From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gn3K7-0003xn-3w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:23:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gn3K6-0002w4-8R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:23:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gn3K5-0002vO-Vx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:23:14 -0500 References: <1548410831-19553-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1548410831-19553-8-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <15bec654-a298-65ca-260c-65b350117131@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:23:03 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/52] hw/arm/Makefile.objs: CONFIG_VIRT created for virt board List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: yang.zhong@intel.com On 25/01/19 16:06, Thomas Huth wrote: >> -obj-y += boot.o virt.o sysbus-fdt.o >> +obj-y += boot.o sysbus-fdt.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIRT) += virt.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += virt-acpi-build.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_DIGIC) += digic_boards.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4) += exynos4_boards.o > > Maybe we should rather name that option CONFIG_ARM_VIRT, since other > targets like riscv have also a "virt" machine? > Yes, why not, especially since CONFIG_* symbols are not namespaced per-target. Paolo