcbvri7MUBrUJZb+JcsXgC8+xa1WnBSVYLNocDMrj36 NYFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WTfn4/92GUldCWcWZf6+mnu3LGsEq9UzUX/G5Ozfv+6piOKqb JOtjIcz3opv6rkdG8SfemPulO0QeLhdTmYws X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxT50zYt27U7Nqafr+aS32iFqx3WmA2xpLflK6DYnJVZ7Ynt+2Ny2Ifvy02ZauecKvGg8O9Ew== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:523:: with SMTP id 32mr2536567plf.176.1597423292358; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pek-vx-bsp2.wrs.com (unknown-146-144.windriver.com. [147.11.146.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 16sm9836332pfi.161.2020.08.14.09.41.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:41:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Bin Meng To: Alistair Francis , Bastian Koppelmann , Palmer Dabbelt , Sagar Karandikar , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 07/18] hw/sd: sd: Fix incorrect populated function switch status data structure Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 00:40:45 +0800 Message-Id: <1597423256-14847-8-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1597423256-14847-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> References: <1597423256-14847-1-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1042; envelope-from=bmeng.cn@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1042.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bin Meng , =?UTF-8?q?Philippe=20Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-block@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Bin Meng At present the function switch status data structure bit [399:376] are wrongly pupulated. These 3 bytes encode function switch status for the 6 function groups, with 4 bits per group, starting from function group 6 at bit 399, then followed by function group 5 at bit 395, and so on. However the codes mistakenly fills in the function group 1 status at bit 399. This fixes the code logic. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- hw/sd/sd.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c index fad9cf1..51f5900 100644 --- a/hw/sd/sd.c +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c @@ -806,11 +806,15 @@ static void sd_function_switch(SDState *sd, uint32_t arg) sd->data[11] = 0x43; sd->data[12] = 0x80; /* Supported group 1 functions */ sd->data[13] = 0x03; + + sd->data[14] = 0; + sd->data[15] = 0; + sd->data[16] = 0; for (i = 0; i < 6; i ++) { new_func = (arg >> (i * 4)) & 0x0f; if (mode && new_func != 0x0f) sd->function_group[i] = new_func; - sd->data[14 + (i >> 1)] = new_func << ((i * 4) & 4); + sd->data[16 - (i >> 1)] |= new_func << ((i % 2) * 4); } memset(&sd->data[17], 0, 47); stw_be_p(sd->data + 64, sd_crc16(sd->data, 64)); -- 2.7.4