From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ale.deltatee.com (ale.deltatee.com. [207.54.116.67]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d207si280799itb.0.2017.06.16.12.17.41 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:17:41 -0700 (PDT) References: <20170615203729.9009-1-logang@deltatee.com> <000001d2e6a7$dfc719a0$9f554ce0$@dell.com> <000101d2e6b6$0fcc2880$2f647980$@dell.com> <6c2b819d-d000-38e2-29ee-d532f92909d2@deltatee.com> <000201d2e6cb$9f4f4e50$ddedeaf0$@dell.com> From: Logan Gunthorpe Message-ID: <15f31689-bc66-81b3-9880-a8eeb9b1e9e7@deltatee.com> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:17:14 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000201d2e6cb$9f4f4e50$ddedeaf0$@dell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] Switchtec NTB Support To: Allen Hubbe , linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: 'Jon Mason' , 'Dave Jiang' , 'Bjorn Helgaas' , 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' , 'Kurt Schwemmer' , 'Stephen Bates' , 'Serge Semin' , Sergey.Semin@t-platforms.ru List-ID: On 16/06/17 12:08 PM, Allen Hubbe wrote: > Alright. I'll leave it to you to find and reconcile common functionalities of the drivers. What about making spad emulation optional? Ok. I don't see the point of making spad emulation optional. Who would want to disable it and what would be the benefit? Logan