From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2389CC433E6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AF72071B for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:17:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="C5JXwJSi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726020AbgIAGRL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 02:17:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53504 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726006AbgIAGRH (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 02:17:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com (mail-pj1-x1044.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCCC9C0612AC; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 23:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id i13so112095pjv.0; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 23:17:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2o88tY7J6w8zextq4qiLo5rGRfZeNcDDNXs+s2Cv/7g=; b=C5JXwJSiEttn0wluZnl7vWYcpSzDIrWO4CJrQHS9m6eRw5flJjAL60Th1U53fSc6Vm 9F8Vbmjk9AtZ8BX1PKLErIDevNovCtOrZ5tNirWF9X2bYRml0NRv9cWsDS+nI9zh5Upe bjZ7GfulZzDg+BL3ub4VqdGfqnUaDnlfIeYE5B5/ZJkR3038fVChfQW8e4bfwhFMCd6b r3TrYWqRHvw0j1FBd/3JWVYG9mZ7GlKIB2ybkPGQEDYBEGfx2JNiPHnYF8cfBbeQ49Ro KkOAf2Ydk2CcSf4r/XDiK2uAZ+so9r4b1pYQjHhjUR6XnvjKYI0Smi+wni8kMcPWyiJa VAVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2o88tY7J6w8zextq4qiLo5rGRfZeNcDDNXs+s2Cv/7g=; b=GoQNKz0xerd2tCv/MDGKlM/t5RPTgQF14N6cnYbimU8u3h5OyuHIzHFaSqKy7T13RE UD7aQAg+gEEOndUCz8FganKz3sNTStiq9+OawjAgwE8LK9ZNpZA+KMLiMlkFUWGjAL/s FSE+aTjPlzbWrtK7QyMCnwM86BtcK3pCqmTBdjPtdkKLuT0LhnJOx1cf1Xf6pqyT67Oc 6kv5kn2GfIs7EPh5mR8kY3klo/e/aboMY2QvqHIx7egdvVB4GES/IrLFi73wwygD4dSS oXUXTySAfWTgmD5pz9Gf13pBqnCn5Klc95+3jtSMT0cdQ8AA02g0sMkh8j62Jj4cPcfW 0YVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FYLqbW/QK5Fli3xzF9nMfgZ4c98vToUNgebd1crDoBi1SOjvT IMX8mlggTb0xDq5b+KejIlsglJ8CrBo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwimDjXGqDUTGorUJk5RKuAeUTUHlriv+xqEennIpezTOJocleqS5z31PE/+eNhK2Zuecj2Qw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5609:: with SMTP id r9mr109290pjf.194.1598941026511; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 23:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([203.185.249.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j12sm228691pjd.44.2020.08.31.23.17.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 31 Aug 2020 23:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:17:00 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] Use asm-generic for mmu_context no-op functions To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20200826145249.745432-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20200830101837.GB423750@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20200830101837.GB423750@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1598940942.o1fbygdcvl.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Excerpts from Mike Rapoport's message of August 30, 2020 8:18 pm: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:52:26AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> It would be nice to be able to modify mmu_context functions or add a >> hook without updating all architectures, many of which will be no-ops. >>=20 >> The motivation for this series is a change to lazy mmu handling, but >> this series stands on its own as a good cleanup whether or not we end >> up making that change. >=20 > I really like this series, I just have some small comments in reply to > patch 1, otherwise feel free to add >=20 > Acked-by: Mike Rapoport I can't see your comments in reply to patch 1. Thanks, Nick